Biomedical subjects

U Leonards

Publications and source records attributed to U Leonards.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Two segmentation mechanisms with differential sensitivity for colour and luminance contrast.

In a texture-segregation paradigm, subjects were asked to detect figures whose elements were segregated from background either because of temporal offset or because of differing orientations. Texture elements were either isoluminant or had high or low luminance contrast. At high luminance contrast, figures could be segregated both on the basis of orientation and temporal cues whereby temporal offsets as short as 10 msec supported detection. At isoluminance, orientation defined figures were as readily distinguishable as in the high contrast condition but temporally defined figures were perceived only for offset intervals > 50 msec. With low luminance contrast, performance for orientation defined figures was impaired relative to the high contrast condition, but for temporally defined figures, it was superior to the isoluminant condition; detection was possible for offset intervals as short as 22 msec. These results suggest that the temporal and orientation cues which support scene segmentation are transmitted by both the luminance and colour sensitive pathways. However, if temporal offsets are < 50 msec, segmentation of temporally defined figures is supported only by the luminance sensitive system.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Parallel visual search is not always effortless.

Serial visual search can become parallel with practice. We tested whether this parallelisation is accompanied by a transition from an attentive to a pre-attentive and thus effortless mode of visual perception. While psychophysiological indicators of attentional effort (galvanic skin conductance, muscle tonus) reflected the distinction between serial and parallel search modes, they did not follow the perceptual changes during learning. Despite the perceptual parallelisation with practice, the attentional load remained high for initially serial tasks.

Attention↗

PubMed1997

Selective temporal interactions between processing streams with differential sensitivity for colour and luminance contrast.

Temporal interactions between spatially separated visual stimuli were investigated in human observers. Subjects had to judge whether briefly presented targets consisted of a single or a double flash. Simultaneous presentation of unattended single or double flash distractors impaired performance if target and distractor followed different time courses, confirming previous findings. This interference occurred only when targets had high luminance contrast or were isoluminant and when distractors had high or low luminance contrast, but not when targets had low luminance contrast or when distractors were isoluminant. Low luminance contrast distractors strongly influenced high luminance contrast targets but not vice versa. These results suggest that (i) information about the precise temporal structure of stimuli is conveyed preferentially by the luminance-sensitive magnocellular system; and (ii) that this information influences judgements on the temporal patterning of signals transmitted by the colour-sensitive parvocellular system.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

The influence of temporal phase differences on texture segmentation.

Scene segmentation and perceptual grouping are important operations in visual processing. Pattern elements constituting individual perceptual objects need to be segregated from those of other objects and the background and have to be bound together for further joint evaluation. Both textural (spatial) and temporal cues are exploited for this grouping operation. Thus, pattern elements might get bound that share certain textural features and/or appear in close spatial or temporal contiguity. However, results on the involvement of temporal cues in perceptual grouping are contradictory [Kiper et al. (1991). Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 17, 1209; Fahle (1993). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 254, 199-203]. We therefore reinvestigated the relative contributions of temporal and spatial cues and their interactions in a texture-segmentation paradigm. Our data show that the visual system can segregate figures solely on the basis of temporal cues if the temporal offset between figure and ground elements exceeds 10 msec. Moreover, segregation of figures defined by orientation differences among pattern elements is facilitated by additional temporal cues if these define the same figure. If temporal and textural cues define different figures, the two cues compete and only the more salient pattern is perceived. By contrast, the detection of a figure defined by orientation is not impaired by conflicting temporal cues if these do not define a figure themselves and do not exceed offset intervals of 100 msec. These results indicate the existence of a flexible binding mechanism that exploits both temporal and textural cues either alone or in combination if they serve perceptual grouping but can exclude either of the two cues if they are in conflict or do not define a figure. It is proposed that this flexibility is achieved by the implementation of two segmentation mechanisms which differ in their sensitivity for spatial and temporal cues and interact in a facultative way.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects: the effect of unilateral attenuation with neutral density filters.

In normal subjects, binocular rivalry suppression takes time to build up (Wolfe, 1986a). The time courses of interocular suppression are different and heterogeneous in amblyopic subjects (de Belsunce & Sireteanu, 1991). In the present study, we found that, in normal observers, progressive reduction of one eye's stimulus luminance with neutral density filters produces time courses similar to those of amblyopic subjects. Conversely, in amblyopes, attenuation of the dominant eye's stimulus produces time courses similar to those of normal observers. Under conditions of balancing of the two eyes, amblyopes experience alternating suppression, similarly to binocular rivalry of normals.

Adult↗