Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V P Shah

Publications and source records attributed to V P Shah.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: isoniazid.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing isoniazid as the only active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are reviewed. Isoniazid's solubility and permeability characteristics according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), as well as its therapeutic use and therapeutic index, its pharmacokinetic properties, data related to the possibility of excipient interactions and reported BE/bioavailability (BA) problems were taken into consideration. Isoniazid is "highly soluble" but data on its oral absorption and permeability are inconclusive, suggesting this API to be on the borderline of BCS Class I and III. For a number of excipients, an interaction with the permeability is extreme unlikely, but lactose and other deoxidizing saccharides can form condensation products with isoniazid, which may be less permeable than the free API. A biowaiver is recommended for IR solid oral drug products containing isoniazid as the sole API, provided that the test product meets the WHO requirements for "very rapidly dissolving" and contains only the excipients commonly used in isoniazid products, as listed in this article. Lactose and/or other deoxidizing saccharides containing formulations should be subjected to an in vivo BE study.

Biological Availability↗

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: prednisolone.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing prednisolone are reviewed. Data on its solubility, oral absorption, and permeability are not totally conclusive, but strongly suggest a BCS Class 1 classification. Prednisolone's therapeutic indications and therapeutic index, pharmacokinetics, and the possibility of excipient interactions were also taken into consideration. Available evidence indicates that a biowaiver for IR solid oral dosage forms formulated with the excipients tabulated in this article would be unlikely to expose patients to undue risks.

Administration, Oral↗

Review of global regulations concerning biowaivers for immediate release solid oral dosage forms.

The regulations with respect to biowaivers for immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms in the USA, the EU, Japan and from the World Health Organization (WHO) are summarized and compared. Two case studies are presented, one from our own files and one from the open literature, showing the similarities and the differences among the qualification requirements of the four systems. The regulatory experience gained up to now is reviewed and expected future trends are discussed.

Administration, Oral↗

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: acetaminophen (paracetamol).

Literature data are reviewed on the properties of acetaminophen (paracetamol) related to the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS). According to the current BCS criteria, acetaminophen is BCS Class III compound. Differences in composition seldom, if ever, have an effect on the extent of absorption. However, some studies show differences in rate of absorption between brands and formulations. In particular, sodium bicarbonate, present in some drug products, was reported to give an increase in the rate of absorption, probably caused by an effect on gastric emptying. In view of Marketing Authorizations (MAs) given in a number of countries to acetaminophen drug products with rapid onset of action, it is concluded that differences in rate of absorption were considered therapeutically not relevant by the Health Authorities. Moreover, in view of its therapeutic use, its wide therapeutic index and its uncomplicated pharmacokinetic properties, in vitro dissolution data collected according to the relevant Guidances can be safely used for declaring bioequivalence (BE) of two acetaminophen formulations. Therefore, accepting a biowaiver for immediate release (IR) acetaminophen solid oral drug products is considered scientifically justified, if the test product contains only those excipients reported in this paper in their usual amounts and the test product is rapidly dissolving, as well as the test product fulfils the criterion of similarity of dissolution profiles to the reference product.

Acetaminophen↗

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: amitriptyline hydrochloride.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing amitriptyline hydrochloride are reviewed. Its therapeutic uses, its pharmacokinetic properties, the possibility of excipient interactions and reported BE/bioavailability (BA) problems are also taken into consideration. Literature data indicates that amitriptyline hydrochloride is a highly permeable active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Data on the solubility according to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) were not fully available and consequently amitriptyline hydrochloride could not be definitively assigned to either BCS Class I or BCS Class II. But all evidence taken together, a biowaiver can currently be recommended provided that IR tablets are formulated with excipients used in existing approved products and that the dissolution meets the criteria defined in the Guidances.

Administration, Oral↗

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) literature data: chloroquine phosphate, chloroquine sulfate, and chloroquine hydrochloride.

Literature data on the properties of chloroquine phosphate, chloroquine sulfate, and chloroquine hydrochloride related to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) are reviewed. The available information indicates that these chloroquine salts can be classified as highly soluble and highly permeable, i.e., BCS class I. The qualitative composition of immediate release (IR) tablets containing these Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) with a Marketing Authorization (MA) in Belgium (BE), Germany (DE), Finland (FI), and The Netherlands (NL) is provided. In view of these MA's and the critical therapeutic indication of chloroquine, it is assumed that the registration authorities had evidence that these formulations are bioequivalent to the innovator. It is concluded that IR tablets formulated with these excipients are candidates for a biowaiver.

Antimalarials↗

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ranitidine hydrochloride.

Literature and experimental data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing ranitidine hydrochloride are reviewed. According to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), ranitidine hydrochloride should be assigned to Class III. However, based on its therapeutic and therapeutic index, pharmacokinetic properties and data related to the possibility of excipient interactions, a biowaiver can be recommended for IR solid oral dosage forms that are rapidly dissolving and contain only those excipients as reported in this study.

Administration, Oral↗

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ibuprofen.

Literature data are reviewed on the properties of ibuprofen related to the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS). Ibuprofen was assessed to be a BCS class II drug. Differences in composition and/or manufacturing procedures were reported to have an effect on the rate, but not the extent of absorption; such differences are likely to be detectable by comparative in vitro dissolution tests. Also in view of its therapeutic use, its wide therapeutic index and uncomplicated pharmacokinetic properties, a biowaiver for immediate release (IR) ibuprofen solid oral drug products is scientifically justified, provided that the test product contains only those excipients reported in this paper in their usual amounts, the dosage form is rapidly dissolving (85% in 30 min or less) in buffer pH 6.8 and the test product also exhibits similar dissolution profiles to the reference product in buffer pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8.

Administration, Oral↗

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) literature data: verapamil hydrochloride, propranolol hydrochloride, and atenolol.

Literature data related to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) are presented on verapamil hydrochloride, propranolol hydrochloride, and atenolol in the form of BCS-monographs. Data on the qualitative composition of immediate release (IR) tablets containing these active substances with a Marketing Authorization (MA) in the Netherlands (NL) are also provided; in view of these MA's the assumption was made that these tablets were bioequivalent to the innovator product. The development of a database with BCS-related data is announced by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP).

Administration, Oral↗

Variability in the bioavailability of phenytoin capsules in males and females.

PURPOSE: To determine inter-lot and intra-subject variability in the bioavailability of the 100 mg extended phenytoin sodium capsules. In addition, to determine the effect of gender and menstrual cycle on phenytoin bioavailability. METHODS: Three different lots of extended phenytoin sodium capsules were given to 12 healthy male and 12 healthy female subjects in a crossover fashion. One of the lots was also given a second time to each subject. Plasma phenytoin was determined, using an HPLC assay, in samples collected over a 73-hr period after each dose. RESULTS: The mean Cmax for the four administrations ranged from 1.71-1.79 microg/ml and mean AUC(0-infinity) values from ranged 53.0-54.1 microg*hr/ml. The elimination half-life was 3 hr shorter, and the AUC(0-infinity) adjusted for the mg/kg dose was 30% lower for females. Average bioequivalence was demonstrated between the three lots for both Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) based on the BE limit of 80-125%. Further, all confidence intervals of AUC(0-infinity) fell within the limit of 90-111%. There were no differences in the confidence limits for Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) determined separately for males and females. Also, there was no difference in the mean Cmax or AUC(0-infinity) for females when analyzed as a function of the week of their menstrual cycle. Individual bioequivalence was demonstrated between three lots of phenytoin using the constant-scaled method, but not the reference-scaled method. CONCLUSIONS: There was very little difference in the bioavailability of the three lots of phenytoin. Females exhibited a lower AUC(0-infinity) than males after adjustment of dose for body weight, but their inclusion in the study did not affect the assessment of bioequivalence. When dose was not adjusted for body weight, no difference in AUC(0-infinity) was seen between males and females.

Adult↗

Progress in methodologies for evaluating bioequivalence of topical formulations.

Assessment of bioequivalence of topical dermatological formulations is a challenge. Currently, comparative clinical studies are used to establish bioequivalence for most formulations (except corticosteroids). This article reviews different in vivo methodologies for determining bioequivalence, and the progress made in this area. Dermatopharmacokinetics is the term used to describe the pharmacokinetics of topically applied drugs in the stratum corneum. A tape stripping procedure used in dermatopharmacokinetic methodology measures the drug concentration in stratum corneum at the site of application. Various studies have shown dermatopharmacokinetics to be a reliable and reproducible method for determining bioequivalence, and have indicated that it is applicable for all topical dermatological drug products. However, confidence in this methodology needs to be established, particularly regarding its relevance to clinical drug efficacy.

Administration, Topical↗

Dissolution testing as a prognostic tool for oral drug absorption: dissolution behavior of glibenclamide.

PURPOSE: The dissolution behavior of two commercially available glibenclamide formulations was tested in various media. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the use of biorelevant dissolution media (BDM) would be advantageous over the use of standard media for predicting the in vivo performance of the two formulations. METHODS: The dissolution tests were performed using USP 23 apparatus 2. Conventional buffers and USP media were compared with two BDM containing different amounts of lecithin and sodium taurocholate. RESULTS: The dissolution of two drug powders was highly dependent on wetting, particle size, pH, and the composition of the medium used. In addition, the dissolution behavior of the two glibenclamide formulations showed differences in all media tested. The dissolution results of the two formulations were compared with those from an in vivo bioequivalence study undertaken by the central quality control laboratory of the German pharmacists (ZL). The bioequivalence criterion set by the ZL requires more than 80% drug release within 10 minutes. Results in FaSSIF, one of the BDMs, met the ZL criterion and this medium was also able to discriminate between the two formulations. This was not the case for the other media tested. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that BDM are better able to discriminate between glibenclamide formulations than standard dissolution media.

Administration, Oral↗

Bioequivalence of methylphenidate immediate-release tablets using a replicated study design to characterize intrasubject variability.

PURPOSE: To determine the relative bioavailability of two marketed, immediate-release methylphenidate tablets. The study used a replicated study design to characterize intrasubject variability, and determine bioequivalence using both average and individual bioequivalence criteria. METHODS: A replicated crossover design was employed using 20 subjects. Each subject received a single 20 mg dose of the reference tablet on two occasions and two doses of the test tablet on two occasions. Blood samples were obtained for 10 hr after dosing, and plasma was assayed for methylphenidate by GC/MS. RESULTS: The test product was more rapidly dissolved in vitro and more rapidly absorbed in vivo than the reference product. The mean Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) differed by 11% and 9%, respectively. Using an average bioequivalence criterion, the 90% confidence limits for the Ln-transformed Cmax and AUC(0-infinity), comparing the two replicates of the test to the reference product, fell within the acceptable range of 80-125%. Using an individual bioequivalence criterion the test product failed to demonstrate equivalence in Cmax to the reference product. CONCLUSIONS: The test and reference tablets were bioequivalent using an average bioequivalence criterion. The intrasubject variability of the generic product was greater and the subject-by-formulation interaction variance was borderline high. For these reasons, the test tablets were not individually bioequivalent to the reference tablets.

Adult↗

The effect of gelatin cross-linking on the bioequivalence of hard and soft gelatin acetaminophen capsules.

PURPOSE: To determine if changes in the in vitro dissolution of hard and soft gelatin acetaminophen capsules, which result from gelatin crosslinking, are predictive of changes in the bioavailability of the capsules in humans. METHODS: Both hard and soft gelatin capsules were "stressed" by a controlled exposure to formaldehyde, resulting in unstressed, moderately stressed and highly stressed capsules. In vitro dissolution studies were conducted using water or SGF with and without pepsin as the media. Separate 24-subject, 3-way crossover human bioequivalence studies were performed on the unstressed and stressed acetaminophen capsules. Plasma acetaminophen was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for 12 hr after each dose. RESULTS: The in vitro rate of dissolution of hard and soft gelatin capsules was decreased by crosslinking. The bioequivalence studies showed that both hard and soft gelatin capsules, which failed to meet the USP dissolution specification in water, but complied when tested in SGF containing pepsin, were bioequivalent to the unstressed control capsules. The capsules that were cross-linked to the greatest extent were not bioequivalent to the unstressed control capsules, based on Cmax. A trend toward an increase in Cmax with increased level of cross-linking was observed, but this was only significant for the severely stressed capsules. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this study a two-tier in vitro dissolution test was developed using enzymes to distinguish between bioequivalent and bioinequivalent gelatin capsules.

Acetaminophen↗

Bioequivalence of immediate-release theophylline capsules.

A three-way crossover study in 18 healthy male volunteers was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of three different 200 mg anhydrous theophylline immediate-release (IR) capsules. The products had not been rated as therapeutically equivalent by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) owing to a lack of bioequivalence data. Serum samples were obtained from 0 to 34 h after dosing. Mean time of maximum serum concentration (T(max)) ranged from 1.3 to 1.4 h. Mean values for the maximum serum concentration (C(max)) and the area under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC) differed by <5% for the three products. The confidence limits for Ln-transformed C(max) and AUC ranged from >/=89 to </=113%. It was concluded that the three products were bioequivalent. In addition, the rapid in vitro dissolution of these formulations, as well as the reported high solubility and high permeability of theophylline, was predictive of the lack of any bioavailability differences among the three products.

Adult↗

Assessment of value and applications of in vitro testing of topical dermatological drug products.

The FDA recently issued a guidance covering practices of scaleup and post approval changes with semisolids (SUPAC-SS). This guidance outlines the steps that must be taken by a company to maintain certification of its semisolid dermatological products after quantitative changes have been made in their compositions and/or after changes have been made in the sourcing of their key ingredients, in their processing, in their batch sizes, and/or after their site of manufacture has been relocated. A key element within the guidance is a release test to be used to determine if the diffusional release of a drug found in a formulation is the same after changes have been made to the formulation as it was prior to implementing the changes. The AAPS-FDA sponsored workshop was set up to explore this qualifying test. The stated aims of the workshop were: a) to illustrate the methodology and techniques of in vitro release testing, b) to show the sensitivity of in vitro release with respect to manufacturing variables and to variations in components and composition (of specific formulations), c) to recognize in vitro release testing as a useful procedure for SUPAC documentation, d) to highlight and evaluate other applications of in vitro release testing, e) to explore the degree to which in vitro release testing and bioavailability may be related, and f) to evaluate the role of in vitro release testing of topical dosage forms as a tool to improve product quality.

Administration, Topical↗

Development of in vivo bioequivalence methodology for dermatologic corticosteroids based on pharmacodynamic modeling.

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic corticosteroid products produce skin blanching that is related to clinical potency and dose. (For application of the vasoconstrictor assay to bioavailability and bioequivalence assessment, dose is defined in terms of duration of treatment exposure [dose duration], so the terms dose and dose duration have been used interchangeably). The vasoconstrictor assay is the method of choice to assess dermatologic corticosteroid products bioequivalence if dose-response is validated. This article examines dose-response validation to meet objectives of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bioequivalence guidance for dermatologic corticosteroid products. METHODS: An exploratory dose-response study was conducted to determine applicability of the empirical maximum effect (Emax) model to the individual subject and population dose-response relationships of six dermatologic corticosteroid product creams that varied from the most to the least potent classes. Products were applied to the skin of 10 healthy subjects in each of two dosing periods for dose durations of 0.5, 1, 2, and 6 hours. Skin blanching was measured by reflectance colorimeter through 24 hours after application. Area under the effect curve (AUEC) was determined for each dose duration. An Emax model was fitted to the AUEC versus dose duration data. A similar analysis was conducted for a bioequivalence study on two formulations of a dermatologic corticosteroid product in 40 healthy subjects. RESULTS: In the exploratory study, the number of individual subject data sets for which the Emax model provided an acceptable fit generally increased with the potency of the dermatologic corticosteroid product. On the basis of population modeling, dose-response data of all products, except the lowest potency cream, were adequately described by the Emax model. Values for population ED50 (the dose duration required to achieve 50% of the fitted AUECmax value) decreased with increase in dermatologic corticosteroid product potency. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable model fits to all individual subject dose-response data were not achieved for any dermatologic corticosteroid product. However, population dose-responses were adequately described by the Emax model. On the basis of these data, the optimal dose duration used for comparison of multisource dermatologic corticosteroid products is recommended to be equal to the ED50 based on population modeling of pilot dose-response study data.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗