Biomedical subjects

William M Rand

Publications and source records attributed to William M Rand.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

M-mode echocardiographic ratio indices in normal dogs, cats, and horses: a novel quantitative method.

A novel method for quantitative echocardiographic interpretations is introduced based on the calculation of ratio indices in which each raw M-mode measurement is divided by the aortic root dimension (Ao). "Aorta-based" indices were calculated with the animal's measured aortic root dimension (Ao(m)) as the length standard. Conversely, "weight-based" indices employed an idealized estimate of aortic dimension (Ao(w)) with a weighted least squares linear regression against the cube root of body weight (Ao(w) = kW(1/3)). Use of these indices circumvented undesirable statistical characteristics inherent in linear regression of echocardiographic dimensions against body weight and, to a lesser extent, body surface area. Compared with the regressions, ratio indices resulted in substantial refinement of the predictive range for each M-mode measurement in dogs, particularly with decreasing body size. Weight-based indices outperformed aorta-based indices in this regard. To refine the predictive range, neither type of index was clearly advantageous in cats compared with the simple average method typically employed for that species. Several of the raw M-mode measurements, however, were correlated with body weight in cats and horses, indicating the need for an appropriate correction for body size in these species. The ratio index method was suitable for this purpose. Summary statistics derived from normal dogs (n = 53), cats (n = 32), and horses (n = 17) are presented for each index, including novel clinical indices calculated from area ratios. The latter were designed to represent body size-adjusted lett ventricular stroke area (ie, volume overload) and myocardial wall area (ie, hypertrophy).

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cisplatin and doxorubicin toxicosis in dogs with osteosarcoma.

Toxicosis associated with doxorubicin and cisplatin administration starting either 2 or 10 days after limb amputation for osteosarcoma was examined retrospectively in dogs. The purpose was to determine whether dosage and timing of chemotherapy affected rates of toxicosis after administration of the 1st treatment. Records of 100 dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma without evidence of metastases or concurrent disease were examined. Dogs received chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cisplatin every 3 weeks for 3 treatments starting 2 days (n = 51) or 10 days (n = 49) after amputation. The dosage of cisplatin was 60 mg/m2 and was given with 6-hour saline diuresis and butorphanol. Doxorubicin was given at 12.5-25 mg/ml during fluid administration. Hematologic data were collected before and weekly after treatment. Client interviews were conducted to assess gastrointestinal toxicosis during the interval between treatments. The reported toxicoses were graded on a scale of 0 to 4. Dogs receiving 25 mg/m2 of doxorubicin experienced greater rates of grade 4 toxicity (67%; n = 6) than dogs in groups receiving 12.5-20 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (< or = 25%; n = 94, P = .03). Dogs in the Day 2 group experienced greater rates (35%) of grade 4 toxicity than dogs in the Day 10 group (12%, P = .007). We concluded that chemotherapy administered 2 days after surgery produced an unacceptable level of toxicoses. except at greatly reduced dosages, and that even with a delay of treatment, 25 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, when given in combination with cisplatin at 60 mg/m2, was too toxic for routine use.

Amputation, Surgical↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Quantitative echocardiographic [corrected] evaluation of mitral endocardiosis in dogs using ratio indices.

This study compares M-mode echocardiographic ratio indices (ERIs) in dogs with mitral regurgitation due to chronic valvular disease (CVD/MR) for their ability to discriminate and quantify associated echocardiographic changes. Weight-based M-mode ERIs were determined retrospectively for 2 groups of dogs, normal (n = 47) and CVD/MR (n = 176). The CVD/MR group was further subdivided into those with (CVD/MR B, n = 74) and without (CVD/MR A, n = 102) left-sided congestive heart failure (LCHF). ERIs were compared descriptively (summary statistics) and also by receiver-operator characteristic curve areas (ROCAs) for their ability to discriminate between groups. Univariate logistic regression (LR) models were used to estimate the odds ratio for each ERI as a predictor of the CVD/MR condition as well as to predict LCHF within the CVD/MR group. A novel ERI (wdeltaA), designed to express body size-normalized short-axis stroke area, was sensitive (90%) and specific (98%) to discriminate between normal and CVD/MR at a cutoff value of 1.8 standard deviations (wdeltaA = 2.1). Prediction of LCHF within the CVD/MR group was more problematic, but an ERI expressing left atrial size (wLA) showed 76% sensitivity and 81% specificity at a cutoff value of 5.2 standard deviations (wLA = 1.55). Ours was a descriptive study of echocardiographic patterns of pathology associated with CVD/ MR and determined which ERIs are sensitive and specific for CVD/MR and for LCHE ERIs normalize echocardiographic data for body size in dogs and are well-suited to quantitative descriptions and analysis.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index.

PURPOSE: The primary aims of this retrospective study were to: (1) evaluate bone quality in different segments of the edentulous jaw and correlate it with demographic data and (2) establish a quantitative and objective assessment of bone quality based on the Hounsfield scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred one randomly selected computerized tomographic (CT) scans were used for the analysis. Edentulous segments ranging from 10 to 30 mm were selected for evaluation, and the findings were analyzed and correlated to demographics. Implant recipient sites were evaluated visually for bone classification by 2 independent examiners. The same sites were subsequently evaluated digitally using the Hounsfield scale, and the results were correlated with the visual classification. RESULTS: The 4 quadrants of the mouth displayed Hounsfield unit (HU) values ranging from -240 HU to 1,159 HU. The highest unit/mean density value (559 +/- 208 HU) was found in the anterior mandible, followed by 517 +/- 177 HU for the anterior maxilla, 333 +/- 199 HU for the posterior maxilla, and 321 +/- 132 HU for the posterior mandible. There was no association between the Hounsfield value and density and age or gender. When subjective bone quality was correlated to Hounsfield index findings, only the relationship between HU and type 4 bone was found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the Hounsfield value as a quantitative measurement of bone density can be helpful as a diagnostic tool. It can provide the implant surgeon with an objective assessment of bone density, which could result in modification of surgical techniques or extended healing time, especially in situations where poor bone quality is suspected.

Adolescent↗