Biomedical subjects

W G Darling

Publications and source records attributed to W G Darling.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations.

The abilities of human subjects to perform reach and grasp movements to remembered locations/orientations of a cylindrical object were studied under four conditions: (1) visual presentation of the object-reach with vision allowed; (2) visual presentation-reach while blindfolded; (3) kinesthetic presentation of the object-reach while blindfolded and (4) kinesthetic presentation-reach with vision. The results showed that subjects were very accurate in locating the object in the purely kinesthetic condition and that directional errors were low in all four conditions; but, predictable errors in reach distance occurred in conditions 1,2, and 4. The pattern of these distance errors was similar to that identified in previous research using a pointing task to a small target (i.e., overshoots of close targets, undershoots of far targets). The observation that the pattern of distance errors in condition 4 was similar to that of conditions 1 and 2 suggests that subjects transform kinesthetically defined hand locations into a visual coordinate system when vision is available during upper limb motion to a remembered kinesthetic target. The differences in orientation of the upper limb between target and reach positions in condition 3 were similar in magnitude to the errors associated with kinesthetic perceptions of arm and hand orientations in three-dimensional space reported in previous studies. However, fingertip location was specified with greater accuracy than the orientation of upper limb segments. This was apparently accomplished by compensation of variations in shoulder (arm) angles with oppositely directed variations in elbow joint angles. Subjects were also able to transform visually perceived object orientation into an appropriate hand orientation for grasp, as indicated by the relation between hand roll angle and object orientation (elevation angle). The implications of these results for control of upper limb motion to external targets are discussed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Is there a preferred coordinate system for perception of hand orientation in three-dimensional space?

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the preferred coordinate system for representation of hand orientation in 3-dimensional space. The ability of human subjects to perceive angles of the hand in 3-dimensional space (elevation, yaw, roll angles-extrinsic coordinate system) was compared to their ability to perceive hand angles relative to the proximal upper limb segments (wrist joint angles, forearm pronation-intrinsic coordinate system). With eyes closed, subjects performed a matching task in which the experimenter positioned the left arm, forearm and hand and the right arm and forearm. Subjects were then told to match an angle in one of the two coordinate systems by moving only the right hand at the wrist or the forearm as in pronation or roll matching. Absolute constant error (ACE), variable error (VE) and normalized variable error (NVE-normalized to tested range of motion) of matching were quantified for each subject for each of the six angles matched. It was hypothesized that matching angles in a preferred coordinate system would be associated with lower ACE, VE and NVE. Overall, ACE and VE were lower for matching hand angles in the intrinsic coordinate system. This suggests that the preferred coordinate system involved specification of hand angles relative to forearm and arm angles (joint angles) rather than the hand angles relative to axes external to the upper limb. However, matching of pronation angles was associated with larger VE and NVE than roll angle matching. There were no significant differences in ACE between pronation and roll matching. In a second experiment subjects with their forearms constrained at different elevations matched hand elevation and wrist flexion angles. Thus, errors in matching the angles in the non-preferred coordinate system were predictable if the subjects were biased toward matching angles in the preferred coordinate system. Trends in the data suggested that subjects preferred matching hand elevation angles but these trends were not consistent within or between subjects. Thus a preferred intrinsic coordinate system for wrist flexion matching was not observed in this experiment. We suggest that matching angles when proximal limb segments are constrained is a simpler task for the subjects (VE lower than in the first experiment) and may bias the matching toward the extrinsic coordinate system. Thus, hand orientation in 3-dimensional space may be perceived as follows: wrist flexion and abduction angles together with forearm elevation and yaw are used to specify hand elevation and yaw; these together with hand roll angle, completely specify the hand angle in 3-dimensional space.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Perception of forearm angles in 3-dimensional space.

The purpose of this study was to determine a preferred coordinate system for representation of forearm orientation in 3-dimensional space. In one experiment, the ability of human subjects to perceive angles of the forearm in 3-dimensional space (forearm elevation and yaw--extrinsic coordinate system) was compared to their ability to perceive elbow joint angle (intrinsic coordinate system). While blindfolded, subjects performed an angle reproduction task in which the experimenter first positioned the upper limb in a reference trial. This was followed, after movement of the subject's entire upper limb to a different position, by an attempt to reproduce or match a criterior angle of the reference trial by motion of the forearm in elbow flexion or extension only. Note that matching of the criterion forearm angle in the new upper limb position could not be accomplished by reproducing the entire reference upper limb position, but only by angular motion at the elbow. Matching of all 3 criterion angles was accomplished with about equal accuracy in terms of absolute constant errors and variable errors. Correlation analysis of the perceptual errors showed that forearm elevation and elbow angle perception errors were not biased but that forearm yaw angle matching showed a bias toward elbow angle matching in 7 of 9 subjects. That is errors in forearm yaw perception were attributed to a tendency toward a preferred intrinsic coordinate system for perception of forearm orientation. These results show that subjects can accurately perceive angles in both extrinsic and intrinsic coordinate systems in 3-dimensional space. Thus, these data conflict with previous reports of highly inaccurate perception of elbow joint angles in comparison to perception of forearm elevation. In an attempt to resolve this conflict with previous results, a second experiment was carried out in which perception of forearm elevation and elbow joint angles with the forearm motion constrained to a vertical plane. Results of this experiment showed that during a two-limb elbow angle matching task, four of five subjects exhibited a clear bias toward forearm elevation angle. During a one-limb angle reproduction task only two of five subjects exhibited such a bias. Perception of elevation angles show little bias toward elbow angle matching.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Muscle activation patterns and kinetics of human index finger movements.

1. The present study was conducted to determine whether dynamic interaction torques are significant for control of digit movements and to investigate whether such torques are compensated by specific muscle activation patterns. 2. Angular positions of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the index finger in the flexion/extension plane were recorded with the use of planar electrogoniometers. Muscle activation patterns were monitored with the use of fine wire and surface electromyography of intrinsic and extrinsic finger muscles. 3. Dynamic interaction torques associated with index finger movements were large in relation to joint torques produced by muscles, especially in faster movements. The significance of dynamic interaction torques was demonstrated in model simulations of two-joint finger motion in response to joint torque inputs. Removal of interaction torques from the model inputs produced movements that differed greatly from digit motions produced by human subjects. 4. Electromyogram (EMG) and torque patterns associated with finger movements of different speeds indicated that muscle activity is necessary not only for producing motion at the joints but also to counteract segmental interaction torques. This was especially evident during movements that required voluntary maintenance of a constant MP joint angle during motion of the distal segment about the PIP joint. Under these conditions, muscle moments acting at the MP acted directly to counteract torques at the MP arising from motion at the PIP. 5. Neural mechanisms underlying control of index finger movement are discussed with reference to the implications of dynamic interaction torques. Potential control strategies include accurate programming of muscle activation patterns, appropriate use of motion-dependent peripheral afferent information, and control of the finger as a viscoelastic system through coactivation of flexor and extensor musculature. It is concluded that additional research incorporating study of motion in three dimensions and the use of mechanical models of the finger and related musculature is required to determine how interaction torques are compensated during finger motion.

Female↗

PubMed1988

Kinematic variability of grasp movements as a function of practice and movement speed.

Grasp movements were studied in six female subjects to determine the effects of practice and movement speed on kinematics and movement variability. Subjects performed four-joint pinch movements of the index finger and thumb, with 200 repetitions at each of three durations (100, 200, and 400 ms). As observed previously, movements of high velocity were performed with bell-shaped, single-peaked velocity profiles. In contrast, slower movements (approximately 200, 400 ms) were performed as a series of two to four submovements with multiple peaks in the associated joint angular velocity profiles. With practice, only the slowest movements (400 ms duration) showed significant reductions in variability of joint end-positions. Surprisingly, variability of finger and thumb joint end-positions did not increase with increasing movement speed as has been observed for arm pointing movements. This was apparently due to reductions in positional variability during deceleration of the movement which offset increases in positional variability during acceleration. Neither practice nor movement speed affected variability of the location of fingertip contact on the thumb, which always occurred on the thumb distal pulpar surface.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1987

Changes in the variability of movement trajectories with practice.

We studied variability in movement phase plane trajectories (velocity-position relation) during movement. Human subjects performed 10 degrees and 30 degrees elbow flexion and extension movements in a visual step tracking paradigm. The area of ellipses with radii equal to one standard deviation in position and velocity was taken as a measure of trajectory variability. Trajectory variability was determined at 10-ms intervals throughout movements. Trajectory variability in both the acceleration and deceleration phases of movement decreased with practice. The average trajectory variability during deceleration was greater than that during acceleration even after extended practice (1000 trials). During practice, subjects usually increased movement speed while maintaining end-position accuracy. Trajectory variability was also related to movement speed when equal amounts of practice were given. Short duration (fast) movements had greater trajectory variability than long duration movements. Thus there is a tradeoff between movement speed and trajectory variability similar to the classical speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trajectory variability increased rapidly during the acceleratory phase of movement. The rate of increase was positively related to both movement amplitude and speed. Thus, the forces producing limb acceleration were variable and this variability was more marked in faster and larger movements. In contrast, trajectory variability increased more slowly or actually decreased during the deceleratory phase of movements. Forces involved in limb deceleration thus appeared to compensate to a greater or lesser degree for the variability in accelerative forces. The experiments indicate that the entire trajectory of simple limb movements is controlled by the central nervous system. Variations in accelerative forces may be compensated for by associated variations in decelerative forces. The linkage between accelerative and decelerative forces is progressively refined with practice resulting in decreased variability of the movement trajectory.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1987

Movement related EMGs become more variable during learning of fast accurate movements.

Human subjects performed simple flexion and extension movements about the elbow in a visual step-tracking paradigm. Movements were self-terminated. Subjects were instructed to increase movement velocity while maintaining end-point accuracy during practice. The effects of practice on the pattern and variability of EMG activity of the biceps and triceps muscles were studied. Initial movements were performed using reciprocal phasic activation of agonist and antagonist muscles as indicated by surface EMGs. With practice, increases in movement speed were associated with larger agonist and antagonist bursts and an earlier onset of the antagonist burst. Decreased duration of the premovement antagonist silence was also observed during practice. Decreases in variability of movements during practice were not accompanied by equivalent decreases in variability of the associated EMGs. Surprisingly, both agonist and antagonist EMGs were more variable in faster, practiced movements. The combined agonist-antagonist EMG variability depended on both movement speed and trajectory variability. Lower variability in movements in the presence of greater variability in the related EMGs occurred because of linked variations in agonist and antagonist muscle activities. Variations in the first agonist burst were often compensated for by associated variations in the antagonist and late agonist bursts. These linked variations maintained the limb trajectory relatively constant in spite of large variations in the first agonist burst. Modifications to impulse-variability models are therefore needed to explain compensations for variability in accelerative impulses (produced by the first agonist burst) by linked variations in impulses for deceleration (produced by the antagonist and late agonist bursts).

Journal Article↗

PubMed1987

A linked muscular activation model for movement generation and control.

A new model for movement control is presented which incorporates characteristics of impulse-variability and mass-spring models. Movements in the model were controlled with phasic torque impulses in agonist and antagonist muscles and a tonic agonist torque. Characteristics of the phasic agonist and antagonist torque profiles were based on observed properties of movement-related EMGs and muscle isometric torques. Variability of the phasic impulses depended on impulse magnitude as in impulse-variability models. The model therefore predicted a speed-accuracy tradeoff for limb movement. The time of onset and magnitude of the antagonist torque depended on the magnitude of the preceding agonist torque as indicated in studies of movement-related EMGs. This led to the new concept of linkage between the agonist and antagonist muscle forces which was shown to be important for reducing variability of fast movements. Progressive development of linkage during practice could explain the previous findings of decreased movement variability with practice coupled with increased variability of movement-related EMGs. It was concluded that an inherently variable motor system deals with the variability associated with generation of large muscle forces by linking the forces produced by opposing muscles. In this way, variability in net joint torques and in movements can be decreased without the need for the nervous system to closely regulate the individual torques.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1983

Human servo responses to load disturbances in fatigued muscle.

Short and long latency EMG responses to muscle stretch and shortening were investigated in the triceps brachii muscle of 16 human subjects during a fatiguing isometric contraction. Increased amplitude reflex responses to stretch, and accentuated reductions in EMG in response to shortening, were evident as fatigue progressed in the majority of subjects. These changes indicate internal compensatory adjustments in the nervous system offsetting the deleterious mechanical effects of muscular fatigue.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Control of simple arm movements in elderly humans.

Eight elderly subjects (aged 68-95 years) and 6 young adults (aged 21-24 years) performed elbow flexion and extension movements in a visual step-tracking paradigm. Movement amplitudes ranging from 10 degrees-80 degrees were made under two instructions: "move at own speed" and "move fast and accurate." In a second experiment, 5 elderly subjects practiced 30 degrees movements for a total of 180 flexion and 180 extension movements under the instruction to increase movement speed, while maintaining accuracy, during practice. Movement trajectories became more variable as both movement amplitude and speed increased. Trajectory variability was greater in the elderly subjects for both the acceleratory and deceleratory phases of movements. This was due primarily to a greater rate of increase in trajectory variability during the acceleration phase in the elderly. With practice, elderly subjects could substantially reduce trajectory variability with little change in movement speed. The agonist burst initiating movements was qualitatively normal in the elderly subjects. However, there was considerable tonic cocontraction of agonist and antagonist muscles prior to and during movement. Phasic antagonist EMG activity was obviously abnormal in many elderly subjects. There was often no clear antagonist burst associated with deceleration of the movements or, if present, it was timed inappropriately early. With practice, combined agonist-antagonist EMG variability decreased. A clear antagonist burst also developed during practice in most elderly subjects, but its inappropriate timing remained in all but one subject. The results show that movement trajectories are less accurately controlled in the elderly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗