Density and affinity of the dopamine D2 receptors in aged symptomatic and asymptomatic MPTP-treated monkeys: PET studies with [11C]raclopride.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Thomas J Ruth.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The ligand-receptor binding potential determined by PET studies at high ligand-specific radioactivity reflects both the receptor density and ligand-receptor affinity. This ambiguity has been resolved by various methods based on the administration of multiple unlabeled ligand concentrations. The authors aimed to implement and refine an approach to multiple ligand concentration receptor assay that combined maximum simplicity and a minimum of assumptions and model dependence that would nonetheless reliably distinguish density from affinity effects. The approach uses administration by bolus followed by infusion to obtain a true equilibrium between bound ligand and the other components of the ligand concentration, and does not require measurements of ligand in blood plasma. Four approaches to the optimization of the desired density and affinity parameters from the measured equilibrium data were implemented and compared in the analysis of raclopride studies performed in both normal control and MPTP-lesioned nonhuman primates. The authors conclude that the method is simple enough for routine use and yet reliable enough to apply in ongoing studies of both chronic and acute drug effects in the dopamine system.
Positron emission tomography (PET) provides a powerful means to non-invasively image and quantify protein expression and biochemical changes in living subjects at nano- and picomolar levels. As the field of molecular imaging develops, and as advances in the biochemistry, pharmacology, therapeutics, and molecular biology of disease are made, there is a corresponding increase in the number of clinically relevant, novel disease-associated biomarkers that are brought to the attention of those developing imaging probes for PET. In addition, due to the high specificity of the PET radiotracers being developed, there is a demand for PET cameras with higher sensitivity and resolution. This manuscript reviews advances over the past five years in clinical and pre-clinical PET instrumentation and in new PET probes and imaging methods associated with the latest trends in the molecular imaging of cancer. Included in the PET tracer review is a description of new radioligands for steroid receptors, growth factor receptors, receptor tyrosine kinases, sigma receptors, tumor-associated enzymes, gene reporter probes, markers for tumor hypoxia and metabolism, and sites associated with angiogenesis and cellular proliferation. The use of PET imaging in drug development, including the monitoring of cancer chemotherapy, also is discussed.
OBJECTIVE: A previous study reported a higher than normal density of dopamine D(2) receptors in psychotic mania but not in nonpsychotic mania. The purpose of this study was to further examine D(2) receptor density in a larger sample of nonpsychotic manic patients by using positron emission tomography (PET) and [(11)C]raclopride. METHOD: Thirteen neuroleptic- and mood- stabilizer-naive patients with DSM-IV mania without psychotic features and 14 healthy comparison subjects underwent [(11)C]raclopride PET scans. Of the 13 patients, 10 were treated with divalproex sodium monotherapy. PET scans were repeated 2-6 weeks after commencement of divalproex sodium. D(2) receptor binding potential was calculated by using a ratio method with the cerebellum as the reference region. RESULTS: The [(11)C]raclopride D(2) binding potential was not significantly different in manic patients than in the comparison subjects in the striatum. Treatment with divalproex sodium had no significant effect on the [(11)C]raclopride D(2) binding potential in manic patients. There was no correlation between the D(2) binding potential and manic symptoms before or after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that D(2) receptor density is not altered in nonpsychotic mania and that divalproex sodium treatment does not affect D(2) receptor availability.
OBJECTIVE: Although dopaminergic hyperactivity has been implicated in mania, the precise location in the brain of the abnormality is unclear. This study assessed presynaptic dopamine function in neuroleptic- and mood-stabilizer-naive nonpsychotic first-episode manic patients before and after treatment with divalproex sodium by measuring [(18)F]6-fluoro-L-dopa ([(18)F]DOPA) uptake in the striatum with positron emission tomography (PET). METHOD: Thirteen patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder, manic episode, and 13 healthy comparison subjects underwent [(18)F]DOPA PET scans. Ten of the 13 patients had repeat PET scans 2-6 weeks after beginning treatment with divalproex sodium monotherapy. [(18)F]DOPA uptake rate constants (K(i) values) in the striatum were calculated by using graphical analysis with activity from the occipital cortex as the input function. RESULTS: No significant differences in [(18)F]DOPA uptake rate constants in the striatum were found between the manic patients and the comparison subjects. After treatment with divalproex sodium, [(18)F]DOPA rate constants were significantly reduced in the patients and were lower in the patients than in the comparison subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Although presynaptic dopamine function as reflected by [(18)F]DOPA uptake is not altered in mania, presynaptic dopamine function in manic patients was lower after treatment with divalproex sodium.