Biomedical subjects
Taryn Young
Publications and source records attributed to Taryn Young.
Two methods of self-sampling compared to clinician sampling to detect reproductive tract infections in Gugulethu, South Africa.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of 2 methods of self-sampling compared to clinician sampling during a speculum examination. GOAL: To improve screening for reproductive tract infections (RTIs) in resource-poor settings. STUDY DESIGN: In a public clinic in Cape Town, 450 women underwent a speculum examination and were randomized to self-sample with either a tampon or vaginal swabs. All specimens were tested for the same pathogens using the same diagnostic tests. RESULTS: Self-sampling resulted in satisfactory validity for N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis, bacterial vaginosis, and Candida species (tampons and swabs) and high-risk human papillomavirus (swabs only) when tested with molecular tests or microscopy, but not for T vaginalis by culture. Self-sampling was feasible and acceptable, but some women preferred speculum examinations, which allow the clinician to view the vagina and cervix. CONCLUSIONS: Although self-sampling should not replace speculum examinations in all circumstances, it should be explored further as an RTI screening strategy.
The nervous system effects of occupational exposure on workers in a South African manganese smelter.
Five hundred and nine production workers at a manganese (Mn) smelting works comprising eight production facilities and 67 external controls were studied cross-sectionally for Mn related neuroehavioural effects. Exposure measures from personal sampling included Mn in inhalable dust as cumulative exposure indices (CEI) and average intensity (INT). Biological exposure and biological effect measures included blood (MnB), urine (MnU) manganese and serum prolactin. Endpoints included items from the Swedish nervous system questionnaire (Q16), World Health Organisation neurobehavioural core test battery (WHO NCTB), Swedish performance evaluation system (SPES), Luria-Nebraska (LN), and Danish product development (DPD) test batteries, and a brief clinical examination. Potential confounders and effect modifiers included age, educational level, alcohol and tobacco consumption, neurotoxic exposures in previous work, past medical history, previous head injury and home language. Associations were evaluated by multiple linear and logistic regression modelling. Modelling assumptions were tested. Average exposure intensity across all jobs ranged from near 0 (0.06 microg/m3) for external controls to 5.08 mg/m3 for inhalable Mn, and was greater than the ACGIH TLV for 69% of subjects. Results from the large number of tests performed resolved into three groups. Group 1 shows differences between external unexposed referents and all the exposed and/or differences between internal low exposed referents and the rest of the exposed but no further exposure-response relationships. It includes the Santa Ana, Benton and digit-span tests from the WHO NCTB; the hand tapping and endurance tapping tests from the SPES; Luria-Nebraska item 2L; questionnaire items tired, depressed, irritated, having to take notes in order to remember things, and subjects' perception that they had sex less often than normal; a test of clinical abnormality; and increased sway under two conditions (eyes open without foot insulation, eyes open with foot insulation). Group 2 shows the presence of a more substantive exposure-response relationship. It consists of only two tests: and includes the WHO digit-symbol test (although the major impact is at low exposure and therefore counterintuitive, arguably placing this test in group 3) and the LN item 1R which has a step to a poorer score at high exposure. Group 3 contains the overwhelming majority of test results (almost all the questionnaire items, almost all the DPD tests including tremor, sway and diadochokinesia, and serum prolactin) which were either null or counterintuitive (did not make sense). The CEI was the strongest predictor of test abnormalities, except for the clinical test which was more strongly associated with blood manganese. Despite a comprehensive range of endpoints, and levels of exposure ranging from environmental to industrial, this large study of Mn workers found little convincing evidence for a continuum of effects, contributing further questions to current debates about the adequacy of the current ACGIH TLV.
The utility of biological monitoring for manganese in ferroalloy smelter workers in South Africa.
Five hundred and nine workers at a manganese (Mn) smelting works comprising eight production facilities and 67 external controls were studied cross-sectionally. Exposure measures from personal sampling included inhalable dust, cumulative exposure indices (CEI) and average intensity (INT = CEI/years exposed) calculated for the current job at the smelter and also across all jobs held by subjects. Biological exposure was measured by Mn in the blood (MnB) and urine (MnU) and biological effect was measured by serum prolactin. Average lifetime exposure intensity across all jobs ranged from near 0 (0.06 microg/m3) for unexposed external referents to 5 mg/m3. Atmospheric exposures and MnB and MnU distributions were consistent with published data for both unexposed and smelter workers. Associations between biological exposures and groups defined by atmospheric exposures in the current job were substantial for MnB, less so for MnU and absent for serum prolactin. Random sampling of MnB measurements representative of a group of workers with more than 1-2 years of service in the same job and notionally homogenous exposure conditions could serve as a cross-sectional predictor of atmospheric Mn exposure in the current job, as well as for surveillance of Mn exposure trends over time. Correlations at the individual level were only modest for MnB (33% of the variance in log atmospheric Mn intensity in the current job was explained by log MnB), much worse for MnU (only 7%). However, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed which showed that it is possible to use a MnB cut-off of 10 microg/l (the 95th percentile in the unexposed) to good effect as a screening tool to discriminate between individual exposures exceeding and falling below a relatively strict atmospheric Mn exposure threshold at the ACGIH threshold limit value (TLV) of 0.2 mg/m3. MnU has no utility as a measure of biological exposure nor does serum prolactin as a measure of biological effect.