Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Computer Simulation↗
Biomedical subjects
Thomas R Knapp
Publications and source records attributed to Thomas R Knapp.
Is self-reported height or arm span a more accurate alternative measure of height?
The purpose of this study was to determine whether self-reported height or arm span is the more accurate alternative measure of height. A sample of 409 people between the ages of 19 and 67 (M = 35.0) participated in this anthropometric study. Height, self-reported height, and arm span were measured by 82 nursing research students. Mean differences from criterion measures were 0.17 cm for the measuring rules, 0.47 cm for arm span, and 0.85 cm and 0.87 cm for heights. Test-retest reliability was r = .997 for both height and arm span. The relationships of height to self-reported height and arm span were r = .97 and .90, respectively. Mean absolute differences were 1.80 cm and 4.29 cm, respectively. These findings support the practice of using self-reported height as an alternative measure of measured height in clinical settings, but arm span is an accurate alternative when neither measured height nor self-reported height is obtainable.
Adolescent↗
The reliability and validity of birth certificates.
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the reliability and validity of birth certificate variables and encourage nurses to spearhead data improvement. DATA SOURCES: A Medline key word search of reliability and validity of birth certificate, and a reference review of more than 60 articles were done. STUDY SELECTION: Twenty-four primary research studies of U.S. birth certificates that involved validity or reliability assessment. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were reviewed, critiqued, and organized as either a reliability or a validity study and then grouped by birth certificate variable. DATA SYNTHESIS: The reliability and validity of birth certificate data vary considerably by item. Insurance, birthweight, Apgar score, and delivery method are more reliable than prenatal visits, care, and maternal complications. Tobacco and alcohol use, obstetric procedures, and delivery events are unreliable. Birth certificates are not valid sources of information on tobacco and alcohol use, prenatal care, maternal risk, pregnancy complications, labor, and delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Birth certificates are a key data source for identifying causes of increasing U.S. infant mortality but have serious reliability and validity problems. Nurses are with mothers and infants at birth, so they are in a unique position to improve data quality and spread the word about the importance of reliable and valid data. Recommendations to improve data are presented.
Alcohol Drinking↗