Studies on Certain Biological Characteristics of Malleomyces mallei and Malleomyces pseudomallei: II. Virulence and Infectivity for Animals.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Journal Article↗
Biomedical subjects
W A Tanner
Publications and source records attributed to W A Tanner.
Minimally invasive techniques in common surgical procedures: implications for training.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used in common surgical procedures. Many of these procedures are used to teach basic surgical trainees (BST) and therefore introduction of these techniques may have implications for training. AIMS: To establish whether the introduction of laparoscopic techniques reduced the opportunity of BSTs to perform surgical procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing hernia repair or appendicectomy in 1991 (when laparoscopy was first introduced) and 1997 (when laparoscopy was readily available) were identified using the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) database. The principal operator and whether the procedure was open or laparoscopic were identified by chart review. RESULTS: The data showed a 50% reduction in the number of appendicectomies performed by BSTs following the introduction of laparoscopic techniques. The number of hernia repairs performed by BSTs has been preserved but the proportion by BSTs fell from 10 to 6%. The proportion of BST-performed procedures carried out laparoscopically has been reduced compared with the registrar-performed group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of minimally invasive techniques has had a negative effect on surgical training. Appropriate measures must be taken to minimise this and such measures should include a structured approach to laparoscopic training and greater access to laparoscopic training facilities.
Appendectomy↗
Symptoms of oesophageal reflux are more common following laparoscopic cholecystectomy than in a control population.
Previous studies have shown that up to 40 per cent of patients have symptoms after cholecystectomy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). There are concerns, however, that these symptoms reflect those of the general population and are not a specific post-operative phenomenon. Abdominal symptoms of 212 patients following LC were compared to a healthy acalculous control population (n = 62). Patients and controls were assessed by questionnaire. Age and sex profiles were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of abdominal pain, bloating or nausea between the 2 groups. Frequent heartburn was a symptom in 19.3 per cent of patients following LC as compared to 3.2 per cent of control patients (p = 0.004, chi-squared 9.39, 1 d.f.). Furthermore 11.3 per cent of post-operative patients complained of dysphagia versus 6.4 per cent of the control group (p = 0.08, chi-squared 1.245, 1 d.f.). One hundred and twenty (57.1 per cent) patients judged their operation to be a complete success, while 9 (4.3 per cent) were dissatisfied. Five of the latter group cited frequent heartburn as the cause of their dissatisfaction. We conclude that abdominal pain, bloating and nausea occur as frequently in the general population as in patients following LC. Patients are more likely to suffer from heartburn and dysphagia following LC than a normal population supporting a link between cholecystectomy and lower oesophageal dysfunction.
Adult↗
Helicobacter pylori does not play a role in the aetiology of acute appendicitis.
The aetiology of acute appendicitis remains uncertain. H. pylori is viable outside the gastroduodenum, however its pathological role outside this area has not been fully investigated. Ten consecutive patients with a histological diagnosis of acute appendicitis were investigated for H. pylori status by serology, and by culture, histology, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of the appendiceal specimens. One patient had positive serology for H. pylori, however PCR analysis was negative. Culture failed to reveal H. pylori colonies. Histology in 5 cases did reveal organisms with a morphological appearance of H. pylori, but PCR analysis confirmed that H. pylori was not present. Using a variety of methods, with PCR acting as the 'gold standard', we have shown that H. pylori is not associated with acute appendicitis.
Acute Disease↗
Staged resection or primary anastomosis for obstructing lesions to the left colon.
The management of obstructing left-sided colonic and rectal lesions has traditionally been by a staged procedure. The introduction of 'on-table lavage', has made primary resection and anastomosis of the large bowel feasible for patients presenting as emergencies. We have studied the perioperative course of 28 patients who presented with left colonic obstruction to determine whether primary anastomosis conferred additional morbidity. The patients ranged in age from 29 to 89 years (mean 66 years) at presentation. The ASA status of patients was comparable in both groups (Table 1). Fourteen patients underwent resection, on-table lavage, and primary anastomosis (PA) and 14 a Hartmann's procedure (HP). The mean operative time for the PA procedure was 200 minutes compared to 110 minutes for the HP group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate nor mean hospital stay rate for the primary procedures between the two groups. There was no clinical anastomotic leak in patients undergoing primary anastomosis. However secondary surgery for patients undergoing colorectal reconnection conferred added morbidity for patients who had a HP. We conclude that resection, on-table lavage, and primary anastomosis is safe in the management of left-sided colonic obstruction and in most cases is the treatment of choice.
Aged↗