Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

William Clegg

Publications and source records attributed to William Clegg.

79 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Kinetic evidence for intramolecular proton transfer between nickel and coordinated thiolate.

The complexes [Ni(YR)(triphos)]BPh(4) (Y = S, R = Ph or Et or Y = Se, R = Ph; triphos = (Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2))(2)PPh) have been prepared and characterized, and the X-ray crystal structure of [Ni(SPh)(triphos)]BPh(4) has been solved. In MeCN, [Ni(YR)(triphos)](+) are protonated by [lutH](+) (lut = 2,6-dimethylpyridine) to give [Ni(YHR)(triphos)](2+). Studies on the kinetics of these equilibrium reactions reveal an unexpected difference in the reactivities of [Ni(SPh)(triphos)](+) and [Ni(SEt)(triphos)](+). In both cases, the reactions exhibit a first-order dependence on the concentration of complex. When R = Ph, the dependence on the concentrations of [lutH(+)] and lut is given by k(obs) = k(1)(Ph)[lutH(+)] + k(-1)(Ph)[lut], which is typical of an equilibrium reaction where k(1)(Ph) and k(-1)(Ph) correspond to the forward and back reactions, respectively. Analogous behavior is observed for [Ni(SePh)(triphos)](+). However, for [Ni(SEt)(triphos)](+), the kinetics are more complicated, and k(obs) = (k(1)k(2)[lutH(+)] + (k(-2) + k(2)))/(k(1)[lutH(+)] + k(-1)[lut]), which is indicative of a mechanism involving two coupled equilibria in which the initial protonation of the thiolate is followed by a unimolecular equilibrium reaction that is assumed to involve the formation of an eta(2)-EtS-H ligand. The difference in reactivity between the complexes with alkyl and aryl thiolate ligands is a consequence of the (Ni(triphos))(2+) site "leveling" the basicities of these ligands. The pK(a)'s of the PhSH and EtSH constituents coordinated to the (Ni(triphos))(2+) are 16.0 and 14.6, respectively, whereas the difference in pK(a)'s of free PhSH and EtSH differ by ca. 4 units. The pK(a) of [Ni(SeHPh)(triphos)](+) is 14.4. The more strongly sigma-donating EtS ligand makes the (Ni(triphos))(2+) core sufficiently electron-rich that the basicities of the sulfur and nickel in [Ni(SEt)(triphos)](+) are very similar; therefore, the proton serves as a bridge between the two sites. The relevance of these observations to the proposed mechanisms of nickel-based hydrogenases is discussed.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗
PubMed1999

Oxidative-Addition Reactions of Diiodine to Dinuclear Rhodium Pyrazolate Complexes.

The pyrazolato (Pz) rhodium(I) complexes [{Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(CO)(L)}(2)] (L = CNBu(t), P(OMe)(3), PMe(2)Ph, P(OPh)(3), P(p-tolyl)(3)) result from the reaction of [{Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(CO)(2)}(2)] with the appropriate L ligand in a trans:cis ratio ranging from 60:40 (L = CNBu(t)) to 95:5 (L = P(p-tolyl)(3)). The pure trans isomers add 1 molar equiv of diiodine to give the dirhodium(II) complexes [{Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(I)(CO)(L)}(2)] (L = CNBu(t) (6), P(OMe)(3) (7), PMe(2)Ph (8), P(OPh)(3) (9)). These complexes incorporate two iodide ligands trans to the rhodium-rhodium bond, as substantiated by the X-ray structure for 7, while the complex [(P{p-tolyl}(3))(CO)(I)Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(2)(&mgr;-CO)Rh(I)(P{p-tolyl}(3))] (10) contains a bridging ketonic CO ligand, due to the insertion of a terminal CO into the metal-metal bond. The metal-metal bond formation involves a 2e oxidation, since identical compounds (6-9) are obtained by oxidation with [Fe(Cp)(2)](PF(6)) followed by addition of potassium iodide. Further reactions of the dirhodium(II) complexes 6-9 with diiodine leading to the metal-metal rupture are electrophilic additions, as exemplified by the reactions with the positive iodine complex [I(Py)(2)](+). They start at the "endo site" (the metal-metal bond) if it is sterically accessible to the electrophile, to give directly the dirhodium(III) complexes [{Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(I)(CO)(L)}(2)(&mgr;-I)](+) (L = CNBu(t), CO). Otherwise, as for the complexes with P-donor ligands, abstraction of a iodide ligand trans to the metal-metal bond (the "exo site") occurs first, to give the dirhodium(II) cationic complexes [(PR(3))(CO)(I)Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(2)Rh(CO)(PR(3))](+) and triiodide. These react again with diiodine to give dirhodium(III) complexes [{Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(I)(CO)(PR(3))}(2)(&mgr;-I)](+) similar to those described above, but with triiodide or pentaiodide as counterion, as substantiated by the X-ray structure of [{Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(I)(CO)(PMe(2)Ph)}(2)(&mgr;-I)]I(5) (18). The diiridium(II) complexes [{Ir(&mgr;-Pz)(I)(CO)(PR(3))}(2)] (PR(3) = P(OPh)(3), PMe(2)Ph) also react with diiodine to give the cationic diiridium(III) complexes [{Ir(&mgr;-Pz)(I)(CO)(PR(3))}(2)(&mgr;-I)]I(3) through a reaction pathway involving the "exo site", while no reaction is observed for [{Ir(&mgr;-Pz)(I)(CO)(2)}(2)]. Finally, replacement of a carbonyl ligand in [{Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(I)(CO)(L)}(2)(&mgr;-I)](+) (L = CNBu(t), CO) by iodide gives the compounds [(CO)(L)(I)Rh(&mgr;-Pz)(2)(&mgr;-I)Rh(I)(2)(L)].

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Interconversion and Reactivity of Two Heterometallic Tin-Containing Cuboidal Clusters from [Mo(3)S(4)(H(2)O)(9)](4+): X-ray Structure of the Single Cube with an Mo(3)SnS(4) Core.

The Mo(3)SnS(4)(6+) single cube is obtained by direct addition of Sn(2+) to [Mo(3)S(4)(H(2)O)(9)](4+). UV-vis spectra of the product (0.13 mM) in 2.00 M HClO(4), Hpts, and HCl indicate a marked affinity of the Sn for Cl(-), with formation of the more strongly yellow [Mo(3)(SnCl(3))S(4)(H(2)O)(9)](3+) complex complete in as little as 0.050 M Cl(-). The X-ray crystal structure of (Me(2)NH(2))(6)[Mo(3)(SnCl(3))S(4)(NCS)(9)].0.5H(2)O has been determined and gives Mo-Mo (mean 2.730 Å) and Mo-Sn (mean 3.732 Å) distances, with a difference close to 1 Å. The red-purple double cube cation [Mo(6)SnS(8)(H(2)O)(18)](8+) is obtained by reacting Sn metal with [Mo(3)S(4)(H(2)O)(9)](4+). The double cube is also obtained in approximately 50% yield by BH(4)(-) reduction of a 1:1 mixture of [Mo(3)SnS(4)(H(2)O)(10)](6+) and [Mo(3)S(4)(H(2)O)(9)](4+). Conversely two-electron oxidation of [Mo(6)SnS(8)(H(2)O)(18)](8+) with [Co(dipic)(2)](-) or [Fe(H(2)O(6)](3+) gives the single cube [Mo(3)SnS(4)(H(2)O)(12)](6+) and [Mo(3)S(4)(H(2)O)(9)](4+) (up to 70% yield), followed by further two-electron oxidation to [Mo(3)S(4)(H(2)O)(9)](4+) and Sn(IV). The kinetics of the first stages have been studied using the stopped-flow method and give rate laws first order in [Mo(6)SnS(8)(H(2)O)(18)](8+) and the Co(III) or Fe(III) oxidant. The oxidation with [Co(dipic)(2)](-) has no [H(+)] dependence, [H(+)] = 0.50-2.00 M. With Fe(III) as oxidant, reaction steps involving [Fe(H(2)O)(6)](3+) and [Fe(H(2)O)(5)OH](2+) are implicated. At 25 degrees C and I = 2.00 M (Li(pts)) k(Co) is 14.9 M(-)(1) s(-)(1) and k(a) for the reaction of [Fe(H(2)O)(6)](3+) is 0.68 M(-)(1) s(-)(1) (both outer-sphere reactions). Reaction of Cu(2+) with the double but not the single cube is observed, yielding [Mo(3)CuS(4)(H(2)O)(10)](5+). A redox-controlled mechanism involving intermediate formation of Cu(+) and [Mo(3)S(4)(H(2)O)(9)](4+) accounts for the changes observed.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Hinge Distortion in Platinum(II) Dimers with a Pt(2)S(2) Ring. An ab Initio Molecular Orbital Study.

Ab initio calculations have been carried out for Pt(II) dimers with S(2)(-) and/or RS(-) bridging ligands in order to elucidate the factors governing the structural preference, planar or hinged, of these complexes. Calculations have been performed for systems which model all structurally characterized Pt(II) binuclear complexes. All possible determinants of the hinge angle have been taken into account in the ab initio calculations. These show that electronic rather than steric effects govern the geometry of the central Pt(2)S(2) ring. Only one minimum of energy has been found for each complex, but the energetic cost of the hinge motion is low. Complexes with two S(2)(-), or with one S(2)(-) and one RS(-), bridging ligands are hinged; the decrease of the through-ring antibonding interaction between the in-plane sulfur p orbitals with folding appears to be the determinant for hinging. Complexes with two RS(-) bridging ligands can be planar or hinged depending on the relative orientation, syn or anti, of the R groups, on the nature, L(4) or L(2)L(2)', of the terminal ligands, and in the latter case on their disposition, cis or trans. However, the aromatic or aliphatic nature of bridging thiolates does not influence the geometry of the Pt(2)S(2) ring significantly. Conclusions drawn from platinum dimers can be extended to the palladium analogs.

Journal Article↗