Presidential address: the role of AAMD in the 1970s.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W D White.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
When surgeons consider ventricular assist devices (VADs) for post-cardiotomy support, unnecessary delays and early use can have detrimental effects on patient outcome. The authors analyzed the timing of intraoperative events in all patients receiving post-cardiotomy VAD support at their institution during a 2-1/2 year period (N = 17). They used ability to wean patients from VAD support as a measure of outcome. Neither preoperative risk factors nor the timing of distinct intraoperative events (e.g., cross-clamp time, total bypass time, delay to VAD) significantly differed between those patients able (Group I, n = 9) and those unable (Group II, n = 8) to be weaned from VAD support. The authors did find, however, that the time intervals from completion of the cardiac procedure to insertion of either an intra-aortic balloon pump (time to IABP) or VAD (time to VAD) were predictive of outcome when normalized to the duration of the cardiac procedure (DCP). [Time to IABP]/DCP ratios of < 1.0 versus > 1.0 (p = 0.02) and [time to VAD]/DCP ratios of < 2.5 versus > 2.5 (p = 0.10) each segregated Group I and II patients, respectively. Appropriate timing criteria for VAD insertion may be predicted during surgery by consideration of the duration of the cardiac procedure. This approach may attenuate tendencies to delay VAD use without leading to premature VAD insertion in the post-cardiotomy setting.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Drawing on a nationally representative survey of physicians, this paper examines the extent to which physicians split their time between primary care and non-primary care activities and whether managed care makes a difference. We find that managed care does matter: Physicians have been narrowing their scope of practice, and the trend is linked to their involvement with managed care plans. These findings have implications for workforce policy and training, regulation of managed care contracting, and the quality of care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of managed care on the employment and compensation of primary care and specialty physicians, as measured by changes in income, physician-to-population ratios, and specialty choices. METHODS: The authors used data from the American Medical Association's Socioeconomic Monitoring System survey, a nationally representative 1% random survey of post-residency patient-care physicians, and location data from the AMA Masterfile to evaluate the relationship between the growth in managed care from 1985 to 1993 and (a) inflation-adjusted physician incomes and (b) physician-to-population ratios for primary care physicians and specialists. They also used data from the National Residency Matching Program for 1989 through 1995 to look at trends in available positions and specialty choices. RESULTS: Primary care incomes grew 4.78% annually ($33,526 cumulatively) in states with the highest managed care growth, compared to 1.20% ($7448 cumulatively) in the lowest quartile of managed care growth. The difference in income growth for medical and surgical subspecialists between the highest and lowest quartiles was not statistically significant. The incomes of radiologists, anesthesiologists, and pathologists (RAPs) rose 0.14%, or $1700, in the highest quartile versus 4.14% ($58,558) in the lowest. Subspecialists per capita did not differ by quartile of managed care growth; but RAPs per capita increased fastest in states in the lowest quartile. Between 1989 and 1995, the number of family practice and pediatric residency positions that were filled rose 32%, while the number filled remained stable for medical and surgical subspecialists and the number of RAP positions filled fell 14%. CONCLUSIONS: The growth in managed care has been associated with significant changes in physician incomes and practice locations. Between 1985 and 1993, states with the fastest growth in managed care penetration saw the highest rate of growth in primary care physicians' income and the slowest rate of growth in RAP physicians' income. At the same time, the number of RAP physicians grew most rapidly in those states with the lowest rate of managed care growth. Finally, between 1989 and 1995, there was a dramatic increase in the number of primary care residency positions filled and a marked decrease in the number of RAP residency positions filled across the country.