Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V P DiProssimo

Publications and source records attributed to V P DiProssimo.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1979

Minicolumn detection method applied to almonds: collaborative study.

The minicolumn screening method for aflatoxins was collaboratively tested on naturally contaminated almonds. The nuts were extracted, and the extract was cleaned up and applied to a Velasco-type minicolumn. This permits the detection of total aflatoxins (B1, B2, G1, G2) as a fluorescent band on the Florisil layer of the column. The results of 20 collaborators are presented. Samples containing 0, 2, 5, 10, and 25 ng aflatoxin/g were analyzed. Ninety-six per cent of the samples containing 5--25 ng total aflatoxins/g and 83% of the negative samples were correctly identified. The method has been adopted as official first action for detection of total aflatoxin levels of greater than or equal to 5 ng/g.

Aflatoxins↗
PubMed1976

Distribution of aflatoxins in some samples of peanuts.

Naturally occurring G aflatoxins were found at approximately 20 times the level of B aflatoxins in one lot of roasted, blanched peanuts. Official methods, as well as high-pressure liquid chromatography, were used to confirm this finding. Additional routine sample analysis data of raw and roasted peanuts revealed that this finding is not so unusual formerly thought. It was found that 9.8% of the raw peanut samples contained higher levels of G than B aflatoxin; 4.9% containing 2-8 times more G than B aflatoxins. In a smaller sampling of roasted peanuts, 28% of the contaminated peanuts contained more G than B aflatoxins.

Aflatoxins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of three methods for determining aflatoxins in melon seeds.

The suitability of 3 methods for determining aflatoxins in melon seeds was examined. The first 2 are the Contaminants Branch (CB) method and the Best Foods (BF) method, both official methods for determining aflatoxins in peanuts and peanut products. The third method, the modified CB method-Rapid Modification of the Cottonseed (CB-RCS-Mod) method, devised in this work, was derived by combining steps from the CB method and the Rapid Modification of the Cottonseed method. The CB method was superior to the other 2 methods for quantitation of aflatoxins. It gave better recoveries and cleaner extracts that exhibit less fluorescent interference for thin-layer chromatography (TLC) than the BF method. Also, its solvent efficiency was better than that of the CB-RCS-Mod method. With the CB method, recoveries from spiked samples were 85.0% for aflatoxin B1 and 90.0% for aflatoxin B2. Recoveries of G aflatoxins were more variable, averaging 90.0% for aflatoxin G1 and 72.5% for aflatoxin G2. Total aflatoxin recovery was 86.5% for the CB method. At a low aflatoxin contamination level (8 micrograms B1/kg sample), aflatoxin B1 was detectable by the CB method but not by the BF method. Detection of aflatoxins in BF method sample extracts by TLC was not improved by the use of chloroform-acetone-water (88 + 12 + 1), benzene-ethanol-water, or ether-methanol-water (96 + 3 + 1) in place of the standard chloroform-acetone (88 + 12) developer. Use of ether-methanol-water (96 + 3 + 1) for detecting aflatoxins by TLC in the CB method extracts increased interference compared with the standard chloroform-acetone (88 + 12) developer.

Acetone↗