Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V Cagli

Publications and source records attributed to V Cagli.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Felodipine ER formulation in the treatment of mild hypertension: efficacy and tolerability vs placebo.

1. Felodipine is a new calcium-antagonist dihydropyridine derivative with a high degree of selectivity for smooth muscle of arteriolar resistance vessels, as opposed to cardiac cells. 2. In this double-blind, cross-over study the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the new extended release (ER) formulation of felodipine 10 mg, once daily, in patients with mild essential hypertension was evaluated. After a 4-week single-blind placebo period 28 patients (15 males; mean age 48 +/- 12 years) were randomized to receive felodipine 10 mg ER once daily or placebo for 4 weeks and the alternative treatment for a further 4 weeks. Supine blood pressure and heart rate were measured in the out-patients department every 2 weeks, 22-24 h after the last drug administration. 3. Felodipine 10 mg ER induced a significant reduction in blood pressure in comparison with placebo (from 149 +/- 16/97 +/- 6 to 140 +/- 12/89 +/- 6 mm Hg). Heart rate remained unchanged. Seven patients dropped-out; five during felodipine ER administration and two during placebo. 4. A once daily dose of felodipine ER significantly reduces blood pressure in mild hypertensive patients 22-24 h after administration. It is well tolerated and the adverse events are related to its pharmacodynamic effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Multicenter clinical study of the antihypertensive activity of lisinopril].

One-hundred patients suffering from slight-moderate hypertension (53 m, 47 f, aged between 18 and 78, average 49.08) have been studied in order to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of lisinopril ("Zestril", ICI-Pharma), a new ACE inhibitor in a single daily administration at doses of between 10 and 80 mg in relation to pressure values. Monotherapy with Lisinopril proved effective in 84 patients (88.4%), in 74 of whom (7.9%) pressure values were returned to normal. 11 patients (11.6%) did not respond to treatment. In most cases, the result was obtained with a dose of 20 mg in a single administration (32.6%). The incidence of side-effects was limited and in no case required the withdrawal of the drug.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

A multicenter trial of low dose captopril administered twice daily in patients with essential hypertension unresponsive to beta blocker-diuretic treatment.

Two hundred and one patients with essential hypertension, whose supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) was greater than or equal to 95 mmHg following 2 weeks of treatment with the optimal dose of a beta blocker-diuretic combination (Phase 1), were randomly assigned to the addition of either 25 or 50 mg captopril BID for 6 weeks (Phase 2). At the end of Phase 2, the dose of captopril was doubled in the patients not normalized (SDBP greater than or equal to 95 mmHg) and maintained in the others (SDBP less than 95) for an additional 4 weeks (Phase 3). At the end of Phase 3, the beta blocker was withdrawn in the normalized (SDBP less than 95 mmHg) patients, and captopril plus diuretic was given for 4 weeks (Phase 4). The addition of captopril at either dose level led to a significant fall (p less than 0.01) in standing and supine diastolic and systolic blood pressure after the first 2 weeks of treatment. There was no significant difference in response between the two dose levels of captopril. At the end of Phase 2, 59.4% and 55.8% of patients, respectively, assigned to 25 and 50 mg captopril BID, were normalized. Doubling the dose of captopril (Phase 3) led to approximately an additional 30% of patients being normalized. At the end of Phase 4 (captopril plus diuretic) the SDBP was still less than 95 mmHg in 63% of patients, whereas it was increased in the others. Side effects were noted in 10 patients (5%). The incidence was similar in each treatment group, and a total of four patients (2%) were withdrawn due to side effects.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1987

Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of captopril in the elderly: comparison with hydrochlorothiazide and placebo in a multicentre, double-blind study.

In this study we compared the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of captopril at 25 mg twice daily, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), 12.5 mg twice daily and placebo in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized study that included 152 essential hypertensive patients (77 males, 75 females, 87 WHO stage I, 65 WHO stage II, aged 69 +/- 4 years, mean +/- s.d.). Supine and standing blood pressure were similarly reduced by captopril and HCTZ (P less than 0.01 for both compared with placebo). The heart rate did not change. Captopril (25-30 mg twice daily) and HCTZ (12.5 mg twice daily), alone or in combination, maintained their antihypertensive effect during a 24-week single-blind follow-up study. During the follow-up, diastolic blood pressure remained less than 100 mmHg in seven essential hypertensives on placebo, in 45 on captopril and in 25 on HCTZ. Side effects were observed in seven essential hypertensives during placebo (treatment withdrawn in two), in eight during HCTZ and in three during captopril. Serum potassium was reduced (P less than 0.05) and uric acid was increased (P less than 0.01) only during HCTZ. We conclude that captopril and HCTZ have similar antihypertensive efficacy in the elderly; however, captopril appears to be better tolerated.

Aged↗
PubMed1977

[The nephelometric method in the study of the hyperlipoproteinaemia: comparative analysis with chemical and electrophoretic methods (author's transl)].

On 814 subjects the cholesterolemia, the triglyceridemia and serum lipoproteins were determined; also the nephelometric analysis of the serum was conducted. The statistical analysis of the results allowed the following conclusions. 1) Approximately 98% of the pathological results are found in 3 types: type IV (about 49%), IIa (about 40%), IIb (about 11%). 2) The nephelometric determination of the M particles is particularly useful in the distinction between types IIa and IIb, because in type IIb there are pathologically increased values also when the triglycerides are normal or almost normal. There exists a significant correlation between the M particles determined by nephelometric analysis and the triglycerides determined by chemical methods.

Cholesterol↗