Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V J Wilson

Publications and source records attributed to V J Wilson.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Vestibulospinal reflexes and the reticular formation.

While both vestibulospinal and reticulospinal tracts contribute to vestibulospinal reflexes, their respective roles are not fully understood. Previous evidence suggests that reticulospinal fibers make an important contribution to the horizontal vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) of the decerebrate cat. Recent work addresses their contribution to the vertical VCR. On the basis of study of reflex and vestibulocollic neuron dynamics, it appears that processing which is necessary to produce some of the spatial properties of the vertical VCR takes place outside the vestibular nuclei. Recording from pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons receiving vestibular input and projecting to different levels of the spinal cord reveals that almost no cells receive only vertical canal input, while approximately half receive otolith input. As is the case for vestibulocollic neurons, these reticulospinal neurons also lack the properties required to produce all of the VCR's spatial properties. Two conclusions are that in response to stimuli in vertical planes pontomedullary reticulospinal fibers are best suited to contribute to otolith reflexes, and that spatial properties of the VCR depend in part on convergence of inputs within the neck itself.

Motor Neurons↗
PubMed1992

Response of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons to vestibular stimuli in vertical planes. Role in vertical vestibulospinal reflexes of the decerebrate cat.

1. To investigate the neural substrate of vestibulospinal reflexes in decerebrate cats, we studied the responses of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons to natural stimulation of the labyrinth in vertical planes. Our principal aim was to determine whether reticulospinal neurons that terminate in, or are likely to give off collaterals to, the upper cervical segments had properties similar to those of the vestibulocollic reflex (VCR). 2. Antidromic stimulation was used to determine whether the neurons projected to the neck, lower cervical, thoracic, or lumbar levels. Dynamics of the responses of spontaneously firing neurons were studied with sinusoidal stimuli delivered at 0.05-1 Hz and aligned to the plane of body rotation, that produced maximal modulation of the neuron (response vector orientation). Each neuron was assigned a vestibular input classification of otolith, vertical canal, otolith + canal, or spatial-temporal convergence (STC). 3. We found, in agreement with previous studies, that the largest fraction of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons projected to the lumbar cord, and that only a small number ended in the neck segments. Neurons projecting to all levels of the spinal cord had similar responses to labyrinth stimulation. 4. Reticulospinal neurons that received only vertical canal inputs were rare (1 of 67 units). Most reticulospinal neurons (48%) received predominant otolith inputs, 18% received otolith + canal input, and only 9% had STC behavior. These data are in sharp contrast to the results of our previous studies of vestibulospinal neurons. A considerable portion of vestibulospinal neurons receives vertical canal input (38%), fewer receive predominantly otolith input (22%), whereas the proportion that have otolith + canal input or STC behavior is similar to our present reticulospinal data. 5. The response vector orientations of our reticulospinal neurons, particularly those with canal inputs (canal, otolith + canal, STC) were predominantly in the roll quadrants. There was no evidence of convergence of inputs from like canals across the midline (e.g., right anterior + left anterior). 6. Two characteristics of the VCR, STC behavior and bilateral input from symmetric vertical canals (in some muscles), cannot be accounted for by the reticulospinal neurons that we studied. Because these characteristics are also not seen in vestibulocollic neurons, they are likely to be the result of the appropriate convergence of vestibular signals in the spinal cord. 7. Pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons seem particularly well suited to play a role in gravity-dependent postural reflexes of neck and limbs.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

Connections between utricular nerve and dorsal neck motoneurons of the decerebrate cat.

1. We studied connections between the utricular (UT) nerve and dorsal neck motoneurons in decerebrate cats. Electrodes were fixed in place on the UT nerve under visual observation; the other branches of the vestibular nerve were transected. 2. The N1 field potential evoked by UT nerve stimulation was recorded in the vestibular nuclei at the start of each experiment. The potential typically grew until it reached a plateau. Stimulus spread (if any) to the central ends of other nerve branches was revealed by an additional increase in N1 amplitude after the plateau was reached. 3. We recorded intracellularly from 55 motoneurons in C1-C3. Some were identified as having axons in the dorsal rami, which innervate dorsal neck muscles. Others projected in nerves that were not available for stimulation. 4. UT nerve stimulation evoked synaptic potentials in essentially all motoneurons studied. The predominant pattern consisted of disynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials in ipsilateral motoneurons and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials that were at least trisynaptic in contralateral motoneurons. 5. The results demonstrate the presence of short-latency connections between the utricular nerve and dorsal neck motoneurons. The functional role of this pathway remains to be investigated.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Intraperitoneal insulin is more potent than subcutaneous insulin at restoring hepatic insulin-like growth factor-I mRNA levels in the diabetic rat: a functional role for the portal vascular link.

There is evidence that the hormonal control of hepatic IGF-I production is mediated by GH and insulin. To elucidate the role of these hormones further we administered s.c. or i.p. insulin (at 2.5 and 5.0 IU/day) and/or GH (0.8 IU/day) to rats made diabetic with streptozotocin 16 days previously. Hepatic IGF-I production was then assessed by quantifying hepatic IGF-I mRNA levels by autoradiography of Northern blots. Diabetes resulted in a fivefold reduction in hepatic IGF-I mRNA levels (optical density (OD) of the 0.7-1.1 kb band: controls, 1.3 +/- 0.09; diabetics, 0.28 +/- 0.08; P < 0.01), which was not significantly changed by treatment with s.c. insulin (OD: low dose, 0.55 +/- 0.05; high dose, 0.58 +/- 0.05) or low dose i.p. insulin (OD: 0.40 +/- 0.03). High dose i.p. insulin enhanced hepatic IGF-I mRNA levels (OD: 0.93 +/- 0.23) compared with diabetic rats (P < 0.01) and those given high dose s.c. insulin (P < 0.04), despite the blood glucose values being similar in the treated groups (i.p., 4.72 +/- 0.29 mmol/l; s.c., 3.32 +/- 0.03 mmol/l). Administration of GH alone partially restored the hepatic IGF-I mRNA level (OD: GH-treated, 1.00 +/- 0.05; diabetic, 0.28 +/- 0.08; P < 0.01), whilst having no effect on blood glucose values (diabetic, 36.35 +/- 0.45 mmol/l; GH-treated, 38.65 +/- 2.39 mmol/l). Additional administration of s.c. insulin completely restored IGF-I mRNA levels to those of controls (OD: low dose, 1.35 +/- 0.14; high dose, 1.27 +/- 0.18).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Participation of Ia reciprocal inhibitory neurons in the spinal circuitry of the tonic neck reflex.

As part of our studies of the spinal circuitry of the tonic neck reflex, we have recorded extracellularly from Ia reciprocal inhibitory neurons of the decerebrate, labyrinthectomized cat. The activity of a majority of neurons driven by stimulation of the quadriceps nerve was modulated by sinusoidal rotation of the neck; such modulation was much less frequent in the case of neurons driven by stimulation of nerves to more distal muscles. The results suggest that some of the inhibition which is part of the tonic neck reflex is mediated by Ia reciprocal inhibitory neurons, but that other pathways must also play an important role.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Commissural neurons in the cat upper cervical spinal cord.

We have begun a study of the intrinsic circuitry of the cat's upper cervical cord, in part to elucidate the role of spinal interneurons in vestibulocollic reflexes. Using retrograde labelling with Fluoro-Gold and intraspinal microstimulation, we have identified commissural neurons projecting to the contralateral ventral horn. Neurons tended to be in the medial half of lamina VIII. Approximately half of the neurons were propriospinal neurons that could be activated antidromically from the rostral border of the cervical enlargement. Most of the tested, spontaneously active neurons were driven by stimulation of the ipsi- and/or contralateral vestibular nerve, in some cases disynaptically.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. III. Response of vestibulocollic neurons to vestibular and neck stimulation.

1. To compare the properties of the vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) with those of vestibular neurons projecting to the neck [vestibulocollic (VC) neurons], we have studied the behavior of the latter in the decerebrate cat. Neurons were identified by their antidromic responses to stimulation in C1-C2, but not C5. Responses to stimulation of vestibular and neck receptors were produced by rotation of the body and head in vertical planes. 2. We determined the plane of whole body (vestibular) or body with head counter-rotated (neck) rotation, which produced the maximal modulation of each neuron (response vector orientation). Neuron dynamics were then studied with sinusoidal (0.02-2 Hz) stimuli aligned with this orientation. 3. On the basis of dynamics and vector orientation, the neuron was assigned a vestibular input classification of otolith, vertical canal, otolith + canal, or spatial-temporal convergence (STC). 4. The properties of this sample of VC neurons are similar to those of a larger population of vestibular neurons whose projection was not identified. For example, the distributions of cells with different types of vestibular inputs were roughly the same; in particular, few cells showed STC responses. In addition, there was no evidence of significant convergence of like canals across the midline (e.g., right anterior + left anterior). 5. Also similar to the larger unidentified population, 80% of VC neurons tested for neck input received such an input. The neck and vestibular responses tended to be antagonistic; the vector orientations were usually opposite, and the response gains and phases similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Effects of muscle and cutaneous hindlimb afferents on L4 neurons whose activity is modulated by neck rotation.

We recorded extracellularly, in decerebrate, labyrinthectomized cats, from spontaneously active L4 neurons whose activity was modulated by head rotation, and studied the effects of stimulation of ipsilateral hindlimb nerves. Rotation of the head about the longitudinal (roll) axis was more effective than rotation about the transverse (pitch) axis or vertical (yaw) axis for this group of neurons. Most units received convergent excitatory or inhibitory inputs from several nerves, with excitation being more prominent. The most effective muscle nerves were quadriceps (37/43 neurons), sartorius (19/21) and tibialis anterior (17/35); stimulation of biceps posterior-semitendinosus, biceps anterior-semimembranosus, or gastrocnemius rarely influenced the firing of the neurons. Group I effects were present in only a small fraction of neurons; however, short latency (central latency less than or equal to 5 ms) group II effects were observed in almost one-third. Longer latency group II as well as group III inputs were also common. All neurons received inputs from mixed and cutaneous nerves which usually had low thresholds and central latencies greater than 5 ms. Most recording sites were in medial lamina VII or lamina VIII; some of the units were identified by antidromic stimulation as propriospinal neurons which projected to the lumbar enlargement.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1989

Afferents and efferents of the vestibular nuclei: the necessity of context-specific interpretation.

A synopsis of physiological and anatomical results is presented that leads to the conclusion that experimental data have to be interpreted in a context meaningful for the system investigated. For example, since there is an obvious spatial relationship between semicircular canals and extraocular muscles, the interdependence between the three-neurone-arc circuitry, and vestibular and visual signals follows quite naturally from a common geometry inherent in the sensory and motor periphery. It is emphasized that signals related to compensatory eye movements have to be interpreted within a vestibular/eye muscle frame of reference. By the same argument, when dealing with the head-neck movement system, the appropriate reference frame will have to be applied to arrive at a meaningful interpretation of related sensorimotor functions. Thus, in general terms, each system has to be interpreted within its own meaningful biological context.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Neck muscle spindle activity in the decerebrate, unparalyzed cat: dynamics and influence of vestibular stimulation.

1. Using floating electrodes, we recorded from neck-muscle spindle afferents in the C2 dorsal root ganglion of the decerebrate cat. Nerves to dorsal neck muscles were cut so that the afferents presumably originated mainly from ventral and ventrolateral perivertebral muscles and sternocleidomastoid. One goal of our experiments was to study possible vestibular influence exerted on these spindles via the fusimotor system. Unparalyzed preparations were therefore used. 2. Stimuli consisted of sinusoidal rotations in vertical planes. Neck tilt stretched neck muscles, whereas whole-body tilt stimulated vestibular receptors. 3. For each afferent we first determined the most effective direction of neck tilt, then used stimuli oriented close to this direction to study response dynamics, particularly gain of responses to stimuli of different amplitudes (0.5-7.5 degrees). 4. Three-quarters of the afferents failed to respond to 0.5 degrees, 0.2-Hz neck rotations. Stimuli that were effective usually elicited responses that had low gain and were linear over the whole range of amplitudes. Only a few afferents had behavior typical of spindle primary afferents: high-gain responses to small sinusoidal stimuli, gain decreasing as stimulus amplitude increases. This prevalence of static spindle responses in the unparalyzed cat is in striking contrast to results obtained on neck-muscle spindles in paralyzed, decerebrate cats, and on hindlimb extensor muscle spindles in decerebrate, unparalyzed cats. 5. Paralysis produced by injection of Flaxedil changed the behavior of 2/4 spindle afferents tested, causing the appearance of high-gain responses to 0.5 degrees stimuli and of nonlinear behavior.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1989

Neck-vestibular interaction in the vestibular nuclei. A dynamic, two-dimensional study.

In decerebrate cats we used response dynamics to classify neurons in Deiters' nucleus and the rostral descending nucleus as receiving input from vertical canals, otolith organs (utricle) or canal + otolith. Many of these neurons, particularly those with convergent vestibular input (canal + otolith, canal + canal) and preferred stimulus directions near roll, also received neck input. Neck and vestibular response vectors tended to point in opposite directions. Neck and vestibular response dynamics were often well matched, so that combined stimuli (head rotation) produced no response over a wide frequency range. In some cases differing dynamics produced an output that appeared to code head position.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Peripheral input to L4 neurons whose activity is modulated by neck rotation.

We studied, in decerebrate cats, peripheral input from the ipsilateral hindlimb to L4 neurons whose activity was modulated by neck rotation ('neck-modulated neurons'). Most neurons received convergent input from muscle, cutaneous and mixed nerves. In about half the neurons muscle input consisted of short-latency group I or group II excitation or inhibition, with group II effects far more frequent. Such synaptic actions were produced almost entirely by stimulation of quadriceps or sartorius. In the other neurons muscle afferents produced only late, diffuse excitation or inhibition, with thresholds usually in the group III range.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Three-dimensional sensitivity and caudal projection of neck spindle afferents.

1. We recorded from neck muscle spindle afferents in the C2 dorsal root ganglion of the decerebrate cat using floating electrodes. The afferents presumably innervated mainly ventral and ventrolateral perivertebral muscles, and sternocleidomastoid. Stimuli consisted of combinations of rotatory head movements about the roll/pitch or pitch/yaw axes. An important difference from our earlier experiments (10) was the addition of yaw movement to the stimulus paradigm making possible a three-dimensional analysis of afferent behavior. 2. For each afferent we determined the most effective direction of tilt (orientation of the response vector) in three dimensions by using sinusoidal stimuli that combined pitch and roll, or pitch and yaw, or by measuring the gains to responses to roll, pitch, and yaw rotation. 3. Most afferents were sensitive to rotation around all three axes; pitch and yaw were usually more effective than roll. There was no indication of clustering of response vectors, as might be expected if the receptors were located in a small number of muscles each of which has receptors aligned in a homogeneous direction. 4. The responses of afferents were further studied using sinusoidal and trapezoidal stimuli aligned as closely as possible with the orientation of their response vector. The availability of the yaw stimulus made receptor classification based on response linearity, gain, and dynamic index more reliable than in our earlier experiments (10). 5. Muscle spindle responses were divided into three categories: A, B, and ambiguous. The evidence suggests that category A are probably spindle primary receptors and category B are secondaries. Ambiguous receptors have intermediate properties. 6. The caudal projection of spindle afferents was examined by delivering antidromic stimuli with a movable electrode on the surface of the ipsilateral dorsal column. Eighteen percent of the afferents projected to C4, and 14% as far as C5. Long caudal projections can be found in A, B, and ambiguous receptors with a range of directional sensitivities. 7. The evidence suggests that C2 spindle afferents make synapses in the midcervical segments with interneurons and propriospinal neurons that are part of the intraspinal pathway of the tonic neck reflex.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1988

Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. I. Response to vestibular stimulation.

1. We have studied, in decerebrate cats, the responses of neurons in the lateral and descending vestibular nuclei to whole-body rotations in vertical planes that activated vertical semicircular canal and utricular receptors. Some neurons were identified as vestibulospinal by antidromic stimulation with floating electrodes placed in C4. 2. The direction of tilt that caused maximal excitation (response vector orientation) of each neuron was determined. Neuron dynamics were then studied with sinusoidal stimuli closely aligned with the response vector orientation, in the range 0.02-1 Hz. A few cells, for which we could not identify a response vector, probably had spatial-temporal convergence. 3. On the basis of dynamics, neurons were classified as receiving their input primarily from vertical semicircular canals, primarily from the otolith organs, or from canal+otolith convergence. 4. Response vector orientations of canal-driven neurons were often near +45 degrees or -45 degrees with respect to the transverse (roll) plane, suggesting these neurons received excitatory input from the ipsilateral anterior or posterior canal, respectively. Some neurons had canal-related dynamics but vector orientations near roll, presumably because they received convergent input from the ipsilateral anterior and posterior canals. Few neurons had their vectors near pitch. 5. In the lateral vestibular nucleus, neurons with otolith organ input (pure otolith or otolith+canal) tended to have vector orientations closer to roll than to pitch. In the descending nucleus the responses were evenly divided between the roll and pitch quadrants. 6. We conclude that most of our neurons have dynamics and response vector orientations that make them good candidates to participate in vestibulospinal reflexes acting on the limbs, but not those acting on the neck.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. II. Response to neck stimulation and vestibular-neck interaction.

1. We have studied the responses of neurons in the lateral and descending vestibular nuclei of decerebrate cats to stimulation of neck receptors, produced by rotating the body in vertical planes with the head stationary. The responses to such neck stimulation were compared with the responses to vestibular stimulation produced by whole-body tilt, described in the preceding paper. 2. After determining the optimal vertical plane of neck rotation (response vector orientation), the dynamics of the neck response were studied over a frequency range of 0.02-1 Hz. The majority of the neurons were excited by neck rotations that brought the chin toward the ipsilateral side; most neurons responded better to roll than to pitch rotations. The typical neck response showed a low-frequency phase lead of 30 degrees, increasing to 60 degrees at higher frequencies, and a gain that increased about threefold per decade. 3. Neck input was found in about one-half of the vestibular-responsive neurons tested with vertical rotations. The presence of a neck response was correlated with the predominant vestibular input to these neurons; neck input was most prevalent on neurons with vestibular vector orientations near roll and receiving convergent vestibular input, either input from both ipsilateral vertical semicircular canals, or from canals plus the otolith organs. 4. Neurons with both vestibular and neck responses tend to have the respective orientation vectors pointing in opposite directions, i.e., a head tilt that produces an excitatory vestibular response would produce an inhibitory neck response. In addition, the gain components of these responses were similar. These results suggest that during head movements on a stationary body, these opposing neck and vestibular inputs will cancel each other. 5. Cancellation was observed in 12 out of 27 neurons tested with head rotation in the mid-frequency range. For most of the remaining neurons, the response to such a combined stimulus was greatly attenuated: the vestibular and neck interaction was largely antagonistic. 6. Neck response dynamics were similar to those of the vestibular input in many neurons, permitting cancellation to take place over a wide range of stimulus frequencies. Another pattern of interaction, observed in some neurons with canal input, produced responses to head rotation that had a relatively constant gain and remained in phase with position over the entire frequency range; such neurons possibly code head position in space.

Animals↗