Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V J Harris

Publications and source records attributed to V J Harris.

62 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Interpretations and treatment decisions based on MR angiography versus conventional arteriography in symptomatic lower extremity ischemia.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency with which treatment plans based on findings at magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) match those based on findings at conventional x-ray arteriography (XRA) in the evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA was performed in 42 patients undergoing XRA for evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. The blind interpretations and treatment plans based on MRA findings were compared with those based on XRA findings, with use of XRA as the standard of reference. RESULTS: For identification of hemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion, the sensitivity and specificity of MRA was 100% and 23% for iliac segments, 100% and 82% for common femoral segments, 89% and 67% for superficial femoral segments, 100% and 88% for popliteal segments, and 92% and 91% for tibioperoneal segments, respectively. The treatment plan based on MRA findings matched that based on XRA findings in 41% of patients. CONCLUSION: For evaluation of symptomatic lower extremity ischemia, two-dimensional TOF MRA cannot be considered a reliable substitute for XRA in patients who lack contraindications to XRA.

Angiography↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Iliac artery evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: update.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, performed with state-of-the-art equipment, in the evaluation of the iliac arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The iliac arteries of 50 patients undergoing conventional arteriography for evaluation of lower-extremity ischemia or abdominal aortic aneurysm were also imaged with axial 2D TOF MR angiography. Blinded interpretations of conventional arteriograms and MR angiograms were compared. MR angiography was performed with a 1.5-T system with 2-mm contiguous axial sections, 60 degrees flip angle, 28-msec repetition time, and 7.4-msec echo time. RESULTS: Blinded interpretations of 2D TOF MR angiograms matched those of conventional arteriograms in 26 of 50 patients (52%). For the diagnosis of obstructive iliac artery lesions, sensitivity and specificity with MR angiography were 85% and 59%, respectively. Two of three saccular iliac artery aneurysms escaped detection with MR angiography. CONCLUSION: Iliac artery evaluation with axial 2D TOF MR angiography is not sufficiently accurate to warrant its use as a replacement for conventional arteriography in patients who lack contraindications to the latter.

Angiography↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of digital subtraction and cut film arteriography in the evaluation of suspected thoracic aortic injury.

PURPOSE: To determine whether intraarterial digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) is as sensitive and specific as cut film arteriography (CFA) in the evaluation of suspected aortic injury resulting from blunt chest trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both CFA and DSA images of the thoracic aorta were obtained in the right posterior oblique (RPO) projection in 100 of 103 consecutive patients undergoing arteriography after blunt chest trauma. Diagnoses based on blinded separate review of both studies (CFA vs DSA) by four independent reviewers were compared. Reviewers graded their confidence in their diagnoses from 1 (certain) to 10 (uncertain). RESULTS: Eleven of 100 patients had aortic or great vessel injuries confirmed by operation (n = 10) or transesophageal echocardiography (n = 1). Three hundred eighty-eight of 400 diagnoses based on RPO CFA and 390 of 400 diagnoses based on RPO DSA agreed with the correct diagnoses. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CFA versus DSA were not significantly different. The reviewers' confidence in their diagnoses was equivalent between CFA (average confidence score, 1.373) and DSA (average confidence score, 1.375). CONCLUSION: DSA and CFA yield equivalent sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of blunt chest trauma.

Adolescent↗