Biomedical subjects

W Gaus

Publications and source records attributed to W Gaus.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Kava extracts: safety and risks including rare hepatotoxicity.

Kava is a perennial shrub native to some islands of the South Pacific and has been cultivated for centuries to prepare a psychoactive beverage from its rhizoma by means of extraction. Subsequently, kava extracts are commonly used as herbal anxiolytic drugs also in many other countries all over the world including European ones and the USA. Toxicological and clinical studies have shown that kava extracts are virtually devoid of toxic effects with the exception of rare hepatotoxic side effects reported in few patients. When assessed primarily by the British regulatory authority MCA but also by us, a critical analysis of the suspected cases (n = 19) in Germany reveals that only in 1 single patient a very probable causal relationship could be established between kava treatment and the development of toxic liver disease due to a positive result of an unscheduled reexposure test, whereas in another patient there might be a possible association. Out of the remaining 17 cases 12 patients were not yet assessable due to insufficient data and in 5 other cases a causal relationship was unlikely or could be excluded. The German regulatory authority might therefore well be advised to provide now additional information for those 12 patients with so far unsatisfactory data, facilitating a more appropriate assessment of causality. Nevertheless, in the meantime physicians and patients should continue to keep an eye on possible hepatotoxic side effects in the course of kava treatment, to stop the treatment alredy at first suspicion and to start with a careful diagnostic work up ruling out all other causes.

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury↗

PubMed2002

[The use of randomisation in clinical studies in rehabilitation medicine: basics and practical aspects].

New therapies in rehabilitation medicine have to be evaluated with clinical trials. For drug approval the methodology of clinical trials is standardized world wide and the results of these studies are widely accepted. This standard should be achieved in clinical trials in rehabilitation research, too. One of the standards is the existence of a control group, comparing the effect of the new intervention against controls. In addition, the investigational and control groups must be equal in terms of the structure of possible confounders. Randomisation is the best possibility to distribute the patients to the therapy-groups, confounders will be equally distributed by chance. Other procedures for assignment to the study groups can result in confounding and lead into biased results. In spite of these advantages, randomisation is not generally accepted in rehabilitation research up to now. There are some reservations, mostly ethical, organisational and methodological ones. However, randomised clinical trials should be conducted in rehabilitation research in order to obtain more convincing results. Our intention is to bring some input in this debate and to present basics and practical aspects of randomisation.

Bias↗

PubMed2002

Camphor-Crataegus berry extract combination dose-dependently reduces tilt induced fall in blood pressure in orthostatic hypotension.

In order to test the efficacy of a combination of natural D-camphor and an extract of fresh crataegus berries (Korodin Herz-Kreislauf-Tropfen) on orthostatic hypotension, two similar, controlled, randomized studies were carried out in a balanced crossover design in 24 patients each with orthostatic dysregulation. The camphor-crataegus berry combination (CCC) was orally administered as a single regimen in 3 different dosages of 5 drops, 20 drops and 80 drops; a placebo with 20 drops of a 60% alcoholic solution served as control. Orthostatic hypotension was assessed with the tilt table test before and after medication. Source data of both studies were pooled and meta-analytically evaluated for all 48 patients. CCC drops decreased the orthostatic fall in blood pressure versus placebo, as almost uniformly established at all times by mean arterial pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Mean arterial pressure demonstrated the very fast onset of action by a clearly dose-dependent statistically significant effect even after 1-minute orthostasis. Increase of mean arterial pressure as compared to the orthostasis test before medication was on average 4.5 mmHg. CCC affected diastolic blood pressure after 1 minute of orthostasis in all dosages as compared to placebo. A statistically significant effect of the highest dose of 80 drops on diastolic blood pressure could be demonstrated after 1-, 3-, and 5-minute orthostasis. The hemodynamic findings of a stabilizing effect on arterial pressure in orthostasis corroborate the long-term medical experience with CCC and justify the indication orthostatic hypotension.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Efficacy of oral ofloxacin for single-dose perioperative prophylaxis in general surgery--a controlled randomized clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis surely reduces surgical infection rate. Pharmacokinetic data of oral ofloxacin in combination with its antibacterial spectrum suggest effective protection against perioperative infection. In addition, costs, adverse effects, and induction of microbial resistance are low. Therefore we performed a controlled randomized study comparing oral and intravenous single dose prophylaxis. METHODS: A total of 61 patients undergoing colonic or pancreatic resection randomly received either a single dose standard intravenous prophylaxis or ofloxacin 400 mg and metronidazole 500 mg orally 2 h before surgery. Postoperative infections were recorded for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Groups were very well comparable regarding age, overweight, concomitant disease, type and duration of surgery, blood loss, and volume support. Infectious complications occurred in 14.8% after parenteral and 3.3% after enteral antibiotic prophylaxis. There was no difference in post-operative hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that single-dose oral ofloxacin is at least as effective as a standard intravenous prophylaxis in patients with colonic or pancreatic resection. It offers significant advantages regarding costs and ease of administration.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2001

Randomized, multicenter trial of two different formulas for very early enteral feeding advancement in extremely-low-birth-weight infants.

BACKGROUND: In extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants, formula feeding is required if human milk is not available. The tolerance of a new 'high' lactose (55 g/L), low protein, low phosphate, hydrolyzed protein formula (HLF) for early enteral feeding advancement of ELBW infants was compared with that of a low lactose (1 g/L) hydrolyzed protein formula (LLF). METHODS: In a randomized multicenter trial, 99 ELBW infants were fed according to a standardized protocol beginning at 48 hours of age with 12 ml/kg daily increments. Primary outcome was the cumulative milk feeding volume (CFV) from days 3 to 14. The authors hypothesized that feeding HLF as a supplement to human milk would increase the CFV at least by 20% in at least 60% of matched pairs compared with LLF. A secondary issue was to investigate whether human milk would increase the CFV compared with formula. RESULTS: The CFV was 720 mL/kg (range, 0-962 mL/kg) with HLF and 613 mL/kg (range, 3-1,283 mL/kg) with LLF feeding. There was no 20% difference. On day 14, the median feeding volume was 103 mL/kg. The CFV was 533 mL/kg (range, 0-962 mL/kg) in infants who received less than 10% of human milk and 832 mL/kg (range, 74-1,283 mL/kg) in infants who received more than 10%. Necrotizing enterocolitis (Bell stage > or =2) occurred only with LLF feeding (n = 5; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study failed to find the hypothesized 20% advantage of the new HLF. The observed advantage of human milk supports the hypothesis that it should be the first diet in ELBW infants; however, this hypothesis still must be confirmed in a controlled, randomized trial.

Enteral Nutrition↗

PubMed2001

Results of applying ADCON-L gel after lumbar discectomy: the German ADCON-L study.

OBJECT: Failed-back syndrome is still an unsolved problem. Use of ADCON-L gel, already commercially available, has been proven to reduce postoperative scarring in animal experiments. The authors of two controlled clinical studies have also shown positive results when applying the gel. They did not, however, establish patient-oriented endpoints. The authors report a study of ADCON-L in which they focus on patient-oriented endpoints. METHODS: Patients with lumbar disc herniation were randomized to an ADCON-L-treated or control group. Therapeutic success was evaluated using the validated Hannover Questionnaire on Activities of Daily Living (FFbH) 6 months after surgery. The study took place between November 14. 1996, and April 20, 1998, in eight neurosurgical centers in Germany. A total of 398 patients was recruited; 41 patients dropped out during follow up. The mean functional FFbH score (100 points = all activities are possible without problem; 0 points = no activity is possible) was 78.5 points in the ADCON-L-treated group compared with 80 points in the control group. Furthermore, in terms of secondary outcome variables, the ADCON-L group did not have an advantage over the control group. Only the mean magnetic resonance imaging score showed a slight advantage of ADCON-L over the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found no positive effect of treatment with ADCON-L gel in patients in whom one-level lumbar microdiscectomy was performed. Because of its rather large sample size and its homogeneity, the study had sufficient power to detect even small differences between the two groups.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2000

Survival and prognosis: investigation of Crataegus extract WS 1442 in congestive heart failure (SPICE)--rationale, study design and study protocol.

UNLABELLED: SPICE is the first, international, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to investigate the influence of the herbal drug Crataegus Special Extract WS 1442 (hawthorn leaves with flowers) on mortality of patients suffering from congestive heart failure. BACKGROUND: In vitro and experimental animal studies have suggested the following pharmacological modes of action of standardized Crataegus extracts: (1) cAMP-independent positive inotropy; (2) peripheral and coronary vasodilation; (3) protection against ischemia-induced ventricular arrhythmias; (4) antioxidative properties; and (5) anti-inflammatory effects. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, international trial (approximately 120 investigational centers in seven European countries), up to 2300 patients with congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association class II and III and markedly impaired left ventricular function, will be enrolled and treated over a period of 24 months. During this time patients receive either two film-coated tablets of 450 mg of the Special Extract WS 1442 standardized to 84.3 mg of oligomeric procyanidines or matched placebo per day in addition to standard therapy for congestive heart failure, such as diuretics, digoxin or digitoxin, beta-adrenoceptor blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. The primary outcome variable is the combined endpoint of cardiac death, non-lethal myocardial infarction, and hospitalization due to progression of heart failure. Secondary outcome variables are total mortality, exercise duration, echocardiographic parameters, quality of life as well as pharmacoeconomic parameters. The first patient was included in October 1998. The trial is expected to be completed at the end of 2002.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Hemoglobin A1c and body mass index in children and adolescents with IDDM. An observational study from 1976-1995.

In adult patients with type 1 diabetes good metabolic control was associated with an undesired weight gain. In the present report the possible association of HbA1c and body mass index (BMI) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (IDDM) was investigated in a long-term retrospective study from 1976 to 1995. Further, the relationship between BMI on one hand and age, gender, duration of IDDM, the number of units of insulin used and the number of injections per day on the other hand were considered. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measurements analyses of variance. The 208 girls and 201 boys were 5-17 years old and had diabetes for beyond one year. For analysis 2512 data sets, in part measurements on the same patient in the course of the disease, were available. In various statistical models, the results show that age, gender, the daily amount of insulin, and the HbA1c level (p<0.001-0.005) were associated with the BMI. Extremely high HbA1c levels coincided with a remarkably low BMI. Hence, in children and adolescents with IDDM it may be difficult to achieve a constantly good metabolic control accompanied by a normal body weight.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

[Clinical studies in rehabilitation research--problems and solutions from biometrical perspective].

Methodology of clinical studies is highly sophisticated in drug research. But clinical trials are also necessary to demonstrate efficacy and safety of rehabilitation treatment. The call for evidence based medicine has also reached rehabilitation. However, in rehabilitation medicine it is much more difficult to design and conduct clinical trials with a high methodological standard. Among the reasons are: A comparable control group is necessary because spontaneous healing and unspecific measures contribute to therapeutic success, too. But what could "placebo rehabilitation" look like? The masking of therapies (blinded studies) will hardly ever be possible. Therefore, it is more difficult to achieve the same treatment and observation for the treatment and control group. Treatments in rehabilitation take longer to become effective than a drug and maybe the success will disappear after some time. Therefore, long-term trials and follow-ups are necessary. Such studies are expensive, need a strong organisation, and drop-outs are unavoidable. An appropriate outcome variable does not always exist. "Return to work" is an important, reliable and valid variable, but it delivers only one bit of information per patient. As a consequence, smaller progress in rehabilitation can only be demonstrated with large sample sizes. Outcome variables based on time enable studies with reasonable sample sizes. Sometimes it is more difficult to obtain acceptance of randomisation in rehabilitation patients than in acute patients. Some rehabilitation hospitals have only recently begun to take an interest in controlled clinical trials, hence are not so experienced. Nevertheless, controlled clinical trials delivering convincing results are possible in rehabilitation medicine as well. But biometrical consultation is necessary e.g. for study design, study conduction and evaluation. Most important points are the methodology of the study design and its practicability. Especially in these topics rehabilitation physicians and biometrician have to cooperate.

Biometry↗

PubMed2000

[Development and validation of a prognosis model for predicting work capacity after rehabilitation based on routinely collected parameters].

For efficient rehabilitation it is important to identify, as early as possible, the patients likely to be successfully returned to work after rehabilitation. The aim of this pilot study was to develop a statistical model for predicting this return as reliably as possible. The model uses only information readily available at the beginning of rehabilitation. A multiple regression analysis with backward elimination was used from a routine data base and identified 8 variables of prognostic value. The model offers a comfortable possibility to predict the probability of return to work of a patient on the basis of routinely registered data. The prognosis was found correct in 68% of those returning to work after rehabilitation (sensitivity) and in 80% of those who did not (specificity). Further work to improve the model for prognosis in rehabilitation research is considered reasonable.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Haemodialysis-membrane biocompatibility and mortality of patients with dialysis-dependent acute renal failure: a prospective randomised multicentre trial. International Multicentre Study Group.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy as to whether haemodialysis-membrane biocompatibility (ie, the potential to activate complement and neutrophils) influences mortality of patients with acute renal failure. We did a prospective randomised multicentre trial in patients with dialysis-dependent acute renal failure treated with two different types of low-flux membrane. METHODS: 180 patients with acute renal failure were randomly assigned bioincompatible Cuprophan (n=90) or polymethyl-methacrylate (n=90) membranes. The main outcome was survival 14 days after the end of therapy (treatment success). Odds ratios for survival were calculated and the two groups were compared by Fisher's exact test. Analyses were based on patients treated according to protocol (76 Cuprophan, 84 polymethyl methacrylate). FINDINGS: At the start of dialysis, the groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, severity of illness (as calculated by APACHE II scores), prevalence of oliguria, or biochemical measures of acute renal failure. 44 patients (58% [95% CI 46-69]) assigned Cuprophan membranes and 50 patients (60% [48-70]) assigned polymethyl-methacrylate membranes survived. The odds ratio for treatment failure on Cuprophan compared with polymethyl-methacrylate membranes was 1.07 (0.54-2.11; p=0.87). No difference between Cuprophan and polymethyl-methacrylate membranes was detected when the analysis was adjusted for age and APACHE II score. 18 patients in the Cuprophan group and 20 in the polymethyl-methacrylate group had clinical complications of therapy (mainly hypotension). INTERPRETATION: There were no differences in outcome for patients with dialysis-dependent acute renal failure between those treated with Cuprophan membranes and those treated with polymethyl-methacrylate membranes.

APACHE↗

PubMed1999

The procedure of new drug application and the philosophy of critical rationalism or the limits of quality assurance with good clinical practice.

K.R. Popper's philosophy of critical rationalism is concerned with the detection and removal of error. Fundamental contradictions exist between Popper's theory of knowledge and the present-day practice of the clinical investigation of new drugs. Currently, the public authorities concerned with the licensing of drugs pass judgment on trials, which are closely linked by the one-sponsor problem: the assertions made by the sponsor are not independently confirmed. This lack leads to excessive documentation and to costly monitoring and auditing, which are intended to ensure the credibility of results. In Popper's view, confirmatory trials, independent of the sponsor and supervised by the regulatory bodies, would be a better way to achieve reliable knowledge. The consequence would, among other things, be a reorganization of phase III of the clinical investigation of new drugs by dividing it into independent parts, one under the control of the sponsor and one under the control of the public authority. The implementation of this suggestion would lead to a more scientific manner of dealing with new drugs and to savings in terms of unproductive measures during the application process.

Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic↗

PubMed1999

A randomised, double blind, multicentre trial of octreotide in moderate to severe acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacological inhibition of exocrine pancreatic secretion with the somatostatin analogue octreotide has been advocated as a specific treatment of acute pancreatitis. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of octreotide in acute pancreatitis in a randomised, placebo controlled trial. METHODS: 302 patients from 32 hospitals, fulfilling the criteria for moderate to severe acute pancreatitis within 96 hours of the onset of symptoms, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: group P (n=103) received placebo, while groups O1 (n=98) and O2 (n=101) received 100 and 200 microg of octreotide, respectively, by subcutaneous injection three times daily for seven days. The primary outcome variable was a score composed of mortality and 15 typical complications of acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: The three groups were well matched with respect to pretreatment characteristics. An intent to treat analysis of all 302 patients revealed no significant differences among treatment groups with respect to mortality (P: 16%; O1: 15%; O2: 12%), the rate of newly developed complications, the duration of pain, surgical interventions, or the length of the hospital stay. A valid for efficacy analysis (251 patients) also revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This trial shows no benefit of octreotide in the treatment of acute pancreatitis.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1999

An epidemiologic survey of human alveolar echinococcosis in southwestern Germany. Römerstein Study Group.

The inhabitants of a rural community in southwestern Germany were examined for alveolar echinococcosis (AE). The study was prompted by the recent increase of the prevalence of the parasite in foxes and the increase of fox populations: in the study area, 75% of the foxes carried Echinococcus multilocularis. The human population was screened using hepatic ultrasound and serology. All participants were interviewed for demographic and potential risk factors. Of 2,560 participants, one was identified with active AE, while 3 others had suspicious liver lesions. Another 9 participants were seropositive for specific antibodies without detectable lesions. Demographic and behavioral factors were not correlated with active or suspected cases nor with seropositivity. If the prevalence of 40/100,000 (95% confidence interval = 15-295/100,000) for active cases would be representative for the rural population in high endemicity areas, the current number of AE cases in southwestern Germany is considerably higher than previously suspected.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

[Comparative study of the cost-effectiveness of initial therapy with imipenem/cilastatin in secondary peritonitis].

The total costs of the hospital treatment of patients with secondary peritonitis were investigated with a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of an initial therapy with Imipenem/Cilastatin was compared to selected alternative antibiotic regimens. Altogether 154 patients (77 Imipenem/Cilastatin group, 77 alternative group) that displayed Mannheim Peritonitis Scores between 16 and 26 (average 20.8) were analyzed. The average total cost of treatment was DM 11,140 per patient (range DM 2794-45,526). Patients receiving an initial therapy with Imipenem/Cilastatin incurred average costs of DM 10,455, while patients with alternative regimens caused average costs of DM 11,826. The difference between the two treatment groups was statistically significant (P = 0.037).

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Randomized observational studies on the economics of therapies--biometrical experience of two trials.

Economic studies in medicine are intended to investigate costs, associated with a particular problem dealing with the indication, diagnosis or therapy, for instance, whether the high costs involved in a highly intensive or innovative therapy could be balanced by the eventual savings made, due to the shorter periods of treatment. In such situations a randomized controlled trial is necessary to find out which therapy or which therapeutical strategy is least expensive in the long run. Economic studies do, however, present some specific problems. Making a list of all the cost-relevant treatment items can be very laborious, but the use of flat rates and lump sums alone cannot lead to a complete cost analysis. Often, costs between hospitals vary more than between treatment regimens. Early and sudden deaths incur low costs and may bias the results. Furthermore, costs are distributed with a long and heavy upper tail including extreme outliers. This does, in fact, complicate the estimation of the sample size. In this article, these problems are outlined and, with the help of the data obtained from two randomized economic trials in health care, solutions are proposed and discussed.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

PubMed1997

Systemic scleroderma. Multicenter trial of 1 year of treatment with recombinant interferon gamma.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm significant improvement of the skin score in systemic sclerosis by treatment with interferon gamma in a larger group of patients and to investigate on a molecular level the influence of interferon gamma on collagen type I messenger RNA expression. DESIGN: Open, noncontrolled multicenter study. SETTING: Five outpatient clinics specializing in the care of systemic scleroderma. PATIENTS: Thirty-two patients suffering from the diffuse or limited form of systemic sclerosis and progressive disease were recruited; 20 patients finished the study. INTERVENTION: Each patient received interferon gamma, 50 micrograms subcutaneously 3 times a week for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Skin score, collagen type I messenger RNA in skin biopsy specimens. RESULTS: The patients who completed the study showed an unchanged median skin score after 1 year of therapy. In addition, similar collagen type I messenger RNA levels were detected in skin biopsy specimens taken from involved skin before and after therapy in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of systemic scleroderma with interferon gamma is associated with stabilization of the skin score and lack of worsening of visceral involvement.

Female↗

PubMed1997

Quantitative liver function tests as surrogate markers for end-points in controlled clinical trials: a retrospective feasibility study.

Quantitative liver function tests such as the determination of galactose elimination capacity (GEC) or the aminopyrine breath test (ABT) may have the potential to serve as refined entry criteria and surrogate markers for end-points in controlled clinical trials. The magnitude of a statistically detectable difference in test results and the period of observation required to document such a difference must be known to properly design such trials. Therefore, we explored retrospectively the time course of changes in GEC and ABT and their reproducibility from a cohort of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis followed for 12 to 42 months, with a median of 34 months. In 15 patients who stopped drinking, GEC improved significantly by 0.64 mg/min/kg within 1 year (mean; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42; 0.86). In contrast, it deteriorated by 0.53 mg/min/kg within 1 year (95% CI: 0.32; 0.74) in another 17 patients who continued to drink (P < .01). The residual standard deviation of the changes in GEC with respect to the patients' initial values was 0.43 mg/min/kg (95% CI: 0.32; 0.52). In addition, ABT improved significantly by 0.14% dose x kg/mmol CO2 (95% CI: 0.09; 0.18) in the abstinent group, and deteriorated by 0.09% dose x kg/mmol CO2 (95% CI: 0.06; 0.13) in the nonabstinent group (P < .01). The residual standard deviation in the above sense for ABT was 0.08% dose x kg/mmol CO2 (95% CI: 0.06; 0.10). These data indicate that clinical trials with a sample size of n = 20 in each group must achieve absolute differences (ADs) in GEC of 0.6 mg/min/kg and of 0.7 mg/min/kg to reach statistical significance at the 5% and 1% level, respectively. In the present study, a period of 11 and 12 months was necessary to observe such differences. The corresponding results for the ABT are 0.11% dose x kg/mmol CO2 (9 months of follow-up; 5% level) and 0.13% dose x kg/mmol CO2 (11 months of observation; 1% level), respectively. Provided that patients with liver diseases treated with drugs are similar to the abstinent and nonabstinent patients with alcoholic liver disease investigated in this study, such numbers could serve for the planning of controlled clinical trials, in which the control group is likely to deteriorate and the treated group is expected to improve. Trials based on GEC or ABT would require only 37 or 30 patient years of observation compared with a median of 444 patient years (range, 50-2,100 patient years) reported for various published controlled clinical trials using survival analysis.

Adult↗