Dislocation of the elbow with fracture of the radial head and distal radius.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W H Thomas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The results of 138 total hip arthroplasties in 98 rheumatoid arthritic patients were reviewed six to 11 years (mean, 7.0 years) after operation. While 96% of the patients were clinically improved as a result of surgery, radiographic analysis suggests that, despite their low functional requirements, this group of patients experiences mechanical loosening and failure with time. Improvements in prosthetic design and cementing technique should contribute to a lowered incidence of mechanical failure in the future. In addition to improvements in technology, the failure rate can be further diminished by recognition of the systemic problems associated with rheumatoid arthritis, e.g., high incidence of infection, osteopenia, and sequelae of multiple joint involvement. In reconstruction of the acetabulum, especially in the presence of protrusio, failure to restore the anatomic position and orientation of the acetabulum predisposes to loosening and migration.
During a ten-year period, 4240 total hip, knee, and elbow arthroplasties were performed. The overall infection rate was 1.25%. Certain groups were identified as being at higher risk of infection following total joint arthroplasty: rheumatoid arthritics were at 2.6 times greater risk than osteoarthritics; patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty as a revision of a previous operation were eight times more likely to have infection than those undergoing a primary operation; and patients with metal-to-metal hinged knee prostheses, when compared with patients with metal-to-plastic knee prostheses, were 20 times more likely to have infection. The majority of infections could be attributed either to perioperative problems or late bacterial seeding from a distant site. Although most infections occurred by two years after operation, late infections, particularly in rheumatoid patients via the hematogenous route, occurred as long as nine years after operation. There was no correlation between the Gram's-staining characteristics of the pathogen and the outcome of the infected joint. Gram-negative organisms were frequent in the perioperative period and reflected either nosocomial infection or the ineffectiveness of the prophylactic antibiotic regimen used in inhibiting gram-negative pathogens. The major factors that influenced the outcome of the infected joint included the interval from the initial surgery to recognition of infection, the delay in institution of appropriate treatment, the particular joint that was infected, the integrity of the bone-cement interface, the type of prosthesis used, and the host susceptibility. Identification of high-risk groups and the recognition that patients with joint implants are at risk of infection at any time in the postoperative period may lead to a lowered infection rate in the future.
A series of 100 consecutive patients with total hip replacements in whom trochanteric osteotomy was performed was compared with 100 patients in whom the greater trochanter was left in place. The groups were comparable with respect to age and incidence of osteoarthritis and connective tissue disorders. Although no statistically significant difference was noted among trochanterectomy groups or disease subgroups in terms of preoperative impairment as indicated by preoperative Harris score, 16 patients presented exposure problems necessitating trochanteric osteotomy despite preoperative plans to leave the trochanter in place. Salvage operations after unsuccessful previous operations were performed in 18 patients in the osteotomy group and 11 in the nonosteotomy group. Mean operating time was 3 hours for patients in the osteotomy group and 2 hours for those in the nonosteotomy group. Considerably more intraoperative and postoperative blood replacement was required in the patients having osteotomy. Patients sat, stood, walked, and left the hospital sooner in the nonosteotomy group than in the osteotomy group. Trochanteric bursitis requiring treatment 3 or more months after operation occurred in 17 patients having osteotomy and in 3 patients not having osteotomy. Hematomas developed in 15 patients in the osteotomy group and in 4 in the nonosteotomy group. Ectopic bone formation was observed in 12 of the osteotomy group, 8 with limitation of function, and 5 of the nonosteotomy group; non had symptoms. Six osteotomized patients had troublesome abductor weakness secondary to wire breakage and proximal migration of the trochanter. The rates of infection and thrombophlebitis were low in both groups. When exposure was not difficult, leaving the trochanter intact had many advantages.