Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W M Thompson

Publications and source records attributed to W M Thompson.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Angiographically induced renal failure and its radiographic detection.

Decreased renal function following arteriography is much more common than is currently realized. Steps to detect this failure are necessary, especially in high risk patients, so that stressful situations such as surgery can be avoided. A recently performed prospective random study of 100 patients undergoing angiography demonstrated a 10% incidence of renal failure. Those patients most at risk had preexisting renal disease as indicated by an elevated serum creatinine and/or cardiovascular disease severe enough to require digoxin, diuretics, or nitroglycerin. No cases of renal failure occurred in the absence of one or both of these processes. The likelihood of postangiographic renal failure was unrelated to the quantity of contrast as measured either by total volume or per kilogram body weight.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

Aortoenteric and paraprosthetic-enteric fistulas: radiologic findings.

Ten cases of graft-intestinal fistulas occurred in 712 patients who had undergone abdominal aortic reconstructive surgery. Radiographic abnormalities were demonstrated in eight--three by conventional barium gastrointestinal examinations and five by angiography. A high index of suspicion of the condition and an aggressive radiologic workup are recommended.

Aged↗

Ileocolonic perforation. A complication following renal transplantation.

During the decade, February, 1965, through February, 1975, 248 patients underwent renal transplantation at the Duke Medical Center. One hundred twenty-five were living related recipients, while 123 were cadaveric recipients. Eleven patients developed ileocolonic perforation. Six cases were felt to represent non-immunologic etiologies while the remaining 5 were felt to be associated with the allograft response and high dose steroid therapy. Only 3 of the patients survived this complication and in each case the perforation was localized. High dose steroid therapy interferes with prompt diagnosis and severely impairs successful treatment. Radiologists must be familiar with the problem of ileocolonic perforation in patients on steroid therapy, must have a high index of suspicion of the site of perforation, and must recommend and complete water soluble contrast examination for establishment of the diagnosis. Early diagnosis, prompt surgical intervention, and discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy are recommended.

Adult↗