Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W H Harvey

Publications and source records attributed to W H Harvey.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

Oral ondansetron 8 mg twice daily is as effective as 8 mg three times daily in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. S3A-376 Study Group.

The efficacy and safety of ondansetron 8 mg BID compared with 8 mg TID for 3 days in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in 402 patients on cyclophosphamide (> or = 500 mg/m2)-based chemotherapy were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, stratified study. The percentage of patients with no emetic episodes over the 3-day study period was 61% in the ondansetron BID group compared with 58% in the ondansetron TID group. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was 14 hr and 17 min in the ondansetron BID group compared with 12 hr and 48 min in the ondansetron TID group. Patients' daily appetite ratings and nausea scores were not significantly different between groups. Clinical laboratory and adverse event profiles were similar between groups. This study is the first large-scale, double-blind trial to demonstrate that ondansetron 8 mg BID for 3 days, a dosing regimen that may enhance patient convenience and compliance, is as effective as ondansetron 8 mg TID for 3 days in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.

Administration, Oral↗

Successful in vitro purging of leukemic blasts from marrow by cortivazol, a pyrazolosteroid: a preclinical study for autologous transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

An important new approach to curative treatment of leukemia is vigorous treatment of autologous marrow to remove residual abnormal cells in vitro prior to reinfusion. This in vitro 'purging' must destroy the malignant cells while preserving sufficient normal precursors to allow re-establishment of normal in vivo function. We have confirmed that cortivazol (CVZ), a glucocorticoid with an unusual structure, can kill dexamethasone (DEX)-resistant leukemic cells and have examined its ability to purge DEX-sensitive (CEM-C7) and -resistant (ICR-27) human leukemic blasts artificially mixed with normal marrow mononuclear cells in vitro. By carefully defining time and dose, we established a 'therapeutic window' that allowed 'cure' of the artificial remission marrow. A sufficient number of viable normal myeloid precursor cells (CFU-GM) remained to suggest that normal marrow precursors adequate for successful marrow transplantation could survive such treatment. CVZ could be a useful drug for in vitro purging of bone marrow for autologous transplantation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, sensitive or resistant to standard glucocorticoid.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Hepatoma/merbarone. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Sixteen eligible patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, previously untreated, received merbarone 1000 mg/m2/d for five consecutive days every 21 days. No complete or partial response to treatment was obtained. Seven patients had grade 4 granulocytopenia. One patient died with renal failure. Merbarone in this dose and schedule was ineffective in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Adult↗

Interferon-alpha-2b downregulation of oncogenes H-ras, c-raf-2, c-kit, c-myc, c-myb and c-fos in ESKOL, a hairy cell leukemic line, results in temporal perturbation of signal transduction cascade.

ESKOL, a B-lymphoblastoid cell line consisting of late differentiated cells, resembles hairy cell leukemia (HCL). It is pseudodiploid with a deleted 7q and an unbalanced translocation between chromosomes 4 and 6. It was screened by Northern hybridization for oncogenes, including H-ras, c-raf-2 (c-raf1p1), c-kit, c-myc, c-myb, c-fos, Fim-1, c-jun, ski, and c-mos, which are believed to contribute to B-cell differentiation and maturation. Interferon-alpha-2b (IFN) downregulates the expression of H-ras, c-raf-2, c-kit, c-myc, c-myb, c-fos, as determined by Northern hybridization of RNA isolated from cells harvested at time points during a 30 h time course. Downregulation of oncogenes H-ras, c-raf-2, c-kit, whose proteins are associated with cell surfaces or are cytosolar transducers, occurs before those oncogenes c-myc, c-myb, and c-fos, whose products are DNA binding proteins. This suggests a temporal perturbation of signal transduction by IFN. No change in oncogene expression occurred in non-treated cells nor were these oncogenes expressed in the non-transformed B-lymphoblast cell line, Wil-2, under the same treatment regimen. The basis for the IFN perturbation is not understood; yet the role of these oncogenes as signal transducers in differentiation and proliferation of human hematopoietic progenitors is unfolding, and ESKOL is an excellent system in which to study this phenomenon.

Aged↗

A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of ondansetron alone with that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran, Cerenex Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg for three doses every 4 hours beginning 30 minutes before cisplatin administration either alone or in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg administered 45 minutes before cisplatin. Cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2) was administered as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes (EEs), adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were enrolled. Of these, 245 were assessable for efficacy. Patients who received ondansetron plus dexamethasone had a higher complete antiemetic response rate (61% v 46%, P = .02) and less nausea (posttreatment visual analog scale mean 18.2 v 32.8, P < .001) than did those who received ondansetron alone. The time to the first EE was longer for patients in the group that received ondansetron plus dexamethasone (P = .005). Headache (12%), diarrhea (2%), and abdominal colic (1%) were the most common antiemetic-related adverse events reported. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: IV ondansetron in combination with dexamethasone is safe and more effective than ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin.

Adult↗

Didemnin B in metastatic malignant melanoma: a phase II trial of the Southwest Oncology Group.

Didemnin B is a cyclic peptide isolated from the marine tunicate Trididemnin cyanophorum. It is a known potent inhibitor of RNA, DNA and protein synthesis, with activity against the murine B16 melanoma. Fourteen patients with disseminated malignant melanoma were evaluated in a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial of didemnin B at 4.2 mg/m2 by 30 min i.v. infusion every 28 days (SWOG-8754). Only patients with no prior chemotherapy were eligible; prior radiation therapy, surgery and at most one prior biologic regimen were allowed. Patients with brain metastasis were eligible only if the disease in the brain had been treated and controlled. All patients had to have normal renal and hepatic function and adequate granulocyte and platelet counts, a performance status of 0-2, and bidimensionally measurable disease. Fourteen patients were entered on the study; five received one and nine received two courses of didemnin B. No responses were noted among the 11 patients evaluable for response. Five patients developed unusual but reversible hypersensitivity reactions during the second course of therapy. Other toxicity in this trial was nausea and vomiting and diarrhea, none of severity greater than grade 3. Given the lack of antitumor efficacy and the unusual toxicity, further evaluation of didemnin B in this dose and schedule in malignant melanoma is not warranted.

Adult↗

Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The Ondansetron Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron (Zofran) as an antiemetic in patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, stratified, placebo-controlled trial conducted between March 1989 and January 1990. SETTING: Twenty-seven oncology centers including university hospitals, community cancer centers, and private medical oncology practices. PATIENTS: A total of 349 chemotherapy-naive patients having their first cycle of cyclophosphamide (> or = 450 mg/m2)-based chemotherapy. Patients also received methotrexate (> or = 30 mg/m2) or doxorubicin (> or = 35 mg/m2). All patients were evaluated for safety and 318 (91%) were evaluated for efficacy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: placebo, 1 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg of ondansetron. Assigned study medication was taken three times per day for 3 consecutive days. MEASUREMENTS: Time and number of emetic episodes as well as degree of nausea were recorded by patients for each of the 3 study days. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, all three doses of ondansetron were superior (P < 0.001) in preventing vomiting and controlling nausea. A complete response (no emetic episodes) was observed in 19%, 57%, 65%, and 66% of patients in the placebo, 1-mg, 4-mg, and 8-mg ondansetron groups, respectively. For patients who received higher-dose cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, a dose-related trend in antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron was observed. Mild headache and constipation were the most frequently reported adverse events. No extrapyramidal reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: Oral ondansetron is a safe and effective antiemetic that is more efficacious than placebo for patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.

Administration, Oral↗

Delayed emesis following high-dose cisplatin: a double-blind randomised comparative trial of ondansetron (GR 38032F) versus placebo.

Despite recent advances in control of acute emesis, delayed nausea and vomiting following cisplatin-based chemotherapy remain a significant cause of treatment-related morbidity. Ondansetron, a selective 5HT3 receptor antagonist, is effective in preventing acute emesis in the initial 24-h period following high-dose cisplatin. The efficacy and safety of ondansetron in preventing the delayed emesis syndrome during days 2-5 after cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2) were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial. 50 patients having two or fewer emetic episodes during the first 24 h were randomised to receive ondansetron (16 mg) or placebo orally three times daily beginning 24 h after cisplatin. Rates of complete control of emesis were higher in ondansetron-treated patients during each study day, 59-78%, compared with 39-50% in placebo-treated patients, but the differences were statistically superior only on the third study day (P = 0.009). 40% of patients in the ondansetron treatment arm and 33% treated with placebo had complete control of emesis during the entire 4-day study period (P = 0.648). Withdrawal from study due to nausea and vomiting occurred in 13% of ondansetron-treated patients compared with 33% in the placebo arm (P = 0.102). Control of nausea was better with ondansetron, but differences were not statistically significant. Adverse effects of oral ondansetron given in this dose schedule were minimal. These data suggest that the delayed emesis syndrome may be partially mediated through the 5HT3 receptor, but that a serotonin antagonist alone provides inadequate control. Further investigation of ondansetron-based therapy in this clinical setting is warranted.

Adult↗

The delayed-emesis syndrome from cisplatin: phase III evaluation of ondansetron versus placebo.

Cisplatin may evoke both an acute emetic response during the first 24 hours following treatment and a less well-recognized syndrome of delayed emesis. While delayed emesis is usually less severe in terms of frequency of vomiting episodes, the problem continues to result in significant morbidity. In comparison with acute emesis, the exact pathogenesis of the delayed emesis syndrome remains unclear. Although a combination of oral metoclopramide and dexamethasone is effective in many patients in preventing delayed emesis, almost 50% continue to experience at least one emetic episode when treated with this regimen. A phase III multicenter study has evaluated oral ondansetron versus placebo in the prevention of the delayed-emesis syndrome in 50 patients during days 2 through 5 following high-dose cisplatin administration. Although the daily rates of complete emetic control, failure, and control of nausea favor ondansetron, this trial is statistically inconclusive in establishing efficacy of ondansetron as a single agent in the prevention of delayed emesis. Ondansetron was well tolerated in the dose and schedule used.

Adult↗

A prospective evaluation of the Port-A-Cath implantable venous access system in chronically ill adults and children.

Totally implantable venous access systems are presently widely used, but large-scale, prolonged studies are lacking in evaluating adequately these systems. We prospectively evaluated 198 systems in 191 patients (ages from two months to 80 years) during a three year period, with a median follow-up time of 330 days (a range of two to 1,088 days). Withdrawal of blood was consistently successful in 91 per cent of the systems. Complication rates for infection and thrombosis were 0.04 and 0.03 per 100 days of catheterization, respectively. No episodes of migration of the catheter or embolization were noted. This was thought to be the result of the placement of all catheters by a cutdown technique rather than percutaneously. Five systems were removed because of thrombosis and 22, because of infection. Implantable venous access devices are reliable and have a low complication rate in adult and pediatric patients who require repetitive venous access.

Adolescent↗

Adjunctive drug use by methadone patients.

Clinical impressions, reinforced by reports in both professional journals and the lay press, suggested that use and abuse of minor tranquilizers and sedative-hypnotics was extensive among patients in our drug treatment clinics and required some change in our policies. We surveyed a randomly selected national sample of methadone program physicians and found they shared our assumptions concerning the use of these drugs. A pilot program of urine screening for the presence of adjunctive drugs was completed, and we found the incidence of use to be below expected levels, except for opiates and alcohol. These results suggest we should reconsider plans to alter clinic policies concerning the regulation of these substances. A rigorous examination of serum and/or urine in a national research program to determine both the incidence of adjunctive drug use by clients in drug treatment programs and correlations of such data with national surveys would be an expensive undertaking, but would provide a more rational basis for policy making at both local and national levels.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Concurrent cisplatin and etoposide with radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Twenty consecutive patients with newly diagnosed or locally recurrent non-small cell lung cancer limited to the chest were treated with concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin plus etoposide. No patient had received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Sixteen of 20 patients (80%) responded to the treatment. Median survival has not been reached but is greater than 13.5 months. Twelve patients have relapsed at a median of 10 months after starting therapy (range, 4-12 months), with only one initial relapse within the radiotherapy port. Hematologic toxicity was mild, with four of 52 wbc count nadirs less than 1000/mm3. Esophageal toxicity was also mild, with all patients maintaining oral intake throughout therapy. We conclude that simultaneous radiotherapy, cisplatin, and etoposide can be safely administered in locoregional non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. A prospective trial of this regimen versus radiotherapy alone is warranted.

Adult↗