Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Wolfgang Lederer

Publications and source records attributed to Wolfgang Lederer.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Frequency of rib and sternum fractures associated with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation is underestimated by conventional chest X-ray.

OBJECTIVE: Fractured ribs and sternum are frequent complications of thoracic compression during CPR in adults. This study was conducted to determine whether findings of plain chest radiography (CXR) correlate with post-mortem findings in patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: CXR findings and autopsy results of CPR-related chest injuries comprising rib and sternum fractures were compared prospectively in 19 patients. RESULTS: Fractures were diagnosed in nine of 19 patients by means of radiology and in 18 of 19 patients by autopsy (rib fractures in 6/19 versus 17/19, P=0.002; sternum fractures in 5/19 versus in 9/19, P=0.227. The total number of isolated bone fractures detected by CXR was 18 (12 rib and six sternum fractures) and by autopsy 92 (83 rib and nine sternum fractures). The majority of rib fractures was located in the anterior part of the thoracic cage. Sternum fractures predominantly occurred in the lower third. Eight of 19 patients received either thrombolytic or antithrombotic treatment during CPR but no major bleeding complication associated with CPR was detected by autopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that fractures associated with CPR are underreported in conventional radiographic investigations. No major bleeding complications related to CPR-associated fractures was detected.

Adult↗

Acute pain is underassessed in out-of-hospital emergencies.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of pain assessment by emergency medical services (EMS) in out-of-hospital emergencies. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on a convenience sample of patients during a one-year observation period. Pain ratings assessed by emergency patients were documented at three different intervals during the emergency call, and compared with concomitant assessments by EMS providers. A visual analog scale (VAS) and a verbal pain scale (VPS) were used for pain assessment. Repeated-measures ANOVA and Dunnett's t-test were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one out of 70 eligible patients met inclusion criteria. In most emergency patients the intensity of pain was underestimated by EMS, especially when pain was severe (p = 0.0001). During the course of transport, both pain and pain assessment by EMS improved significantly (p = 0.0001). The VAS and VPS were significantly correlated (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: EMS providers significantly underestimate their patients' pain severity. EMS providers should be more attentive to their patients' complaints and comfort.

Acute Disease↗