Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W T Sherman

Publications and source records attributed to W T Sherman.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Immunoregulatory effects of catrix.

The immunoregulatory effect of Catrix on in vitro and and in vivo antibody production was examined in mice. Catrix, an acidic mucopolysaccharide complex, contains glycosaminoglycans including chondroitin sulfate. Catrix-S, a soluble derivative, was found to enhance T-dependent and T-independent antibody responses in vivo in a dose-dependent manner, with 100 mg intraperitoneally or 10 mg intravenously being optimal. Lower doses were found to be less effective or inhibitory. In vitro, the enhancing activity of Catrix-S on proliferative response was additive with that of dextran sulfate and lipopolysaccharide but not with chondroitin sulfate C. This immunoaugmenting activity appears to be related to the chondroitin sulfate component of Catrix-S, because both have similar effects on in vivo and in vitro antibody responses and because chondroitinase ABC inactivates activity. The inhibitory activity of Catrix-S could be separated from its stimulatory effects by ammonium sulfate precipitation or by fractionation according to molecular weight. The immunoaugmenting effect was present in the 0-30% saturated ammonium sulfate precipitate and in the 5-10,000-m.w. and 30-100,000-m.w. fractions. The ability of Catrix-S to enhance antibody responses in nude as well as in normal mice, and antibody responses to T-independent as well as to T-dependent antigens, indicates that its activity is due in part to a direct effect on B cells and/or to an indirect effect mediated by macrophages.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Chondroitin sulfates used as adjuvants for antibody formation and as mitogens for B cells.

The effects of chondroitin sulfates (ChS) A and C on antibody formation in mice and chickens and on proliferation of murine B cells in vitro were determined. Simultaneous injection of ChS with sheep erythrocytes (SRBC) caused enhanced antibody production as measured by plaque-forming cells per spleen on day 5 after antigen and by serum agglutinin titers. ChS.C was more active than ChS.A and intravenous (i.v.) injection was far more effective, requiring 100-fold lower doses, than intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. Responses of chickens could be enhanced by i.v., but not by i.p., injection of ChS.C with SRBC. Simultaneous injection of ChS.C with trinitrophenylated Ficoll had no effect, but injection of ChS.C 2 days after this antigen significantly increased the responses. Although ChS.C and ChS.A both caused proliferation of normal and athymic mouse spleen cells, the concentrations required for this effect in vitro were much higher than those needed for the in vivo effect. ChS.C caused only a slight increase in delayed hypersensitivity to a contact sensitizer.

Animals↗

Peroral immunization of rats with Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin delivered by microspheres.

The antigenicity of the Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin was not protected against the adverse effect of gastric acidity when the toxin was given together with bicarbonate for peroral immunization to rats, but immunization with the heat-labile enterotoxin encapsulated in pH-dependent microspheres aroused the same strong degree of serum and mucosal antitoxin responses and of protection against challenge as was achieved by peroral immunization after ablation of gastric secretions by pretreatment with cimetidine.

Administration, Oral↗

Threshold responses in formaldehyde-sensitive subjects.

Patch tests with three low concentrations of formaldehyde were applied continuously in formaldehyde-sensitive subjects for 1 wk. The closed patch test method produced a response to 30 parts per million (ppm) in some subjects by 120 continuous hours of testing. Thirteen subjects then sprayed a 30-ppm formaldehyde solution in an axilla on a double-blind, controlled, 2-wk-use test. Their responses to 30 ppm aqueous formaldehyde indicate that levels below this concentration should be tolerated by sensitive subjects if repeatedly applied to normal skin. Popular formaldehyde-releasing preservatives can be above or below this threshold-eliciting response.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗