Biomedical subjects

W D Hopkins

Publications and source records attributed to W D Hopkins.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

Hemispheric specialization in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for a relation with gender and arousal.

The current study extends previous documentation of behavioral asymmetries in hand-to-mouth, self-consoling behaviors of infant chimpanzees. The underlying source of lateralized hand-to-mouth, self-calming behavior was investigated by comparing individual differences in neonatal arousal levels, regulatory ability, and motor performance with individual differences in the degree of laterality at 3 months. Asymmetrical hand-to-mouth, self-calming behaviors at 3 months of age were significantly related to general arousal at 2 days of age (i.e., the Range of State cluster scores measured by the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale). Simply stated, chimpanzees with a right-hand bias in hand-to-mouth behavior exhibited lower arousal at 2 days of age compared with nonright-handed individuals. The only item of the Range of State cluster to distinguish subjects was irritability: Right-handed subjects were less irritable. Previously, a trend was reported with respect to sex differences in the laterality of hand-to-mouth behavior. With the greater number of subjects in the present study, we found that females exhibited a significantly greater right-hand bias for hand-to-mouth behaviors (12 of 13) than did males (9 of 15). We conclude that neonatal arousability, and not regulatory capacity or motor performance, predicts the degree of laterality found in hand-to-mouth, self-calming behaviors in 3-month-old chimpanzees. These data are discussed from the standpoint of early pari-parturitional or intrauterine factors affecting lateralized development.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Perception of human chimeric faces by chimpanzees: evidence for a right hemisphere advantage.

The aim of this study was to investigate hemispheric advantages in the processing of human chimeric faces by chimpanzees using a free-vision task developed by Levy, Heller, Banich, and Burton (1983a). Subjects were taught a visual discrimination in which they were to select the human face that appeared "happiest" when paired with its neutral counterpart. After reaching criterion, chimeric faces were substituted as test trials, and the face the subjects selected was recorded. On 62% of the trials, three chimpanzee subjects selected the face in which the smiling half fell in the left hemispatial field. Familiarity factors appear to have accounted for some of the observed findings. We believe this is the first evidence for hemispheric advantages in the perception of human faces by great apes.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Mirror-image matching and mental rotation problem solving by baboons (Papio papio): unilateral input enhances performance.

Three experiments, using a matching-to-sample procedure, were conducted to examine hemispheric specialization in mirror-image discrimination and mental rotation in baboons (Papio papio). In Experiment 1, no significant difference was found in discrimination of mirror-image and asymmetric pattern stimuli. In Experiment 2, orientation discrimination was assessed within the left (LVF) and right (RVF) visual half-fields. An RVF advantage was found in accuracy for asymmetric patterns, whereas an LVF advantage was found for discrimination of mirror-image stimuli. No significant relation was found between angular disparity of the stimuli and response time. Experiment 3 examined the effect of bilateral visual input on accuracy and response time. Significantly lower accuracy and longer response times were found for bilateral compared with unilateral visual input.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Posture and reaching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).

Hand preference in reaching was assessed under 2 postural adjustment conditions in 40 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and 9 orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). The postural conditions were quadrupedal and upright, during which reaching for food was scored on a minimum of 50 trials. Results indicated no population preference during quadrupedal reaching but a right-hand population preference was found during upright reaching. There were no significant effects of age or sex on either the direction or strength of hand preference. Early rearing history affected the strength of hand preference but not direction. The results suggest that posture is an important factor in the assessment of hand preference in great apes and may have important evolutionary consequences.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Behavioral laterality in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Behavioral laterality was studied in a captive group of 11 bonobos (Pan paniscus). In an observational method a significant left lateral bias in carrying and a right lateral bias in leading limb were found. Direction of lateral bias in carrying and leading limb was enhanced when subjects maintained a bipedal posture. Analysis of bimanual feeding behavior revealed a significant right-hand bias for eating when subjects were holding food with their left hand. In an experimental method a significant shift toward greater right-hand use was found when subjects were required to maintain a bipedal, rather than a quadrupedal, posture. There was no evidence of lateral bias for measures of face touching, self-touching, or gestures. The results are discussed in the context of previous reports of primate laterality.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Hand movements and hemispheric specialization in dichhaptic explorations.

Dichhaptic testing has been widely used to assess lateralization in tactile processing. The rationale of dichhaptic testing is that simultaneous exploration of two objects enhances competition between relevant cortical areas in the right and left hemispheres. The synchronization of hand movements in a dichhaptic situation was investigated to determine whether both hands explore the two shapes simultaneously. Fourteen men were tested with the aid of a dichhaptic intermodal task. Tactile stimuli were composite shapes and the activity of each hand was assessed through analysis of hand contacts on each part of the shape. Only 20% of the total exploration time was devoted to simultaneous investigation of the two shapes. In addition, it was found that (i) the recognition accuracy was greater when the target shape was explored by the left hand compared with the right, and (ii) the left hand touched a greater number of parts of the stimuli than the right. Overall, comparison of the present data with those from a previous, monohaptic, task with the same stimuli suggests an advantage of dichhaptic over monohaptic testing to demonstrate laterality differences in accuracy of recognition. However, it is suggested that this advantage is due to cognitive factors rather than to competition between homologous cortical areas.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Assessment of hand preference in two language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): a multimethod analysis.

The nonhuman primate literature concludes that monkeys and apes do not exhibit handedness preferences at the population level. This discrepancy between human and nonhuman primate findings may be due to differences in the methods of assessment of handedness, lack of reliability between various measures of handedness, and a paucity of studies involving great apes. This paper presents the results of extensive hand preference studies with two language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Both naturalistic and experimental paradigms are described. In particular, various methodologic factors involved in handedness assessment, including the use of a hand preference measure previously used with human subjects were examined. Both chimpanzees exhibited a right-hand preference for fine motor tasks requiring manual dexterity.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Hemispheric priming by meaningful and nonmeaningful symbols in language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): further evidence of a left hemisphere advantage.

Hemispheric priming was examined in 3 language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) using a simple reaction time paradigm. Subjects were required to hold down a response button until the occurrence of a response cue. A warning stimulus was presented to either the left visual field (LVF) or the right visual field (RVF) before the response cue occurred. No warning stimulus was presented on control trials. The warning stimuli were geometric communicative symbols from two semantic categories: foods and tools. A third set of warning stimuli were familiar geometric symbols. Dependent measures included reaction time and the number of false-positive responses. Reaction-time data indicated an RVF advantage in priming when the warning stimuli were food or tool symbols. No significant visual half-field differences were found for familiar symbols, but a trend toward an RVF advantage was observed. These effects were enhanced when subjects responded with their left hand. False-positive data also indicated an RVF advantage for the food and tool warning stimuli. The data indicate that hemispheric asymmetries for processing communicative symbols are present in language-trained chimpanzees.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Behavioral asymmetries of psychomotor performance in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): a dissociation between hand preference and skill.

Hand preferences were recorded for 35 rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) as they manipulated a joystick in response to 2 computerized tasks. These preferences were then used to contrast 8 left- and 10 right-handed subjects on performance measures of hand skill. Individual hand preferences were found, but no significant population asymmetry was observed across the sample. However, the performance data reveal substantial benefits of right-handedness for joystick manipulation, as this group of monkeys mastered the 2 psychomotor tasks significantly faster than did their left-handed counterparts. The data support earlier reports of a right-hand advantage for joystick manipulation and also support the importance of distinguishing between hand preference and manual performance in research on functional asymmetries.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Evidence for asymmetrical hemispheric priming using known and unknown warning stimuli in two language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

In this article results are reported from 3 warning stimulus-priming experiments that assessed hemisphere-specific activation and lateralization in 2 language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Results from Experiment 1 indicated a right visual field advantage in priming for meaningful warning stimuli presented in blocks of 36 trials. In Experiments 2 and 3, randomized presentations of meaningful, familiar, and meaningless stimuli resulted in right visual field advantages for meaningful warning stimuli. No visual half-field differences were found for familiar or meaningless warning stimuli. The findings are similar to those found in human subjects using known-unknown symbol paradigms; they suggest that basic phylogenetic neuropsychological systems related to activation and priming processes may link nonhuman primate and human studies of lateralization.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Perceived control in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): enhanced video-task performance.

This investigation was designed to determine whether perceived control effects found in humans extend to rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) tested in a video-task format, using a computer-generated menu program, SELECT. Choosing one of the options in SELECT resulted in presentation of 5 trials of a corresponding task and subsequent return to the menu. In Experiments 1-3, the animals exhibited stable, meaningful response patterns in this task (i.e., they made choices). In Experiment 4, performance on tasks that were selected by the animals significantly exceeded performance on identical tasks when assigned by the experimenter under comparable conditions (e.g., time of day, order, variety). The reliable and significant advantage for performance on selected tasks, typically found in humans, suggests that rhesus monkeys were able to perceive the availability of choices.

Achievement↗

PubMed1990

Processing of form stimuli presented unilaterally in humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Visual forms were unilaterally presented using a video-task paradigm to 10 humans, 3 chimpanzees, and 2 rhesus monkeys to determine whether hemispheric advantages existed in the processing of these stimuli. Both accuracy and reaction time served as dependent measures. For the chimpanzees, a significant right hemisphere advantage was found within the first 3 test sessions. The humans and monkeys failed to show a hemispheric advantage as determined by accuracy scores. Analysis of reaction time data revealed a significant left hemisphere advantage for the monkeys. A Visual Half-Field x Block interaction was found for the chimpanzees, with a significant left visual field advantage in Block 2, whereas a right visual field advantage was found in Block 4. In the human subjects, a left visual field advantage was found in Block 3 when they used their right hands to respond. The results are discussed in relation to recent reports of hemispheric advantages for nonhuman primates.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Effects of competition on video-task performance in monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

The effects of competition on performance of a video-formatted task were examined in a series of experiments. Two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained to manipulate a joystick to shoot at moving targets on a computer screen. The task was made competitive by requiring both animals to shoot at the same target and by rewarding only the animal that hit the target first each trial. The competitive task produced a significant and robust speed-accuracy trade-off in performance. The monkeys hit the target in significantly less time on contested than on uncontested trials. However, they required significantly more shots to hit the target on contested trials in relation to uncontested trials. This effect was unchanged when various schedules of reinforcement were introduced in the uncontested trials. This supports the influence of competition qua competition on performance, a point further bolstered by other findings of of behavioral contrast presented here.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Lateral bias in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

This study documents the presence, strength, and direction of lateralization in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) over the first 3 months of life. Nursery-reared chimpanzees (7 males and 5 females) were repeatedly assessed on a behavioral scale. Lateral bias was measured for 4 behaviors: hand-to-mouth, hand-to-hand, defensive grasp, and first step. Hand-to-mouth was significantly lateralized for the sample. Eight of the 10 chimpanzees that showed hand-to-mouth used the right hand. Lateral bias for defensive grasp was positively related to lateral bias both of first step and of hand-to-mouth. Lateral bias in hand-to-mouth was inversely related to lateral bias in hand-to-hand. Strength of lateralization increased as chimpanzees matured. These laterality effects in infant chimpanzees were expressed under conditions of emotional arousal. Moreover, degree of laterality may be a predictor of responsivity to stress.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

The NASA/LRC Computerized Test System.

A new testing package, including apparatus and tasks, is described for the study of behavior of a variety of species in a variety of experiments. The package is described with respect to the kinds of comparative psychological investigations for which it is well suited. The preliminary data generated within this new testing paradigm demonstrate that the NASA/LRC Computerized Test System provides a flexible yet powerful environment for the investigation of behavioral and psychological processes.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Lana chimpanzee learns to count by "NUMATH": a summary of a videotaped experimental report.

This paper summarizes a videotaped presentation (Rumbaugh, Savage-Rumbaugh, Hopkins, Washburn, & Runfeldt, 1987) of computerized training programs whereby an adult female chimpanzee, Lana (Pan troglodytes), learned to use a joystick to remove from a screen the number of boxes appropriate to the value of a randomly selected Arabic numeral 1, 2, or 3. Initial training provided a variety of cues, both numeric and otherwise, to support correct performance. Across software programs, all cues other than numeric ones were deleted. In the final test, Lana was correct on over 80% of trials in which there was no residual feedback of intratrial events and where only her memory of those events could provide the cue to indicate that she had removed boxes in accordance with the value of the target numbers and should terminate the trial. The tape is narrated and consists of video recordings of Lana's performance on each software program.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Laterality for visual-spatial processing in two language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Most reviews of laterality in nonhuman primates indicate that hemispheric asymmetries, similar to those found in humans, are not evident. With the growing evidence for cognitive processes germane to language in apes, in addition to their phylogenetic similarity to humans, they appear to be useful candidates for studies of laterality. Laterality for visual-spatial processing in two language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) was investigated with a visual half-field paradigm. Initially, the chimpanzees were taught to manipulate a joystick that controlled the movement of a cursor on a computer monitor to a central fixation point. Subjects were then taught a visual discrimination based on the location of a short line contained within a geometric form. Testing consisted of systematic presentation rates of 15, 122, and 226 ms to the left and right visual fields. For half of the trials, subjects used their left hand to respond and, alternately, used the right hand for the remaining trials. Accuracy and reaction time were the dependent measures. One subject demonstrated significantly faster reaction times to stimuli presented to the left visual field (LVF) regardless of which hand was used to respond. The other subject demonstrated a significant LVF bias when using the left hand to respond. The results are discussed in the context of current theories on the evolution of laterality and its relation to linguistic functioning.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), video tasks, and implications for stimulus-response spatial contiguity.

Recent reports (Iwai, Yaginuma, & Mishkin, 1986; Yaginuma & Iwai, 1986) have supported the earlier conclusion by Meyer, Treichler, and Meyer (1965) and by Stollnitz (1965) that the efficiency of primate learning is compromised to the degree that there is spatial discontiguity between discriminanda and the locus of response. The research reported in this article calls for a reconsideration of this conclusion. Two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) easily mastered precise control of a joystick to respond to a variety of computer-generated targets despite the fact that the joystick was located 9 to 18 cm from the video screen. We hold that stimulus-response contiguity is a significant parameter of learning only to the degree that the monkey visually attends to the directional movements of its hand in order to displace discriminanda as in the Wisconsin General Test Apparatus. If, instead, attention is focused on the effects of the hand's movement rather than on the hand itself, stimulus-response contiguity is no longer a primary parameter of learning. The implications of this work for mirror-guided studies are discussed.

Animals↗