[Successful long-term therapy of enterococcal endocarditis using doxycycline].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W Stille.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In a nonblind, randomised, parallel-group study, initial empirical monotherapy with meropenem 1 g intravenously every 8 h was compared to an identical dosage of imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of 66 febrile episodes in 61 adult neutropenic patients. 25/31 episodes treated with meropenem and 24/30 imipenem/cilastatin-treated episodes were still receiving unmodified therapy at 72 h (primary endpoint); this difference was not statistically significant. By the end of the treatment courses, 18/31 meropenem-treated episodes had responded clinically (cured or improved) compared with 18/30 episodes treated with imipenem/cilastatin. Another ten episodes initially treated with meropenem and six episodes treated with imipenem/cilastatia were cured after an additional antimicrobial agent had been administered (cured with modification). Satisfactory bacteriological responses (eradication plus presumed eradication) at the end of unmodified therapy was 9/11 in the meropenem group and 14/16 in the comparator group. Both regimes were well tolerated; however, there were more reports of nausea and/or vomiting in the impenem/cilastatin group (7/33 vs. 2/33 in the meropenem group). The carbapenems meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin appear to be suitable agents for empirical monotherapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients. Meropenem may be better tolerated than imipenem/cilastatin, allowing optimal dosing in this patient population.
The objective of the presented, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of antimicrobial monotherapy with imipenem (3 x 0.5g/d) to a combination therapy with cefotaxime (3 x 2g/d) plus piperacillin (3 x 4g/d) for empirical treatment of infections in neutropenic patients. In 165 patients, 237 infectious episodes were evaluable. The overall response rate of patients treated with cefotaxime plus piperacillin was 67/115 (58%), of those treated with imipenem 66/122 (54%). In patients not responding to the initial therapy regimen within 2 or 3 days, the antimicrobial therapy was modified. After therapy modification 85/100 patients were cured. Fever of unknown origin (FUO) showed the most favourable course compared to other infection types, with a response in 46/59 (78%) and in 35/50 (70%) cases, respectively. In comparison, pneumonias were successfully treated in only 3/21 (14%) and 7/37 (19%) cases. Even including patients with modified therapy, only 66% (21/32) of pneumonia episodes responded. The unfavourable results in pneumonias is mainly due to the high rate of 13 systemic mycoses in this group (22%). Overall, a similar response was observed in patients treated with cefotaxime plus piperacillin in comparison with imipenem. In primary bacteremias however, an advantage was observed in patients treated with imipenem (20/27; 74%) compared with cefotaxime plus piperacillin (11/23; 48%).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The activity of lomefloxacin was compared to that of four other quinolones. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were similar to those of enoxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin against the Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis. The activity of lomefloxacin was antagonized in urine at pH 5.4, but not in urine at pH 7.0. Higher inocula required higher lomefloxacin concentrations for inhibition. Lomefloxacin was more active at alkaline pH. At concentrations equal to or 2-fold the MIC, it was rapidly bactericidal against Gram-negative organisms and required a longer time for the reduction of inoculum by 99% and 99.9%. An "Eagle effect" was seen against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus but not against P. aeruginosa.