Biomedical subjects

V Mahachai

Publications and source records attributed to V Mahachai.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

Caffeine clearance study in hepatocellular carcinoma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate hepatic metabolic capacity in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We compared plasma caffeine clearance, calculated by two point analysis, between patients with cirrhosis alone and cirrhosis complicated with HCC. These two groups were comparable with regards to age, sex, and the severity of liver disease, graded by Child-Pugh score as compensated and decompensated cases. From our result, caffeine clearance in compensated cases was clearly higher than that of decompensated cases in both groups studied, particularly in the HCC group (p = 0.001). The mean value of caffeine clearance in HCC patients correlated well with the tumor staging as classified by Okuda's criteria. There was also a reversal correlation between tumor size and the clearance tested in compensated cases of HCC (p = 0.046), but this finding was not detected in decompensated cases (p > 0.05). We conclude that the determination of caffeine clearance can serve as a useful parameter for the assessment of hepatic functional reserve in cirrhotic patients complicated with HCC, and may be a useful predictor for survival outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Telomerase assay for differentiating between malignancy-related and nonmalignant ascites.

The differential diagnosis between malignancy-related ascites (MRAs) and nonmalignant ascites (NMAs) has remained an essential problem in clinical practice. Our purpose was to determine the diagnostic value of ascitic fluid telomerase activity in discriminating these two categories compared with that of cytological examination. Twenty-five MRAs and 47 NMAs as the control group were enrolled in our study. In the MRA group, telomerase activity was detected in 13 of 16 (81.3%) cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis and in 6 of 9 (66.7%) cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-associated ascites. Contrasting that, cytological examination was positive in only 9 of 16 (56.3%) and 1 of 9 (11.1%) cases, respectively. In the NMA group, telomerase-positive ascitic fluid samples were found in 2 of 47 (4.3%) cases, all belonging to subgroups that contained large numbers of lymphocytes in the ascites. In our study, the telomerase activity and cytological examination exhibited a sensitivity of 76% and 40% and a specificity of 95.7% and 100%, respectively. Regarding subgroups of MRAs, the telomerase activity and cytological examination demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.3% and 56.3%, respectively, in peritoneal carcinomatosis and a sensitivity of 66.7% and 11.1%, respectively, in HCC-associated ascites. In conclusion, telomerase activity is a more sensitive marker than cytological examination for differentiating between MRAs and NMAs. It may also serve as a useful indicator for detecting early i.p. metastasis in HCC-associated ascites.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Twice daily nizatidine or ranitidine is superior to once daily dosing in elevating 24 h intragastric pH in patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

The present study was performed in six asymptomatic patients with a history of resistant duodenal ulcers in whom 24 h intragastric pH, gastric juice pepsin and PGE2 concentrations, as well as serum gastrin concentrations, were measured. We wanted to compare the effects on these parameters of a single night time (q.h.s.) dose of nizatidine 300 mg (N1), nizatidine 300 mg b.i.d. (N2), ranitidine 300 mg q.h.s. (R1) or ranitidine 300 mg b.i.d. (R2) compared with placebo (P). During the night (22.00-08.00 h), all treatments gave a higher mean pH than P, but during the day (08.00-22.00 h) the mean pH was higher than P only for patients administered R2 and N2. Doubling the dose of nizatidine (N2 vs N1) or ranitidine (R2 vs R1) increased the mean daytime pH, but had no effect on night time pH. The daytime pepsin concentration was unaffected by H2-receptor antagonists, while night time pepsin was lower with R1 and R2, but not with N1 or N2. The night time gastrin concentration was unaffected by H2-receptor antagonists; doubling the dose of the H2-receptor antagonist (R2 vs R1 and N2 vs N1) increased daytime gastrin concentration. During the night, each treatment increased PGE2 concentration by at least six-fold compared with P. Thus, where it is therapeutically indicated to achieve greater suppression of acid secretion, doubling the total daily dose by dosing with twice daily versus once daily night time nizatidine or ranitidine is efficacious.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Diurnal variation in the pharmacokinetics of nizatidine in healthy volunteers and in patients with peptic ulcer disease.

Six healthy volunteers and six patients with asymptomatic duodenal ulcer disease received placebo or 300 mg nizatidine once at night or twice daily (morning and evening) for a week in a random, cross-over fashion. Steady-state serum nizatidine concentrations and gastric pH were measured over a 24-hour period. No significant differences in the pharmacokinetic indices were observed between the healthy volunteers and patients with duodenal ulcer disease. In patients with duodenal ulcers, significantly lower peak serum concentrations, longer half-life (t1/2) and larger volume of distribution (Vd) were observed after the night doses compared with the daytime doses. The diurnal variation in drug kinetics between the nighttime and daytime doses in the twice daily regimen may be caused by a slower absorption rate, paralleled with a higher extent of distribution. Despite lower serum nizatidine concentrations, gastric pH was higher in the evening than in the daytime; it is speculated that this was due to a time-dependent enhanced distribution of the H2-receptor blocker into the site of action.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Both phenolic and acyl glucuronidation pathways of diflunisal are impaired in liver cirrhosis.

The pharmacokinetics of diflunisal, a salicylate derivative that undergoes phenolic and acyl glucuronidation as well as sulphate conjugation, has been studied after a single oral dose (250 mg) in patients with cirrhosis (n = 5) and in healthy controls (n = 5). The plasma clearance of total (bound + unbound) diflunisal was 10.2 ml.min-1 in the control subjects and it was not affected by cirrhosis (10.9 ml.min-1). The plasma protein binding of diflunisal was significantly reduced in cirrhosis; the percentage of unbound diflunisal in plasma was 0.089 in the controls and 0.147 in the patients with cirrhosis. Plasma clearance of unbound diflunisal was significantly impaired in cirrhosis: 11.5 l.min-1 in control subjects vs 7.41.min-1 in cirrhotics. In cirrhotic patients, the unbound partial clearances to the phenolic and acyl glucuronides were both significantly reduced, by approximately 38%. The unbound partial clearance to the sulphate conjugate was not significantly affected by cirrhosis. The results show that both the phenolic and acyl glucuronidation pathways of diflunisal are equally susceptible to the effects of liver cirrhosis.

Acylation↗

PubMed1992

Effect of intravenous and oral omeprazole on 24-hour intragastric acidity in duodenal ulcer patients.

Nine patients with duodenal ulcer were on separate occasions given omeprazole, 20 mg orally, 10 mg intravenously (IV), and 40 mg IV once daily for 5 days. On day 1, the median reduction of 24-hour intragastric acidity was 42.2% for the 20-mg oral dose and 54.8% and 88.4% for the two IV doses, respectively, but the between-patient variability was considerable for all three doses. On day 5, the degree of reduction had increased for all three doses to a median value of 99.9% for the 20-mg oral dose and 95.7% and 99.9% for the two IV doses, respectively. Plasma omeprazole concentrations increased significantly from day 1 to day 5 only for the 20-mg oral and 40-mg IV doses. Thus, the increased pharmacological effect of omeprazole during repeated once daily administration can only partly be explained by increased plasma concentrations, suggesting that some additional factor(s) must influence the degree of reduction of 24-hour intragastric acidity. Thus, when determining the optimal dose of omeprazole for acid inhibition, the route and duration of administration must be taken into consideration; after 5 days of once-daily administration of doses as low as 10 mg IV and 20 mg orally are effective and dependable in reducing 24-hour intragastric acidity in patients with duodenal ulcer. However, a daily dose of 40 mg IV omeprazole is not sufficient to keep intragastric pH above 4 in all patients during the first day of treatment.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1989

Concurrent determination of hepatic bioavailability of salicylamide by three techniques in the dog.

Three methods of measuring hepatic first-pass metabolism of salicylamide in dogs that had undergone portacaval transposition were compared. The drug in both its radiolabeled (0.74 MBq) and unlabeled (20 mg/kg) forms was infused concurrently into forelimb and hindlimb veins, respectively. Because of the transposition, drug from the hindlimb is subject to first-pass metabolism in the liver. Bioavailability is a complementary measure of the extent of this metabolism. The three methods of determining bioavailability were continuous withdrawal of blood to determine the ratio of the areas under the plasma concentration versus time curves, ratio of specific activities in plasma after all the drug had been administered, and the conventional method, measurement of the ratio of areas determined from sequential plasma concentrations. The three techniques were found to give virtually identical values for bioavailability. Each method has its own advantages, limitations, and possible applications. The continuous withdrawal technique is potentially most applicable for drugs with short half-lives. The ratio of specific activities may be the preferred method for drugs with long half-lives. The conventional method is limited by the number of samples needed, but is potentially useful under those conditions in which data following test and intravenous routes of administration are available.

Animals↗

PubMed1988

Non-linear hepatic first-pass metabolism of salicylamide in dogs after portacaval transposition.

The effect of the rate of input of salicylamide into the portal vein of dogs on the clearance and bioavailability of the drug was examined. The four dogs had undergone portacaval transposition so that a hindlimb infusion delivered the drug directly and only into the liver. On separate occasions, salicylamide, 20 mg/kg, was infused into a hindlimb vein at three different rates, the duration of each infusion was 3, 10, and 30 min. Simultaneously, to measure the bioavailability, 14C-salicylamide was infused at the same rate into a forelimb vein. As the duration of the infusion was increased from 3 to 30 min, the clearance of salicylamide increased significantly from 1.05 +/- 0.21 (mean +/- SD) to 1.57 +/- 0.38 L/min and the half-life decreased significantly from 14.66 +/- 3.60 to 9.09 +/- 2.42 min. Bioavailability decreased from 0.84 +/- 0.11 to 0.61 +/- 0.61, but the differences were not statistically significant. As predicted for a drug that has nonlinear clearance and bioavailability, the rate of infusion of salicylamide affects the values of these parameters.

Animals↗

PubMed1987

Pharmacological management of patients with peptic ulcer disease: prospects for the late 1980's.

Over the past ten years there have been major advances in the physician's ability to treat patients with peptic ulcer disease. Cimetidine continues to be the standard against which newer therapies are generally compared, although ranitidine is equally effective for short-term therapy, more effective for maintenance therapy, and has a superior safety profile. Famotidine is an even more potent H2 receptor antagonist, and initial clinical studies are promising. The initial concern for the development of gastric carcinoid lesions in rodents, maintained for long periods on high doses of omeprazole, defused the initial enthusiasm for this hydrogen-potassium ATPase "proton pump" inhibitor, but recent studies continue to show a marked efficacy of this agent for the short-term care of patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers and for the management of patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Sulcrate continues to enjoy wide popularity for acute and chronic care of acid peptic disorders because of its local action and minimal adverse effects. Pirenzepine is effective in achieving and maintaining healing, but prevalence of anticholinergic side-effects has hampered enthusiasm for its widespread use. The 2 forerunners in the prostaglandin analogues arena, misoprostol and enprostil, are antisecretory agents when given in sufficiently high doses. These orally administered prostaglandins have a favourable safety profile, and their only adverse effect is that of the development of transient mild diarrhea. Finally, while antacids continue to be used in large amounts because of their over-the-counter availability, their clinical usefulness is limited by their unpalatable taste and the relatively large amounts usually required to achieve ulcer healing.

Alprostadil↗

PubMed1987

Enprostil reduces G-cell hyperplasia and hypergastrinemia in duodenal ulcer.

A 42-year-old man with a 26-year history of duodenal ulcer volunteered for a 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring study, at which time his fasting gastrin concentration was found to be elevated. Secretin injection decreased the serum gastrin concentration. When not on treatment his total gastrin, gastrin-17 (G-17), and gastrin-34 (G-34) response to a protein-containing breakfast was marked. Immunocytochemical staining of antral biopsies showed hyperplasia of gastrin-containing cells, more pronounced for G-17 than for G-34. Cimetidine or cimetidine plus pirenzepine increased 24-hour intragastric pH, whereas pirenzepine alone rendered the gastric contents more acidic, particularly overnight. The total serum gastrin concentrations increased after meals and were unaffected by cimetidine or pirenzepine; enprostil, however, reduced the postprandial increase in total gastrin, G-34, and G-17. After six weeks of treatment with enprostil, the number of cells containing G-17 and G-34 was reduced. The findings show that G-cell hyperplasia may occur in the presence of a normal fasting serum gastrin concentration; fasting serum gastrin concentrations may fluctuate widely over time; the food-stimulated increase in G-17 was greater than that for G-34, and is associated with more pronounced antral hyperplasia for G-17 and G-34; and enprostil blunts the postprandial increase in G-17, G-34, and total gastrin. These observations suggest that enprostil may reduce G-cell hyperplasia and hypergastrinemia.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Synergistic interaction between an H2-receptor antagonist and enprostil on 24-hour intragastric pH, serum gastrin concentration, and tissue immunoperoxidase staining for gastrin, somatostatin, and serotonin in a patient with metastatic gastrinoma.

A 56-year-old woman newly diagnosed as having Zollinger-Ellison syndrome due to a metastatic gastrinoma underwent 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring, serum gastrin (total, G-17 and G-34) measurements, and immunoperoxidase staining of duodenal, antral, and gastric body biopsies for gastrin, somatostatin, and serotonin. Determinations were made while the patient was given different doses of ranitidine, enprostil (a synthetic orally administered prostaglandin E2), or ranitidine plus enprostil. Following are the findings from this single-patient study: Intragastric pH was persistently low but varied in response to food when the patient was given ranitidine. Immunocytochemical staining of antral biopsies obtained before the patient was treated revealed a reduced number of cells containing G-17 and G-34 but an increase in the antral somatostatin-containing D-cells. Treatment with 35 micrograms of enprostil BID plus 300 mg of ranitidine BID for two and 11 weeks was associated with an increased number of duodenal G-cells, a decrease in antral D-cells, and a decrease in the number of antral serotonin-containing cells. Enprostil in a dosage of 35 or 70 micrograms BID had no effect on intragastric pH, but when enprostil was given in combination with ranitidine, postprandial and nocturnal intragastric alkalinity was accentuated along with a return of duodenal and antral G-cells and a loss of the antral D-cell hyperplasia. Optimal pH control was achieved with 300 mg of ranitidine BID; more frequent dosing with ranitidine did not further increase intragastric pH. Both the total serum gastrin concentration and G-17 levels fluctuated in response to meals. The serum concentrations of total gastrin, G-17, and G-34 were reduced with enprostil and with ranitidine.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1985

Comparison of cimetidine and ranitidine on 24-hour intragastric acidity and serum gastrin profile in patients with esophagitis.

Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH and serum gastrin profiles were monitored in six male asymptomatic patients who previously were found to have esophagitis on endoscopy and biopsy. They received cimetidine 300 mg qid (C), ranitidine 150 mg bid (R), or placebo (P) for one week each, utilizing the Latin-square design. The mean BAO was 0.4 +/- 0.2 mmol/hr, and the pentagastrin-stimulated MAO was 21.2 +/- 3.2 mmol/hr. In the P-treated patients, the pH fluctuated between 1.8 and 3.5 and over 90% of the readings were less than pH 4. As compared to P, both C and R significantly suppressed H+ after breakfast, overnight, and over the 24-hr period. The mean pH after lunch was significantly higher in R than in P, but not in C. Over the 24-hr period, a higher percentage of the readings were above pH 4.0 in R as compared to C. During the night, 50% of the pH readings were above pH 4.0 in C and R, whereas in P 50% of the pH readings were less than pH 2.0. The integrated gastrin responses after each meal were similar in C and R and were greater than in P. The biphasic response of the ratio of H+ and gastrin (H+/G) following each meal was suppressed by both H2-receptor antagonists, with numerically lower values obtained in R than in C. This study suggests that ranitidine 150 mg bid is superior to cimetidine 300 mg qid in suppressing the 24-hr intragastric acidity.

Adult↗

PubMed1985

Antisecretory and serum gastrin lowering effect of enprostil in patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

This study was designed to compare the effects of enprostil, a synthetic dehydro-prostaglandin E2, on 24-h intragastric pH and serum gastrin profile in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. The dosing regimen included 3 enprostil groups: 35 microgram h.s. (at bedtime), 70 micrograms h.s., and 35 micrograms b.i.d., compared with cimetidine 600 mg b.i.d., and with placebo. Ten patients with inactive duodenal ulcer disease were randomly assigned to all five treatment regimens for 1 wk each according to a Latin Square design. There was a 1-wk washout period between each treatment. Intragastric pH and serum gastrin measurements were carried out on the last day of each treatment week. In placebo-treated patients, intragastric pH rose after each meal and fluctuated between 1.5 and 3.5. Enprostil 35 micrograms b.i.d. and cimetidine elevated pH after breakfast and during the night (p less than 0.05). The single nighttime dose of enprostil had a marked effect on pH only when given in the dose of 70 micrograms and this effect lasted over 13.5 h. The pH values during the night were similar in the groups treated with enprostil 35 micrograms b.i.d. and 70 micrograms h.s. During the daytime, the readings at or above pH 4 were placebo, 5%; cimetidine, 21%; enprostil 35 micrograms b.i.d., 34%. During the nighttime, the readings greater than or equal to 4 were placebo, 12%; cimetidine, 29%; enprostil 35 micrograms b.i.d., 39%; 35 micrograms h.s., 19%, and 70 micrograms h.s., 38%. The postprandial rise in serum gastrin was greatly enhanced by cimetidine, but the change after breakfast was dramatically blunted by enprostil 35 micrograms b.i.d. Gastrin concentration was increased with cimetidine during the night but there was no difference in gastrin concentration overnight between all regimens of enprostil and placebo. This study suggests that (a) enprostil 35 micrograms b.i.d. is as effective as cimetidine 600 mg b.i.d. in suppressing postprandial and nocturnal intragastric acidity; (b) enprostil 35 micrograms b.i.d. and 70 micrograms at night are similarly potent in suppressing nocturnal acidity; and (c) in addition to its cytoprotective effect, enprostil has potent antisecretory and antigastrin properties.

Adult↗

PubMed1985

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between cimetidine and pirenzepine.

The oral administration of pirenzepine (PRZ), an antimuscarinic agent, has a variable effect on gastric acid secretion in patients with duodenal ulcer, and it seems to potentiate cimetidine-induced inhibition of secretion. The possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between these drugs was examined in eight patients who received cimetidine and PRZ alone and in combination in a crossover fashion. Cimetidine, 600 mg b.i.d., PRZ, 50 mg b.i.d., or combination therapy were each given for 1 week before the study. Serum samples were serially drawn during each dosing interval for determination of cimetidine and PRZ concentrations by HPLC and RIA, respectively. Cimetidine given alone or with PRZ exhibited diurnal variation, as the peak serum concentration was lower after the nighttime dose than after the morning dose. PRZ showed intersubject variation. However, each drug failed to alter the pharmacokinetic indices of the other. The times to attain the peak serum concentration were not significantly different for cimetidine alone or with PRZ, arguing against an effect of PRZ on gastric motility in the doses we used. The greater and prolonged acid inhibition with the combination of cimetidine and PRZ, therefore, may stem from a synergistic action of both drugs on receptor sites on gastric parietal cells.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1985

Interrelationship between gastric acidity and gastrin concentration in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer and in healthy subjects.

Although increased gastric acidity may be important in the pathogenesis of duodenal ulcer, it has a less well-defined role in the formation of gastric ulcers. The present study was undertaken to determine (1) the 24-hour intragastric pH and serum gastrin profiles of 31 patients with duodenal ulcers, eight patients with gastric ulcers, and seven healthy volunteers and (2) the effect of 600 mg of cimetidine BID on these measurements. There was considerable overlap of basal acid output values in the three groups, and mean values did not differ significantly. In response to pentagastrin, the peak acid output was significantly higher in the duodenal ulcer group than in the gastric ulcer or healthy group. There were no intergroup differences in intragastric hydrogen ion (H+) activity after meals, overnight, and over 24 hours, when all subjects received placebo. However, the pH values remained at or above 4.0 for a longer period during the night in the gastric ulcer patients than in the duodenal ulcer patients or healthy subjects. There were no intergroup differences in basal gastrin concentration, but the postprandial gastrin response after each meal was higher in the gastric ulcer group than in the other two groups. In the gastric ulcer group, cimetidine suppressed H+ activity at all times; in the duodenal ulcer and healthy groups, cimetidine suppressed H+ activity only after breakfast, overnight, and over 24 hours. Cimetidine enhanced the serum gastrin response to food to a greater extent in the ulcer patients than in the healthy subjects. In the healthy subjects, the ratio of H+ to gastrin (H+:G) was higher than in the duodenal or gastric ulcer patients but was suppressed only minimally by cimetidine, whereas cimetidine markedly suppressed the H+:G ratio in both groups of ulcer patients. Patients with a history of duodenal or gastric ulcers differed from healthy volunteers in their food-stimulated gastrin response and in their H+:G ratio when treated with cimetidine. Intergroup differences in gastrin response to food, but not in intragastric pH in response to food, suggests that defective control of or response to gastrin may be important in the pathogenesis of acid-peptic disease. Cimetidine, which was effective in H+ suppression in all subject groups, may alter the sensitivity of the parietal cells to gastrin in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers.

Adult↗

PubMed1985

Postprandial changes in serum concentrations of gastrin-17, gastrin-34, and total gastrin in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers and in normal subjects.

The fasting concentrations of total gastrin and gastrin-17 (G-17) were similar in healthy volunteers and in asymptomatic patients with gastric ulcers or duodenal ulcers. However, the fasting serum concentration of gastrin-34 (G-34) was higher in patients with gastric ulcers than in normal subjects, in whom it was higher than in patients with duodenal ulcers. In response to food, the increases in G-17, G-34, and total gastrin were greater in ulcer patients than in healthy subjects. Cimetidine administration was associated with further increases in G-17, G-34, and total gastrin in normal subjects and gastric ulcer patients after meals. The ratio G-17/G-34 was similar in placebo-treated normal subjects and placebo-treated patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers. Cimetidine produced an increase in G-17/G-34 in placebo-treated normal subjects and placebo-treated patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers, but the ratio G-17/G-34 was greater in patients with gastric ulcers than in normal subjects. These results indicate that: differences in serum gastrin concentrations between patient groups, treatment regimens, and time of day are better detected by measuring G-17 and G-34 rather than total gastrin; there are differences in fasting and food-stimulated gastrin concentrations between normal subjects and patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers; the fasting concentration of G-34 is higher than G-17 in normal subjects and patients with gastric ulcers but not in patients with duodenal ulcers; food increases G-17 in all subjects but G-34 only in subjects with gastric ulcers; cimetidine increases the fasting concentration of total gastrin in normal subjects and patients with gastric ulcers and increases G-17 and G-34 in normal subjects; cimetidine increases the ratio G-17/G-34 in normal subjects and patients with gastric ulcers, but decreases G-17/G-34 in patients with duodenal ulcers. It is proposed: that measurements of total gastrin concentration should be replaced by measurements of G-17 and G-34 and that such measurements of G-17 and G-34 indicate differences in serum gastrin concentrations between normal subjects and those with peptic ulcers and between those with gastric versus duodenal ulcers. The role of altered gastrin metabolism in the pathogenesis of ulcers needs to be established.

Cimetidine↗

PubMed1984

Comparative effects of two cimetidine regimens on 24-hour intragastric acidity in patients with asymptomatic duodenal ulcer.

The effect of 600 mg of cimetidine given twice daily on 24-hour intragastric hydrogen ion (H+) concentration was compared with that of the standard regimen of 300 mg of cimetidine given four times daily in six patients with asymptomatic duodenal ulcer. According to the double-blind, Latin-square, repeated-measures design, all subjects followed each cimetidine regimen and a placebo regimen for one week. Acid secretion studies and determinations of drug and gastrin levels in the blood were carried out on the last day of each treatment week. Although 600 mg of cimetidine BID suppressed H+ after breakfast and during the night, compared with placebo treatment (P less than 0.01), the 300-mg QID regimen suppressed H+ only after breakfast and supper (P less than 0.05). A higher percentage of pH readings greater than or equal to 3.0 were obtained with 600 mg of cimetidine BID than with 300 mg of cimetidine QID during the night (P less than 0.05); compared with percentages when placebo was taken, the percentages of pH readings greater than or equal to 3.0 were greater both overnight and during a 24-hour period only when 600 mg of cimetidine was given BID (P less than 0.01). The observed difference in intragastric H+ suppression after each regimen could not be explained by variations in serum concentrations of cimetidine or serum concentrations of gastrin. Despite similar peaks of serum cimetidine after evening doses of 300 or 600 mg of cimetidine, nocturnal intragastric acidity was lower in subjects given 600 mg BID. Further, H+ levels after lunch were similar in both cimetidine-treated groups, despite markedly higher serum cimetidine concentrations in patients receiving 600 mg BID. Pharmacokinetic studies showed equivalent elimination half-times and 24-hour areas under the curve of serum cimetidine concentration in patients on the two cimetidine regimens. Postprandial integrated gastrin responses were of similar magnitude in patients on either cimetidine regimen. There was no significant difference in mean serum gastrin concentrations during the night in placebo-treated and cimetidine-treated patients. Only a weak correlation was observed between H+ and serum gastrin concentration. Although a fluctuation of the H+:gastrin ratio occurred after each meal in all groups, the ratio was suppressed by both dosages of cimetidine. The findings suggest that a regimen of 600 mg of cimetidine BID is superior to the standard regimen of 300 mg QID in suppressing intragastric acidity in patients with asymptomatic duodenal ulcer.

Adult↗

PubMed1984

Effect of combination of antacid and cimetidine on 24-hour intragastric acidity in patients with asymptomatic duodenal ulcer.

UNLABELLED: By means of a Latin square design, the effect of antacid alone and in combination with cimetidine on a 24-hour intragastric hydrogen ion (H+) activity and serum gastrin profiles was studied in eight patients with duodenal ulcer. Antacid given seven times a day (one and three hours after meals and at bedtime) combined with 600 mg BID of cimetidine (C + A7) achieved greater suppression of H+ after breakfast, overnight, and over the 24-hour period than did antacid alone seven times daily (A7). Antacid given four times a day (one and three hours after lunch and after supper) combined with cimetidine BID (C + A4) maintained the neutralizing capacity during this time, but was less effective than the C + A7 regimen. However, C + A4 produced more suppression of nocturnal H+ than did A7. A higher percentage of the readings at or above pH 4.0 were obtained with C + A7 than with A7 or C + A4. A greater postprandial integrated gastrin response was obtained with all active treatments as compared with a placebo regimen. The mean peak cimetidine concentration (Cmax) was higher but the time to peak (Tmax) was shorter after the morning than after the evening dose. The area under the cimetidine concentration-time curve and the Cmax and Tmax values after the morning and evening doses of cimetidine were not affected by the coadministration of antacid. IN CONCLUSION: (1) combination therapy of cimetidine plus antacid is more effective than antacid alone in the reduction of intragastric H+; (2) antacid alone fails to suppress the overnight intragastric acidity; and (3) antacid given concurrently with cimetidine does not interfere with pharmacokinetic determinants of plasma cimetidine concentration.

Adult↗