Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V Ravery

Publications and source records attributed to V Ravery.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Scrotal trauma: management strategy].

Scrotal traumas are rare. Most are blunt traumas caused by a direct blow on the scrotum. The testicle is projected against the pubic arch. Early surgical investigation has considerably improved the prognosis of testicular trauma, and reduced orchidectomy rate. ULtrasonography has also improved the management of scrotal trauma. But there is a controversy about accuracy of ultrasonography in predicting presence or absence of testicular disruption. ULtrasonography should not challenge the dogma regarding systematic surgical investigation of hematocele and enlarged scrotum. Long term outcomes (testicular atrophy, infertility) may be more frequent as previously thought and should be detected.

Decision Trees↗
PubMed2006

[Screening for prostate cancer: arguments "in favour"].

Prostate cancer is a problem of public health; the relevance of its mass screening remains to be demonstrated by the conclusions of ongoing randomized prospective studies of which the preliminary results are promising. Yet, non-randomised and/or retrospective studies report a benefit of screening-related mortality. On such basis, French scientific authorities currently recommend individual screening.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Prostate saturation biopsy in the reevaluation of microfocal prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the ability of an extended, 32-core repeat transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy protocol to improve the characterization of low volume, well differentiated disease in men with a diagnosis of potentially insignificant microfocal prostate cancer, as defined by 1 single focus positive core of 10 with less than 5 mm of Gleason score 6 or less tumor on primary biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 consecutive patients, who were 62 to 75 years old, had a median serum prostate specific antigen of 8 ng/ml (range 0.5 to 14) and a diagnosis of minimal prostate cancer, and were willing to consider observation with delayed treatment at progression, were offered repeat saturation prostate biopsy with a median of 32 cores (range 18 to 36) under local anesthesia. This biopsy was to determine whether more extensive prostate sampling would confirm or disprove the initial diagnosis of microfocal, well differentiated prostate cancer. RESULTS: The procedure was aborted in 1 patient because of massive rectal hemorrhage. Another patient had acute prostatitis with gram-negative sepsis. Of 34 evaluable biopsy sets 11 (32%) were negative for cancer, suggesting that tumor detected at the primary biopsy was probably of low volume and amenable to observation with delayed treatment. Of the biopsies 23 (68%) were positive, 17 were at multiple sites and 7 were upgraded to Gleason score 7 or greater. These patients were then considered to have significant tumors and were offered active treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study is to our knowledge the first to describe the clinical use of prostate saturation biopsies for re-evaluating potentially insignificant prostate cancer. Of patients with minimal disease on standard 10-core biopsy, results show that this technique may be helpful for distinguishing the 30% who probably have minimal disease based on negative repeat saturation biopsy from the 70% who almost certainly have a significant tumor, as characterized by multiple positive cores, with or without an increased Gleason score. The latter patients should be offered active therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.

OBJECTIVES: To study the pathologic features of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens of patients operated on the basis of a potentially "Insignificant" prostate cancer (Ca P) characterized by one single focus (less than 3mm) of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma - Gleason score < or =6, out of 6-10 biopsies and to determine which characteristics, if any, are predictive of the presence of a "non significant" prostate cancer in the specimen characterized by a low volume (<0.5 ml) moderately differentiated organ confined, cancer (Gleason score less than 6). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PSA, biopsy features, and surgical specimens of a series of 56 patients submitted to RP for "insignificant Ca P" on TRUS prostate biopsies between 1988 and 2004 were compared regarding the number of tumor foci, Gleason grade and score, tumor volume determined by the cylinder method, as well as extraprostatic extension (EPE) and positive surgical margins (P.SM.). RESULTS: 70% of the patients had multifocal microfocal cancer apart from the index tumor. The presence of grade 4 was ignored by the biopsy in 50% of the cases, however the primary grade was correctly evaluated in more than 70% of the biopsy sets. 42% of the patients had a cancer volume less than 0.5 ml and 29% met the definition of insignificant/unimportant cancer characterized by a moderately differentiated (Gleason score < or =6) of low volume (less than 0.5 ml) however no feature accurately predictive of insignificant cancer could be individualized. In this whole series, only 8% of the patients had EPE. When the pre-operative PSA was <10 ng/ml, 98% of the patients had an organ confined tumor. CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer on the basis of one single focus less than 3 mm of moderately differentiated (Gleason < or =6) prostate cancer have 30% of chances of harboring an insignificant tumor in their prostate and are therefore, at risk of being overtreated, however there is at this time no specific feature able to identify these patients pre operatively.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and finasteride on prostate cancer risk.

PURPOSE: We examine the relationship of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and finasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants in this case control study using a prospective collection of data were drawn from consecutive patients who underwent prostate biopsy at 12 different departments of urology from January 1999 to June 2000. Medication use was assessed by self-questionnaire as well as questions about dietary and lifestyle factors that might be relevant for prostate cancer risk. RESULTS: The study included 639 patients with prostate cancer and 659 cancer-free controls. Univariate analysis showed no significant impact of aspirin and finasteride on prostate cancer risk while the nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users had a lower risk (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99). After adjusting for potential confounders, the protective effect of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was no longer significant (OR, 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.07), while finasteride showed a significant protective effect (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that finasteride could have a chemopreventive role in prostate cancer. While aspirin did not show any impact on prostate cancer risk, the role of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs warrants further studies.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Standards, options, and recommendation for external radiotherapy of prostatic cancer: evaluation of the effect of dosage].

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) collaborative project was initiated in 1993 by the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), with the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, several French public university and general hospitals, as well as private clinics and medical speciality societies. Its main objective is the development of serviceable clinical practice guidelines in order to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review, followed by critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts. Draft guidelines are produced, then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: Produce clinical practice guidelines for the radiotherapy of prostate cancer using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: The FNCLCC and the French Urology Association (AFU) designated the multidisciplinary group of experts. Available data were collected by a search of Medline and lists selected by experts in the group. A first draft of the guidelines was written, they validated by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1/ a minimal dose of 70 Gy must be used, whatever the prognostic factors; 2/ it appeared that patients with favourable prognostic indicators (stage T1-2, PSA < or = 10 micrograms/L and Gleason score < or = 6) do not benefit from a dose escalation effect for doses over 70-74 Gy; 3/ patients with intermediate prognosis are the ones who benefit most from the dose escalation effect over 74 Gy, provided they receive exclusive radiation therapy; 4/ whenever possible, patients should be included in controlled trials designed to assess the effects of dose escalation and hormonotherapy.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

[Post-prostatectomy radiotherapy: for which patients and when?].

Biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy is not exceptional, ranging from 10 to 40% in the literature. To prevent this biochemical failure, adjuvant radiotherapy was proposed to patients with a high risk of relapse. No phase III trial has actually validated this attitude. Best indications for adjuvant irradiation seem to be patients with an extensive extracapsular extension or multiple positive margins. Historical comparisons seems to confer, in these case, a benefit in biochemical control for adjuvant irradiation versus observation. Others authors prefer immediate post-operative irradiation, a delayed treatment, when biochemical relapse has occurred. This attitude has spared some patients irradiation useless. This salvage irradiation lowered the PSA level in 40 to 70% of the cases, but long-term efficiency is obtained only in the case of a low value of the PSA before irradiation. Delayed radiotherapy is, therefore, justified only if a close follow-up is performed, with repeated dosage of PSA. Whatever the case, it is important to differentiate between local and distant relapse: patients with positive nodes at the time of surgery are most likely at risk of distant relapse. It seems that patients with seminal vesicles involvement are also at high risk for distant relapse, but this must be confirmed.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

The management of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Up to 30% of patients complain about urine leakage after radical prostatectomy, but persistent stress incontinence (beyond 1 year) affects <5% of them. This complication is mainly caused by sphincter dysfunction. Some preventive measures have been described to decrease the risk of incontinence after radical prostatectomy, but with conflicting results. The effectiveness of preoperative and early postoperative physiotherapy is controversial. Moreover, while meticulous apical dissection of the prostate significantly improves postoperative continence, the benefit of other surgical techniques, e.g. preserving the bladder neck and the neurovascular bundles, is under debate. The treatment of persistent stress urinary incontinence is mainly based on surgery, as this type of incontinence usually does not respond to physiotherapy and anticholinergic medication. While injection therapy is safe and well tolerated, its effect on postoperative continence is limited and decreases with time. The best results are achieved by implanting an artificial urinary sphincter, but with significant complication and revision rates.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed2001

Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated pathological features of prostate cancer detected on repeat prostate biopsy in men with a serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level between 4 and 10 ng/ml who were diagnosed with benign prostatic tissue after an initial biopsy and compared them to those cancers detected on initial prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective European prostate cancer detection study, 1,051 men with a total PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/ml underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided sextant biopsy and two additional transition zone biopsies. All subjects whose biopsy samples were negative for prostate cancer (CaP) underwent a repeat biopsy after 6 weeks. Those with clinically localized cancers underwent radical prostatectomy. Pathological and clinical features of patients diagnosed with cancer on either initial or repeat biopsy and clinically organ confined disease who agreed to undergo radical prostatectomy were compared. RESULTS: Initial biopsy was positive (CaP) in 231 of 1,051 enrolled subjects and negative (benign histology) in 820 subjects. Of these 820 subjects, CaP was detected in 10% (83/820) upon repeat biopsy. Of cancers detected on initial and repeat biopsy, 148/231 (64%) and 56/83 (67.5%) had clinically localized disease, respectively, and were offered radical prostatectomy. 10/148 (6.7%) and 3/56 (5.3%), respectively, opted for radiation therapy and thus, 138/148 (93.3%) and 53/56 (94.7%), respectively, underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. There were statistically significant differences with respect to multifocality (P = 0.009) and cancer location (P < 0.001) with cancers on repeat biopsy showing a lower rate of multifocality and a more apico-dorsal location. In contrast, there were no differences with respect to stage (P = 0.2), Gleason score (P = 0.36), percentage Gleason grade 4/5 (P = 0.1), serum PSA (P = 0.62), and patient age (P = 0.517). CONCLUSIONS: At least 10% of patients with negative prostatic biopsy results will be diagnosed with CaP on repeat biopsy. Despite differences in location and multifocality, pathological and biochemical features of cancers detected on initial and repeat biopsy are similar, suggesting similar biological behavior and thus advocating for a repeat prostate biopsy in case of a negative finding on initial biopsy. Cancers missed on initial biopsy and subsequently detected on repeat biopsy are located in a more apico-dorsal location. Repeat biopsies should thus be directed to this rather spared area in order to improve cancer detection rates.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2001

[Standards, Options, and Recommendations for brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer: efficacy and toxicity].

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) collaborative project was initiated in 1993 by the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), with the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, several French public university and general hospitals, as well as private clinics and medical specialty societies. Its main objective is the development of serviceable clinical practice guidelines in order to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review, followed by a critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts. Draft guidelines are produced, then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: Produce clinical practice guidelines for the brachytherapy of prostate cancer using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: The FNCLCC and the French Urology Association (AFU) first designated the multidisciplinary group of experts. Available data were collected by a search of Medline and lists selected by experts in the group. A first draft of the guidelines was written, they validated by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1/Brachytherapy with permanent seeds alone is a possible curative treatment for prostate cancer patients with the following prognosis factors: tumour stage T1 or T2a (TNM 1992), Gleason score < or = 6 and PSA < 10 micrograms/L. 2/Combined treatment with brachytherapy and hormonal therapy could be more efficient than brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer patients with Gleason score > 7 and/or PSA > 10.3/Combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy can be proposed to prostate cancer patients with intermediate prognosis. 4/Before and after seed implantation, risks of infection must be prevented by appropriate antibiotic therapy (recommendation). 5/Brachytherapy must not be performed within 2 months of transurethral prostate resection. 6/The height of the urethra receiving more than 200% of the prescribed dose must be reported. The portion of the rectum receiving 100 and 120% of the prescribed dose must be limited to 10 and 5 mm length, respectively.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2001

Frequency of renal phosphate leak among patients with calcium nephrolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Nephrolithiasis is a frequent disorder affecting 10 to 15% of the population in Europe and the United States. More than 80% of renal stones are made of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate. The main identified risks for calcium renal stone formation are hypercalciuria and urinary saturation. A urine phosphate (Pi) loss is often associated with hypercalciuria; furthermore, hyperphosphaturia increases urinary saturation. METHODS: To determine whether urinary phosphate loss is associated with calcium urolithiasis, we measured renal Pi threshold (TmPi) in 207 stone formers with normal parathyroid hormone (PTH) serum concentration and in 105 control subjects. RESULTS: The TmPi followed a normal distribution in both groups. The mean TmPi was significantly lower in stone formers versus controls (0.72 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.87 +/- 0.18 mmol/L, P < 0.0001) because of a shift to the left of the TmPi distribution curve in the stone former population, with no evidence for bimodal distribution. Five percent of the controls had a TmPi <0.63 versus 19% of the stone formers. Daily urinary calcium excretion was significantly higher in stone formers than in controls. Calcium excretion was also significantly higher in stone formers with TmPi <0.63 mmol/L compared with those with TmPi > or =0.63. Serum PTH and ionized calcium concentrations were not different in stone formers and in control subjects, whatever the TmPi value. CONCLUSIONS: : A low TmPi is more frequently encountered in stone formers with a normal PTH concentration than in control subjects and is associated with a high urinary Ca excretion. The hypophosphatemia induced by a renal phosphate leak may predispose the subject to calcium stone formation by increasing the serum calcitriol level, calcium excretion, and urinary saturation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Contribution of surgical techniques used in liver transplantation in the treatment of retroperitoneal tumors].

The authors describe the surgical technique used in liver transplantation and its application to treat retroperitoneal tumours. This technique comprises primary mobilization of the liver with easy vascular control. This technique, used in 29 patients, is simple, facilitates exposure of great vessels which can be controlled and allows excellent exposure in difficult cases. Analysis of the postoperative course emphasized the absence of hepatic and renal complications, as reflected by normal renal function and liver enzymes. The use of this technique for renal and adrenal surgery avoids the need for extracorporeal circulation and a thoracophrenoabdominal approach, thereby limiting the specific complications related to these two procedures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

[Acute urinary retention secondary to clear cell adenocarcinoma of the urethra].

The authors report a case of primary clear cell cancer of the urethra in a woman presenting with acute urinary retention. The diagnosis was based on cystoscopy and confirmed by histological examination of urethral biopsies. Treatment consisted of urethrocystectomy with creation of an "Indiana pouch". The pathological stage was T3N2M0 [1]. Three months postoperatively, the patient presented with inguinal lymph node metastases. She was treated with 3 courses of chemotherapy (mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil) combined with radiotherapy. With a follow-up of 10 months, the patient is still alive and inguinal lymph nodes have regressed. This case report emphasizes the rarity of this histological type and describes the management of urinary retention in a woman when an underlying specific disease is suspected.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

[IVU: a test of the past without future?].

IVU has been gradually replaced over recent years as the "gold standard" investigation for the renal parenchyma and urinary tract by two new modalities: ultrasound and computed tomography. Some authors still advocate IVU for the assessment of renal colic, for the following reasons: the excess cost of CT (which is not true for plain CT) and the absence of functional data (there are specific CT signs for increased pressure). However, the advantages of CT are clearly established: contrast resolution allowing the detection of almost all stones except for certain complications of triple combination therapy in HIV seropositive patients, extensive cover facilitating identification of differential diagnoses, rapidity and greater efficacy, and finally the absence of risk related to the injection of iodinated contrast agents in this indication. However, the performance of CT may be more limited in certain situations: thin patients, or when the female genital tract also needs to be investigated, but IVU is not more contributive in this context. The current place of IVU in renal colic is therefore to establish a definitive diagnosis and to guide an urgent procedure (removal of an obstruction in a context of infection) when CT is either unavailable (maintenance...) or really excessively irradiating, as in pregnant women, when ultrasound, or even MRI and MR urography have not been sufficiently contributive. The essential indication remains detailed visualization of the urinary tract (assessment of haematuria, detection of an urothelial tumour), detailed visualization of the entire urinary tract (assessment of certain malformations), or even a gross assessment of renal function in a patient with multiple injuries, which cannot be investigated by CT and in whom the surgeon rightly hesitates before opening the retroperitoneum. However, in the absence of IVU, we may fail to diagnose papillary necrosis or a small caliceal diverticulum, but is that really important in the final analysis? IVU, in countries with adapted equipment, is therefore now only an expert examination. IVU is an examination of the past, without a future indeed, but with a descendant: CT urography.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?

PURPOSE: We evaluated biochemical parameters and pathological features, as well as biopsy related morbidity of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 2, 3 and 4 in men with total serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) between 4 and 10 ng./ml. These features were compared to those detected on prostate biopsy 1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study 1,051 men with total PSA between 4 and 10 ng./ml. underwent transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy and 2 additional transition zone biopsies. All patients in whom biopsy samples were negative for prostate cancer underwent biopsy 2 after 6 weeks. If also negative, biopsies 3 and even 4 were performed at 8-week intervals. Those patients with clinically localized cancer underwent radical prostatectomy. Pathological and clinical features of patients diagnosed with cancer on either biopsy 1 or 2 and clinically organ confined disease who agreed to undergo radical prostatectomy were compared. RESULTS: Cancer detection rates on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 22% (231 of 1,051), 10% (83 of 820), 5% (36 of 737) and 4% (4 of 94), respectively. Overall, of the patients with clinically localized disease, which was 67% of cancers detected, 86% underwent radical prostatectomy and 14% opted for watchful waiting or radiation therapy. Overall, 58.0%, 60.9%, 86.3% and 100% of patients had organ confined disease on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Despite statistically significant differences in regard to multifocality (p = 0.009) and cancer location (p = 0.001), including cancer on biopsy 2 showing a lower rate of multifocality and a more apico-dorsal location, there were no differences in regard to stage (p = 0.2), Gleason score (p = 0.3), percent Gleason grade 4/5 (p = 0.2), serum PSA and patient age between biopsies 1 and 2. However, cancer detected on biopsies 3 and 4 had a significantly lower Gleason score (p = 0.001 and 0.001), lower rate of grade 4/5 (p = 0.02), and lower volume (p = 0.001 and 0.001) and stage (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in location and multifocality, pathological and biochemical features of cancer detected on biopsies 1 and 2 were similar, suggesting comparable biological behaviors. Cancer detected on biopsies 3 and 4 had a lower grade, stage and volume compared with that on biopsies 1 and 2. Morbidity on biopsies 1 and 2 was similar, whereas biopsies 3 and 4 had a slightly higher complication rate. Therefore, biopsy 2 in all cases of a negative finding on biopsy 1 appears justified. However, biopsies 3 and 4 should only be obtained in select patients with a high suspicion of cancer and/or poor prognostic factors on biopsy 1 or 2.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

[Can a precise vesiculectomy be performed during radical prostatectomy?].

OBJECTIVE: To define the anatomical landmarks allowing precise vesiculectomy to be performed during radical prostatectomy for cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 12 non-formalin-preserved anatomical subjects were dissected as during retropubic and perineal prostatectomy, with and without coloured latex vascular injection. RESULTS: Three anatomical landmarks were defined: 1) Denonvilliers' fascia; 2) vas deferens; 3) arteries supplying the seminal vesicles. CONCLUSIONS: These three anatomical landmarks ensure: complete resection, preservation of adjacent anatomical structures and elective haemostasis.

Aged↗