Biomedical subjects

V Pravettoni

Publications and source records attributed to V Pravettoni.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1987

The role of suggestion in asthma. I. Effects of inactive solution on bronchial reactivity under bronchoconstrictor or bronchodilator suggestion.

Twenty-eight subjects affected by perennial asthma were selected in order to investigate the possibility of inducing or relieving an asthmatic attack by means of suggestion. Twenty-five were positive to methacholine challenge test and, among them, eleven reacted to an ultrasonic nebulized distilled water test. The effect of suggestion on airway response was assessed by eight inhalations of normal saline at 32 degrees C alternately presented as a bronchoconstrictor or as a bronchodilator drug. Eight inhalations of the same diluent without any psychic stimulus were used as control test. Seven patients reacted with bronchoconstriction to both positive and negative suggestion and to control test. Further, this group of patients showed a lower methacholine PD20 when compared with the other subjects. In this study, the effects of suggestion on bronchial reactivity were not observed and bronchoconstriction belonged to an individual hyperreactivity of the airways.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed1985

Evaluation of allergic etiology in perennial rhinitis.

In 197 patients with perennial rhinitis, 49 patients (24.9%) were found to be allergic to perennial inhalant allergens, 37 patients (18.8%) allergic to seasonal allergens, 52 patients (26.4%) had food intolerance, 12 patients (6.6%) showed evidence of nasal infection, and in 46 patients (23.3%) etiology was undetermined.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Allergen specific IgG subclass antibody response in hyposensitization with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract.

Most of the controlled trials of specific immunotherapy (SIT) with house dust mite showed a good clinical efficacy of different kinds of extract after variable periods of treatment. However, few of them looked at all the parameters available to monitor this therapy, such as threshold dose of specific provocation test, end point titration and immunological variations. In particular, the behaviour of specific IgE antibodies is not completely known, while, in more recent studies, mite specific IgG antibodies have been shown to increase even in the early stages of treatment. Few data are available on mite specific IgG1-4 subclasses. The preliminary results of a double blind placebo controlled trial we performed with alginate conjugated Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract seem to indicate a good clinical and immunological response to this kind of extract. Moreover, we observed a significant increase of specific IgG antibodies, total and subclasses IgG1.2.4, with a prevalence of IgG4 subclass after three months of SIT. After two years of SIT mite specific IgG1 antibodies showed a tendency to decrease, while IgG4 antibodies maintained a constantly high level.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Are double-blind food challenges necessary before starting an elimination diet?

Food allergy is normally treated by eliminating the offending food. Such a measure, however, may cause nutritional and sociopsychological problems, so an allergy must be diagnosed with the utmost certainty. To date the most reliable diagnostic test is the double-blind food challenge (DBFC). The rationale for using this test is the marked difference in positive results with open and double-blind food challenges. Only about 30% of open challenges that appear positive are confirmed on blind challenge. There is ample evidence, too, that a negative DBFC may in fact indicate tolerance to that food. From the literature it appears that almost all patients who reintroduced a certain food into their diet after a DBFC had given negative findings did not present any adverse reaction to it. In our caselist of 21 patients with probable reactions to foods but negative DBFC, 19 (90.5%) tolerated the "incriminated" food well when it was reintroduced into their diet even in unlimited amounts. Only two (9.5%) again presented symptoms when they started taking large amounts of the problem food. Therefore, one precaution recommended before reintroducing a food item into a patient's diet after a negative DBFC is to check how it is tolerated at high doses. A review of the literature confirms the unquestioned utility of the DBFC. Nevertheless, in some situations this test is not indicated. The main one, of course, is in patients with life-threatening symptoms such as anaphylactic shock or glottis edema, in whom any provocation test is contraindicated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diet↗