Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Unger

Publications and source records attributed to T Unger.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Involvement of adrenoceptors in the angiotensin II-induced expression of inducible transcription factors in the rat forebrain and hypothalamus.

Angiotensin II (Ang II) acts as a neuromodulator/neurotransmitter in specific brain nuclei involved in the regulation of blood pressure and volume homeostasis. It also induces a highly differentiated transcription factor expression in these nuclei. We investigated whether adrenoceptors, which modulate other central actions of angiotensin II like the vasopressin release, also play a role in the AT1 receptor-mediated expression of the transcription factors (TF) c-Fos, c-Jun and Krox-24 in the rat brain. Ang II, injected intracerebroventricularly, induced the expression of c-Fos, c-Jun and Krox-24 in the hypothalamic paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic (SON) nuclei. Pretreatment with the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin, significantly inhibited the Ang II-induced transcription factor expression in the SON and PVN. The alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, also reduced Ang II-stimulated transcription factors significantly in both nuclei. This inhibition was mainly localized in vasopressinergic magnocellular neurons in both nuclei. The beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol, did not influence the Ang II-induced expression of TF. Our results show that both, Ang II-induced vasopressin release and transcription factor expression, involve the same neuronal connections in the brain, implicating that the signal transduction pathways leading to the two different effects are at least to a certain degree convergent.

Angiotensin II↗

The renin-angiotensin system in the brain: possible therapeutic implications for AT(1)-receptor blockers.

Biochemical, physiological and functional studies suggest that the brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is regulated independently of the peripheral RAS. The classical actions of angiotensin II in the brain include blood pressure control, drinking behaviour, natriuresis and the release of vasopressin into the circulation. At least two subtypes of G-protein coupled receptors, the AT(1) and the AT(2) receptor, have been identified. Most of the classic actions of angiotensin II in the brain are mediated by AT(1) receptors. The AT(2) receptor is involved in brain development and neuronal regeneration and protection. Additionally, AT(2) receptors can modulate some of the classic angiotensin II actions in the brain. Selective non-peptide AT(1) receptor blockers, applied systemically, have been shown to inhibit both peripheral and brain AT(1)receptors. In genetically hypertensive rats, inhibition of brain AT(1) receptors may contribute to the blood pressure lowering effects of AT(1) receptor blockers. Animal studies have shown that AT(1) receptor antagonists enable endogenous angiotensin II to stimulate neuronal regeneration via activation of AT(2) receptors. In animal models, inhibition of the brain RAS proved to be beneficial with respect to stroke incidence and outcome. Blockade of brain and cerebrovascular AT(1) receptors by AT(1) receptor blockers prevents the reduction in blood flow during brain ischaemia, reduces the volume of ischaemic injury and improves neurological outcome after brain ischaemia. This paper reviews the actions of angiotensin II and its receptors in the brain, and discusses the possible consequences of AT(1) receptor blockade in neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, cerebral haemodynamics and ischaemia.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

The relevance of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme: manifestations in mechanistic and endpoint data.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is primarily localized (>90%) in various tissues and organs, most notably on the endothelium but also within parenchyma and inflammatory cells. Tissue ACE is now recognized as a key factor in cardiovascular and renal diseases. Endothelial dysfunction, in response to a number of risk factors or injury such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesteremia, and cigarette smoking, disrupts the balance of vasodilation and vasoconstriction, vascular smooth muscle cell growth, the inflammatory and oxidative state of the vessel wall, and is associated with activation of tissue ACE. Pathologic activation of local ACE can have deleterious effects on the heart, vasculature, and the kidneys. The imbalance resulting from increased local formation of angiotensin II and increased bradykinin degradation favors cardiovascular disease. Indeed, ACE inhibitors effectively reduce high blood pressure and exert cardio- and renoprotective actions. Recent evidence suggests that a principal target of ACE inhibitor action is at the tissue sites. Pharmacokinetic properties of various ACE inhibitors indicate that there are differences in their binding characteristics for tissue ACE. Clinical studies comparing the effects of antihypertensives (especially ACE inhibitors) on endothelial function suggest differences. More comparative experimental and clinical studies should address the significance of these drug differences and their impact on clinical events.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

C-FOS expression in the rat brain in response to substance P and neurokinin B.

Substance P, the principal neurokinin peptide in the mammalian brain and the natural ligand for the NK(1) tachykinin receptor, plays an integrative role in the regulation of cardiovascular, neuroendocrine and behavioural responses to stress. In rats, stimulation of periventricular NK(1) receptors in the forebrain induces a distinct pattern of cardiovascular responses which is accompanied by intense grooming behaviour. Ligands for NK(3) receptors induce a different pattern of cardiovascular and behavioural responses which comprises an increased release of vasopressin from the posterior pituitary and wet-dog shakes behaviour. To define the brain areas in the rat which respond to stimulation of forebrain NK(1) and NK(3) receptors and participate in the generation of these responses, the induction of c-Fos immunoreactivity was examined in brains following intracerebroventricular injections of substance P and neurokinin B in conscious rats. Stimulation of central NK(1) receptors by substance P (25, 100 and 500 pmol) injected into the lateral ventricle elicited grooming behaviour (face washing and hind limb grooming) and resulted in a marked c-Fos expression in the paraventricular, dorsomedial and parabrachial nuclei and in the medial thalamus. At 25 pmol, substance P did not significantly increase c-Fos expression, at 100 pmol, maximal c-Fos activation was induced in all four brain regions which responded to the peptide. Intracerebroventricular pretreatment of rats with the selective and high-affinity, non-peptide NK(1) receptor antagonist, RP 67580 (500 pmol), but not with its inactive enantiomer, RP 68651, completely abolished the behavioural response to substance P and reduced the substance P-induced c-Fos expression in all brain areas to nearly control levels. Intracerebroventricular injection of the natural ligand for NK(3) receptors, neurokinin B (500 pmol), elicited wet-dog shakes behaviour and activated c-Fos expression in localized regions of the forebrain including the organum vasculosum laminae terminalis, subfornical organ, median preoptic nucleus, paraventricular, supraoptic and anterior hypothalamic nuclei, medial thalamus and in the ventral tegmental area. These results demonstrate that the neurokinins, substance P and neurokinin B, induce specific and different patterns of c-Fos expression in distinct regions of the rat brain. Brain areas which selectively responded to substance P have been traditionally linked to the central regulation of cardiovascular and neuroendocrine reactions to stress or involved in the processing of nociceptive responses. On the other side, brain areas activated by neurokinin B are known to be involved in the central regulation of blood pressure, water and salt homeostasis or control of behaviour.

Analgesics↗

Angiotensin and its AT2 receptor: new insights into an old system.

The AT2 receptor represents a true receptor, but signals and functions in unexpected ways compared to the respective features of the 'classical' AT1 receptor. Moreover, some of the actions of the AT2 receptor are even directly opposed to those of the AT1 receptor, especially concerning the growth- and differentiation-modulating actions of ANG II. The regulation of the AT2 receptor itself by its agonist, as well as by growth factors during ontogenesis, and its acknowledged effects on the regulation of cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis, points towards a role of a program modulator in embryonic development and regeneration.

Angiotensin II↗

Differential effects of angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors on the expression, translation and function of the Na+-H+ exchanger and Na+-HCO3- symporter in the rat heart after myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the role of angiotensin receptor subtype 1 (AT1) and angiotensin receptor subtype 2 (AT2) in the regulation of Na+-H+ exchanger (NHE) and Na+-HCO3 symporter (NBC) in the infarcted myocardium. BACKGROUND: The cardiac renin-angiotensin system is activated after myocardial infarction (MI), and both angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors are upregulated in the myocardium. METHODS: Na+-H+ exchanger isoform-1 and NBC-1 gene expression were determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Northern blot analysis; protein levels by Western blot analysis; and activity by measurement of H+ transport in left ventricular (LV) free wall, interventricular septum (IS) and right ventricle (RV) after induction of MI. Rats were treated with placebo, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril (1 mg/kg/day), the AT1 receptor antagonist valsartan (10 mg/kg/day) or the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 (30 mg/kg/day). Treatment was started seven days before surgery. RESULTS: Na+-H+ exchanger isoform-1 and NBC-1 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and protein levels were increased twofold in the LV free wall after MI, whereas no changes were observed in the IS and RV. Na+-dependent H+ flux was increased in the LV free wall. Ramipril inhibited mRNA and protein upregulation of both transporters. Valsartan inhibited the upregulation of NHE-1 mRNA and protein but had no effect on NBC-1 mRNA expression and translation. In contrast, PD 123319 abolished the upregulation of NBC-1 mRNA and protein but had no effect on NHE-1 upregulation. Ramipril and valsartan prevented post-MI increase in NHE-1 activity, whereas ramipril and PD 123319 decreased NBC-1 activity. CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II via its AT1 and AT2 receptors differentially controls transcriptional and translational regulation as well as the activity of NHE-1 and NBC-1 in the ischemic myocardium and contributes to the control of pH regulation in cardiac tissue.

Angiotensin I↗

The effect of cyclization of magainin 2 and melittin analogues on structure, function, and model membrane interactions: implication to their mode of action.

The amphipathic alpha-helical structure is a common motif found in membrane binding polypeptides including cell lytic peptides, antimicrobial peptides, hormones, and signal sequences. Numerous studies have been undertaken to understand the driving forces for partitioning of amphipathic alpha-helical peptides into membranes, many of them based on the antimicrobial peptide magainin 2 and the non-cell-selective cytolytic peptide melittin, as paradigms. These studies emphasized the role of linearity in their mode of action. Here we synthesized and compared the structure, biological function, and interaction with model membranes of linear and cyclic analogues of these peptides. Cyclization altered the binding of melittin and magainin analogues to phospholipid membranes. However, at similar bound peptide:lipid molar ratios, both linear and cyclic analogues preserved their high potency to permeate membranes. Furthermore, the cyclic analogues preserved approximately 75% of the helical structure of the linear peptides when bound to membranes. Biological activity studies revealed that the cyclic melittin analogue had increased antibacterial activity but decreased hemolytic activity, whereas the cyclic magainin 2 analogue had a marked decrease in both antibacterial and hemolytic activities. The results indicate that the linearity of the peptides is not essential for the disruption of the target phospholipid membrane, but rather provides the means to reach it. In addition, interfering with the coil-helix transition by cyclization, while maintaining the same sequence of hydrophobic and positively charged amino acids, allows a separated evaluation of the hydrophobic and electrostatic contributions to binding of peptides to membranes.

Acinetobacter calcoaceticus↗

Significance of timing of angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade in rats with myocardial infarction-induced heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: Blockade of angiotensin AT(1) receptors has been shown to prevent cardiac remodeling and improve left ventricular function and survival after myocardial infarction (MI). However, the timing of initiation of treatment has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of very early (30 min after MI), early (3 and 24 h after MI) and delayed (7 days after MI) treatments with the angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonist fonsartan (HR 720) on cardiac morphological and hemodynamic parameters in a rat model of MI-induced heart failure and to establish the therapeutic window for the start of treatment. METHODS: Male Wistar rats underwent coronary ligation and were randomized fonsartan (HR720) treatment starting 30 min, 3 h, 24 h and 7 days after MI or no treatment. Treatment was continued up to 6 weeks post MI. RESULTS: Fonsartan (HR720) treatment attenuated cardiac hypertrophy when treatment started 30 min or later after MI, limited infarct size when treatment initiated 3 and 24 h after MI, decreased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure when treatment started 3 h to 7 days after MI, and improved dP/dt(max) when treatment commenced 24 h and 7 days after MI compared to untreated infarct group. CONCLUSION: Our results show that angiotensin AT(1) receptor blockade with fonsartan (HR720) produced the best cardioprotective effects when treatment was started 3 to 24 h after MI although a start of treatment 7 days following MI still could improve functional parameters. These results suggest an optimal time window for the start of treatment with angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonists seems to be between 3 and 24 h post MI.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Differential regulation of thrombospondin-1 and fibronectin by angiotensin II receptor subtypes in cultured endothelial cells.

OBJECTIVES: Angiotensin II (ANG II) can modulate cellular proliferation in various cell types via AT(1) and AT(2) receptors. In the present study, we investigated the effect of the angiotensin AT(1) and AT(2) receptors on DNA-synthesis as well as on the expression of the extracellular matrix (ECM) components, thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) and fibronectin (FN) in endothelial cells (EC). METHODS: The experiments were performed in microvascular EC derived from rat heart (CEC) and macrovascular EC derived from bovine aorta (BAEC). The experiments were performed in cells of the second and third passage and the expression of AT(1) and AT(2) receptors was verified by binding studies, Northern analysis or RT-PCR. Quiescent rat CEC and BAEC were stimulated to proliferate by the addition of 25 ng/ml bFGF, while ANG II (10(-7) M) and the selective ANG II receptor antagonists, Losartan (10(-5) M) and PD123177 (10(-6) M) or the AT(2) agonist, CGP42112A (10(-7) M) were added 16 h later. RESULTS: ANG II induced a dose-dependent decrease of DNA-synthesis in BAEC measured by [3H]-thymidine incorporation. This inhibitory effect of ANG II was prevented by the addition of the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123177 (10(-6) M), demonstrating, that the inhibition of DNA synthesis is mediated by the AT(2) receptor. In the presence of Losartan, stimulation of both, CEC and BAEC, with ANG II resulted in a marked increase of TSP-1 mRNA levels, which was maximal between 3 and 6 h in rat CEC and after 9 h in BAEC. In addition, TSP-1 was clearly induced by the AT(2) agonist CGP42112A. In contrast, blockade of the AT(2) receptor by the selective AT(2) antagonist, PD123177 (10(-6) M), resulted in a pronounced down regulation of FN mRNA 9 h after the stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that the ANG II receptor subtype AT(2) mediates growth inhibition in macrovascular EC similar to what has been shown before in microvascular rat EC and that AT(2) receptors mediates remodeling of the endothelial ECM by upregulation of TSP-1 expression in both macro- and micro-vascular endothelial cells.

Angiotensin II↗

Fibroblast growth factor-2 acutely influences the impulse activity of rat dorsal horn neurones.

The neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) are well-established. The signal cascade mediating these effects includes steps that are likely to influence also the electrical properties of neurones. However, the possibility that FGF-2 may acutely affect the processing of neuronal impulse activity is largely unexplored. In the present study the impulse activity of single dorsal horn neurones was recorded in the rat during ionophoretical administration of FGF-2 close to the neurones. Before and during FGF-2 ionophoresis the receptive field of each cell was tested with defined mechanical stimuli. At a concentration of 10 nM in the ionophoresis pipette, FGF-2 reduced the responses of the cells to mechanical stimulation. There was no preferential action of FGF-2 on a particular functional type of dorsal horn neurone; both non-nociceptive and nociceptive cells exhibited a reduced mechanical responsiveness. The background (ongoing) activity was also depressed in most neurones. The results of the study show that in addition to neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions FGF-2 has an acute inhibitory influence on the impulse activity of spinal sensory neurones. This depression of neuronal activity could add to the neuroprotective action of FGF-2 by counteracting glutamate excitotoxicity following a central nervous trauma.

Action Potentials↗

Transcriptional and translational regulation of calpain in the rat heart after myocardial infarction--effects of AT(1) and AT(2) receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitor.

1. Recent studies demonstrated that the cardiac calpain system is activated during ischaemic events and is involved in cardiomyocyte injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of AT(1) and AT(2) receptors in the regulation of calpain-mediated myocardial damage following myocardial infarction (MI). 2. Infarcted animals were treated either with placebo, the ACE inhibitor ramipril (1 mg kg(-1) d(-1)), the AT(1) receptor antagonist valsartan (10 mg kg(-1) d(-1)) or the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD 123319 (30 mg kg(-1) d(-1)). Treatment was started 7 days prior to surgery. On day 1, 3, 7 and 14 after MI, gene expression and protein levels of calpain I, II and calpastatin were determined in left ventricular free wall (LVFW) and interventricular septum (IS). At day 3 and 14 post MI, morphological investigations were performed. 3. Calpain I mRNA expression and protein levels were increased in IS 14 days post MI, whereas mRNA expression and protein levels of calpain II were maximally increased in LVFW 3 days post MI. Ramipril and valsartan decreased mRNA and protein up-regulation of calpain I and II, and reduced infarct size and interstitial fibrosis. PD 123319 did not affect calpain I or II up-regulation in the infarcted myocardium, but decreased interstitial fibrosis. Calpastatin expression and translation were not affected by AT receptor antagonists or ACE inhibitor. 4. Our data demonstrate a distinct, temporary-spatial up-regulation of calpain I and II following MI confer with the hypothesis of calpain I being involved in cardiac remodelling in the late and calpain II contributing to cardiac tissue damage in the early phase of MI. The up-regulation of calpain I and II is partly mediated via the AT(1) receptor and can be reduced by ACE inhibitors and AT(1) receptor antagonists.

Angiotensin II↗

Pharmacology of AT1-receptor blockers.

Angiotensin II mediates its haemodynamic effects by binding to specific cell-surface receptors. In humans, two receptor subtypes have been identified, designated AT1 and AT2. Because all major deleterious effects of angiotensin II are produced via binding to AT1-receptors, selective blockade of this receptor subtype should confer haemodynamic benefits, while allowing stimulation of the potentially beneficial effects mediated by AT2-receptors. Experimental studies using various models have consistently revealed marked differences in the receptor binding properties of different AT1-receptor blockers. The relative receptor binding affinities of currently available AT1-receptor blockers is candesartan > irbesartan > valsartan/EXP-3174/telmisartan > tasosartan > losartan > eprosartan. Candesartan is also released from the receptor more slowly than other available AT1-receptor blockers, with a half-life of approximately 152 min for the receptor-blocker complex, compared with 31 min for EXP-3 174, 17 min for irbesartan and 5 min for losartan. Candesartan therefore binds to the AT1-receptor more tightly and more persistently than other AT1-receptor blockers.

Angiotensin II↗

Inhibiting renin-angiotensin in the brain: the possible therapeutic implications.

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) within the brain is involved in central blood pressure regulation. Biochemical and neurophysiological studies suggest that the brain system is regulated independently of the peripheral RAS and that the system may also contribute to blood pressure control and body fluid homeostasis. In addition, circulating angiotensin II can exert some of its actions through the stimulation of angiotensin subtype 1 (AT1) and subtype 2 (AT2) receptors within the brain. As in peripheral tissues, the AT1 receptor mediates the central actions of angiotensin II on osmotic control and blood pressure regulation. The AT2 receptor appears to be involved in brain development and neuronal regeneration, but may also modulate some effects of central AT1 receptor stimulation. Selective non-peptide antagonists of the AT1 receptor have been shown to inhibit not only peripheral, but also central AT1 receptors after systemic application. In animal models, treatment with AT1 receptor antagonists proved to be beneficial with respect to stroke incidence and outcome. Other animal studies have shown that the AT1 receptor antagonists enable endogenous angiotensin II to stimulate nerve generation via AT2 receptors.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Calcium channel blockade limits cardiac remodeling and improves cardiac function in myocardial infarction-induced heart failure in rats.

Calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) have been proposed to prevent cardiac events after myocardial infarction (MI). However, unwanted effects, such as negative inotropy, limit their use in many cases. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of long-term treatment with the CCAs, mibefradil, verapamil, and amlodipine, administered before and after chronic MI on myocardial remodeling and cardiac function. MI was induced by permanent ligation of the left coronary artery in male Wistar rats. Infarcted animals were treated with placebo, mibefradil (10 mg/kg/d po), verapamil (8 mg/kg bid po), or amlodipine (4 mg/kg/d po). Treatment was started 7 days before or 3 h after MI induction. Six weeks after MI, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and cardiac contractility (dP/dt(max)) were measured. Morphometric parameters such as infarct size (IS), left ventricular dilation (LVD), septal thickness (ST), and cardiac fibrosis were determined in picrosirius red-stained hearts. Six weeks after MI, MAP and dP/dt(max) were decreased, whereas LVEDP and HR were increased in placebo-treated controls. The hearts featured an IS of 45%, left ventricular dilation, cardiac fibrosis, and septal thinning. MAP of all CCA-treated animals was increased, whereas LVEDP was decreased and dP/dt(max) increased 7-day pre- and 3-h post-MI started in mibefradil- and amlodipine-treated animals, but not in verapamil-treated animals. In contrast to amlodipine treatment, before and after MI started mibefradil and verapamil treatment decreased HR. Pretreatment with all CCA reduced IS and increased ST, whereas only mibefradil and amlodipine pretreatment prevented LVD and cardiac fibrosis. After MI started treatment with mibefradil and amlodipine reduced IS and cardiac fibrosis, and increased ST. Long-term treatment with the CCAs mibefradil, verapamil, and amlodipine reduced myocardial remodeling and improved cardiac function in MI-induced heart failure in rats.

Amlodipine↗

Angiotensin II type 2 receptors: signalling and pathophysiological role.

The signalling mechanisms and biological significance of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor have long been unknown. In recent years, studies, first in cell culture models but now increasingly also in vivo, have shed some light on the molecular events occurring after a stimulation of the receptor with its ligand as well as on its physiological effects and its significance for pathophysiological processes. There is increasing evidence that the angiotensin II type 2 receptor is involved in different pathophysiological processes, such as myocardial infarction, heart and kidney failure, and stroke.

Animals↗

Effect of repetitive icv injections of ANG II on c-Fos and AT(1)-receptor expression in the rat brain.

ANG II has been implicated in neuroplastic processes via stimulation of inducible transcription factors (ITF) in the brain. In the present study, we investigated the effects of acute vs. repetitive once daily intracerebroventricular injections of ANG II for 7 days on the expression of ITF and constitutive transcription factor (CTF) and the AT1 receptor in the median preoptic area (MnPO), the subfornical organ (SFO), and the hypothalamic paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic nuclei (SON). After repetitive injections, the expression of c-Fos declined by approximately 50% in MnPO, SFO, PVN, and SON compared with controls injected once. The desensitization of c-Fos occurred on the transcriptional level as shown in the SON by RT-PCR. Apart from a novel expression of c-Jun in the SON, the ITF c-Jun, JunB, JunD, and Krox-24 did not change after repetitive stimulation. Neither were the CTF, calcium response element binding protein, activating transcription factor 2, and serum response factor altered after repetitive vs. single injections of ANG II. The AT1 receptor was coexpressed with c-Fos/c-Jun. Immunohistochemical stainings suggest an increase in AT1-receptor number in MnPO, SFO, PVN, and SON on chronic stimulation compared with once-injected controls. These findings demonstrate that repetitive periventricular stimulation with ANG II essentially alters the expression of transcription factors compared with acute stimulation and suggest c-Fos and c-Jun as major intermediates of the AT1-receptor transcription.

Activating Transcription Factor 2↗

Time-dependent apoptotic development and pro-apoptotic genes expression in rat heart after myocardial infarction.

We investigated the apoptotic development and apoptotic-related gene expression after myocardial infarction (MI) at different time points in the current study. Bax gene expression was increased at 12 h after MI and peaked at 24 h. Fas gene started to over-express at 12 h after MI as well but it reached maximum at 72 h. In the MI groups, strongest staining of apoptosis was detected in rats 3 days post operation. Our results demonstrate that apoptotic development after MI is time dependent in the ischemic area and there could be some linkage with the over expression of angiotensin II receptors post MI.

Animals↗