Biomedical subjects

Travis T Mallard

Publications and source records attributed to Travis T Mallard.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Robust inference and correlates from genetic associations with personality.

Personality traits describe stable differences in how people think, feel and behave, and how they interact with and experience their social and physical environments1,2. Many questions remain unanswered about associations between DNA and personality traits, such as their robustness, their generalizability and the biological and social pathways through which they act. Here we meta-analyse data across 46 cohorts comprising 611,037 to 1.14 million participants with European-like and African-like genomes for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the Big Five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness to experience), and data from up to 50,725 participants for within-family GWAS. We identify 1,260 lead genetic variants associated with personality, including 824 novel variants3. Common genetic variants explain a moderate 4.8-9.3% of the variance in measures of each trait, and 9.3-13.3% among instruments with typical measurement reliability. Genetic associations with personality are highly consistent but not identical across geography, reporter (self versus close other), age group and measurement instrument, and we find minimal spousal assortment for personality in recent history. In contrast to many other social and behavioural traits4,5, within-family GWAS and polygenic index analyses indicate that genetic associations with personality are minimally confounded by the shared family environment. Polygenic prediction, genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization analyses indicate that personality traits have widespread, potentially causal associations with consequential behaviours and life outcomes. Overall, we find that the genetic architecture of personality is robustly generalizable, minimally confounded and widely relevant to human experience.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Optimizing Control Definitions in Opioid Use Disorder Genetic Research Using Electronic Health Records.

Amidst the opioid crisis, understanding the genetic basis of opioid use disorder (OUD) is crucial for identifying biological mechanisms and intervention points. However, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been hampered by inadequate sample sizes and often the use of control populations not assessed for prior opioid exposure. Because opioid exposure is a prerequisite for the development of OUD, consideration of exposure history in controls is important. Electronic health record data (EHR) paired with genomic information allow a broader sampling of patients with OUD and exposed controls. We leveraged data across two healthcare systems to evaluate the impact of using controls not screened for opioid exposure ('generic') versus minimally opioid-exposed control ('exposed'). First, at the phenotypic level, we conducted phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) to compare the medical comorbidity profiles of OUD cases when using generic versus exposed controls. While PheWAS results for OUD-related comorbidities were more pronounced when using the generic group, 83% of the disease associations were overlapping and of similar effect sizes. Second, at the genetic level, we conducted GWAS (cases vs. generic; cases vs. exposed) and assessed differences in genetic correlations and degrees of phenotypic misclassification. Genetic results were concordant across control groups based on heritability (generic: 0.16 ± 0.07 vs. 0.10 ± 0.07), associations with the coding OPRM1 variant rs1799971 (pgeneric = 8.83E-03 vs. pexposed = 1.83E-02) and genetic correlations with prior OUD GWAS (rg-generic = 0.83 ± 0.26 vs. rg-exposed = 0.78 ± 0.27). Although GWASs were limited by sample size (Ngeneric = 6269, Nexposed = 6365), compared to an independent OUD GWAS (N = 425 944), the dilution value for the two GWAS was not different from 1, suggesting no major impact of phenotypic misclassification. This study represents the first effort to enhance OUD genetic research through optimization of control definitions using EHR data. Generic controls ascertained within the US health systems, where exposure to prescription opioids is high, offer a practical alternative for genetic studies of OUD.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Multivariate genetic of 2.2 million individuals demonstrate genetic influences on substance use disorders operate via behavioral disinhibition and substance-specific risk.

Ongoing efforts to identify genes involved in substance use disorders (SUDs) often focus on individual disorders despite high rates of co-occurrence with each other and other externalizing traits. Here, we investigate whether incorporating data on other externalizing traits can boost power to detect without sacrificing specificity of SUD genetic signal. We used multivariate genomic analyses and downstream biological annotation and genetic association analyses to explore this question. We found that joint analysis of SUDs and other externalizing traits resulted in increased insights into the neurobiology of broad and substance-specific SUD risk. We found no evidence of loss of specificity for SUD genetic signal but note improvements in our ability to characterize the neurobiology of broad and substance-specific SUD genetic effects. Our findings suggest that genetic risk for SUDs operates largely via pathways shared with other behaviors characterized by behavioral disinhibition, with additional substance-specific risk, and that modeling this shared disposition improves gene discovery.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2024

Multi-ancestry meta-analysis of tobacco use disorder identifies 461 potential risk genes and reveals associations with multiple health outcomes.

Tobacco use disorder (TUD) is the most prevalent substance use disorder in the world. Genetic factors influence smoking behaviours and although strides have been made using genome-wide association studies to identify risk variants, most variants identified have been for nicotine consumption, rather than TUD. Here we leveraged four US biobanks to perform a multi-ancestral meta-analysis of TUD (derived via electronic health records) in 653,790 individuals (495,005 European, 114,420 African American and 44,365 Latin American) and data from UK Biobank (ncombined = 898,680). We identified 88 independent risk loci; integration with functional genomic tools uncovered 461 potential risk genes, primarily expressed in the brain. TUD was genetically correlated with smoking and psychiatric traits from traditionally ascertained cohorts, externalizing behaviours in children and hundreds of medical outcomes, including HIV infection, heart disease and pain. This work furthers our biological understanding of TUD and establishes electronic health records as a source of phenotypic information for studying the genetics of TUD.

Humans↗