Biomedical subjects

Wolfgang Prinz

Publications and source records attributed to Wolfgang Prinz.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Perceiving while acting: action affects perception.

In two experiments we studied how motor responses affect stimulus encoding when stimuli and responses are functionally unrelated and merely overlap in time. Such R-S effects across S-R assignments have been reported by Schubö, Aschersleben, and Prinz (2001), who found that stimulus encoding was affected by concurrent response execution in the sense of a contrast (i.e., emphasizing differences). The present study aimed at elucidating the mechanisms underlying this effect. Experiment 1 studied the time course of the R-S effect. Contrast was only obtained for short intertrial intervals (ITIs). With long ITIs contrast turned into assimilation (i.e., emphasizing similarities). Experiment 2 excluded an interpretation of the assimilation effect in terms of motor repetition. Our findings support the notion of a shared representational domain for perception and action control, and suggest that contrast between stimulus and response codes emerges when two S-R assignments compete with each other in perception. When perceptual competition is over, assimilation emerges in memory.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Cortical activations associated with auditorily paced finger tapping.

We investigated neuromagnetic responses during an auditorily paced synchronization task using a 122-channel whole-head neuromagnetometer. Eight healthy right handed subjects were asked to synchronize left and right unilateral finger taps to a regular binaural pacing signal. Synchronization of the right hand with an auditory pacing signal is known to be associated with three tap-related neuromagnetic sources localized in the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex. While the first source represents the neuromagnetic correlate of the motor command the second one reflects somatosensory feedback due to the finger movement. The functional meaning of the third source, which is also localized in the primary somatosensory cortex is still unclear. On the one hand this source represents a neuromagnetic correlate of somatosensory feedback due to the finger tap. On the other hand it has been suggested that the function of this source could additionally represent a cognitive process, which enables the subject to monitor the time distance between taps and clicks. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the function of this source, which would fundamentally reform the meaning of the primary somatosensory cortex in the timing of movements with respect to external events. The data of the present study demonstrate that the three sources in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex are stronger related to the tap than to the click. This result contradicts the assumption of a cognitive process localized in the primary somatosensory cortex. Thus, activation in the primary somatosensory cortex most likely represents exclusively somatosensory feedback and no further cognitive processes.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

Representing others' actions: just like one's own?

Previous research has shown that observing others' actions can affect individual performance of the same actions. In the present study, we developed a new paradigm to investigate whether and how complementary actions at the disposal of another agent are represented and influence one's own actions. A spatial compatibility task was distributed among two people so that each participant took care of one of two responses. The identical task was performed alone and alongside another participant. There was a spatial compatibility effect in the group setting only. It was similar to the effect obtained when one person took care of both responses. This result suggests that one's own actions and others' actions are represented in a functionally equivalent way.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain.

Voluntary action is goal-directed and therefore depends on the ability to learn associations between movements and their perceivable consequences. The neural substrate of this ability was investigated with H2(15O) positron emission tomography (PET). Healthy adults first learned that self-initiated keypresses were consistently followed by certain tones (i.e., action effects). During PET imaging, participants listened to varied ratios of action-effect tones and neutral tones without performing any movement. The caudal supplementary motor area and the right hippocampus increased their activity with the frequency of action-effect tones, suggesting that both cortical areas play a role in linking the consequences of an action and the action itself. This integration process represents a highly flexible mechanism that helps to promote the learning, automatization, and control of voluntary

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: evidence for action simulation during action perception.

Does the action system contribute to action perception? Recent evidence suggests that actions are simulated while being observed. Given that the planning and simulating system are the same only when one observes one's own actions, it might be easier to predict the future outcomes of actions when one has carried them out oneself earlier on. In order to test this hypothesis, three experiments were conducted in which participants observed parts of earlier self- and other-produced trajectories and judged whether another stroke would follow or not. When the trajectories were produced without constraints, participants accomplished this task only for self-produced trajectories. When the trajectories were produced under narrow constraints, the predictions were equally accurate for self- and for other-generated trajectories. These results support the action simulation assumption. The more the actions that one observes resemble the way one would carry them out oneself, the more accurate the simulation.

Adult↗