Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas J Lynch

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas J Lynch.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 polymorphism predicts overall survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

DNA repair is a critical mechanism of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is the lead enzyme in the nucleotide excision repair process. Increased ERCC1 mRNA levels are related directly to platinum resistance in various cancers. We examined the association between two polymorphisms of ERCC1, codon 118 C/T and C8092A, which are associated with altered ERCC1 mRNA levels and mRNA stability, and overall survival (OS) in 128 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The two polymorphisms were in linkage disequilibrium. There was a statistically significant association between the C8092A polymorphism and OS (P = 0.006, by log-rank test), with median survival times of 22.3 (C/C) and 13.4 (C/A or A/A) months, respectively, suggesting that any copies of the A allele were associated with poor outcome. No statistically significant association was found for the codon 118 polymorphism and OS (P = 0.41, by log-rank test), with median survival times of 19.9 (T/T), 16.1 (C/T), and 13.3 (C/C) months, respectively. In conclusion, the ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism may be a useful predictor of OS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Adult↗

XPD and XRCC1 genetic polymorphisms are prognostic factors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Platinum agents cause DNA cross-linking and oxidative damage. Genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes are associated with differential DNA repair activity and may explain interindividual differences in overall survival after therapy with platinum agents for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We used polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism to evaluate genetic polymorphisms of the XPD (Asp312Asn) and XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) DNA repair genes in 103 patients with stage III (54%) and IV (46%) NSCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Median age was 58 years (range, 32 to 77 years), 49% were females, and there were 86 deaths. Median follow-up period was 61.9 months. Median survival time (MST) was 14.9 months; by stage, MST was 28.6 months (IIIA), 16.0 months (IIIB), and 9.3 months (IV). Genotypes were not associated with stage. Increasing numbers of either XPD or XRCC1 variant alleles were associated with shorter overall survival (P =.003 and P =.07, respectively, by log-rank test). Similarly, when we compared combinations of variant alleles across both polymorphisms, we found that a greater number of variant alleles was associated with decreasing overall survival (P =.009, log-rank test). These polymorphisms independently predicted overall survival even after taking into account stage, performance status, and chemotherapy regimen. CONCLUSION: Genetic polymorphisms in XPD and XRCC1 may be important prognostic factors in platinum-treated patients with advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer have no response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib, which targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, about 10 percent of patients have a rapid and often dramatic clinical response. The molecular mechanisms underlying sensitivity to gefitinib are unknown. METHODS: We searched for mutations in the EGFR gene in primary tumors from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who had a response to gefitinib, those who did not have a response, and those who had not been exposed to gefitinib. The functional consequences of identified mutations were evaluated after the mutant proteins were expressed in cultured cells. RESULTS: Somatic mutations were identified in the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR gene in eight of nine patients with gefitinib-responsive lung cancer, as compared with none of the seven patients with no response (P<0.001). Mutations were either small, in-frame deletions or amino acid substitutions clustered around the ATP-binding pocket of the tyrosine kinase domain. Similar mutations were detected in tumors from 2 of 25 patients with primary non-small-cell lung cancer who had not been exposed to gefitinib (8 percent). All mutations were heterozygous, and identical mutations were observed in multiple patients, suggesting an additive specific gain of function. In vitro, EGFR mutants demonstrated enhanced tyrosine kinase activity in response to epidermal growth factor and increased sensitivity to inhibition by gefitinib. CONCLUSIONS: A subgroup of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer have specific mutations in the EGFR gene, which correlate with clinical responsiveness to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. These mutations lead to increased growth factor signaling and confer susceptibility to the inhibitor. Screening for such mutations in lung cancers may identify patients who will have a response to gefitinib.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Phase I clinical trial of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor BMS-214662 given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: BMS-214662 is a nonsedating benzodiazepine derivative that exhibits broad spectrum cytotoxicity against human solid tumor cell lines and potently inhibits farnesylation of the H-ras and K-ras oncogenic proteins. This report describes the initial Phase I clinical trial of the compound. The main objective of the study was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose of BMS-214662 when administered as a single dose i.v. over 1 h every 21 days to patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid tumors and adequate organ function were eligible for the study. The dose was escalated according to a modified Fibonacci schedule after evaluating groups of at least three patients for toxicity during the first cycle of therapy at each dose level. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed after administration of the two initial doses. RESULTS: The dose of BMS-214662 was escalated from 36 to 225 mg/m(2) through 5 intermediate dose levels in a total of 44 patients. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 3 of the 13 (23%) patients during the first cycle of treatment with 225 mg/m(2), consisting of grade 3 nausea/vomiting in 2 patients and grade 3 diarrhea in another patient. In addition, four of these patients experienced reversible grade 3 transaminitis, which was not considered to be dose-limiting. At the recommended dose for Phase II studies, 200 mg/m(2), the most common side effects were reversible transaminitis, nausea, and vomiting. Although there were no objective responses, one patient with pancreatic cancer continues to receive treatment more than 3.5 years after entering the study. BMS-214662 exhibited linear pharmacokinetics and had a mean biological half-life of 1.55 +/- 0.27 h and a total body clearance of 21.8 +/- 10.8 liters/h/m(2), with a low apparent volume of distribution at steady state (31.5 +/- 12.9 liters/m(2)). In patients treated with the recommended Phase II dose, the mean maximum plasma concentration of the drug was 6.57 +/- 2.94 microg/ml, and farnesyltransferase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells decreased to a nadir of 10.5 +/- 6.4% of baseline at the end of the infusion but fully recovered within 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: BMS-214662 can be delivered safely as a single 1-h i.v. infusion at a dose that results in pronounced inhibition of farnesyltransferase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. However, the duration of enzyme inhibition was transient, recovering in parallel with the decline in plasma concentrations of this rapidly eliminated drug. Because indications of anticancer activity were observed in several patients, further optimization of the administration schedule for this promising new compound is warranted.

Adult↗

Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib (ZD1839, "Iressa") on an expanded access study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib (ZD1839 or Iressa; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE), in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This was an open label, expanded access program (EAP) of oral gefitinib administered at 250 mg per day continuously until evidence of undue toxicity or disease progression. RESULTS: Two hundred consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range 0-6). One hundred seventy-two patients were treated with gefitinib; 23 expired from disease progression prior to treatment and 5 withdrew their consent. One hundred fifty-four patients are evaluable for toxicity; 8 (5.2%) experienced grade 3/4 toxicity; 2 patients discontinued therapy for grade 3 rash and one for grade 3 nausea. Of 172 patients evaluable for efficacy, 7 (4.1%; 95% CI; 1.7-8.2%) experienced a partial response (PR); 60 patients (34.9%) had stable disease (SD) as their best response. Median survival for all patients was 4.5 months (95% CI; 4.1-4.9 months). One-year survival was 29%. Significant independent prognostic factors associated with improved survival were female gender, good performance status (0/1), and adenocarcinoma histology. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib has anti-tumor activity, in a heterogeneous population of NSCLC patients treated on the EAP study. Treatment with gefitinib in this population is associated with a longer survival in women, those with good performance status and in patients with adenocarcinomas. These findings need to be further validated in additional clinical studies.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Phase II trial of vinorelbine plus doxorubicin in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9332.

Small-cell lung cancer that progresses after initial response may still be sensitive to systemic treatment. This study assessed doxorubicin plus vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine Injection) in patients who had no prior exposure to these agents. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and doxorubicin at 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The trial was stopped early because of excessive toxicity. The partial response rate was 26.7%. Toxicities included grade IV neutropenia in 73%, and febrile neutropenia and/or sepsis in 60%. Three patients died from sepsis during cycle 1. Performance status 2 was significantly associated with febrile neutropenia (p = 0.044). Although this regimen had some activity, the toxicity precluded further evaluation.

Adult↗

Help me help you: support groups in cancer therapy.

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery that provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The Center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Three invited patients attended rounds and told their compelling stories; these each effectively demonstrated their fight as cancer survivors. Much of the strength that they displayed came from the different types of support they each received, and the invaluable role of the medical team. Each shared a very positive experience with 'The Wellness Community,' in Boston. The article discusses issues of support and the role of formal support groups. Types of support intervention, the impact they have on quality of life and survival are reviewed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Too old to care?

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH (http://www.theschwarzcenter.org/rounds.asp). The Schwartz Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient and support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Ageism is a pervasive problem throughout society. It is rooted in language, attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and policies. Aging profoundly influences physiology, challenging the medical community to accommodate but not discriminate. The elderly are at an increased risk of disease and disability. Sixty percent of cancer occurs in people aged 65 and older, and the population is aging. The treatment of cancer in the elderly is complicated by comorbidities and other physiological factors, particularly renal, bone marrow, and metabolic reserve. Caregivers have to treat patients in a manner that optimizes treatment and avoids anticipated harm. However, the caregiver is often faced with situations where they must balance their personal beliefs, professional values, and knowledge of medicine with their patients' preferences and needs. Discussion in the Rounds focused on age bias, drug toxicity, life prolongation, and symptom relief, with the role of the caregiver, and the relationship to the patient, being pivotal.

Aged↗

Cancer as metaphor.

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient and support to caregivers and encourages the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Metaphors illuminate complex issues and can paint a thousand words. However, fundamental to individual and collective expression, they are also capable of creating or perpetuating stereotypes, and stigma. In oncology, the military metaphor is perhaps the most prominent, with the high profile of the "War on Cancer," and the imperative for patients to have a fighting spirit. Balancing the instinct to fight with words of healing and acceptance remains a challenge. The history of the military metaphor and how the humanities have illuminated cancer as a metaphor are reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of the use of this metaphor are discussed, as well as the use of other metaphors in the psychosocial dynamic of care.

Humans↗

Radiation dose escalation in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To review the treatment outcomes of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients treated with > or =50 Gy of radiation at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) between 1987 and 2000 and to assess for evidence of a continuation of a radiation dose response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The MGH cancer registry was searched for SCLC patients treated with radiotherapy between 1987 and 2000. Records of LS-SCLC patients treated with curative intent and radiation doses > or =50 Gy at MGH were reviewed. Surgical patients were excluded. RESULTS: Eighty-four LS-SCLC patients were treated with radiotherapy at MGH between 1987 and 2000. Of the 84 patients, 54 (64%) met the inclusion criteria; 30 patients (56%) in this study died, and 4 (7%) were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 42 months. The median overall survival was 29 months. The 2- and 5-year survival rate was 64% and 47%, respectively. The local control rate at 3 years was 78%. CONCLUSION: The overall survival, local control, and disease-free survival rates for LS-SCLC patients treated with > or =50 Gy of radiation compare favorably with historical data. These findings suggest a continuation of the radiation dose-response curve in LS-SCLC. This further supports the need for appropriately powered, Phase III, prospective randomized trials in radiation dose escalation or radiation dose intensification for LS-SCLC.

Adult↗

Phase I clinical trial and pharmacokinetic study of the spicamycin analog KRN5500 administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive days to patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The spicamycin analogue KRN5500 is a nucleoside-like antibiotic with broad spectrum activity against human solid tumor models. It appears to possess a novel mechanism of action directed against the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus with effects on protein processing. A Phase I trial was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetic behavior of KRN5500 given as a 1-h i.v. infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Adult patients with refractory solid tumors, good performance status, and normal to near normal renal, hepatic, and hematological function were eligible for the study. At least three patients were evaluated at each dose level, and a modified Fibonacci algorithm was used for dose escalation. The MTD was based on the occurrence of severe toxicity during the first cycle of therapy. The plasma pharmacokinetics of KRN5500 was characterized during the first week of dosing. RESULTS: Characteristics of the 26 patients entered into the study were as follows: 13 males and 13 females; median age, 54.5 years (range, 40-70 years); and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. A majority had refractory colorectal carcinoma (17 of 26 patients) with at least two prior regimens of therapy. The dose of KRN5500 was escalated from 0.8 to 4.9 mg/m(2)/day in five dose levels, and the MTD was 2.9 mg/m(2)/day. All dose-limiting toxicities were nonhematological and included pulmonary toxicities, hyperglycemia, fatigue, hepatotoxicity, and ataxia, with one fatality due to interstitial pneumonitis. Clinically significant toxicities occurring in multiple patients that were not dose-limiting included nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, neurological symptoms, hyperbilirubinemia, hyperglycemia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia. There were no objective responses, although 3 of 17 evaluable patients exhibited disease stabilization for 5-6 cycles. The pharmacokinetics for the first dose of KRN5500 was biexponential and linear across all five dose levels. Mean values of pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: total plasma clearance, 6.15 +/- 2.37 liters/h/m(2); apparent volume of distribution at steady state, 6.56 +/- 1.98 liters/m(2); biological half-life, 1.29 +/- 0.37 h; and mean residence time, 1.07 +/- 0.31 h. Clearance was significantly lower (P = 0.011) in the eight patients who were at least 65 years old (4.6 +/- 1.6 liters/h/m(2)) as compared with the 18 younger patients (7.1 +/- 2.3 liters/h/m(2)). Peak plasma concentrations of KRN5500 in the cohort receiving the MTD ranged from 350 to 400 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of KRN5500, when given as a 1-h i.v. infusion for 5 consecutive days, was 2.9 mg/m(2)/day. The only suggestion of therapeutic activity observed in this study was disease stabilization in three patients with chemorefractory colorectal cancer. Administering KRN5500 as a continuous i.v. infusion with the objective of prolonging systemic exposure to potentially cytotoxic concentrations of the drug should be considered.

Adult↗

Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial.

CONTEXT: More persons in the United States die from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than from breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer combined. In preclinical testing, oral gefitinib inhibited the growth of NSCLC tumors that express the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a mediator of cell signaling, and phase 1 trials have demonstrated that a fraction of patients with NSCLC progressing after chemotherapy experience both a decrease in lung cancer symptoms and radiographic tumor shrinkages with gefitinib. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in symptomatic and radiographic response among patients with NSCLC receiving 250-mg and 500-mg daily doses of gefitinib. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Double-blind, randomized phase 2 trial conducted from November 2000 to April 2001 in 30 US academic and community oncology centers. Patients (N = 221) had either stage IIIB or IV NSCLC for which they had received at least 2 chemotherapy regimens. INTERVENTION: Daily oral gefitinib, either 500 mg (administered as two 250-mg gefitinib tablets) or 250 mg (administered as one 250-mg gefitinib tablet and 1 matching placebo). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement of NSCLC symptoms (2-point or greater increase in score on the summed lung cancer subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung [FACT-L] instrument) and tumor regression (>50% decrease in lesion size on imaging studies). RESULTS: Of 221 patients enrolled, 216 received gefitinib as randomized. Symptoms of NSCLC improved in 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33%-53%) of patients receiving 250 mg of gefitinib and in 35% (95% CI, 26%-45%) of patients receiving 500 mg. These benefits were observed within 3 weeks in 75% of patients. Partial radiographic responses occurred in 12% (95% CI, 6%-20%) of individuals receiving 250 mg of gefitinib and in 9% (95% CI, 4%-16%) of those receiving 500 mg. Symptoms improved in 96% of patients with partial radiographic responses. The overall survival at 1 year was 25%. There were no significant differences between the 250-mg and 500-mg doses in rates of symptom improvement (P =.26), radiographic tumor regression (P =.51), and projected 1-year survival (P =.54). The 500-mg dose was associated more frequently with transient acne-like rash (P =.04) and diarrhea (P =.006). CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib, a well-tolerated oral EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved disease-related symptoms and induced radiographic tumor regressions in patients with NSCLC persisting after chemotherapy.

Administration, Oral↗

The phase III trial in the era of targeted therapy: unraveling the "go or no go" decision.

PURPOSE: To review characteristics of contemporary phase III oncology trials and create an explicit framework to help clinical researchers prioritize novel therapies for phase III testing. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for all reviews of phase III trials; cataloged all phase III trials in two national clinical trial databases; and reviewed approval criteria of recently approved oncology drugs from public data provided by the US Food and Drug Administration. Industry data not available elsewhere in the medical literature were obtained from a sourcebook published by a large contract research organization. RESULTS: Phase III oncology trials are the most expensive and time-consuming aspect of the drug development process. The results of these trials continue to exert the greatest influence on the treatment decision of oncologists and remain pivotal to the granting of drug approval. Making optimal decisions about which agents to advance to phase III testing may decrease the overall cost of cancer drug development and limit the number of patients exposed to ineffective drugs. A conceptual decision model for prioritizing novel therapies for phase III testing is presented. CONCLUSION: Cancer drug development has become more complex and expensive, whereas overall clinical progress remains slow. The transition from phase II to phase III requires a strategic decision that is based on new considerations. A greater investment in phase I and II drug trials may be required to provide the information necessary for phase III planning.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

The impact of a physician awareness group and the first year of training on hematology-oncology fellows.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of a Balint-like physician awareness group on hematology-oncology fellows' attitudes and measure changes in attitudes during the first fellowship year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a modified crossover design in which one half of a fellowship class at a time was exposed to the group intervention over a 2-year period (2000 to 2002). Two 14-fellow classes were followed for 1 year each and were given three "attitudes" questionnaires, at the beginning, middle, and end of the academic year. RESULTS: Forty Balint group sessions were held during the 2-year study period; 82 questionnaires of the 84 administered (98%) were recovered. Instrument content and criterion validity were demonstrated, as was topic domain reliability. Overall, mean attitude scores increased following the group intervention, from 3.6 (95% CI, 3.5 to 3.7) to 3.7 (95% CI, 3.6 to 3.8; P =.09). Within domains, scores increased in a "fellow's views of him/herself as a physician," from 3.8 (95% CI, 3.6 to 3.9) to 4.1 (95% CI, 3.9 to 4.2; P =.008) and "comfort dealing with emotional patient/clinical situations," from 3.5 (95% CI, 3.3 to 3.7) to 3.7 (95% CI, 3.6 to 3.9; P =.11). Changes in responses to individual questions included: an increase in fellows' comfort with the technical aspects of being an oncologist (P <.03); an increase in fellows' comfort with discussing the stress of home at work (P <.023); and an increase among fellows in feeling pressed for time to discuss psychosocial issues with patients (P =.035). CONCLUSION: A physician awareness group was feasible and enhanced fellows' development as physicians. Further research is needed to determine how to incorporate such groups into oncology fellowships.

Adult↗

Association between self-reported environmental tobacco smoke exposure and lung cancer: modification by GSTP1 polymorphism.

Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) exposure has been associated with lung cancer risk. ETS is composed of emissions from cigarette smoke and contains a higher concentration of tobacco smoke carcinogens than mainstream smoke. Polymorphisms in genes that metabolize tobacco smoke carcinogens have been studied as effect modifiers of the association between active smoking and lung cancer risk. GSTP1 is a polymorphic gene that encodes for GST pi, a detoxification enzyme and has a high expression in the lung. We investigated the association between ETS and lung cancer risk and the modification of this association by the GSTP1 polymorphism. Using a case-control design, individuals were genotyped for GSTP1 using PCR-RFLP techniques. All analyses were carried out using multiple logistic regression. The association between ETS exposure and lung cancer risk was evaluated in different strata based on smoking habits to evaluate the consistency of results. The effect of the GSTP1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk was evaluated by considering the joint effect of having both an ETS exposure and the GSTP1 GG genotype compared to the absence of ETS exposure and the GSTP1 AA genotype as a reference group as well as doing stratified analysis by genotype. ETS exposure was associated consistently with higher lung cancer risk in all the strata considered. The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) evaluating the association between ETS and lung cancer risk for the different strata were: nonsmokers (Cases/Controls 66/413; AOR = 1.38; 95% CI = 0.78-2.43), ex-smokers (Cases/Controls 560/527; AOR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.22-2.25), current smokers (Cases/Controls 415/219; AOR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.00-2.41). The AORs for ex-smokers and light smoking subgroups were: ex-smokers who quit for 19 years or more (Cases/Controls 144/244; AOR = 2.64; 95% CI = 1.55-4.50), ex-smokers who quit for 10-19 years (Cases/Controls 141/128; AOR = 1.16; 95% CI = 0.66-2.04), ex-smokers who quit for 10 years or less (Cases/Controls 247/122; AOR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.83-2.55) and participants who had <15 packyears and nonsmokers combined (Cases/Controls 143/640; AOR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.02-2.28). Among those with the GSTP1 GG genotype the ETS-lung cancer risk association was greater than those with the GSTP1 AA genotype: nonsmokers (GSTP1 GG AOR = 7.84; 95% CI = 0.80-76.68; GSTP1 AA AOR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.46-2.90), ex-smokers (GSTP1 GG AOR = 2.32; 95% CI = 0.90-5.96; GSTP1 AA AOR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.34-3.44), current smokers (GSTP1 GG AOR = 1.75; 95% CI = 0.42-7.32; GSTP1 AA AOR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.67-2.58) and participants who had <15 packyears and nonsmokers (GSTP1 GG AOR = 1.93; 95% CI = 0.54-6.97; GSTP1 AA AOR = 1.58; 95% CI = 0.83-3.01). We found that ETS exposure is associated with higher lung cancer risk. Furthermore, the presence of the GSTP1 GG genotype appears to enhance the magnitude of the association between ETS exposure and lung cancer. Larger studies will be needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Adenocarcinoma↗