Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W H Maleck.
A new hand-held quantitative capnometer (BCI Capnocheck) was tested in the animal lab setting. The end-tidal CO2 values, as measured with this device, showed good agreement with arterial (Paco2) values. This device seems suited for quantitative capnometry in the prehospital setting. It must be noted, however, that this device has no alarms.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Since 1982, more than 20 patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cessation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Lazarus phenomenon) have been published. We report on another case here. Such cases are probably underreported due to medicolegal concerns. After cessation of resuscitation, each patient should be further monitored for at least 10 min to detect a possible Lazarus phenomenon.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the ease of endotracheal intubation on the ground for various rescuer positions. METHODS: Six female and 18 male emergency medical technicians were asked to intubate a Laerdal Megacode Trainer placed on the ground. Rescuers assumed the following positions in random order: prone, sitting, kneeling at the mannequin's head, and straddling the chest. The authors measured times 1) for changing from mask ventilation to assuming intubation position and 2) from touching the laryngoscope to putting it down. Incidences of esophageal tube placement and clicks (possible tooth damage) were noted. The rescuers rated their satisfaction with each position on a six-point scale (1 = very good, 6 = insufficient). Total intubation times of the other three positions were compared with that for prone by rank order test for paired observations. Handling, esophageal positions, and clicks of the other three positions were compared with those for prone by sign test for paired observations. A Bonferroni correction (factor 12) was applied. RESULTS: Mean total intubation times (in seconds) were 11.8 +/- 3.3 for prone, 13.9 +/- 4.7 for sitting, 11.4 +/- 4.5 for kneeling, and 16.2 +/- 5.8 for straddling. The difference between straddling and prone was statistically significant (p < 0.005). For handling, the results were for prone 3.0 +/- 1.4, for sitting 3.1 +/- 1.1, for kneeling 2.2 +/- 0.6, and for straddling 2.8 +/- 1.4. Esophageal positions occurred for prone 1, for sitting 1, for kneeling 2, and for straddling 3. Clicks were counted for prone 2, for sitting 1, for kneeling 1, and for straddling 0. CONCLUSIONS: All tested positions provide satisfactory conditions for intubation on the ground. The straddling position requires statistically, but not clinically, significantly more time for intubation than does prone and may be an important backup position if access from behind the patient's head is impossible.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility of closed chest compressions in ambulances. METHODS: Ten male emergency medical technicians performed closed chest compressions on a Laerdal Skillmeter Resusci Anne placed 1) on the ground, 2) on the stretcher of an MB 510 ALS ambulance, 3) on the stretcher of an MB 310 ambulance, and 4) on the stretcher of a VW T4 BLS ambulance for 2 minutes each. The authors noted the percentage of correct compressions as shown by the mannequin and counted the heart rate of the participants before and after each session. The authors compared the percentage of correct compressions and the increase in heart rate during the three ambulance sessions with those of the session on the ground by rank order test for paired observations. A p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction (factor 3) was considered significant. RESULTS: The percentage of correct compressions was 90% +/- 7% on the ground, 77% +/- 19% in the MB 510, 60% +/- 31% in the MB 310, and 38% +/- 24% in the VW T4. Heart rate increase was 18 +/- 16 min-1 on the ground, 23 +/- 9 min-1 in the MB 510, 30 +/- 16 min-1 in the MB 310, and 32 +/- 13 min-1 in the VW T4. Only the difference in percentage of correct compressions between on the ground and the VW T4 was significant (p < 0.01 after Bonferroni correction). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of correct compressions in all the vehicles tested was lower when compared with the percentage on the ground, and the increase in heart rate was higher. Only one of these results was statistically significant. A further study with more participants seems warranted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Transillumination-guided intubation is a useful back-up method when laryngoscopic intubation proves to be difficult or impossible. The Trachlight (Laerdal, N-4001 Stavanger, Norway) is suited for both nasal and oral use. Intubation times (IT) and success rates (SR) for nasal and oral intubation with the Trachlight were compared. Twenty-four medical students, inexperienced in intubation were instructed in the use of the Trachlight. A demonstration also was performed. Subsequently, they were asked to intubate a Laerdal Airway Management Trainer (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) using the Trachlight. Each student intubated 10 times orally and 10 times nasally (five times through the right and five times through the left nostril). The succession of the students was randomized. The intubation times were measured and the position of the tube noted. Nasal and oral intubation times for the tenth trial (steady state conditions) were compared using the rank-order test for paired observations. Oral and nasal success rates were compared using the sign test for paired observations. The differences between nasal and oral intubation concerning intubation time and the success rates were not significant. Nasal intubation with the Trachlight seems to be more difficult than the oral intubation.