Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Valmik Bhargava

Publications and source records attributed to Valmik Bhargava.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Temporal and spatial phase analyses of the electrocardiogram stratify intra-atrial and intra-ventricular organization.

We hypothesized that electrocardiogram (ECG) spatial phase analysis would define a spectrum of intracardiac organization from atrial fibrillation (AF), nonisthmus-dependent and isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) to supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), and similarly for ventricular arrhythmias. We analyzed arrhythmia ECGs of 33 patients with isthmus (n = 9) and nonisthmus (n = 5) dependent AFL and SVT: atrial (n = 3), atrioventricular nodal (n = 3), and orthodromic reciprocating (n = 3) tachycardias, as well as AF (n = 5), ventricular tachycardia (monomorphic, VT-MM; n = 7), and fibrillation (VF; n = 3). ECG spatial phase was considered coherent when the correlation coefficient of an atrial (or ventricular) template to its ECG over time maintained a constant relationship in XY, XZ, and YZ planes. Regularity was quantified spectrally from ECG and correlation series. Spatial coherence occurred in 9/9 cases of isthmus--but only 1/5 of cases of nonisthmus-dependent AFL (p < 0.01; chi2). All showed one dominant spectral peak (temporal coherence). In AF, spatial phase was inconsistent in all planes and spectra were broad band. Temporal and spatial coherence occurred in other SVT. VT-MM maintained spatial phase and a single spectral peak, while VF displayed neither. Our conclusions are that temporal and spatial phase analysis from the ECG stratifies intra-atrial and intra-ventricular organization and reveals subtle variability lost on visual inspection.

Adult↗

Cardiac-directed expression of adenylyl cyclase and heart rate regulation.

Mice with cardiac-directed overexpression of AC(VI) show increased cardiac responsiveness to beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation but regulation of heart rate is unknown. Telemetry was used to test the hypothesis that mice overexpressing cardiac adenylyl cyclase type VI (AC(VI)) would have normal heart rate regulation. Mice overexpressing cardiac AC(VI) were generated using the alphaMHC promoter and studied 10 days after implantation of telemetry devices. Cardiac transgene AC(VI) presence and expression was verified using PCR, RT-PCR and immunoblotting. Ambulatory heart rates were assessed using time and frequency domain analysis over two 24 hour light-dark cycles. Heart rates then were assessed following pharmacological blockade. Time domain analyses showed ambulatory heart rates were unchanged (AC(VI): 597 +/- 15 (SEM) bpm, Control: 595 +/- 12 bpm; p = 0.92). Circadian heart rate variability was preserved and not different from control mice (ANOVA, p = 0.52). Frequency domain analysis of heart rate variability also was unchanged. No difference in heart rate response to pharmacological autonomic blockade was found (intrinsic heart rate: AC(VI) 622 +/- 17 bpm, control 616 +/- 16 bpm, p = 0.79). In conclusion, mice overexpressing cardiac AC(VI) have normal conscious ambulatory heart rates and normal heart rate variability. Overexpression of cardiac AC(VI) does not result in altered heart rate regulation in contrast to cardiac overexpression of other elements of the beta-adrenergic signaling pathway.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

Quantifying intracardiac organization of atrial arrhythmias using temporospatial phase of the electrocardiogram.

INTRODUCTION: Separating nonisthmus-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) from "organized" atrial fibrillation (AF), or isthmus-dependent AFL, may be difficult using ECG characteristics alone. We hypothesized that temporal and spatial phase analysis of ECG atrial waveforms could effectively separate these rhythms by quantifying subtle variations in ECG atrial activation during supraventricular tachycardias (SVT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 52 patients at electrophysiologic study (EPS) who demonstrated isthmus-dependent (n = 15) and nonisthmus-dependent (n = 9) AFL, atrial tachycardia (n = 6), AV nodal reentry (n = 9), orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (n = 6), and AF (n = 7). Atrial activity was represented as a series of correlations of an atrial template to successive time samples of the arrhythmia ECG. Spatial phase was analyzed as a reproducible relationship of this atrial activity between leads over time; temporal regularity was measured from power spectra. Spatial phase was maintained (coherent) in lead planes V5/aVF (XY), V5/V1 (XZ), and aVF/V1 (YZ) in 15 of 15 cases of isthmus-dependent AFL, but in only 1 of 9 cases of nonisthmus-dependent AFL (P < 0.01; chi2). Temporally, all cases of AFL showed one dominant peak on correlation spectra (magnitude >6 dB), suggesting one activation wavefront, although this was smeared in nonisthmus-dependent cases. In contrast, AF showed inconsistent spatial phase in all planes and broad band spectra, consistent with multiple and/or variable activation paths. All other SVTs showed spatial coherence and one dominant spectral peak. CONCLUSION: Coherence of temporal and spatial phase is a powerful approach to measure the spatial organization of intracardiac activation from the ECG that reveals a spectrum from SVT to isthmus-dependent and nonisthmus-dependent AFL, to AF.

Adult↗

Hemodialysis access assessment with intravascular ultrasound.

Reliable identification and treatment of specific hemodialysis access complications may improve access patency and result in significant cost reduction. Angiography is the gold standard for the evaluation of vascular access; however, it has significant limitations. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a relatively new technique capable of detecting subtle vascular abnormalities. To investigate the safety, feasibility, and accuracy of IVUS imaging to detect hemodialysis access complications, including stenoses, graft deterioration, and thrombus, we performed 31 IVUS imaging studies in 22 hemodialysis patients. Nineteen studies were performed in the dialysis unit, and 12 studies in the angiography suite. The IVUS catheter was inserted into the graft through the access used for hemodialysis. Findings of 21 studies (17 patients) imaged on the same day by both angiography and IVUS were compared. Grafts and vessels were successfully imaged using IVUS in 29 of 31 studies. There were no adverse effects caused by IVUS. Angiography assessed 17 of 54 vessel segments as normal versus 9 of 54 segments by IVUS (P < 0.001). Angiography detected lesions in 25 segments as opposed to 33 segments by IVUS (P < 0.001). A thrombus was detected in 32 of 54 vessel segments by IVUS, but in only 1 of 54 segments by angiography (P < 0.001). In conclusion, IVUS imaging is feasible and safe to assess hemodialysis access in the angiographic suite and dialysis unit. IVUS detected more vascular abnormalities than angiography. IVUS may be a useful independent imaging and screening modality in the assessment of dialysis access complications, which may help increase graft patency and reduce cost.

Angiography↗

Centered versus noncentered source for intracoronary artery radiation therapy: a model based on the Scripps Trial.

BACKGROUND: The Scripps Trial was a randomized study of intracoronary artery radiation therapy with iridium 192 used to treat restenotic vessels. We used the intravascular ultrasound data from the Scripps Trial to investigate whether a lumen-centered gamma or beta radiation source would reduce radiation dose heterogeneity compared with the noncentered source position used. METHODS: Analysis included 28 patients with stent placement in 20 native vessels and 8 saphenous vein grafts enrolled in this trial. Radiation dosimetry for gamma radiation was calculated to deliver 800 cGy to the far field target, provided the maximum dose to the near field target did not exceed 3000 cGy. Prescribed dosimetry for beta radiation by use of yttrium 90 was 1600 cGy at 2 mm distance from the source. RESULTS: The calculated average minimum source to target distance by use of a lumen-centered source increased by 0.18 mm from 1.70 +/- 0.25 to 1.88 +/- 0.36 mm, whereas the maximum distance decreased by 0.17 mm from 3.64 +/- 0.60 to 3.47 +/- 0.43 mm (P <.05). On the basis of these distances, the maximum radiation dose, as well as radiation dose heterogeneity (ratio of maximum to minimum), would have been reduced in 22 of 28 patients by use of a lumen-centered gamma or beta source (P <.005). The reduction in dose heterogeneity was substantially greater with a beta source compared with a gamma source (48% vs 16% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Centering of the intracoronary artery radiation therapy delivery catheter within the vessel lumen can significantly reduce radiation dose heterogeneity when compared with a noncentered source position. This dose reduction is substantially greater for a beta compared with a gamma source.

Beta Particles↗