Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W Burke.
Primary care residency graduates were surveyed about their satisfaction with their training. The respondents desired more training in outpatient knowledge and procedures, psychosocial skills, and business skills.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Family history of cancer is recognized as one of the most important risk factors in predicting personal cancer risk. Nevertheless, there are few published population-based estimates of family history prevalence by age categories. METHODS: We used responses of female controls (n = 4,754) from the population-based Cancer and Steroid Hormone study (1980-1982) to estimate the frequency of family history of various cancers among female relatives. We determined the age- and race-specific prevalence of family history of breast, ovarian, endometrial, and other cancers in first-degree female relatives of women aged 20-54 years. To evaluate changes in reporting family history over time, we also analyzed responses of control women (n = 1,544) from the Women's Interview Study on Health (WISH) (1990-1992) to estimate the prevalence of family history of breast cancer. RESULTS: The prevalence of a first-degree family history of breast, ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers was 6.4% (95% CI 5.7-7.1%), 1.1% (0.8-1.4%), 3.5% (3.0-4.0%), and 2.1% (1.7-2.5%), respectively. Among first-degree female relatives, the prevalence of family history of colon, lung, and thyroid cancers was 2.4% (2.1-2.9%), 1.5% (1.2-1.8%), and 0.5% (0.3-0.7%), respectively. The prevalence of family history of breast and colon cancers increased significantly with respondent's age. Similar results for family history of breast cancer were obtained from an analysis of responses from the WISH. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to providing a point of reference for research and health policy, these results may be of interest to providers who care for female patients because of the usefulness of information about family history of cancer for assessing lifetime risk of cancer.
There is an increasing need for accurate prediction methods of assessing individual risk for breast cancer for both clinical and research purposes. The purpose of this study is to compare the Gail and Claus model risk estimates of breast cancer among women with a family history of breast cancer. This study presents risk estimates from two models of breast cancer risk in 491 women 18 to 74 years of age with a family history of breast cancer who were recruited to risk counseling clinical trials in Seattle, Washington between 1996 and 1997. These trials included women from the general population and additional samples of Ashkenazi Jewish, African-American, and lesbian women. We estimated and compared lifetime (to age 79) and 5-year risk for developing breast cancer using the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adaptation of the Gail model and the Claus model. About one-quarter of participants fell into the Gail "high" risk category (> or =1.7% risk of developing breast cancer in the next 5 years). The average lifetime risk was estimated at 13.2% by the Gail model and 11.2% by the Claus model. Estimates from the two models were moderately and positively correlated (r = 0.55) with the Gail model yielding a higher estimate than the Claus model for most participants. If women with a family history of breast cancer are being counseled regarding decisions on genetic testing, tamoxifen use, or other preventive measures, presenting both Claus and Gail estimates may be the best option.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
1. In eight adult cats intense, sharply circumscribed, monocular laser lesions were used to remove all cellular layers of the retina. The extents of the retinal lesions were subsequently confirmed with counts of alpha-ganglion cells in retinal whole mounts; in some cases these revealed radial segmental degeneration of ganglion cells distal to the lesion. 2. Two to 24 weeks later, area 17 (striate cortex; V1) was studied electrophysiologically in a standard anaesthetized, paralysed (artificially respired) preparation. Recording single- or multineurone activity revealed extensive topographical reorganization within the lesion projection zone (LPZ). 3. Thus, with stimulation of the lesioned eye, about 75 % of single neurones in the LPZ had 'ectopic' visual discharge fields which were displaced to normal retina in the immediate vicinity of the lesion. 4. The sizes of the ectopic discharge fields were not significantly different from the sizes of the normal discharge fields. Furthermore, binocular cells recorded from the LPZ, when stimulated via their ectopic receptive fields, exhibited orientation tuning and preferred stimulus velocities which were indistinguishable from those found when the cells were stimulated via the normal eye. 5. However, the responses to stimuli presented via ectopic discharge fields were generally weaker (lower peak discharge rates) than those to presentations via normal discharge fields, and were characterized by a lower-than-normal upper velocity limit. 6. Overall, the properties of the ectopic receptive fields indicate that cortical mechanisms rather than a retinal 'periphery' effect underlie the topographic reorganization of area 17 following monocular retinal lesions.
Women with a family history of breast cancer often over-estimate their personal risk for cancer and may view themselves as candidates for genetic testing even when the likelihood of an informative test result is low. We report here on genetic counseling of women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer, defined as women who have one or more biological relatives with breast cancer but whose pedigree suggests a low likelihood of autosomal dominant transmission. A genetic counseling protocol based on traditional genetic counseling strategies was developed with additional components added to address the needs of women with moderately increased breast cancer risk. These additional components included information about non-genetic risk factors, comparisons of high and moderate risk pedigrees, and evaluation of personal risk based on both genetic and nongenetic risk factors. Most participants liked the genetic counseling and found it useful. At baseline, participants over-estimated both their personal risk of breast cancer and that of the average woman. After counseling, estimates of personal and average risk of breast cancer were lower, although both remained higher than actual risk. Most participants reported that they felt less worried about breast cancer after receiving their personal-risk estimate. At baseline, most women judged themselves to be candidates for genetic testing and expressed interest in testing. The number who considered themselves candidates for testing was reduced after counseling (60% versus 82%) but still constituted a majority. Similarly, interest in testing was partially reduced by counseling (60% versus 91%). We conclude that genetic counseling can help women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer to develop more accurate views of their risk, reduce their breast cancer worry, and aid some of them in developing a more realistic view of genetic testing.
OBJECTIVE: Women's health centers have been increasing in number but remain relatively unstudied. We examined patient expectations and quality of care at a hospital-based women's health center compared with those at a general medicine clinic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: University hospital-affiliated women's health and general internal medicine clinics. PARTICIPANTS: An age-stratified random sample of 2,000 women over 18 years of age with at least two visits to either clinic in the prior 24 months. We confined the analysis to 706 women respondents who identified themselves as primary care patients of either clinic. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Personal characteristics, health care utilization, preferences and expectations for care, receipt of preventive services, and satisfaction with provider and clinic were assessed for all respondents. Patients obtaining care at the general internal medicine clinic were older and had more chronic diseases and functional limitations than patients receiving care at the women's health center. Women's health center users (n = 357) were more likely than general medicine clinic users ( n = 349) to prefer a female provider ( 57% vs 32%, p =.0001) and to have sought care at the clinic because of its focus on women's health (49% vs 17%, p =. 0001). After adjusting for age and self-assessed health status, women's health center users were significantly more likely to report having had mammography (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 15.2) and cholesterol screening (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0, 2.6) but significantly less likely to report having undergone flexible sigmoidoscopy (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3, 0.9). There were no significant differences between the clinics on receipt of counseling about hormone replacement therapy or receipt of Pap smear, or in satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, at least in this setting, women's health centers provide care to younger women and those with fewer chronic medical conditions and may meet a market demand. While the quality of gender-specific preventive care may be modestly better in women's health centers, the quality of general preventive care may be better in general medical clinics.
Screening rates for colorectal cancer are unacceptably low. New guidelines, public education campaigns, and expanded coverage of screening costs by healthcare insurance are expected to increase screening rates, but interventions targeting women may accelerate this change. Most American women already participate in regular cancer screening, in the form of Papanicolaou (Pap) tests and mammography, so they may be receptive to tailored messages about the need to add regular colorectal cancer screening to their preventive health regimen. In addition, their role in promoting the health of family members may position women to influence screening behavior in family and friends. Women may be particularly valuable change agents in populations where screening rates are traditionally low, such as medically underserved populations, the elderly or low socioeconomic status groups with competing health priorities, and populations with cultural values or practices inconsistent with the adoption of a new screening behavior. To serve as agents of change in their family and social networks, women must understand that colorectal cancer is not solely a man's disease and that the benefits of colorectal screening are similar to those of Pap testing and mammography. Colorectal cancer screening should also be promoted within a framework of a lifelong strategy for health maintenance for both men and women. The message to women should emphasize the value of colorectal cancer screening rather than the disagreement among experts over preferred screening strategies and should emphasize the value of shared decision making between the patient and her healthcare provider.
We have examined the influence of 'feedback' projections from extrastriate visual cortical area 21a on the responses of neurons in area 17 of the cat, by cooling area 21a to 5-10 degrees C while the temperature over the recording sites was kept at 36 degrees C. Orientation, direction and length selectivities as well as contrast sensitivity were tested before and during cooling and after rewarming of area 21a. Overall, for the sample of cells recorded from the part of area 17 visuotopically corresponding to area 21a, the 'spontaneous' activity (at background illumination of 1 cd/m(2)) and the responsiveness to visual stimuli of standard contrast (15) were significantly reduced by inactivation of area 21a. In about half of the cells inactivation of area 21a affected substantially the sharpness of orientation-tuning. However, only in a minority of the cells were the direction or length selectivities significantly affected by inactivation of area 21a. Thus (i) the feedback projections from area 21a appear to exert mainly an excitatory influence on the background activity and responsiveness of area 17 cells and (ii) only in subgroups of area 17 cells does the feedback activity originating from area 21a appear to modulate specifically certain receptive field properties.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.