Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Vincent N Mosesso

Publications and source records attributed to Vincent N Mosesso.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The role of law enforcement agencies in out-of-hospital emergency care.

BACKGROUND: A key component of out-of-hospital emergency care is the rapid response of trained providers with appropriate medical equipment. In some communities, law enforcement agents function as first responders to accomplish this goal. The purpose of this national survey was to assess the proportion of law enforcement agencies that provide medical care to determine the extent of care they provide, to identify how many use AEDs, and to assess the attitudes of agency leaders regarding their roles as medical first responders. METHODS: Eight hundred agencies were selected at random from a national database of 43,000 agencies available through the National Public Safety Bureau (Stevens Pt, WI). These agencies were sent a 19-question survey either by US mail or telephone. RESULTS: Four-hundred and fifty-four (57%) surveys were returned, and 420 (53%) were available for use after exclusion criteria were applied. Eighty percent of law enforcement agencies respond routinely to medical emergencies and 39% of these reported they deploy AEDs. Thirty-one percent of all law enforcement agencies are equipped with AEDs, a ten-fold increase from 2.6% reported in a previous national study in 1997. Funding issues were the most common reasons cited for not using AEDs. Approximately 75% of respondents agreed that law enforcement agencies should provide initial emergency medical care and indicated that officers in their agency would be willing to receive additional training to accomplish this. CONCLUSION: Based on this survey, law enforcement agents often serve as medical first responders. Nearly three quarters of responding agencies felt this role was appropriate. AEDs are now deployed much more frequently than indicated by a previous national study, but still less than one-third of law enforcement agencies carry AEDs as part of their standard response equipment.

Attitude↗
PubMed2006

Characteristics of volunteers responding to emergencies in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the characteristics of volunteers responding to emergencies in the North American Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. METHODS: The PAD Trial was a prospective evaluation of cardiac arrest survival in community facilities randomized to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or to CPR with automated external defibrillators (AEDs). The PAD volunteers' characteristics were analyzed using Poisson regression clustered on the facility and offset by the number of emergency episodes to which volunteers were exposed. RESULTS: A total of 19,320 volunteers in 1260 facilities were trained to provide emergency care. Of these, 8169 volunteers were participating actively at their facility during a time when one or more emergency episodes occurred. There were 1971 emergency episodes responded to by 1245 volunteers. The treatment arm (CPR-only versus CPR+AED) was not associated with the likelihood of volunteer participation in an episode. Likewise, the volunteers' age or sex did not affect response. Volunteers more likely to respond were supervisory/management or security personnel, non-minority participants, volunteers with previous CPR training, volunteers with previous experience in emergency care and those who passed the PAD CPR skills follow-up test. Volunteers who had a formal education beyond a high school level were less likely to respond. CONCLUSIONS: Volunteers with previous emergency training and positions of responsibility in their facility had a greater likelihood of participation in medical emergencies in the PAD Trial.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Stress reactions and perceived difficulties of lay responders to a medical emergency.

BACKGROUND: Bystander CPR rates remain low. One reason may be that the thought of responding to an emergency is so stressful that it decreases the willingness of laypersons to respond. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of stress experienced by lay responders to a medical emergency and to identify barriers that may have impeded their response to the event. METHODS: Responses from 1243 laypersons responding to an emergency during the Public Access Defibrillation Trial were analyzed in a mixed methods study. Stress related to the event was recorded using a 0 (none) to 5 (severe) scale. Qualitative responses to the question of "What was most difficult?" about the event were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Reported stress levels were low overall (mean 1.2, median 1.0). Laypersons responding to an emergency presumed to be a cardiac arrest had higher stress than those involved in other events (median 2.0 versus 1.0). Stress levels were higher in residential than in public settings (mean 1.41, median 1.0 versus mean 1.13, median 1.0). Those who fit a certain profile (females, non-native English speakers) reported statistically higher stress levels than others. A total of 614 qualitative responses were studied and aggregated into four major categories of difficulty: practical issues; characteristics of the victim; interpersonal issues; thoughts and feelings of the lay responder. Most difficulties were in the category of practical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Among these study volunteer lay responders, low levels of stress were reported. Incorporating descriptions of the difficulties experienced by lay responders in CPR/AED training curricula may make courses more realistic and useful.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Using the exception from informed consent regulations in research.

This article reflects the proceedings of a breakout session, "Using the Regulations in Research" at the 2005 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, "Ethical Conduct of Resuscitation Research." There have been two organized studies, and a number of anecdotal reports, describing the decline in cardiac arrest resuscitation research in the United States since the implementation of the Final Rule. Paradis and colleagues found that the volume of human cardiac arrest research published in the United States was significantly less in a four-year period after the Final Rule was adopted as compared to the earlier period. Nichol and colleagues reported that both the absolute number of US-based randomized cardiac arrest trials and the proportion of US-based trials (vs. foreign trials, based on the mailing address of the first author) decreased by about 15% annually. Despite the concern about a negative impact, there are at least five published trials, one in progress and one in planning that have been or are being conducted under the regulations. Those completed include the Diaspirin Cross-Linked Hemoglobin, Public Access Defibrillation, Multicenter Vest CPR, Brain-CPR, and Pre-Hospital Treatment of Status Epilepticus trials. Reports of how investigators met the regulations and their experience in doing so are reviewed. A summary table of the federal regulations is provided. Participants discussed what additional information and research about using the regulations would be helpful for the promotion of quality resuscitation and emergency care research in the United States. Areas suggested for further investigation include: impact on the quality as well as quantity of such research; current level of understanding of the regulations by investigators, regulatory/IRB personnel and potential subjects (the general public); costs incurred: additional time required for preparation, approval and conducting community consultation and public disclosure; impact on research on non-life-threatening conditions; value and cost of a registry; use of a standard reporting template for issues regarding meeting the requirements in individual clinical trials; whether more specific guidance would be helpful or restrictive; what constitutes effective community consultation and public disclosure; and whether titration of community consultation and public disclosure based on the risk of the proposed intervention to subjects is feasible and acceptable.

Community-Institutional Relations↗
PubMed2004

Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial experience.

BACKGROUND: The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing two prehospital resuscitation strategies, was conducted under the regulations for exception from informed consent (21CFR50.24) in 24 communities in North America. These regulations place additional requirements for human subject protection on investigators and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), including conducting community consultation (CC) and public disclosure (PD). OBJECTIVE: To describe the IRB approval process at study sites and the number and types of community consultation and public disclosure activities conducted. METHODS: The 24 study sites in the United States and Canada submitted IRB applications, CC and PD plans, and a structured report on IRB process and investigator perceptions to the Clinical Trial Center at the University of Washington. RESULTS: The primary IRBs for all 24 trial sites and a total of 101 IRBs approved the study. The median interval from submission to approval was 108 days (IQR 43-196), and the mean number of revisions was two (range 0-7). Investigators conducted nearly 12,000 activities to achieve CC and PD; activities varied greatly from site to site in both type and quantity. CONCLUSION: The length of time to obtain IRB approval and the extent of community consultation and public disclosure varied greatly among trial sites in meeting the current regulations for conducting emergency research with exception from informed consent. This suggests that more specific guidance may be useful and that determination of effective strategies for community consultation and public disclosure is needed.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Law Enforcement Agency Defibrillation (LEA-D): proceedings of the National Center for Early Defibrillation Police AED Issues Forum.

Why does LEA-D intervention seem to work in some systems but not others? Panelists agreed that some factors that delay rapid access to treatment, such as long travel distances in rural areas, may represent insurmountable barriers. Other factors, however, may be addressed more readily. These include: absence of a medical response culture, discomfort with the role of medical intervention, insecurity with the use of medical devices, a lack of proactive medical direction, infrequent refresher training, and dependence on EMS intervention. Panelists agreed that successful LEA-D programs possess ten key attributes (Table 6). In the end, the goal remains "early" defibrillation, not "police" defibrillation. It does not matter whether the rescuer wears a blue uniform--or any uniform, for that matter--so long as the defibrillator reaches the victim quickly. If LEA personnel routinely arrive at medical emergencies after other emergency responders or after 8 minutes have elapsed from the time of collapse, an LEA-D program will be unlikely to provide added value. Similarly, if police frequently arrive first, but the department is unwilling or unable to cultivate the attributes of successful LEA-D programs, efforts to improve survival may not be realized. In most communities, however, LEA-D programs have tremendous lifesaving potential and are well worth the investment of time and resources. Law enforcement agencies considering adoption of AED programs should review the frequency with which police arrive first at medical emergencies and LEA response intervals to determine whether AED programs might help improve survival in their communities. It is time for law enforcement agency defibrillation to become the rule, not the exception.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prehospital fluid resuscitation of the patient with major trauma.

The most appropriate prehospital approach to resuscitative fluid interventions for trauma patients involves: determining the mechanism of injury (i.e., blunt versus penetrating versus thermal injury); identifying anatomic involvement (i.e., truncal versus isolated head injury versus isolated extremity injury); and staging the condition (i.e., hemodynamic stability versus instability versus moribund state). Based on available data, the liberal use of fluid infusions for presumed uncontrolled internal hemorrhage, such as that usually occurring after penetrating abdominal and thoracic injuries, is no longer advised. Although some infusion might be appropriate in patients with extremely severe hemorrhage (i.e., no palpable blood pressure, unconscious), the priority in such patients is rapid evacuation to definitive surgical intervention, with airway control and intravenous access provided en route. The data are less clear for patients with blunt injuries, particularly those with closed head injury. Most researchers would still recommend that patients with isolated extremity and head injuries, either blunt or penetrating, are candidates for immediate support of blood pressure through fluid infusions. However, the addition of potential intra-abdominal, intrapelvic, or intrathoracic injuries with uncontrolled hemorrhage confounds the decision-making process. Although conventional wisdom has been to provide aggressive blood pressure support under these circumstances through judicious use of isotonic, or perhaps hypertonic, fluid resuscitation, recent experimental data challenge even this philosophy. Use of new blood substitutes might help to resolve some of these issues by providing oxygen delivery with limited volume in the face of uncontrolled hemorrhage.

Emergency Medical Services↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prehospital therapy for acute congestive heart failure: state of the art.

Acute congestive heart failure (CHF) is one of the most common syndromes encountered in emergency care settings. Correct diagnosis and treatment for pulmonary edema, the most common acute manifestation of CHF, are of primary importance as misdiagnosis can result in deleterious consequences to patients. The pathogenesis of acute pulmonary edema (APE) is currently believed to arise primarily from the redistribution of intravascular fluid to the lungs secondary to acutely elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressures. This understanding has provided a basis for the management of acute APE, which entails reduction of LV preload, reduction of LV afterload, ventilatory support, inotropic support as needed, and identification and treatment of other underlying factors contributing to elevated LV filling pressures. The agent most applicable and effective for field treatment is nitroglycerin. Diuretics and morphine should be used with caution, as they carry higher risks, especially in misdiagnosed patients. The role of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has yet to be demonstrated in a prehospital setting. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation methods are effective adjuncts to current treatment, but their mode of delivery presents technical challenges. The development of novel rapid diagnostic tools, currently in progress, might prove valuable for emergency medical services (EMS) personnel in the future. But for now, EMS personnel must rely on their fundamental skills of history taking and physical examination for accurate diagnosis of CHF.

Emergency Medical Services↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Ten years of police defibrillation: program characteristics and personnel attitudes.

OBJECTIVE: In 1992,a study to evaluate the effectiveness of police defibrillation was initiated in seven suburban police departments. This paper describes the characteristics of those programs and the attitudes of chiefs and officers ten years after the commencement of that study. METHODS: A 32-item survey instrument including questions on department demographics, defibrillation program characteristics, and attitudes was mailed to the chiefs. A separate 25-item survey was developed to assess officers' attitudes; a non-management officer distributed and collected these surveys anonymously. Responses are reported descriptively. RESULTS: All seven chiefs and 78% of the officers completed surveys. Police arrive prior to emergency medical services on 80% or more of calls, with a mean +/- standard deviation response interval of 3.1 +/-1.7 minutes. All departments identify a program coordinator and six a medical director; three departments have a quality-improvement program. Five departments have liability coverage for the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED), and no department reported any liability-related problems. Five of the chiefs and 82% of the officers disagreed or strongly disagreed that liability issues are a concern or a source of hesitation in using the AED. Ninety-six percent of the officers agreed or strongly agreed that police AED use is beneficial to cardiac arrest victims. All seven police chiefs and 89% of the officers agreed or strongly agreed that AED use by police is appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: In these seven police departments with ten years of program experience, defibrillation has become integrated into the law-enforcement culture. Liability issues are not a prominent concern of chiefs or officers. Police chiefs and officers in these departments continue to support police-based defibrillation programs.

Adult↗