Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

X Rogiers

Publications and source records attributed to X Rogiers.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

In situ splitting of cadaveric livers. The ultimate expansion of a limited donor pool.

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluate the safety, applicability, and effectiveness of a new technique for split-liver transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Split-liver transplantation offers an attractive way to increase the donor pool for cadaveric liver transplantation. The application of this concept has been hampered by inferior patient and graft survivals and higher complication rates. Without supportive data, the concern about increasing biliary leakage and poor initial graft function persisted. The authors focused on the causes of these complications by presenting a new technique to eliminate these problems. METHODS: Liver splitting was performed in the heart-beating cadaveric organ donor, using the technique described for procurement of the left lateral lobe of a live donor. A detailed description of the technique is presented. A retrospective review of the first 14 transplantations resulting from 7 in situ splitting procedures was collected. The results were compared with 19 conventional split-liver transplants performed during the same period. RESULTS: Six-month patient and graft survivals after in situ split-liver transplantation were 92.8% and 85.7%, respectively. Biliary complications were absent. Postoperative courses were mostly uneventful and characterized by lower peak transaminase levels compared with standard techniques. Early graft function of extrahepatic organs procured simultaneously was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: In situ split-liver transplantation provides superior results, related mainly to reduction of cold ischemic damage of the grafts and avoidance of biliary complications. In situ split-liver transplantation renders graft reduction alone obsolete and opens a donor pool for adults to receive right lobes safely. It allows for long-distance sharing between pediatric and adult liver transplant units because the procedure abolishes ex situ benching and prolonged ischemia time and provides two anatomically perfect grafts with hemostasis accomplished.

Adult↗

[Therapy splitting: are intra-operative cholangiography and surgical bile duct revision still indicated?].

The role of therapeutic splitting in cases of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis has to be reviewed since laparoscopic bile duct exploration might be an alternative. To assess the need of the new approach we evaluated our results of the therapeutic splitting. Between 1988-1992 a cholecystectomy was performed in 577 cases either as an open (n = 274) or laparoscopic (n = 277) procedure. Pre- or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERC/P) was performed if the clinical presentation, laboratory findings or ultrasound showed signs of choledocholithiasis. In the laparoscopic cases no intraoperative cholangiography was carried out. The patient follow-up was evaluated by a questionnaire. 128 patients were suggested to have a common bile duct (CBD) stone and had a preoperative ERC/P. In 68 cases stones were extracted. After cholecystectomy 19 ERC/P's were performed. In 4 patients residual stones after preoperative ERC/P were detected. So far occult stones were found in 5 cases. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed additionally in the patients with open cholecystectomy n = 207¿, of whom two demonstrated choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic clearance of the common bile duct was achieved in all patients. Minor complications occurred after ERC/P in 1.5%. Within a median follow-up time of 48 months patients with endoscopic papillotomy did not develop further CBD stones or a cholangitis. The therapeutical splitting facilitates in all patients with cholecysto- or choledocholithiasis a successful clearance of the CBD. Intraoperative cholangiography is not necessary according to our experience. With an experienced endoscopic team the therapeutic splitting should be the preferred treatment modality compared to the laparoscopic bile duct exploration, which will probably lead to a high complication rate if performed outside specialized centers.

Adolescent↗

[Liver transplants from living donors].

In this article the authors discuss the advantages of Living Related Liver Transplantation (LRLT), criteria for the selection of donors and the standard operation technique. Among a total of 241 liver transplantation (LTx), 42 LRLT were performed at the University of Hamburg between October 1, 1991 and December 19, 1994. The body weight of recipients for LRLT ranged from 4,6 to 39 kg, with 64,2% having less than 10 kg. The volume of the donor left lateral liver lobe ranged from 100 cc to 350 cc. The average one year survival rate among electively operated patients-status 3-4 (UNOS 1995 classification) was 86.7%, two year survival rate 83.3%. The main advantages of LRLT are consired the following: 1. Absence of mortality on the waiting list, 2. Optimal timing of the transplantation (elective procedure, patient in a good condition), 3. Excellent organ (no primary non function), 4. A possible immunologic advantage, 5. Relief of the waiting list for cadaveric organs, 6. Psychological benefit for the family, 7. Cost effectiveness. Potential candidates for living donation with more than one cardiovascular risk factors were excluded. Social and psychological reasons leading to rejection of candidates were as follows: unstable family structure, expected professional or financial difficulties after living donation or withdrawal from consent. LRLT gives parents of a child with TLD a chance to avoid the risk of death on the waiting list or primary non function of the graft. LRLT has therefore established an important place in pediatric liver transplantation.

Adult↗

[Tuberculous pseudotumor of the omentum].

The abdomen is one of the most common extrathoracic manifestation sites for tuberculosis. The constellation of ascites, fatigue, fever, weight loss and ileus in younger patients should lead to the diagnosis, particularly in times when immunosuppression appears more frequently associated with AIDS. Using modern imaging techniques like CT and ultrasound and in combination with interventional procedures (guided paracentesis or biopsy) the number of diagnostic laparotomies and laparoscopies, like in the case presented could be reduced. In this context the radiologist should include tuberculosis in the differential diagnosis.

Adult↗

Transplantation of complete and split liver grafts for patients with fulminant hepatic failure.

Fulminant hepatic failure is associated with considerable mortality under conservative management. The aim of this study was to assess applicability and outcome of liver transplantation using cadaveric and living donated grafts in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. 42 patients presenting with fulminant hepatic failure between 1988 and 1995 were retrospectively analyzed. 37 (88%) met the indication criteria for liver transplantation. 22 patients underwent orthotopic liver transplantation, one patient auxiliary orthotopic liver transplantation. Actual survival rate of these patients is 74% alter a mean follow-up of 23 (3-68) months. 38% (14/37) of the patients with an indication for transplantation did not receive a cadaveric graft due to scarcity of cadaveric organs (n = 9), medical contraindications (n = 3) or spontaneous recuperation (n = 2). Only 21% (3/14) of these patients survived. Due to unavailability of a cadaveric organ four patients, six months to 22 years of age, underwent living related liver transplantation as a last possible treatment option. Three of them died from cerebral herniation. It is concluded that transplantation of a cadaveric graft increased survival rate from 21% to 74% in patients with an indication for liver transplantation. Living related liver transplantation as an individual rescue therapy had no favourable outcome.

Adolescent↗

Selection of the living liver donor.

Living related liver transplantation offers several advantages in comparison to transplantation of cadaver organs. To achieve maximal donor safety evaluation, selection criteria and complications of the donor operation were retrospectively analyzed in living donors of segmental liver transplants. Seventy-three liver donor candidates were evaluated between October 1991 and June 1994. The median age of 42 mothers and 31 fathers was 31 years (range, 19-50 years). The median volume of the left lateral liver lobe comprised 230 ml (100-350 ml). Twenty-four of 73 (33%) donor candidates were not accepted for living donation. Rejection was due to unsuitability of the donor's liver as a graft (n = 13) or due to an increased risk for living donation (n = 11). Of 35 living donations performed so far, one was a full left hemihepatectomy and 34 were left lateral segmentectomies. The length of the donor operation was, on average, 4.3 hr. No heterologous blood was needed. Postoperative complications included death due to pulmonary embolism (n = 1), seizure due to a previously undiagnosed ependymoma (n = 1), bile duct injury (n = 1), incisional hernia necessitating late revision (n = 2), and duodenal ulcer (n = 2). Long-term follow-up revealed no persistent complications. Using our standardized protocol, 33% of young, presumably healthy donor candidates were rejected for living donation.

Adult↗

In situ splitting of the liver in the heart-beating cadaveric organ donor for transplantation in two recipients.

SLT presents an interesting concept to alleviate the organ shortage for children with end-stage liver disease. The procedure has, however, not gained wide acceptance. This is not only related to the complexity of the procedure, but also to the poorer results and the complications reported on the right side graft. We report on a first case in which we applied a new concept for splitting. The liver was split in situ in the heart-beating cadaveric donor with the aim of reducing the problems with the right side graft. This procedure makes splitting of the liver possible without submitting the recipient of the right side to increased risk. Therefore, in situ splitting of the liver has the potential of making splitting of liver grafts the rule rather than the exception, thus increasing the organ pool for small children presently carrying a high risk of dying on the waiting list.

Adult↗

Reduced-size hepatic allografts.

Reduced-size hepatic transplantation (RSHT) was developed to alleviate the mortality resulting from the scarcity of suitable cadaveric grafts. RSHT consists of various techniques that reduce a full liver to a smaller size. These techniques include reduced-size cadaveric liver transplantation (RLT), split liver transplantation (SLT), and living-related liver transplantation (LRLT). RLT utilizes part of a liver, while the rest is discarded; in SLT, the whole liver is used for two recipients after bipartition; and in LRLT, a portion of the liver retrieved from a living donor is transplanted. Whereas RLT only redistributes the pool of organs to the advantage of pediatric recipients, both SLT and LRLT increase the availability of grafts for transplantation. RSHT yields results comparable to full-liver allografting and drastically reduces the mortality of patients waiting for transplantation. The procedures involved are technically demanding and should be restricted to experienced liver centers.

Adolescent↗