Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

X Zhai

Publications and source records attributed to X Zhai.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Cisplatin-DNA adducts are molecular decoys for the ribosomal RNA transcription factor hUBF (human upstream binding factor).

The toxicity of DNA-damaging agents is widely believed to result from the formation of lesions that block polymerases or disrupt the integrity of the genome. A mechanism heretofore not addressed is that DNA damage may titrate essential DNA-binding proteins away from their natural sites of action. This report shows that the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcription factor hUBF (human upstream binding factor) binds with striking affinity (Kd(app) approximately 60 pM) to the intrastrand cis-[Pt(NH3)2](2+-d(GpG) crosslink formed by the anticancer drug cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin). When protein blots of human cell extracts are probed with cisplatin-modified DNA, 97- and 94-kDa proteins are detected, consistent with the known sites of hUBF species. A similar analysis of blots containing in vitro translated hUBF confirmed that the protein binds cisplatin adducts with high specificity. By contrast, DNA adducts of the clinically ineffective trans isomer of cisplatin, trans-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), are not recognized by hUBF. DNase I inhibition patterns of hUBF bound to a 100-base-pair DNA fragment containing a centrally located cis-[Pt(NH3)2](2+)-d(GpG) crosslink reveal specific protein-DNA interactions in a 14-base-pair region flanking the adduct. The affinity of hUBF for the rRNA promoter is similar (Kd(app) approximately 18 pM) to that measured for the cisplatin adduct. In addition, we observe that the hUBF-promoter interaction is highly sensitive to the antagonistic effects of cisplatin-DNA adducts. These results suggest that a cisplatin-mediated transcription-factor-hijacking mechanisms could disrupt rRNA synthesis, which is stimulated in proliferating cells.

Base Sequence↗

Preconditioning and post-ischaemic contractile dysfunction: the role of impaired oxygen delivery vs extracellular metabolite accumulation.

The aim of the present study was to identify components of ischaemia involved in the induction of preconditioning. Isolated rat hearts (n = 8 per group) were perfused with bicarbonate buffer. Following 10 min aerobic perfusion they were randomised and subjected to 5 min periods during which the perfusion conditions were: (i) normal aerobic perfusion (controls); (ii) zero flow ischaemia; (iii) low flow ischaemia (10% of control O2 delivery); (iv) hypoxia (10% of control O2 delivery); or (v) acidosis (pH 6.4). After these periods of "preconditioning", all hearts underwent 5 min aerobic perfusion followed by 40 min zero flow global ischaemia and 35 min reperfusion. Contractile function was measured at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. Despite profound differences in coronary flow during preconditioning, substantial and similar protection was observed in all groups preconditioned by transiently limiting oxygen delivery. Recovery of cardiac output was 66.7 +/- 6.3%, 58.7 +/- 5.1% and 62.6% +/- 3.3% in the zero flow, low flow and hypoxic groups, respectively, vs 31.0 +/- 3.0% in controls (all P < 0.05). In hearts subjected to acidosis there was no protection (recovery of cardiac output 38.1 +/- 2.7%). Impairment of oxygen delivery appears to be the principle component of ischaemia responsible for the induction of preconditioning. Metabolite accumulation appears to play no significant role.

Acidosis↗