Biomedical subjects

Wei-Shone Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Wei-Shone Chen.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Comparison between straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomoses in surgery for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the long-term results of straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancers located in the critical position of 5-6cm from the anal verge. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 81 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal cancers located 5-6 cm from the anal verge, followed by straight or J-pouch coloanal anastomosis, performed in 41 and 40 patients, respectively. Careful clinical and manometric follow-up was conducted and the results were compared. RESULTS: There were no differences in the incidence of local recurrence, the disease-free survival rate, postoperative stool frequency, continence, sphincter pressures, or functional length between the two groups. Both groups had a high incidence of clustering or fragmented defecation; however, the J-pouch patients had better urgency control, a greater capacity before feeling the urge to defecation, superior rectal tolerance, and better compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Both straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomoses are oncologically and functionally acceptable for the treatment of rectal cancer located 5-6cm from the anal verge, but the J pouch has slight superiority in urgency control, as a result of larger urge threshold and tolerable volume, and better compliance. The reason for the high incidence of clustering defecation in both groups needs to be investigated.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Tumor marker CEA in monitoring of response to tegafur-uracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The assessment of response to chemotherapy of solid tumors is generally made by measurement of tumors visualized by imaging, commonly computed tomography scanning. However, response assessment based on imaging is not always feasible because patients often have disease not measurable by imaging study, such as diffuse peritoneal dissemination. Furthermore, response assessment by imaging is expensive and time consuming. This study was carried out in an effort to evaluate the correlation between serial change on imaging and on CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) levels for assessing chemotherapeutic response of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODOLOGY: Between May 1998 and August 1999, a total of 40 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in this study. All the patients had to have measurable lesions. Oral tegafur-uracil 300 mg/m2/day and folinic acid 60 mg/day were administered concurrently for four weeks, repeated every five weeks, as the first-line treatment. Tumor marker CEA was examined before and during the whole course of treatment. Response based on CEA assessment was defined as a more-than 50% drop in serum CEA level for more than four weeks. The correlation between serial change on CEA and on imaging for assessing chemotherapeutic response was evaluated. RESULTS: Forty patients received a total of 318 courses of treatment and a response rate of 32.5% (95% confidence interval, 18.0% to 47.0%), including five complete responses and eight partial responses, was achieved by imaging studies. The pretreatment CEA levels were elevated beyond the normal cut-off value in 34 (85%) patients. The response rate evaluated by CEA assessment was 42.5% (17/40). Nine responders (22.5%) based on CEA had no remission on imaging. Agreement in assessment by imaging study and by CEA was observed in 20 patients (50%), including eight responders, five stable diseases, and seven progressive diseases. The sensitivity of falling CEA levels in the prediction of true responders on imaging was 62%. The sensitivity of elevated CEA levels for the prediction of progressive disease was 70%. Concerning the diagnostic accuracy, change in CEA levels in the prediction of true responders and progressive disease on imaging were 65% and 85%, respectively. On a follow-up of 24 months, patients with remarkable falling CEA levels survived significantly longer than non-responders (P = 0.0184, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of CEA levels might be useful in monitoring chemotherapeutic response and in predicting the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Serum CEA level may be used as a means of monitoring chemotherapeutic response when imaging study is unsuitable for assessing the response in clinical practice.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

EIA versus RIA in detecting carcinoembryonic antigen level of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Little literature exists comparing the differences between enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) in the detection of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Because EIA has the advantage of avoiding the use of radioisotopes, the potential of using EIA instead of RIA in detecting CEA of patients with colorectal cancer is of interest to us. METHODOLOGY: Between March and August 2001, a total of 120 blood specimens, including 60 specimens from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and another 60 from patients with non-malignant diseases, were examined in this study. Serum CEA levels were examined by EIA and RIA methods in parallel. The CEA-EIA tests were done using EIA kits manufactured by Abbott Laboratories at Illinois in the United States. Comparison was done with the conventional CEA-RIA tests using RIA kits manufactured by CIS laboratory at France. The blood samples were sent to Veterans General Hospital-Taipei for EIA and RIA determination. The cut-off value for CEA was set at 5.0 ng/mL. RESULTS: The correlation between the Abbott-EIA and the CIS-RIA methods in detecting serum CEA levels was high. The results give a correlation coefficient of 0.992 with a linear regression line y=0.975 x + 0.215 (p<0.0001). Agreement in the Abbott-EIA and CIS-RIA tests in diagnosis was observed in 113 patients (94%), including 53 positive (>5 ng/mL) and 60 negative (<5 ng/mL) in both tests. The sensitivity was similar in both assays (83% vs. 80%) at a cut-off level of 5 ng/mL. The ability to discriminate between colorectal cancer and non-malignant diseases was good in both assays (p<0.001). The specificity and positive predictive value were slightly higher with the Abbott-EIA method compared with CIS-RIA assay (92% vs. 83% and 91% vs. 83%, respectively). The Abbott-EIA method achieved a similar diagnostic accuracy to CIS-RIA method (88% vs. 82%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the Abbott-EIA has similar diagnostic power to CIS-RIA in the measurement of CEA levels of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, with an additional advantage of avoiding the use of radioisotopes. We believe that ELA has the potential to replace RIA in the measurement of CEA in clinical practice.

Adult↗