Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W R Levick

Publications and source records attributed to W R Levick.

56 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Neurophysiology of central retinal degeneration in cat.

Receptive fields of ganglion cells have been studied in cats possessing a chronic, arrested lesion of central retinal degeneration. Lesions were characterized by an ophthalmoscopically sharp border separating apparently normal retina from the region of the lesion. Under direct ophthalmoscopic guidance, a succession of recordings was obtained from ganglion cells having cell bodies at various positions relative to the lesion. Cells located more than 1 deg outside the ophthalmoscopic border had normal visual sensitivity as assessed by area-threshold experiments. Inside the lesion cells within 1 deg of the border had reduced sensitivity which often precluded functional classification by the usual visual tests. Ganglion cells located more than 1 deg inside the border of large lesions were blind and some had abnormal patterns of maintained discharge of action potentials. Nevertheless, the antidromic latencies of these blind cells fell into the familiar conduction groups (T1/T2/T3). Receptive-field maps of cells near the border of the lesion often appeared truncated, with the missing portion of the field covered by the lesion. These observations were consistent with the abnormal form of area-threshold curves. Although the responsiveness of cells near the lesion was abnormally low for grating stimuli, cutoff spatial frequency and orientation bias of these cells were within normal limits.

Action Potentials↗

Distinguishing direction selectivity from orientation selectivity in the rabbit retina.

Direction selectivity and orientation selectivity were examined in the direction-selective (DS) and orientation-selective (OS) ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. Spike activities were recorded in vivo using tungsten-in-glass electrodes. Three types of visual stimuli (flashing slit, moving edges behind a slit, and whole-field drifting gratings) were used to distinguish these attributes. Fourier analysis was performed on data obtained using drifting gratings as proposed by Worgotter and Eysel (1987). Results from both angular and Fourier (polar angle frequency) domains were consistent. DS cells had strong directional components and varying strength of orientational components; they also had intact inhibitory surrounds. The phase of the biased orientation did not have a consistent relationship with the preferred direction. OS cells had predominant orientational components and very weak directional components. We conclude that the orientation bias does not contribute to the generation of direction selectivity, and that the mechanism of this bias of DS cells is rather different from the mechanism that generates orientation selectivity in rabbit OS cells. There are indications that it is similar to the mechanism shown to cause orientation bias in cat concentric cells.

Action Potentials↗