[Percutaneous alcohol instillation in functional thyroid autonomy].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W Lindner.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: In vitro studies have shown that, like catecholamines, both propranolol and atenolol are taken up by and released from adrenergic cells. We performed this study to investigate whether this may also play a role in humans and whether stereoselective aspects are important. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of two groups of 12 healthy volunteers. Subjects received single oral doses of 80 mg (R,S)-, 40 mg (R)-, and 40 mg (S)-propranolol; 100 mg (R,S)-, 50 mg (R)-, and 50 mg (S)-atenolol; and placebo at intervals of 1 week. Exercise was performed at 4 and 9 hours after drug intake, and blood samples were taken before and at the end of each exercise period. The plasma concentrations of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of propranolol and atenolol, as well as those of epinephrine and norepinephrine, were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Effects of exercise on the plasma levels of the enantiomers of propranolol and atenolol were similar. When the optically pure enantiomers were administered, exercise caused a marked and significant increase of the plasma concentrations of the (S)- but not of the (R)-enantiomers. When the drugs were administered in the racemic form, the plasma levels of both the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers were elevated to the same extent. The increase of norepinephrine levels during exercise was more pronounced than that of epinephrine and paralleled that of the (S)-enantiomers of the beta-blockers. CONCLUSION: Bearing the in vitro data in mind, we conclude that (S)-propranolol and (S)-atenolol are taken up into and released from adrenergic cells together with norepinephrine during exercise. The reason why the plasma concentrations of (R)-propranolol and (R)-atenolol are increased only during exercise in the presence of the corresponding (S)-enantiomers remains to be determined.
All beta-adrenergic antagonists have an asymmetric carbon atom, and most commercially available beta-blockers consist of (R)- and (S)-enantiomers in a fixed 1:1-ratio. The drugs are believed to be contraindicated when peripheral vascular disease exists, presumably due to unopposed alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction. However, little is known about direct vascular effects of beta-blockers or of stereoselective effects on peripheral arteries. Therefore, we investigated the effects on forearm blood flow (FBF) of brachial artery infusions of the (R)- and (S)- enantiomers of propranolol and atenolol (2, 10, and 50 micrograms/min each) and their inhibitory effects on isoprenaline (Iso)-induced vasodilatation by forearm venous occlusion plethysmography in 12 healthy subjects. Only (R)-propranolol caused an increase in FBF (+21%, p < 0.05), whereas (S)-propranolol and (R)- and (S)-atenolol had no direct effect on peripheral arteries. Vasodilatation induced by Iso was abolished by (S)-propranolol and reduced by (R)-propranolol (-56%, p < 0.05) and (S)-atenolol (-68%, p < 0.05), whereas (R)-atenolol had no effect. Our results indicate that the optically pure (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of propranolol and atenolol do not exert direct vasoconstrictive effects. Furthermore, our results confirm that predominantly (S)-enantiomers have beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects, but they also show that neither the non-beta-blocking (R)-enantiomer of propranolol nor the (S)-enantiomer of the beta 1-selective agent atenolol is completely devoid of blocking effects on vascular beta 2-adrenoceptors.
An enantioselective HPLC bioanalytical method for (+/-)-delmopinol was established in order to elucidate the pharmacokinetic behaviour of this chiral drug. (+/-)-Delmopinol and (+/-)-M1652, a structurally related compound used as internal standard, were extracted from plasma by a solid-phase extraction procedure using CN cartridges. The enantiomers were derivatized with a chiral derivatizing agent (R,R)-O,O'-di-p-toluoyl tartaric acid anhydride yielding diastereomeric derivatives which were separated on a reversed-phase column with acetonitrile-0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer (65:35, v/v) pH 5.7 as mobile phase. The resolution values of the diastereomeric derivatives of (-)- and (+)-M1652 and of the derivatives of (-)- and (+)-delmopinol were 1.03 and 1.46, respectively. The limit of quantitation was approximately 3 pmol (1 ng)/enantiomer per 0.5 ml plasma using electrochemical detection (+0.75 V versus Pd/PdO reference electrode). The effectiveness of the derivatization was > 98% and the total recovery of (+/-)-delmopinol and of (+/-)-M1652 from plasma or serum was found to be approximately 50%. The assay was applied to enantioselective pharmacokinetic investigations in humans, rats and dogs but showing here only one concentration time curve of the (+)- and (-)-delmopinol in a human subject after administering (+/-)-delmopinol in form of an aqueous mouth wash solution for 60 s.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In order to examine possible drug interactions of (R)- and (S)-propranolol a randomized, double blind, crossover study has been performed, administering orally single doses of 40 mg (R,S)- and of 20 mg (S)-propranolol. HCl three times daily over a week to reach steady state conditions. After the first single dose of 40 mg (R,S)-propranolol. HCl, the AUC0-infinity and Cmax values of the (S)-isomer were greater than those of the (R)-isomer: the ratio of AUC(S) over AUC(R) was 1.77 (P < 0.05) and that of Cmax 1.57 (P < 0.01). When (S)-propranolol.HCl was given as a single 20 mg dose, the AUC(S) value was a factor of 0.55 lower than that administration of 40 mg (R,S)-propranolol.HCl. At steady state, the AUC of (S)-propranolol was 1.52 times higher (P < 0.01) than that of the (R)-isomer after administration of 40 mg racemate, and comparing the (S)-isomer, the ratio was 1.21. Following administration of the first single dose of 40 mg of the racemate, the mean (SD) clearance of the (R)- and (S)-isomers was 110 (84) and 61 (37) ml min-1 kg-1, respectively; at steady state these values were 89 (55) and 57 (37) ml min-1 kg-1, respectively. Respective values for (S)-propranolol after single isomer administration (20 mg) were 86 (36) and 57 (25) ml min-1 kg-1 in single dose and steady state situations. The data are based on the quantitative analysis of (R)- and (S)-propranolol in plasma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in 12 healthy volunteers, the effects of single oral doses of 100 mg rac-atenolol were compared during exercise to those of equal amounts of the optically pure enantiomers, i.e., 50 mg (R)- and 50 mg (S)-atenolol. The mean rate pressure product decreased with rac-atenolol (-37%; P < 0.01) and half-dosed (S)-atenolol (-35%; P < 0.01) to the same extent, whereas (R)-atenolol caused no effect. Radioligand binding studies in beta-adrenergic receptors of the guinea pig heart yielded a eudismic ratio of 46 for (S)- to (R)-atenolol. The mean AUCs, maximal plasma concentrations, and plasma half-lives of the enantiomers were similar regardless of whether they were administered as optically pure enantiomers or as racemic mixture. On the other hand, the AUC of (R)-atenolol was 1.08-fold greater (P < 0.01) than that of the (S)-enantiomer. The reason for this finding remains unclear. We conclude that only (S)-atenolol, but not (R)-atenolol, contributes to the beta-blocking effect of currently used rac-atenolol since the same effect can be elicited with the (S)-enantiomer alone.
An enantioselective HPLC bioassay has been developed relying on extraction of (R)- and (S)-atenolol from alkalinized plasma or serum (pH > 12) into dichloromethane containing 5% (v/v) 1-butanol followed by an achiral derivatization of the drug with phosgene leading to (R)- and (S)-oxazolidine-2-one derivatives. Under these conditions there was quantitative conversion of the acetamido group to the corresponding nitrile. These stable derivatives were separated on a (R,R)-diaminocyclohexane-dinitrobenzoyl chiral stationary phase [(R,R)-DACH-DNB] using dichloromethane/methanol 98/2 as mobile phase. Determination limits of 0.5 ng for (R)- and 0.6 ng for (S)-atenolol could be achieved using fluorimetric detection. The assay was applied to a human pharmacokinetic study which was performed in a randomized cross-over, double-blind fashion in 12 healthy volunteers, administering single oral doses of 100 mg (R,S)-, 50 mg (R)-, and 50 mg (S)-atenolol. AUC0-24 and Cmax values of (R)-atenolol were slightly but significant higher than those of (S)-atenolol. The R/S ratios were 1.09 for AUC(R)/AUC(S) and 1.03 for Cmax (R)/Cmax(S) (P < 0.01) respectively after administration of the racemic drug. However, there were no difference between AUC, Cmax, and t1/2 values of each enantiomer, whether they were administered as single enantiomers or in the form of its racemic mixture.
Immunoenhancing in vivo effects of beta-adrenergic blockers have been previously ascribed to a reduced beta-receptor-mediated immunosuppression. In the present study using a whole blood stimulation assay, the effects of a five-day treatment with the purified (R)- or (S)-isomer of propranolol (3 x 40 mg/day) on the polyclonal in vitro responsiveness of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of normothyroid and hyperthyroid persons were assessed. It is shown that both isomers likewise exhibit a significant enhancing effect on the proliferative response of PBL to T and B cell mitogens, which strongly argues for nonspecific effects of propranolol to be responsible rather than a specific beta-adrenergic receptor blockade.
In-vitro studies have shown that atenolol, a beta-blocking agent, is stereoselectively taken up by and released from adrenergic nerve endings by membrane depolarisation. To investigate the potential importance of these findings, blood samples were taken at rest and after exercise testing from 10 patients (mean [SE] age 60 [3] years) receiving long-term treatment with racemic atenolol. At rest, mean plasma concentration of (R)-atenolol was higher than that of (S)-atenolol (ratio 1.14, p less than 0.01), but after exercise there was a stereoselective increase in (S)-atenolol concentration, which changed the ratio to 0.66 (p less than 0.01). Since (S)-atenolol but not (R)-atenolol causes clinically relevant beta-blockade, our findings may have importance for the management of patients receiving beta-blocking drugs.
In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in 10 healthy volunteers the hemodynamic effects, drug plasma concentrations, and thyroid hormone profiles were compared after oral administration for 1 week of 40 mg t.i.d. racemic (R,S)-propranolol versus 20 mg t.i.d. optically pure (S)-propranolol. During exercise, both substances decreased heart rate (-14%, p less than 0.01), as well as the overall rate pressure product (-19%, p less than 0.01) to the same extent, indicating similar beta-blocking effects. After oral application of (R,S)-propranolol the maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of (S)-propranolol were higher than those of (R)-propranolol (eudismic ratios (S)- over (R)-propranolol Cmax, 1.36 [p less than 0.01] and AUC, 1.42 [p less than 0.01]) despite dose-equivalence of both enantiomers in the administered racemic (R,S)-propranolol preparation indicating different pharmacokinetic properties. Mean values of Cmax and the AUC of (S)-propranolol did not differ significantly after 1 week of oral administration of 40 mg (R,S)-propranolol and 20 mg (S)-propranolol t.i.d., respectively. The ratio of triiodothyronine to thyroxine was decreased by (R,S)-propranolol (-25%, p less than 0.01) but not by (S)-propranolol, suggesting that only the (R)-enantiomer inhibits the conversion of thyroxine to triiodothyronine. Thus, half-dosed optically pure (S)-propranolol is an equally effective beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist compared with currently used racemic (R,S)-propranolol. By contrast, the conversion of thyroxine to triiodothyronine is inhibited by (R)-propranolol only.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The specific interactions of both (R)- and (S)-propafenone with the cardiac sodium channel were studied with patch clamp techniques in the whole-cell recording mode at reduced extracellular Na+ on guinea pig ventricular cells. Both (R)- and (S)-propafenone (10 microM) shifted the membrane potential required for half-maximal steady-state inactivation (E0.5) of the cardiac sodium channel to considerably more negative membrane potentials [E0.5 = -70.8 +/- 2.9 mV for controls vs. -85 +/- 3.1 mV for (R)-propafenone and -91.9 +/- 1.7 mV for (S)-propafenone]. (S)-Propafenone at a concentration of 10 microM is more effective in shifting the h infinity curve of the cardiac sodium channel. Recovery from inactivation of the cardiac sodium current is prolonged by orders of magnitude by both stereoenantiomeric forms [time constants were estimated to be 38 +/- 15 ms at -90 mV vs. 46.5 +/- 14.3 s for (R)-propafenone and 74.2 +/- 37.9 for (S)-propafenone]. Development of block occurs mainly through the inactivated channel conformation for both (R)- and (S)-propafenone. Development of block of inactivated cardiac sodium channels occurs with time constants of 15.9 +/- 3.9 s for (R)-propafenone and 19.7 +/- 7.3 s for (S)-propafenone at 10 microM. Action potential duration and possible stereoselective interaction with ion transport systems other than sodium channels may influence the block developed by either (R)- or (S)-propafenone at a given concentration and beating frequency indirectly through the membrane potential.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The interaction of propafenone enantiomers with human alpha 1-acid glycoprotein was studied using high-performance liquid chromatography. Each of the two optical antipodes interacted with one class of high-affinity binding sites characterized by Ka(R) = (6.18 +/- 0.93) x 10(5) M-1, n(R) = 1.34 +/- 0.09 for the (R)-isomer and Ka(S) = (8.93 +/- 1.82) x 10(5) M-1, n(S) = 0.99 +/- 0.08 for the (S)-isomer. Nonspecific binding to secondary low-affinity high-capacity binding site(s) was only slightly greater in the case of the (S)-enantiomer (n'k'(S) = (1.06 +/- 0.09) x 10(4) M-1) compared to the (R)-enantiomer (n'k'(R) = (6.87 +/- 0.72) x 10(3) M-1). It was concluded that both enantiomers interact with common single class of high-affinity binding sites on AAG (along with nonspecific binding) exhibiting only slight stereoselectivity for propafenone.
A 5-month-old infant presented with severe combined immunodeficiency disease, reticuloendotheliosis, and hypereosinophilia (Omenn syndrome) resulting in recurrent infections and endomyocardial disease. Bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical donor after chemotherapeutic conditioning led to both immunological and clinical recovery. Bone marrow transplantation, however, was followed by severe pulmonary occlusive disease. The patient gradually recovered while on increased inspiratory oxygen and the calcium channel blocker nifedipine.
1. Optically pure enantiomers of propafenone and diprafenone were prepared from their racemic mixtures and tested for their ability to block beta-adrenoceptors and to prolong functional refractory period in the guinea-pig heart. beta-Adrenoceptor affinity of the enantiomers was determined by the radioligand binding technique and in functional experiments. 2. Propafenone and diprafenone inhibited specific binding of the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist (-)-[3H]-CGP-12177 to guinea-pig myocardial membranes. beta-Adrenoceptor affinities of diprafenone enantiomers exceeded those of corresponding propafenone enantiomers by one order of magnitude. Displacement of (-)-[3H]-CGP-12177 by both antiarrhythmics was highly stereoselective, in that the (S)-enantiomers were 40-60 fold, i.e. 1.6-1.8 log units more potent than the (R)-enantiomers. 3. Propafenone and diprafenone antagonized the positive inotropic action of isoprenaline in isolated atria. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonist potencies of diprafenone enantiomers were about one order of magnitude higher than those of corresponding propafenone enantiomers. For both drugs the (S)-enantiomer was found to be considerably more potent (14-40 fold) than the (R)-enantiomer. 4. Propafenone and diprafenone prolonged functional refractory period of isolated auricles with equal potency and no difference in the antiarrhythmic activity of purified enantiomers was found. 5. It is concluded that the enantiomers of propafenone and diprafenone exert comparable antiarrhythmic activity, whereas only (S)-enantiomers block cardiac beta-adrenoceptors with high affinity, which explains the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist effects of the racemic drugs.
Beta adrenoceptor antagonists bind specifically to beta receptors in a reversible way, so they inhibit beta stimulating actions of beta mimetics such as epinephrine, norepinephrine, isoprenaline, etc. The effect of beta adrenoceptor antagonism depends on the extent of sympathetic activity and is most pronounced during work and stress. Most beta blockers are administered as racemic mixtures consisting of 50% of the (R)- and 50% of the (S)-enantiomer, but only one enantiomer (e.g. (S)-propranolol) exerts beta blocking activity in therapeutic doses while the other one (e.g. (R)-propranolol) does not. But there is also a number of non-beta blocking actions of beta adrenoceptor antagonists that show variable stereoselectivity. Propranolol is explored most extensively in this field: 1. Only (R)-propranolol inhibits the conversion of thyroxine to triiodothyronine. 2. Both (R)- and (S)-propranolol exert class 1 antiarrhythmic activity. 3. Both (R)- and (S)-propranolol decrease the intraocular pressure. In all these indications mentioned above, beta blockade as an unwanted effect could be avoided by administering optically pure (R)-propranolol instead of the racemic mixture. Stereoselectivity does not only influence the effects but also metabolism, protein-binding etc. of beta adrenoceptor antagonists. In fact, the (R)- and the (S)-enantiomer of a beta adrenoceptor antagonist are 2 substances with different pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Nevertheless, they are currently used as racemic mixtures in research as well as in therapy without being aware of stereoselective implications although there are nowadays methods available to separate and isolate the optically pure enantiomers of most beta adrenoceptor antagonists with high purity and on large scale at reasonable costs.
We performed a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy and safety of the surfactant preparation, Survanta (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, USA), for 750-1750 g infants with idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome, (IRDS) receiving assisted ventilation with 40% or more oxygen. One hundred and six eligible infants from the eight participating centers were randomly assigned between March 1986 and June 1987 to receive either surfactant (100 mg phospholipid/kg, 4 ml/kg) or air (4 ml/kg) administered into the trachea within 8 h of birth (median time of treatment 6.2 h, range 3.2-9.1 h). The study was stopped before enrollment was completed at the request of the United States Food and Drug Administration when significant differences were observed in incidence of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage (PIH), between the surfactant treated and control infants. Surfactant treated infants had larger average increases in the arterial-alveolar oxygen ratio, (a/A ratio) (P less than 0.0001), and larger average decreases in FiO2 (P less than 0.0001) and mean airway pressure, (MAP) (P less than 0.017) than controls over the 48 h following treatment. The magnitude of the differences between the surfactant and control groups were 0.19 (SE = 0.03) for a/A ratio, -0.28 (SE = 0.04) for FiO2 and -1.7 cm H2O (SE = 0.70) for MAP. The clinical status on days 7 and 28 after treatment was classified using four predefined ordered categories: (1) no respiratory support; (2) supplemental O2 with or without continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); (3) intermittent mandatory ventilation; and (4) death. There were no statistically significant differences in the status categories on days 7 or 28 between surfactant and control infants.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Propafenone is a class 1c antiarrhythmic agent with moderate beta-blocking activity as a result of a structural similarity to beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. In a randomized, double-blind crossover exercise study, eight healthy volunteers were examined before and 2 1/2 hours after oral administration of 300 mg (R,S)-, 150 mg (R)-, and 150 mg (S)-propafenone hydrochloride. The mean rate pressure product was significantly reduced by (R,S)-propafenone hydrochloride (-5.2%; p = 0.045) and half-dosed (S)-propafenone hydrochloride (-5.9%; p = 0.013), whereas the (R)-enantiomer caused no significant changes. There was a significant difference between the effects of (R)- and (S)-propafenone (p = 0.033). In beta-adrenoceptor-binding inhibition experiments with (S)-(125I)iodocyanopindolol in a sarcolemma-enriched cardiac membrane preparation, the eudismic ratio of (S)- over (R)-propafenone was 54. On the spontaneously beating Langendorff-perfused guinea pig heart, 3 x 10(-6) mol/L of both (R)- and (S)-propafenone resulted in significant changes (p less than 0.01) on His bundle conduction (+79% +/- 27% and +69% +/- 9%), as well as comparable decreases in the maximal rate of pacing with 1:1 conduction of the atrial (-54% +/- 10% and -57% +/- 8%) and ventricular myocardium (-42% +/- 6% and -43% +/- 6%), indicating equal effects in sodium channel-dependent antiarrhythmic class 1 activity. Thus (R)- and (S)-propafenone exert different beta-blocking actions but equal effects on the sodium channel-dependent antiarrhythmic class 1 activity. More specific antiarrhythmic class 1 therapy with reduction of beta-blocking side effects may be attained with optically pure (R)-propafenone hydrochloride instead of the currently used racemic mixture.