Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Tiffany K Bee

Publications and source records attributed to Tiffany K Bee.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Multiplicity of solid organ injury: influence on management and outcomes after blunt abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The current study was undertaken to examine how concomitant injury to liver and spleen after blunt abdominal trauma affects management and outcomes. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of all blunt abdominal trauma patients admitted with a diagnosis of liver or spleen injury at two Level I trauma centers over a 4-year period. Presentation, injury grade, management, and outcomes were analyzed. Patients with single-organ injury (liver or spleen) were compared with patients having injury to both organs (liver and spleen). Significance was set at 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of 1,288 patients who met entry criteria, 1,125 had single (spleen, 573; liver, 552) organ injury (group S) and 163 had injury to both organs (group B). Group B patients had significantly higher Injury Severity Score, higher admission lactate, and lower admission systolic blood pressure and base excess. Eighty-one percent (915 of 1,125) of group S and 69% (112 of 163) of group B patients were managed nonoperatively (p < 0.05). Of the nonoperatively managed patients, 5.8% (53 of 915) in group S and 11.6% (13 of 112) in group B failed this form of therapy (p < 0.05). Higher failure rate in group B was because of bleeding from injured solid organ(s), and not non-solid organ related failures. Mortality, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, and transfusion requirements were all significantly higher in group B. CONCLUSION: Blunt trauma patients with concomitant injury to liver and spleen have higher Injury Severity Score, mortality, lengths of stay, and transfusion requirements. There is a higher failure rate with nonoperative management, and therefore extra vigilance is warranted when choosing this form of therapy in the presence of injury to both organs.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2002

Associated injuries in blunt solid organ trauma: implications for missed injury in nonoperative management.

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, nonoperative management (NOM) of hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients with liver (L) or spleen (S) injury has become the standard of care. This trend has led to concerns over missed associated intra-abdominal injuries with concomitant morbidity. To better understand the incidence and risk of missed injury, patterns of associated intra-abdominal injury were examined in all patients with blunt liver and spleen injuries, and missed injuries were reviewed in patients undergoing NOM. METHODS: Patients were identified from the registry of a Level I trauma center over a 3-year period. Records were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, and associated injuries. Indications for primary operation were hemodynamic instability or significant associated intra-abdominal injury. Missed injury was defined as unsuspected intra-abdominal injury requiring laparotomy in patients otherwise undergoing NOM for liver or spleen injury. RESULTS: Eight hundred three patients (338 in the L group, 345 in the S group, and 120 in the L + S group) were treated between December 1995 and December 1998. Rates of planned NOM were 89% (L group), 78% (S group), and 75% (L + S group). On examination of all patients with blunt liver or spleen injuries, the incidence of associated intra-abdominal injury was higher in the L group at 5% as compared with 1.7% in the S group (p = 0.02). The associated intra-abdominal injury rate in the L + S group was similar to the L group at 4.2%. Although in the L and S groups, rates of diaphragm (0.5% vs. 1%, p = 0.45) and intra-abdominal bladder injury (0.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.99) were similar, bowel injury was more common in the L group (11% vs. 0%, p = 0.0004), as was pancreatic injury (7% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). In NOM patients, missed injury occurred in seven (2.3%) L patients versus zero S patients (p = 0.012). No L + S patient had unexpected injuries. Missed injuries included two small bowel, three diaphragm, one pancreas, and one mesenteric tear. CONCLUSION: Damage to the pancreas and bowel is significantly associated with liver as opposed to spleen injuries. Actual missed intra-abdominal injury with NOM mirrors this pattern, occurring more often with liver than with spleen injuries. However, the overall incidence of missed injury is quite low, and should not influence decisions concerning eligibility for NOM. We speculate that the greater amount and/or different vector of energy transfer needed to injure the liver versus the spleen accounts for the greater rate of associated injuries to the pancreas/small bowel.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2002

Blunt aortic injury with concomitant intra-abdominal solid organ injury: treatment priorities revisited.

BACKGROUND: Patients with blunt aortic injury (BAI) often have concomitant liver or spleen (L/S) injuries. With increasing use of cardiopulmonary bypass with heparinization in repair of BAI, many advocate operative management of the L/S injury before aortic repair to eliminate risk of hemorrhage. We evaluated the safety of nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt L/S injuries in patients undergoing acute BAI repair with bypass. METHODS: All patients admitted over a 6-year period with BAI were identified from the registry of our Level I trauma center. Patients with isolated L/S injuries without BAI admitted over the same period served as controls. Groups were compared with regard to demographics, injury characteristics, hospital course, and mortality. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were diagnosed with BAI from 1994 to 2000; 28 (33%) also had blunt abdominal trauma. Three patients with severe brain injury did not undergo BAI repair, and five required laparotomy before BAI repair for other intra-abdominal injuries (two for hemodynamic instability with splenic injury, and three for concomitant bowel injury). Therefore, 20 of 28 (71.4%) BAI patients with grade I or II L/S injury (Aorta L/S group) underwent planned NOM. All BAIs were repaired using partial bypass with full heparinization. These 20 patients are compared with 894 patients with grade I or II L/S injuries with no BAI (L/S group) over the same time period. There was no difference in the nonoperative failure rate of the Aorta L/S group versus the L/S group (0% vs. 1.7%). Both groups had similar complication rates. The Aorta L/S group was also compared with 56 BAIs without solid organ injury (Aorta group). Although the Aorta L/S group was more severely injured than the Aorta group (Injury Severity Score of 35.3 vs. 26.8, < 0.0001), transfusion rates (5.7 U of packed red blood cells vs. 8.0 U of packed red blood cells, p = NS), hospital days (17.9 vs. 19.1, p = NS) and mortality (10% vs. 9%, p = NS) were similar. CONCLUSION: NOM of patients with grade I or II L/S injury who undergo systemic anticoagulation with heparin for repair of BAI is safe and associated with transfusion rates similar to BAI alone. Patients with low-grade liver or spleen injuries do not require laparotomy before BAI repair using partial bypass.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2002

Does gender difference influence outcome?

BACKGROUND: Recent laboratory studies have demonstrated that immune responses differ between male and female rodents, and some clinical studies have suggested gender differences regarding incidence and mortality from sepsis. The differences appear because of both deleterious testosterone and beneficial estrogen effects; clinical trials of testosterone blockage and/or estrogen administration for male subjects have been suggested. We evaluated the effect of gender on various outcomes in trauma patients. METHODS: Trauma patients over a 52-month period were identified from the trauma registry. Early deaths were excluded. Outcomes included mortality, pneumonia (> or = 10 colony-forming units/mL in bronchoalveolar lavage effluent), acute respiratory distress syndrome, bacteremia, ventilator days, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Patients were stratified by injury mechanism, gender, age (assuming women < or = 40 were premenopausal and those > 50 were postmenopausal), and injury severity. RESULTS: There were 18,133 patients identified, and 544 were excluded because of early death. There were 12,756 (73%) men and 4,833 (27%) women. There were no outcome differences after penetrating injury with respect to gender and age group. There was a survival advantage for women < or = 40 in the Injury Severity Score 16 to 24 group, but these patients had statistically less severe injury. Overall, men tended to have more infectious complications, but women had lower survival in the face of infection. Logistic regression did not identify gender as an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: Although there was a survival advantage for women in subgroup analysis, there was no overall difference in mortality. Women with pneumonia, however, had a higher mortality than men. Further understanding of potential mechanisms is necessary before hormonal manipulation studies.

Adult↗