Surgical management of complications of portal hypertension: Review of the experience at the MUSC hospitals.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W M Rambo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cefoxitin was administered to 25 patients on a general surgical service. In 16 of these patients, a bacteriologic diagnosis was made: four patients had peritonitis, one had ascending cholangitis, seven had cellulitis, and four had abscess. The dosage of cefoxitin varied from 4 to 8 g per day and was generally well tolerated, although there were three cases of phlebitis and one superinfection. There was no evidence of renal, liver, or bone marrow toxicity. All isolates of Bacteroides (eight), Escherichia coli (six), and Staphylococcus aureus (five) were sensitive to cefoxitin. Two of three strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were resistant. All patients recovered with cefoxitin and corrective surgery. The results indicate that cefoxitin has the potential of replacing combination therapy in some surgical patients.
The efficacy and safety of moxalactam were compared with those of a combination of clindamycin and an aminoglycoside in a randomized study of therapy for 60 patients with the following surgical infections: intraabdominal or pelvic infections (12 patients), abscesses (13 patients), and severe infections of extremities (35 patients). These infections were equally distributed between the two treatment groups, except that, according to the randomization process, a majority of patients with intraabdominal infections received moxalactam therapy. Surgery was used as adjunctive therapy when necessary. One adverse reaction--fever and leukocytosis with eosinophilia--was due to continued administration of moxalactam. No significant adverse reaction was observed in the patients treated with the clindamycin-aminoglycoside combination. Although the number of isolated organisms resistant to the antibiotics was similar within each treatment regimen, an alarmingly high percentage of gram-positive cocci were intermediately sensitive to moxalactam in vitro. Even in the presence of resistant organisms, moxalactam therapy was as effective as the clindamycin-aminoglycoside therapy when surgical debridement or drainage was properly timed and executed.