Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

U Jeppesen

Publications and source records attributed to U Jeppesen.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Statins and peripheral neuropathy.

Within the past 3 years seven cases of reversible peripheral neuropathy apparently caused by statins have been reported. Here we report seven additional cases associated with long-term statin therapy, in which other causes of neuropathy were thoroughly excluded. The neuropathy was in all cases axonal and with affection of both thick and thin nerve fibers. The symptoms of neuropathy persisted during an observation period lasting from 10 weeks to 1 year in four cases after statin treatment had been withdrawn. We suggest that long-term statin treatment may be associated with chronic peripheral neuropathy.

Action Potentials

The stereoselective metabolism of fluoxetine in poor and extensive metabolizers of sparteine.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine is administered as a racemic mixture, and R- and S-fluoxetine are metabolized in the liver by N-demethylation to R- and S-norfluoxetine, respectively. R- and S-fluoxetine and S-norfluoxetine are equally potent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, but R-norfluoxetine is 20-fold less potent in this regard. Racemic fluoxetine and norfluoxetine are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 in vivo and in vitro and recent studies in vivo have shown that racemic fluoxetine is metabolized by CYP2D6. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the stereoselective metabolism of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine by CYP2D6 in vivo. A single oral dose of fluoxetine (60 mg) was administered to six poor and six extensive metabolizers of sparteine. Blood samples were collected during 6 weeks for poor metabolizers and 3 weeks for extensive metabolizers. Once a week a sparteine test was performed. The R- and S-enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were determined by a stereoselective gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy method. In the poor metabolizers, the oral clearance of R- and S-fluoxetine was 3.0 l/h and 17 l/h, respectively, the corresponding values in the extensive metabolizers were 36 l/h and 40 l/h, respectively. For both enantiomers, the phenotype difference was statistically significant. In poor metabolizers, the elimination half-lives were 6.9 days and 17.4 days for R- and S-norfluoxetine, respectively, and in the extensive metabolizers it was 5.5 days for both enantiomers, a significant phenotypical difference only for S-norfluoxetine. For fluoxetine the elimination half-lives were 9.5 and 6.1 days in poor metabolizers for the R- and S-enantiomer, respectively. The corresponding values in the extensive metabolizers were 2.6 and 1.1 days, respectively. Also for this parameter, the differences were statistically significant. This study shows that CYP2D6 catalyses the metabolism of R- and S-fluoxetine and most likely the further metabolism of S-norfluoxetine but not of R-norfluoxetine.

Area Under Curve

Fluvoxamine inhibits the CYP2C19-catalyzed bioactivation of chloroguanide.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interaction between fluvoxamine and chloroguanide (INN, proguanil) to confirm that fluvoxamine inhibits CYP2C19. METHODS: The study was carried out with a randomized, in vivo, crossover design. Six volunteers were extensive metabolizers of the S-mephenytoin oxidation polymorphism, and six volunteers were poor metabolizers. In period A of the study, each subject took 200 mg chloroguanide orally. In period B, each subject took 100 mg/day fluvoxamine for 8 days and on day 6 ingested 200 mg chloroguanide. In both periods, blood and urine were sampled at regular intervals. Chloroguanide and its two metabolites cycloguanil and 4-chlorphenylbiguanide in plasma and in urine were assayed by means of HPLC. RESULTS: During fluvoxamine use, the median of the total clearance of chloroguanide decreased in a statistically significant way from 1282 ml/min to 782 ml/min among the extensive metabolizers, whereas there was no change among the poor metabolizers. The partial clearance of chloroguanide by means of cydoguanil and 4-chlorphenylbiguanide formation among the extensive metabolizers decreased from 222 ml/min and 97 ml/min before to 33 ml/min and 11 ml/min during fluvoxamine intake, respectively. Among poor metabolizers the corresponding values were 35 ml/min and 7.6 ml/min before and 38 ml/min and 6.9 ml/min during fluvoxamine intake. For each metabolite clearance the change was statistically significant among the extensive metabolizers but not among the poor metabolizers. Both cycloguanil and 4-chlorphenylbiguanide formation clearances were statistically significantly higher among the extensive metabolizers than the poor metabolizers in period A but not in period B (phenocopy). CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine is an effective inhibitor of CYP2C19.

Administration, Oral

Griseofulvin and fluvoxamine interactions with the metabolism of theophylline.

Theophylline is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2). A possible interaction between griseofulvin and theophylline was reported to our laboratory, which led us to form the hypothesis that griseofulvin induces the metabolism of theophylline. One purpose of this study was to investigate this hypothesis. The study was carried out as a randomized crossover study of 12 healthy volunteers. In period A of the study, each volunteer received a single dose of 300 mg theophylline ethylenediamine orally. In period B, the subjects took fluvoxamine, 50 mg for 1 day and 100 mg for 6 days, and on day 4, the subjects ingested 300 mg theophylline ethylenediamine. Fluvoxamine is a potent inhibitor of CYP1A2, and period B was included as a positive control. In period C, the subjects took 500 mg griseofulvin for 9 days; on day 8 the subjects again ingested 300 mg theophylline ethylenediamine. Theophylline and its metabolites (1-methyluric acid [IMU], 3-methylxanthine [3MX], and 1,3-dimethyluric acid [13DMU]) in plasma and urine were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography. During fluvoxamine intake, the median of the total clearance of theophylline decreased from 80 ml/min to 24 ml/min, and the half-life increased from 6.6 to 22 h. The partial formation clearances of the metabolites decreased from 17 to 1.7 ml/min, from 8.9 to 0.9 ml/min, and from 21 to 6.8 ml/min for 1MU, 3MX, and 13DMU, respectively. The results confirm that assessment of theophylline metabolism indeed serves as a biomarker for CYP1A2. During griseofulvin ingestion, the median of the total and partial clearances of theophylline were 84 ml/min, 22 ml/min (1MU), 9.4 ml/min (3MX), and 25 ml/min (13DMU). The half-life decreased significantly from 6.6 to 5.7 h. The increase in partial formation clearances of 1MU and 13DMU, but not of 3MX, were statistically significant. The increase in the total clearance reached only borderline significance. In four subjects a marked induction was seen for all pharmacokinetic parameters, suggesting that the susceptibility to induction is more pronounced in some subjects. This susceptibility could theoretically be explained by a polymorphism in the inducibility of the gene coding for the CYP1A2 enzyme.

Adult

Dose-dependent inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 by citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and paroxetine.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pharmacokinetic study was to investigate the dose-dependent inhibition of model substrates for CYP2D6, CYP2C19 and CYP1A2 by four marketed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs): citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and paroxetine. METHODS: The study was carried out as an in vivo single-dose study including 24 young, healthy men. All volunteers had been identified as sparteine- and mephenytoin-extensive metabolisers. The volunteers received in randomised order, at weekly intervals, increasing single oral doses of one of the four SSRIs, followed 3 h later by sparteine (CYP2D6), mephenytoin (CYP2C19) and caffeine (CYP1A2) tests. Fluoxetine was given at 3-week intervals because of the long half-life of fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluoxetine. Citalopram, fluoxetine and paroxetine were given in doses of 10, 20, 40 and 80 mg and fluvoxamine was given in doses of 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg. RESULTS: With increasing doses, there was a statistically significant increase in the sparteine metabolic ratio (MR) (P < 0.01, Page's test for trend) for all four SSRIs. The increase was modest after intake of citalopram and fluvoxamine, while the increase was more pronounced after fluoxetine intake, although no volunteers changed phenotype from extensive metabolisers to poor metabolisers. Three of the six volunteers changed phenotype from extensive metabolisers to poor metabolisers after intake of 40 or 80 mg paroxetine. There was a statistically significant increase in the mephenytoin S/R ratio (P < 0.01, Page's test for trend) with increasing doses of fluoxetine and fluvoxamine, but not after citalopram and paroxetine. However, no volunteers changed phenotype from extensive to poor metabolisers of S-mephenytoin. After intake of fluvoxamine, the urinary excretion of the metabolites related to N3 demethylation of caffeine were below the limit of quantification, whereas there were no significant changes in the urinary caffeine metabolic ratios after intake of the other three SSRIs. CONCLUSION: This investigation confirms that paroxetine and fluoxetine are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, that fluvoxamine and fluoxetine are moderate inhibitors of CYP2C19 and that fluvoxamine is a potent inhibitor of CYP1A2 in humans in vivo. The clinical prediction of interaction from single-dose experiments may have to take the degree of accumulation during steady-state after multiple doses into account.

Adult

A fluvoxamine-caffeine interaction study.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine is a very potent inhibitor of the liver enzyme CYP1A2, which is the major P450 catalysing the biotransformation of caffeine. Thus, a pharmacokinetic study was undertaken with the purpose of documenting a drug-drug interaction between fluvoxamine and caffeine. The study was carried out as a randomized, in vivo, cross-over study including eight healthy volunteers. In Period A of the study, each subject took 200 mg caffeine orally, and in Period B, the subjects took fluvoxamine 50 mg per day for 4 days and 100 mg per day for 8 days. On day 8 in Period B, the subjects again ingested 200 mg caffeine. After caffeine intake, blood and urine were sampled at regular intervals. Caffeine and its three primary demethylated metabolites, paraxanthine, theobromine and theophylline in plasma and the same four compounds plus 11 more metabolites in urine were assayed by HPLC. During fluvoxamine, the median of the total clearance of caffeine decreased from 107 ml min-1 to 21 ml min-1 and the half-life increased from 5 to 31 h. The N3-demethylation clearance of caffeine to paraxanthine decreased from 46 to 9 ml min-1; the N1- and N7-demethylation clearances decreased from 21 to 9 ml min-1 and from 14 to 6 ml min-1, respectively. The results confirm that CYP1A2 is the main enzyme catalysing the biotransformation of caffeine, in particular the N3-demethylation and partly the N1- and N7-demethylation. The results indicate that intake of caffeine during fluvoxamine treatment may lead to caffeine intoxication. Finally, our study provides additional evidence that fluvoxamine can be used to probe CYP1A2 in drug metabolism.

Adult

[Women's attitude towards gynecologic examinations].

Twelve women aged between 27 and 76 years were interviewed one week before hospitalization for a planned gynaecological operation with the aim of illustrating their experience of the pelvic examination. The study demonstrated that women's experience of pelvic examination was unpleasant when the communication between the women and the doctors was poor. The pelvic examination could be a positive experience, if the doctor gave information about the procedure and about the findings. Information about the genitals' anatomy could also diminish the discomfort of the situation. The oldest women had the least experience of pelvic examination.

Adult