Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Tom Callens

Publications and source records attributed to Tom Callens.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Genetic and clinical mosaicism in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Patients with typical features of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) limited to a specific body segment are usually referred to as having "segmental NF1", which is generally assumed to be the result of somatic mosaicism for a NF1 mutation. Mosaicism has also been demonstrated at the molecular level in some sporadic cases with phenotypically classic NF1. In the present report, we describe a patient with NF1 disease manifestations throughout the whole body, but leaving a few sharply delineated segments of the skin unaffected, suggestive of revertant mosaicism. A large intragenic deletion was found by mutation analysis using long-range RT-PCR. The intra-exonic breakpoints were characterized in exon 13 and exon 28, resulting in a deletion of 99,571 bp at the genomic level. The presence of two genetically distinct cell populations, confirming mosaicism for this NF1 mutation, was shown by analysis of several tissues. Revertant mosaicism was excluded by demonstrating heterozygosity for markers residing in the deletion region. The findings in this patient demonstrate two things: (1) although the entire body is affected, mosaicism can still be suspected at clinical examination and proven by DNA analysis and skin biopsies; (2) long-range RT-PCR is a feasible method for demonstrating large intragenic deletions in NF1.

Adult↗

Complex splicing pattern generates great diversity in human NF1 transcripts.

BACKGROUND: Mutation analysis of the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene has shown that about 30% of NF1 patients carry a splice mutation resulting in the production of one or several shortened transcripts. Some of these transcripts were also found in fresh lymphocytes of healthy individuals, albeit typically at a very low level. Starting from this initial observation, we were interested to gain further insight into the complex nature of NF1 mRNA processing. RESULTS: We have used a RT-PCR plasmid library based method to identify novel NF1 splice variants. Several transcripts were observed with specific insertions/deletions and a survey was made. This large group of variants detected in one single gene allows to perform a comparative analysis of the factors involved in splice regulation. Exons that are prone to skipping were systematically analysed for 5' and 3' splice site strength, branch point strength and secondary structure. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a complex splicing pattern, generating a great diversity in NF1 transcripts. We found that, on average, exons that are spliced out in part of the mRNA have significantly weaker acceptor sites. Some variants identified in this study could have distinct roles and might expand our knowledge of neurofibromin.

Journal Article↗

A patient severely affected by spinal neurofibromas carries a recurrent splice site mutation in the NF1 gene.

Spinal neurofibromas are found in up to 38% of NF1 patients. However, they cause clinical implications only in about 5% of the patients. In contrast, multiple symptomatic spinal neurofibromas are the main clinical finding in patients with familial spinal neurofibromatosis. Familial spinal neurofibromatosis has been considered to be a distinct clinical form of neurofibromatosis. Linkage analysis in two families and identification of a NF1 gene mutation in a third family strongly associate spinal neurofibromatosis with the NF1 gene. We describe a NF1 patient who satisfies the NIH diagnostic criteria and has severe spinal involvement with bilateral spinal root neurofibromas at every level. A recurrent splice site mutation (IVS19b-3C>G) was identified in the NF1 gene in the patient. We discuss the possibility that the clinical picture of this patient represents an additional example of spinal neurofibromatosis. By comparison of the clinical expression of NF1 in this patient and that in another patient with the identical mutation the hypothesis that spinal neurofibromatosis is associated with a particular mutation is highly unlikely. The involvement of other genes linked to the NF1 gene or modifying genes is currently the most likely explanation for the clinical phenotype of spinal neurofibromatosis.

Adult↗