Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Wharton

Publications and source records attributed to T Wharton.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge after primary angioplasty in low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. PAMI-II Investigators. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II) study evaluated the hypothesis that primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), with subsequent discharge from the hospital 3 days later, is safe and cost-effective in low risk patients. BACKGROUND: In low risk patients with myocardial infarction (MI), few data exist regarding the need for intensive care and noninvasive testing or the appropriate length of hospital stay. METHODS: Patients with acute MI underwent emergency catheterization with primary PTCA when appropriate. Low risk patients (age <70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction >45%, one- or two-vessel disease, successful PTCA, no persistent arrhythmias) were randomized to receive accelerated care (admission to a nonintensive care unit and day 3 hospital discharge without noninvasive testing [n = 237] or traditional care [n = 234]). RESULTS: Patients who received accelerated care had similar in-hospital outcomes but were discharged 3 days earlier (4.2+/-2.3 vs. 7.1+/-4.7 days, p = 0.0001) and had lower hospital costs ($9,658+/-5,287 vs. $11,604+/-6,125 p = 0.002) than the patients who received traditional care. At 6 months, accelerated and traditional care groups had a similar rate of mortality (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00), unstable ischemia (10.1% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.52), reinfarction (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00), stroke (0.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.07), congestive heart failure (4.6% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.85) or their combined occurrence (15.2% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.49). The study was designed to detect a 10% difference in event rates; at 6 months, only a 2.3% difference was measured between groups, indicating an actual power of 0.19. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification of low risk patients with MI allowed safe omission of the intensive care phase and noninvasive testing, and a day 3 hospital discharge strategy, resulting in substantial cost savings.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II) Trial Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: A large, international, multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was performed to determine the role of prophylactic intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that routine IABP use after primary PTCA reduces infarct-related artery reocclusion, augments myocardial recovery and improves clinical outcomes. METHODS: Cardiac catheterization was performed in 1,100 patients within 12 h of onset of AMI at 34 clinical centers. Clinical and angiographic variables were used to stratify patients undergoing primary PTCA into high and low risk groups. High risk patients were then randomized to 36 to 48 h of IABP (n = 211) or traditional care (n = 226). The study had 80% power to detect a reduction in the primary end point from 30% to 20%. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the predefined primary combined end point of death, reinfarction, infarct-related artery reocclusion, stroke or new-onset heart failure or sustained hypotension in patients treated with an IABP versus those treated conservatively (28.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.95). The IABP strategy conferred modest benefits in reduction of recurrent ischemia (13.3% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.08) and subsequent unscheduled repeat catheterization (7.6% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.05) but did not reduce the rate of infarct-related artery reocclusion (6.7% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.64), reinfarction (6.2% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.46) or mortality (4.3% vs. 3.1%) and was associated with a higher incidence of stroke (2.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.03). IABP use did not result in enhanced myocardial recovery as assessed by paired admission to predischarge and 6-week rest and exercise left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, a prophylactic IABP strategy after primary PTCA in hemodynamically stable high risk patients with AMI does not decrease the rates of infarct-related artery reocclusion or reinfarction, promote myocardial recovery or improve overall clinical outcome.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗