Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Y Carter

Publications and source records attributed to Y Carter.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Choice of venous cannulation for bypass during repair of traumatic rupture of the aorta.

BACKGROUND: Choices for venous cannulation for left heart bypass, to assist repair of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta, are between the left atrial appendage and pulmonary veins. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent operative repair of ruptured aorta. RESULTS: Over a 15-year period between March 1985 and February 2000, 133 patients were admitted to a level I trauma center with aortic rupture. Of the 50 procedures performed with left heart bypass, the left atrial appendage was cannulated in 19 and pulmonary veins in 31 (four superior, 27 inferior). Complications occurred in 7 of the 19 patients who underwent venous cannulation via the atrial appendage (two ventricular fibrillation, three atrial fibrillation, one pericardial effusion leading to tamponade, and one phrenic nerve injury). Complications occurred in 2 patients who underwent cannulation via pulmonary vein (one atrial fibrillation, one pericardial effusion requiring tapping) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Cannulation via the pulmonary veins is associated with a decrease in complication rates compared with cannulation of the atrial appendage.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Anatomical considerations in the surgical management of blunt thoracic aortic injury.

PURPOSE: Blunt aortic injury (BAI) involving the thoracic aorta is usually described as occurring at the isthmus. We hypothesized that injuries 1 cm or less from the inferior border of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) are associated with an increased mortality rate compared with injuries that are more distal. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients admitted with the diagnosis of BAI was performed. Injuries were divided into two groups: group I, injuries that were 1 cm or less from the junction of the LSCA and the thoracic aorta; group II, injuries that were more than 1 cm from the LSCA. Primary outcome measures included cross-clamp time, rupture, and death. RESULTS: In a 14-year period, 122 patients were admitted with BAI. The anatomy relative to the LSCA could be determined in 91 patients who underwent operative repair. Forty-two injuries (46%) were classified as group I, and 49 injuries were classified as group II. Group I injuries were characterized by an increased mortality rate (18/42 or 43% in group I vs 11/49 or 22% in group II, P = .04), intraoperative rupture rate (7/42 or 17% in group I vs 1/49 or 2% in group II, P = .003), and cross-clamp time (39.5 +/- 21.9 minutes in group I vs 28.4 +/- 13 minutes in group II, P = .04). Three ruptures occurred while proximal control was being obtained. CONCLUSION: Increased technical difficulty and risk of rupture characterize injuries that occur proximally in the descending thoracic aorta, 1 cm from the LSCA. These injuries may be better managed by instituting bypass before attempting to obtain proximal control and by routinely clamping proximal to the LSCA.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Why don't low-income mothers worry about their preschoolers being overweight?

CONTEXT: Mothers are in an important position to prevent obesity in their children by shaping early diet and activity patterns. However, many mothers of overweight preschool children are not worried about their child's weight. OBJECTIVE: To explore mothers' perceptions about how they determine when a child is overweight, why children become overweight, and what barriers exist to preventing or managing childhood obesity. DESIGN: Three focus groups with 6 participants in each. Participant comments were transcribed and analyzed. Themes were coded independently by the 6 authors who then agreed on common themes. SETTING: A clinic of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Cincinnati, Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen low-income mothers (13 black, 5 white) of preschool children (mean age of 44 months) who were at-risk for later obesity. All but 1 mother had a body mass index (BMI) >/=25 kg/m(2), and 12 mothers had a BMI >/=30 kg/m(2). All but 1 child had a BMI >/=85th percentile for age and sex, and 7 had a BMI >/=95th percentile. Results. Mothers did not define overweight or obese in their children according to how height and weight measurements were plotted on the standard growth charts used by health professionals. Instead, mothers were more likely to consider being teased about weight or developing limitations in physical activity as indicators of their child being overweight. Children were not believed to be overweight if they were active and had a healthy diet and/or a good appetite. Mothers described overweight children as thick or solid. Mothers believed that an inherited tendency to be overweight was likely to be expressed in the child regardless of environmental factors. In trying to shape their children's eating, mothers believed that their control over the child's diet was challenged by other family members. If a child was hungry, despite having just eaten, it was emotionally difficult for mothers to deny additional food. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals should not assume that defining overweight according to the growth charts has meaning for all mothers. Despite differing perceptions between mothers and health professionals about the definition of overweight, both groups agree that children should be physically active and have healthy diets. Health professionals may be more effective in preventing childhood obesity by focusing on these goals that they share with mothers, rather than on labeling children as overweight.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Do practice-based preventive child health services affect the use of hospitals? A cross-sectional study of hospital use by children in east London.

BACKGROUND: Acute paediatric admissions have risen steadily over the past 20 years. During the same period, practice-based child health clinics have increased, although provision is less common in areas of deprivation where hospital use is greatest. AIM: To investigate the contribution of practice-based, preventive child health services to rates of hospital utilisation in children under five years of age. METHOD: A cross-sectional retrospective study examining practice variations in paediatric acute admissions, outpatient referrals, and accident and emergency (A&E) department attendances in the East London and the City Health authority, including all 164 practices in the inner-city boroughs of Hackney, Newham, Tower Hamlets, and the City of London. The main outcome measures were practice-based paediatric hospital attendance rates, for discrete age and sex bands, for the year to 31 March 1996. RESULTS: Hospital use varied with age and sex, with the rates being highest for the youngest children and for boys. The median A&E attendance rate (including reattendances) for boys up to one year of age was 897 per thousand children per practice. In east London, 62% of practices are registered for child health surveillance and 71% provide a child health clinic. Practice approval for child health surveillance, and the provision of child health clinics, did not account for differences between practices in hospital use, but proportionally greater health visiting hours were significantly related to lower rates of emergency hospital admission by young children. Multivariate analyses revealed that up to 23% of the variation between practice admission rates could be explained by health visiting hours. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant associations between the amount of health visiting time available to the practice population and rates of acute admission and outpatient referral among children up to five years of age. These findings suggest that increasing health visitor provision could contribute to lower paediatric emergency admission and outpatient referral rates. A small change would have a significant effect, particularly among the youngest children, given that during the study year 10,000 children under two years of age in east London were either admitted or referred to hospital.

Age Factors↗