There's nothing really new
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to T Treasure.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: We determined that cold blood cardioplegia and intermittent ventricular fibrillation with ischemia were associated with similar enzyme and myocardial protein leakage in a randomized, prospective study of 40 patients. We have continued to use both methods in our unit, according to surgeons' preference. METHODS: In our database we have reviewed 1,923 patients who have undergone first-time elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting from January 1992 to May 1997. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-eight patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with cold blood cardioplegia and 1,345 had ventricular fibrillation and aortic cross-clamping. The preoperative factors were virtually identical. Intraoperative differences were only those inherent to the two techniques: temperature and cross-clamp time. Mortality was 2.5% for ventricular fibrillation and aortic cross-clamping arrest and 2.1% for cardioplegia (p=0.55 by chi2 test). There was a higher use of the intraaortic balloon pump in the ventricular fibrillation and aortic cross-clamping group (2.4% versus 1.0%; p=0.04), but no other differences in outcome were detected. CONCLUSIONS: A truly randomized trial to demonstrate which technique is superior is impractical at this level of difference because it would require 37,000 patients to avoid a beta error. We have to base our practice on the retrospective data available. Each technique has its merits in practice, which are discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Conventional assessment of the outcome of cardiac surgery usually takes the form of retrospective mortality figures and, at best, indicates an average performance over time. Summary tables conceal good and bad runs, and without risk adjustment they are difficult to interpret. We developed a refinement of the cumulative sum method that weights death and survival by each patient's risk status and provides a display of surgical performance over time. METHODS: The variable life-adjusted (VLAD) plot shows the difference between expected and actual cumulative mortality. VLAD shows whether a surgeon's performance is above or below what might be expected. This mortality-scoring system accumulates penalties for each death and rewards for every survivor, based on the inherent risk of perioperative death of each case concerned. FINDINGS: We illustrate the results of three performance reviews, displayed as VLADs. The first shows the results of an individual surgeon for 547 consecutive cardiac-surgical cases. The overall mortality was 36% less than that predicted by the Parsonnet scoring system. The second displays the results for 5000 consecutive patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass between 1992 and 1996, divided into six contemporaneous series. The predicted mortality was 9% compared with 6% actual mortality. The third is a plot for a trainee surgeon and clearly shows how a period of poor performance was identified and then substantially improved, which would not have been revealed by conventional tables of summary statistics. INTERPRETATION: VLAD provides a graphical display of risk-adjusted survival figures for individual surgeons or units over time and could be modified to monitor performance over a range of treatments and outcomes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A number of studies have examined the impact of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) on mood by means of cross-sectional analyses. These studies have provided a "snapshot" view of the numbers of patients showing psychological disturbance. To examine both the incidence and patterns of depression, 121 patients undergoing routine elective CABG were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 8 days, 8 weeks, and 12 months on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The incidence findings suggested a small, transient increase in the number of patients with depression shortly after surgery. The preoperative score on the BDI was the best predictor of postoperative depression at all times of measurement. Discriminant function analysis on the patterns of depression indicated that trait anxiety maximally separated those patients who were depressed pre- and postoperatively from those only depressed shortly after the operation. The findings emphasize the value of examining patients' levels of anxiety and depression prior to surgery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.