Endoscopic mucosal resection.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Takuji Gotoda.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Local endoscopic mucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors is often associated with margin involvement that requires further intervention. The efficacy of resection of these tumors with endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) was evaluated. METHODS: Fourteen rectal carcinoid tumors were treated by ESMR-L between 1999 and 2002. ESMR-L was performed with a conventional colonoscope with an attached band-ligator device. For comparison, 14 rectal carcinoid tumors, treated by either endoscopic mucosal resection or polypectomy between 1990 and 1997, were evaluated as historical controls. All tumors were estimated to be 1 cm or less in diameter. OBSERVATIONS: There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, or tumor size. For 6 (43%) patients in the control group, there was tumor involvement at the margin of the resection specimen, whereas all tumors removed by ESMR-L had histopathologically proven negative margins (p < 0.05). The mean vertical resection margin also was significantly deeper in the ESMR-L group (p < 0.05). There was no complication of any procedure. CONCLUSIONS: ESMR-L is technically simple, minimally invasive, and safe for treatment of small rectal carcinoid tumors contained within the submucosa. ESMR-L provides a deeper resection margin compared with that obtained with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection or polypectomy.
BACKGROUND: In Japan, approximately half of gastric cancers are diagnosed in the early stage. Longer survival has been provided for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Several new surgical procedures have been employed for some EGCs. To compare the functional results of these techniques with those of classic distal gastrectomy, it is important to evaluate the remnant stomach in relation to quality of life (QOL) and secondary cancers. We propose a new endoscopic classification, regarding several aspects of the remnant stomach, which enables common understanding and description of the condition. METHODS: Of 651 patients who underwent a distal gastrectomy or pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), 324 had at least one upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy during the follow-up period. Ninety-three of the 324 patients underwent a Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY); 175, Billroth type 1 (B1); and 56, PPG. Endoscopic findings regarding residual food, gastritis, and bile reflux in the gastric stump were investigated for these patients. We classified the amount of residual food into five grades, the degree and the extent of gastritis into five grades, and bile reflux into two grades. First, we evaluated the consistency of diagnosis between two endoscopists, in the first 200 patients, and then we applied the classification to all 324 patients to examine the usefulness of this classification. RESULTS: Consistency of diagnosis was obtained between two endoscopists who classified the patients independently. The agreement rate was 98.5% for residual food, 93% for gastritis, and 100% for bile reflux. Residual food was observed in 14.0% of the RY group, 22.3% of the B1 group, and 37.5% of the PPG group. These differences were significant (RY versus B1; P < 0.05 and RY versus PPG; P < 0.01). The remnant stomach after B1 showed significantly more severe and extensive gastritis than that after RY and PPG ( P < 0.01). As for bile reflux, there was no significant difference among the three groups. CONCLUSION: The classification (RGB classification: Residue, Gastritis, Bile) can be used easily and is practical. The results suggest some important differences among methods of reconstruction. This classification seems to be useful to describe these findings and to further evaluate these reconstructive methods.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most important prognostic factor for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). A D2 gastrectomy has been the gold standard treatment. Strict criteria for endoscopic mucosal resection have been widely accepted in Japan. There are some trials aimed at expanding the indications for local treatment, although there has not been a comprehensive review of the risk of LNM with the lesions of EGC.METHODS: We investigated 5265 patients who had undergone gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for EGC at the National Cancer Center Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital. Nine clinicopathological factors were assessed for their possible association with LNM.RESULTS: None of the 1230 well differentiated intramucosal cancers of less than 30 mm diameter regardless of ulceration findings, were associated with metastases (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-0.3%). None of the 929 lesions without ulceration were associated with nodal metastases (95% CI, 0-0.4%) regardless of tumor size. Similarly to findings for intramucosal cancers, for submucosal lesions, there was a significant correlation between tumor size larger than 30 mm and lymphatic-vascular involvement with an increased risk of LNM. None of the 145 differentiated adenocarcinomas of less than 30-mm-diameter without lymphatic or venous permeation were associated with LNM, provided that the lesion had invaded less than 500 &mgr;m into the submucosa (95% CI, 0-2.5%).CONCLUSION: Based on our large series of cases, we have been able to clarify the risks associated with EGC and to propose expansion of the criteria for local treatment. However, accurate histological evaluation of the resected specimens is essential to avoid recurrence for such EGCs that should be cured.