Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Crielaard

Publications and source records attributed to W Crielaard.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Photobiology of bacteria.

The field of photobiology is concerned with the interactions between light and living matter. For Bacteria this interaction serves three recognisable physiological functions: provision of energy, protection against excess radiation and signalling (for motility and gene expression). The chemical structure of the primary light-absorbing components in biology (the chromophores of photoactive proteins) is surprisingly simple: tetrapyrroles, polyenes and derivatised aromats are the most abundant ones. The same is true for the photochemistry that is catalysed by these chromophores: this is limited to light-induced exciton- or electron-transfer and photoisomerization. The apoproteins surrounding the chromophores provide them with the required specificity to function in various aspects of photosynthesis, photorepair, photoprotection and photosignalling. Particularly in photosynthesis several of these processes have been resolved in great detail, for others at best only a physiological description can be given. In this contribution we discuss selected examples from various parts of the field of photobiology of Bacteria. Most examples have been taken from the purple bacteria and the cyanobacteria, with special emphasis on recently characterised signalling photoreceptors in Ectothiorhodospira halophila and in Fremyella diplosiphon.

Bacteria↗

Abundance, subunit composition, redox properties, and catalytic activity of the cytochrome bc1 complex from alkaliphilic and halophilic, photosynthetic members of the family Ectothiorhodospiraceae.

Ubiquinol-cytochrome c oxidoreductase (cytochrome bc1) complexes were demonstrated to be present in the membranes of the alkaliphilic and halophilic purple sulfur bacteria Ectothiorhodospira halophila, Ectothiorhodospira mobilis, and Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii by protoheme extraction, immunoblotting, and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. The gy values of the Rieske [2Fe-2S] clusters observed in membranes of E. mobilis and E. halophila were 1.895 and 1.910, respectively. In E. mobilis membranes, the cytochrome bc1 complex was present in a stoichiometry of approximately 0.2 per reaction center. This complex was isolated and characterized. It contained four prosthetic groups: low-potential cytochrome b (cytochrome bL; Em = -142 mV), high-potential cytochrome b (cytochrome bH; Em = 116 mV), cytochrome c1 (Em = 341 mV), and a Rieske iron-sulfur cluster. The absorbance spectrum of cytochrome bL displayed an asymmetric alpha-band with a maximum at 564 nm and a shoulder at 559 nm. The alpha bands of cytochrome bH and cytochrome c1 peaked at 559.5 and 553 nm, respectively. These prosthetic groups were associated with three different polypeptides: cytochrome b, cytochrome c1, and the Rieske iron-sulfur protein, with apparent molecular masses of 43, 30, and 21 kDa, respectively. No evidence for the presence of a fourth subunit was obtained. Maximal ubiquinol-cytochrome c oxidoreductase activity of the purified complex was observed at pH 8; the turnover rate was 57 mol of cytochrome c reduced.(mol of cytochrome c1)-1.s-1. The complex showed a strikingly low sensitivity towards typical inhibitors of cytochrome bc1 complexes.

Bacteria↗

Spectral identification of the electrochromically active carotenoids of Rhodobacter sphaeroides in chromatophores and reconstituted liposomes.

Reaction centers with both light harvesting complexes I and II (B875 and B800/850; i.e., RCLHILHII complexes) have been isolated from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. These complexes have been incorporated into liposomes made from lipids purified from Escherichia coli. The electrochromic bandshift of carotenoids, present in these reconstituted complexes, shows shifted minima and maxima with respect to a similar spectrum in chromatophores of Rb. sphaeroides in a potassium diffusion potential induced difference spectrum (see also Crielaard, W., Hellingwerf, K.J. and Konings, W.N. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 973, 205-211). The absorbance spectrum, at room temperature or at 77 K, of both membrane preparations did not, however, reveal differences in the carotenoid region. The long-wavelength carotenoid peak in both preparations is located at 513 nm (77 K). A small difference could be observed between the 77 K excitation spectra of the B850 fluorescence. Reconstituted complexes show a carotenoid peak at 513 nm, whereas in chromatophores this peak is located at 514.5 nm. When fluorescence was recorded at 805 nm, to detect B800 excitation, there was a marked difference between both preparations. In liposomes the long wavelength B800-associated carotenoid peak is located at 512.5 nm, whereas in chromatophores this peak is located at 516 nm. These results explain the shifted minima and maxima in a potassium diffusion induced difference spectrum in proteoliposomes. The prediction of two carotenoid pools in chromatophores (De Grooth, B.G. and Amesz, J. (1977) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 462, 247-258) is confirmed, and the field sensitive carotenoids are identified as the pool that is associated with the B800 band (Kramer, H.J.M., Van Grondelle, R., Hunter, C.N., Westerhuis, W.H.J. and Amesz, J. (1984) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 765, 156-165).

Bacterial Chromatophores↗

Mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides lacking one or more pigment-protein complexes and complementation with reaction-centre, LH1, and LH2 genes.

The photosynthetic apparatus of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is comprised of three types of pigment-protein complex: the photochemical reaction centre and its attendant LH1 and LH2 light-harvesting complexes. To augment existing deletion/insertion mutants in the genes coding for these complexes we have constructed two further mutants, one of which is a novel double mutant which is devoid of all three types of complex. We have also constructed vectors for the expression of either LH1, LH2 or reaction-centre genes. The resulting system allows each pigment-protein complex to be studied either as part of an intact photosystem or as the sole complex in the cell. In this way we have demonstrated that reaction centres can assemble independently of either light-harvesting complex in R. sphaeroides. In addition, the isolation of derivatives of the deletion/insertion mutants exhibiting spontaneous mutations in carotenoid biosynthesis provides an avenue for examining the role of carotenoids in the assembly of the photosynthetic apparatus. We show that the LH1 complex is assembled regardless of the carotenoid background, and that the type of carotenoid present modifies the absorbance of the LH1 bacteriochlorophylls.

Carotenoids↗

Sodium ion-dependent amino acid transport in membrane vesicles of Bacillus stearothermophilus.

Amino acid transport in membrane vesicles of Bacillus stearothermophilus was studied. A relatively high concentration of sodium ions is needed for uptake of L-alanine (Kt = 1.0 mM) and L-leucine (Kt = 0.4 mM). In contrast, the Na(+)-H(+)-L-glutamate transport system has a high affinity for sodium ions (Kt less than 5.5 microM). Lithium ions, but no other cations tested, can replace sodium ions in neutral amino acid transport. The stimulatory effect of monensin on the steady-state accumulation level of these amino acids and the absence of transport in the presence of nonactin indicate that these amino acids are translocated by a Na+ symport mechanism. This is confirmed by the observation that an artificial delta psi and delta mu Na+/F but not a delta pH can act as a driving force for uptake. The transport system for L-alanine is rather specific. L-Serine, but not L-glycine or other amino acids tested, was found to be a competitive inhibitor of L-alanine uptake. On the other hand, the transport carrier for L-leucine also translocates the amino acids L-isoleucine and L-valine. The initial rates of L-glutamate and L-alanine uptake are strongly dependent on the medium pH. The uptake rates of both amino acids are highest at low external pH (5.5 to 6.0) and decline with increasing pH. The pH allosterically affects the L-glutamate and L-alanine transport systems. The maximal rate of L-glutamate uptake (Vmax) is independent of the external pH between pH 5.5 and 8.5, whereas the affinity constant (Kt) increases with increasing pH. A specific transport system for the basic amino acids L-lysine and L-arginine in the membrane vesicles has also been observed. Transport of these amino acids occurs most likely by a uniport mechanism.

Alanine↗

Light-driven amino acid uptake in Streptococcus cremoris or Clostridium acetobutylicum membrane vesicles fused with liposomes containing bacterial reaction centers.

Reaction centers of the phototrophic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris were introduced as proton motive force-generating systems in membrane vesicles of two anaerobic bacteria. Liposomes containing reaction center-light-harvesting complex I pigment protein complexes were fused with membrane vesicles of Streptococcus cremoris or Clostridium acetobutylicum by freeze-thawing and sonication. Illumination of these fused membranes resulted in the generation of a proton motive force of approximately -110 mV. The magnitude of the proton motive force in these membranes could be varied by changing the light intensity. As a result of this proton motive force, amino acid transport into the fused membranes could be observed. The initial rate of leucine transport by membrane vesicles of S. cremoris increased exponentially with the proton motive force. An H+/leucine stoichiometry of 0.8 was determined from the steady-state level of leucine accumulation and the proton motive force, and this stoichiometry was found to be independent of the magnitude of the proton motive force. These results indicate that the introduction of bacterial reaction centers in membrane vesicles by the fusion procedure yields very attractive model systems for the study of proton motive force-consuming processes in membrane vesicles of (strict) anaerobic bacteria.

Amino Acids↗

Rhodopsin(s) in eubacteria.

While the biochemical basis of photosynthesis by bacteriochlorophyll-based reaction centres in purple phototrophic Eubacteria and retinal-based bacteriorhodopsin in the Archaebacterium Halobacterium salinarium has been elucidated in great detail, much less is known about photosensory signal transduction; this is especially the case for Eubacteria. Recent findings on two different photosensory proteins in two different Eubacteria, which both show clear resemblances to the rhodopsins, will be presented. The photoactive yellow protein (PYP) from the purple phototrophic organism Ectothiorhodospira halophila probably functions as the photoreceptor for a new type of negative phototaxis response and has been studied in some detail with respect to its structural and photochemical characteristics. On basis of crystallographic an photochemical data it has been proposed that PYP contains retinal as a chromophore. However, we have unambiguously demonstrated that the PYP chromophore is different from retinal, in spite of the fact that PYP's photochemical properties show striking similarities with the rhodopsins. The cyanobacterium Calothrix sp. displays complementary chromatic adaptation, a process in which the pigment composition of the phycobilisomes is adjusted to the spectral characteristics of the incident light. In orange light the blueish chromophore phycocyanin is present, in green light the reddish phycoerythrin is synthesized. On the basis of the action spectrum of this adaptation process, we hypothesized that a rhodopsin is the photosensor in this process. In line with this, we found that nicotine, an inhibitor of the biosynthesis of beta-carotene (which is the precursor of retinal), abolishes chromatic adaptation. Direct proof of the involvement of a photosensory rhodopsin was obtained in experiments in which the chromatic adaptation response was restored by the addition of retinal to the cultures. The two photosensory proteins mentioned above represent the first examples of eubacterial photoreceptors that can be studied at a molecular level. Our current knowledge on these two proteins and their status as retinal proteins will be reviewed.

Journal Article↗