Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

U Fuhr

Publications and source records attributed to U Fuhr.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Induction of drug metabolising enzymes: pharmacokinetic and toxicological consequences in humans.

Currently, 5 different main mechanisms of induction are distinguished for drug-metabolising enzymes. The ethanol type of induction is mediated by ligand stabilisation of the enzyme, but the others appear to be mediated by intracellular 'receptors'. These are the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor, the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR), the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR, phenobarbital induction) and the pregnane X receptor [PXR, rifampicin (rifampin) induction]. Enzyme induction has the net effect of increasing protein levels. However, many inducers are also inhibitors of the enzymes they induce, and the inductive effects of a single drug may be mediated by more than one mechanism. Therefore, it appears that every inducer has its own pattern of induction; knowledge of the main mechanism is often not sufficient to predict the extent and time course of induction, but may serve to make the clinician aware of potential dangers. The possible pharmacokinetic consequences of enzyme induction depend on the localisation of the enzyme. They include decreased or absent bioavailability for orally administered drugs, increased hepatic clearance or accelerated formation of reactive metabolites, which is usually related to local toxicity. Although some severe drug-drug interactions are caused by enzyme induction, most of the effects of inducers are not detected in the background of nonspecific variation. For any potent inducer, however, its addition to, or withdrawal from, an existing drug regimen may cause pronounced concentration changes and should be done gradually and with appropriate monitoring of therapeutic efficacy and adverse events. The toxicological consequences of enzyme induction in humans are rare, and appear to be mainly limited to hepatoxicity in ethanol-type induction.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Problems and perspectives of phenotyping for drug-metabolizing enzymes in man.

Pronounced interindividual differences in drug disposition are mainly caused by differences in the activity of liver drug-metabolizing enzymes. These depend on known and unknown covariates, including genetic as well as environmental factors. Phenotyping, i.e. assessment of enzyme activities in vivo after administration of a test dose, seems to be a promising tool for determining actual metabolic capacities. Although it is a well-established experimental approach, phenotyping has not yet found its way into clinical practice. Main reasons for this are lack of validation for many probes and assays used, complicated procedures, invasiveness, semi-quantitative test results, non-compliance on behalf of the subjects tested, high costs, and lack of prospective clinical studies to assess the benefit of phenotyping for patients. Problems and perspectives of phenotyping are exemplified for the cytochrome P-450 enzymes CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, two major human drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2↗
PubMed2000

Variation of CYP1A2-dependent caffeine metabolism during menstrual cycle in healthy women.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The activity of the human cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 is decreased by female sex hormones during pregnancy or treatment with oral contraceptives. However, the influence of menstrual cycle on CYP 1A2 activity is not clear. METHODS: CYP1A2 activity was monitored in 15 women (13 with confirmed ovulatory cycles, 2 smokers, age (mean +/- SD) 27.8 +/- 3.8 years, body mass index 23.8 +/- 3.8 kg x m-2) using the specific substrate caffeine (mean doses 149 mg). After a run-in period started one week prior to expected onset of menses, daily saliva samples were taken 7.3 +/- 0.7 hours after caffeine intake throughout the cycle, and caffeine clearance was estimated from the paraxanthine to caffeine ratio therein. Ovulation was confirmed by progesterone serum concentration above 3 ng/ml in the second half of the cycle. RESULTS: Initial (day 2) caffeine clearance (n = 15, geometric mean) was 1.37 ml/min/kg body weight (coefficient of variation (CV) 48%). The ratio of caffeine clearance for the luteal (day -9 to -4 prior to onset of the next menses) to the follicular phase (days 5-10) was (n = 13, point estimate) 1.03 (90% CI 0.95-1.12), indicating that there was no difference in CYP1A2 activity between these cycle phases. The median intraindividual CV in ovulatory cycles (n = 13) was 23% (range 11% to 39%). As an additional finding, there was evidence for long-term fluctuations of CYP1A2 activity in most individuals. CONCLUSIONS: A dose adaptation according to the phase of menstrual cycle based on pharmacokinetics is not required for CYP1A2 substrates.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Clinically significant" new drug interactions].

The concomitant intake of drugs with the potential to cause drug interactions is frequent. In contrast, adverse effects due to drug interactions account for only a small fraction of all adverse effects. A reproducible evaluation of the clinical relevance of drug interactions is lacking. We now can accurately define the potential of a drug to cause interactions, primarily by comparative investigations within a drug class. Whether or not the selection of the drug based on this information is useful for the patient is unknown. Therefore, usually it is to be recommended to abandon therapeutically reasonable drug combinations with a risk for interactions only if equivalent therapeutic options are available. Several actual examples on interactions with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, mibefradil, sildenafil, protease inhibitors and with grapefruit juice are discussed.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed1999

["Clinically significant" new drug interactions].

The concomitant intake of drugs with the potential to cause drug interactions is frequent. In contrast, adverse effects due to drug interactions account for only a small fraction of all adverse effects. A reproducible evaluation of the clinical relevance of drug interactions is lacking. We now can accurately define the potential of a drug to cause interactions, primarily by comparative investigations within a drug class. Whether or not the selection of the drug based on this information is useful for the patient is unknown. Therefore, usually it is to be recommended to abandon therapeutically reasonable drug combinations with a risk for interactions only if equivalent therapeutic options are available. Several actual examples on interactions with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, mibefradil, sildenafil, protease inhibitors and with grapefruit juice are discussed.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed1999

Interaction of pefloxacin and enoxacin with the human cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP1A2.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pefloxacin is reported to cause clinically relevant inhibition of theophylline metabolism in vivo, but in vitro pefloxacin was only a weak inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 CYP1A2, mediating main theophylline biotransformation. We therefore further characterized the interaction between pefloxacin and CYP1A2. METHODS: A randomized 3-period change-over study was conducted in 12 healthy young volunteers on the steady-state interactions between pefloxacin or enoxacin (400 mg twice a day) with caffeine (183 mg once daily), a validated marker of CYP1A2. Caffeine pharmacokinetics were estimated after its fifth dose. Studies in human liver microsomes were carried out to measure the effect of pefloxacin and norfloxacin on caffeine 3-demethylation, an in vitro CYP1A2 probe, and to identify the enzyme(s) that mediate pefloxacin N-4'-demethylation with selective inhibitors. RESULTS: For the in vivo study, ANOVA-based point estimates (90% confidence intervals [CI]) for the ratios of caffeine pharmacokinetics with and without pefloxacin coadministration were 1.11 for maximal steadystate plasma concentrations (Cmax,ss; 90% CI, 0.99 to 1.26), 0.53 for total clearance (CLt,ss; 90% CI, 0.49 to 0.58), and 1.04 for the beta-phase distribution volume (Vdbeta; 90% CI, 0.96 to 1.13). The values for enoxacin were 1.99 for Cmax,ss (90% CI, 1.77 to 2.23), 0.17 for CLt,ss (90% CI, 0.16 to 0.19), and 1.01 for Vdbeta (90% CI, 0.90 to 1.13). Thus pefloxacin caused a 2-fold decrease in caffeine clearance, and enoxacin caused a 6-fold decrease in caffeine clearance. In vitro, norfloxacin and pefloxacin competitively inhibited CYP1A2, with inhibition constant (Ki) values of 0.1 and 1 mmol/L, respectively, and CYP1A2 was the only enzyme with a relevant contribution (approximately 50%) to pefloxacin N-4'-demethylation. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxacin and to a lesser extent pefloxacin may cause clinically relevant interactions with further CYP1A2 substrates. The data suggest that the pefloxacin interaction is partly mediated by its major metabolite norfloxacin.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Inhibitory effects of trospium chloride on cytochrome P450 enzymes in human liver microsomes.

Trospium chloride, an atropine derivative used for the treatment of urge incontinence, was tested for inhibitory effects on human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Metabolic activities were determined in liver microsomes from two donors using the following selective substrates: dextromethorphan (CYP2D6), denitronifedipine (CYP3A4), caffeine (CYP1A2), chlorzoxazone (CYP2E1), S-(+)-mephenytoin (CYP2C19), S-(-)-warfarin (CYP2C9) and coumarin (CYP2A6). Incubations with each substrate were carried out without a possible inhibitor and in the presence of trospium chloride at varying concentrations (37-3000 microM) at 37 degrees in 0.1 M KH2PO4 buffer containing up to 3% DMSO. Metabolite concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in all cases except CYP2A6 where direct fluorescence spectroscopy was used. First, trospium chloride IC50 values were determined for each substrate at respective K(M) concentrations. Trospium chloride did not show relevant inhibitory effects on the metabolism of most substrates (IC50 values considerably higher than 1 mM). The only clear inhibition was seen for the CYP2D6-dependent high-affinity O-demethylation of dextromethorphan, where IC50 values of 27 microM and 44 microM were observed. Therefore, additional dextromethorphan concentrations (0.4-2000 microM) were tested. Trospium chloride was a competitive inhibitor of the reaction with Ki values of 20 and 51 microM, respectively. Thus, trospium chloride has negligible inhibitory effects on CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP2A6 activity but is a reasonably potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 in vitro. Compared to therapeutic trospium chloride peak plasma concentrations below 50 nM, the 1000-times higher competitive inhibition constant Ki however suggests that inhibition of CYP2D6 by trospium chloride is without any clinical relevance.

Benzilates↗
PubMed1999

Estimation of cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 activity in 863 healthy Caucasians using a saliva-based caffeine test.

A pronounced variability limits the usefulness of CYP1A2 phenotyping for drug therapy, for evaluating liver function, and for assessing the role of this enzyme in carcinogenesis. To identify and quantify sources of this variation, we estimated CYP1A2 activity in 863 healthy Caucasians using caffeine clearance derived from saliva concentrations before and 5-7 h after a caffeine test dose. Data from 786 individuals were eligible for evaluation (mean age 39 years, 415 women including 94 taking oral contraceptives, 401 non-smokers). Overall geometric mean (geometric SD) caffeine clearance was 1.34 ml min(-1) kg b.w.(-1) (1.65). The effect of the following covariates was evaluated by analysis of covariance: age, sex, oral contraceptives, body height, body weight, body mass index, number of cigarettes smoked, tar exposure from smoking, several indices of dietary caffeine consumption, intake of sauerkraut, and country of residence (Germany, Bulgaria or Slovakia). Estimated changes relative to arbitrarily defined basal caffeine clearance (male, non-smoking, German resident) exerted by significant (P < 0.05) covariates were: coffee, 1.45-fold per litre of coffee drunk daily; body mass index, 0.99-fold per kg m(-2); smoking, 1.22-fold, 1.47-fold, 1.66-fold, and 1.72-fold for 1-5, 6-10, 11-20, and > 20 cigarettes smoked per day, respectively; oral contraceptives, 0.72-fold; country of residence, 0.81-fold and 0.74-fold for Bulgaria and Slovakia, respectively; female, 0.90-fold. These covariates explained 37% of overall variation. The 95% confidence interval of individual clearance was 0.46-2.20 times the predicted value. No relevant polymorphism was found for CYP1A2 activity when adjusted for covariate effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Omeprazole weakly inhibits CYP1A2 activity in man.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Omeprazole is an inducer of human cytochrome P450 1A (CYP1A) enzymes, but shows inhibitory effects on CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. In this study, a potential inhibitory effect of omeprazole on caffeine metabolism, a validated CYP1A2 marker, was examined. METHODS: A randomized, balanced crossover single-dose study was conducted in 16 healthy volunteers comprising 12 extensive (EM) and 4 poor metabolizers (PM) for CYP2C19. All volunteers received a 40 mg omeprazole dose or placebo 0.5 h prior to caffeine 3 mg/kg body weight. Six EMs were re-tested with 80 mg of omeprazole. In vitro, effects of omeprazole on caffeine N3-demethylation were determined in human liver microsomes. RESULTS: In vivo, non-parametric point estimates (90% confidence intervals) for the ratios of caffeine pharmacokinetics with/without co-administration of the 40 mg omeprazole dose were: AUC 1.08 (1.04 - 1.13), MRT 1.09 (0.99 - 1.19), and plasma ratio of paraxanthine/caffeine 6 h post-dose 0.91 (0.80 - 1.00). Inhibition of caffeine N3-demethylation by omeprazole was slightly more pronounced in PM than in EM of CYP2C19. Estimates for the 80 mg omeprazole dose were: AUC 1.12 (1.05 -1.18), MRT 1.18 (1.07 - 1.30), and paraxanthine/caffeine ratio 0.83 (0.74 -0.94). In vitro, omeprazole was mainly a competitive CYP1A2 inhibitor with K(i) values of around 150 microM. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole exerts a concentration-dependent inhibition of CYP1A2 activity in man. However, even after single oral doses up to 80 mg, this effect is weak and without clinical relevance.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Drug metabolism biosensors: electrochemical reactivities of cytochrome P450cam immobilised in synthetic vesicular systems.

Biosensors containing cytochrome P450cam in a didodecyldimethylammonium bromide vesicular system were prepared by cross-linking onto a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with glutaraldehyde in the presence of bovine serum albumin. Cyclic voltammetric responses of the sensor in air-free buffer solution showed that the sensor exhibited reversible electrochemistry due to direct electron exchange between the haem Fe(3+/2+) redox system and the GCE surface. In air-saturated solution containing camphor, the biosensor gave an irreversible electrocatalytic current which is compatible with the monooxygenation of the substrate. Steady state amperometric experiments with camphor, adamantanone and fenchone were performed with a biosensor prepared by cross-linking P450cam with glutaraldehyde onto a Pt disc electrode. The sensor was characterised by fast amperometric responses, attaining steady-state in about 20 s in a cobalt sepulchrate mediated electrochemical system. The kinetic parameters of the biosensor were analysed using the electrochemical Michaelis Menten equation. The estimated apparent Michaelis-Menten constant, Km, values for the biosensors were in the range of 1.41-3.9 mM.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Absence of effect of rufloxacin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in steady state.

Several quinolone antibacterial agents are known to inhibit the metabolism of theophylline, with the potential to cause adverse events due to raised theophylline concentrations during coadministration. A randomized crossover study was therefore conducted with 12 healthy male volunteers (ages, 23 to 34 years; body weight, 64 to 101 kg) to evaluate a possible interaction between rufloxacin and theophylline. Both drugs were administered at steady state. Following the administration of an oral loading dose of 400 mg on day 1, rufloxacin was given orally at 200 mg once daily on days 2 to 7 during one period only. During both periods, 146 mg of theophylline was administered orally twice daily for 3 days (which were days 4 to 6 of the rufloxacin coadministration period) and intravenously once the next morning to test for an interaction. Theophylline and rufloxacin concentrations were measured by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography, the pharmacokinetics of theophylline at steady state following administration of the last dose were calculated by compartment-model-independent methods. To compare the treatments, analysis of variance-based point estimates and 90% confidence intervals (given in parentheses) were calculated for the mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic parameters from the test (rufloxacin coadministration) over those from the reference (theophylline without rufloxacin) period. These were as follows: maximum concentration at steady state, 1.01 (0.96 to 1.07); area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h, 0.98 (0.94 to 1.02); half-life, 0.99 (0.95 to 1.03); total clearance at steady state, 1. 02 (0.99 to 1.06); and volume of distribution in the elimination phase, 1.01 (0.97 to 1.05). In conclusion, rufloxacin did not affect theophylline pharmacokinetics at steady state. Therefore, therapeutic coadministration of rufloxacin and theophylline is not expected to cause an increased incidence of theophylline-related adverse events.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Drug interactions with grapefruit juice. Extent, probable mechanism and clinical relevance.

Concomitant intake with grapefruit juice increases the concentrations of many drugs in humans. The effect seems to be mediated mainly by suppression of the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 in the small intestine wall. This results in a diminished first pass metabolism with higher bioavailability and increased maximal plasma concentrations of substrates of this enzyme. The effect was most pronounced in drugs with a high first pass degradation and in many cases has the clear potential to reach clinical relevance, as shown by an occasional change in drug effects or tolerability. For felodipine, nitrendipine, nisoldipine and saquinavir, the interaction was most marked with median increases of area under the curve (AUC) and/or the maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration after single-dose administration (Cmax) values exceeding 70% of respective control periods. Less pronounced, but possibly relevant, concentration increases were found for nifedipine, nimodipine, verapamil, cyclosporin, midazolam, triazolam and terfenadine. This list is not complete because many drugs have not been studied yet. The components of grapefruit juice which are the most probable causes of the interactions are psoralen derivatives, but the flavonoid naringenin may also contribute. Concomitant grapefruit juice intake does not generally decrease the variability of drug pharmacokinetic parameters. Therefore, it is recommended that patients refrain from drinking grapefruit juice when they are taking a drug that is extensively metabolised, unless a lack of interaction has already been demonstrated for the drug. It is also recommended that drugs possibly interacting with grapefruit juice should be appropriately labelled. A place for grapefruit juice as a drug-sparing agent in treatment involving expensive medicine cannot be derived from the information currently available on grapefruit juice interactions.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1998

Grapefruit juice increases oral nimodipine bioavailability.

The bioavailability of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers following oral administration was shown to be increased by concomitant intake of grapefruit juice for all drugs of this class tested up to now. Here we report a randomized crossover interaction study on the effects of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of nimodipine and its metabolites. Eight healthy young men (4 smokers/4 nonsmokers) were included. Nimodipine was given as a single 30 mg tablet (Nimotop) with either 250 ml of water or 250 ml of grapefruit juice (751 mg naringin/l). Drug concentrations in plasma withdrawn up to 24 hours postdose were measured by GC-ECD, and model-independent pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. The study was handled as an equivalence problem. Point estimators and ANOVA based 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the test (= grapefruit juice period) to reference (= water period) ratios using dose-normalized concentrations. The absence of a relevant interaction was assumed if the CIs were within the 0.67-1.50 range. Cmax for nimodipine reached 124% of the reference period (90% CI 0.76-2.01), AUC was increased to 151% (90% CI 114%-200%), respectively. The null hypothesis "relevant interaction" thus could not be rejected for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters AUC and Cmax. The ratios of metabolite AUC to parent drug AUC were slightly reduced with grapefruit juice intake. Additionally, there was evidence for a more pronounced hemodynamic response in the grapefruit juice period. To avoid the interaction, nimodipine should not be taken with grapefruit juice.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Uroporphyrinogen oxidation catalyzed by human cytochromes P450.

Porphyria cutanea tarda is associated with excess hepatic production of uroporphyrin. Oxidation of uroporphyrinogen to uroporphyrin was previously demonstrated to be specifically catalyzed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2. Here, we investigated the ability of human CYP1A2 to catalyze uroporphyrinogen oxidation (UROX). UROX activity in human liver microsomes was maximally only 10% of the activity in microsomes from livers of untreated mice. There was a poor correlation of UROX activity with methoxyresorufin demethylation, an activity catalyzed predominantly by CYP1A2 and strongly correlated with immunodetectable CYP1A2. With CYP forms expressed in HepG2 cells, the methoxyresorufin demethylation and (ethoxyresorufin deethylation) activities of murine and human CYP1A2 forms were similar, but UROX activity catalyzed by human CYP1A2 was only 15-20% of the activity catalyzed by murine CYP1A2. Human CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP3A4 expressed in lymphoblastoid cells all catalyzed UROX. In insect cells, CYP1A2 was more active in catalyzing UROX than was CYP1A1, CYP2E, CYP3A4, or CYP3A5. Human CYP1A2 expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion protein with rat CYP oxidoreductase also catalyzed UROX. Reconstituted human CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 were active in catalyzing UROX, with reconstituted CYP1A2 having the highest specific activity obtained in this study. From inhibitor studies, it was concluded that some of the UROX activity in the insect cell microsomes was attributable to expressed CYP and some to an unidentified source. These results indicate that human CYP1A2 is active in catalyzing UROX but has lower activity than the murine orthologue. The results also indicate that most of the UROX activity found in human liver microsomes is not due to CYP1A2.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

[Theophylline].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

[Bioavailability of a new theophylline chewable pill].

Oral administration of theophylline as a chewable tablet is an alternative to the conventional parenteral route used in the treatment of acute dyspnoea in asthma bronchiale and other obstructive pulmonary diseases. To investigate the bioavailability of this preparation, a randomised 2-period cross-over study on the pharmacokinetics of a 100 mg theophylline single dose was conducted comparing oral administration as a chewable tablet (test medication) or as solution (reference) in 14 healthy male volunteers (age 21-31 years, body weight 60-90 kg). Bioequivalence of the tested formulations could be confirmed basing on the primary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, Cmax) for the extent and rate of theophylline absorption. The criterion of bioequivalence was also met for the secondary parameters, including terminal elimination half-life, mean residence time, time point of maximal plasma concentration and the ratio Cmax/AUC. Hence, the chewable theophylline tablet is bioequivalent to theophylline given as a solution. With regard to therapeutic efficacy, equivalence to medication by droplets can be expected.

Administration, Oral↗