Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Sterling

Publications and source records attributed to T Sterling.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Sexual and drug risk-related behaviours after initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy among injection drug users.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is associated with a subsequent resumption of sexual and drug use risk behaviors. METHODS: Within an ongoing prospective study of HIV-seropositive injection drug users (IDUs), a subsample with at least one CD4 cell count < 500 x 106 cells/l after 1996 (when HAART became available) and three consecutive visits were selected for analysis. Patients underwent semi-annual interviews for risk behaviors and reports of medication use. Data from visits immediately prior to and following initiation of HAART for the treated group, and from consecutive visits for the eligible but untreated group were compared using linear growth curve analysis. RESULTS: Of 316 eligible HIV-seropositive IDUs, 133 reported HAART use during the study period; 95% were African American, 76% were male, and median age at enrollment was 34 years. The proportion who reported any sexual activity increased over time from 55 to 61% for the HAART-treated group, but decreased from 67 to 63% in the untreated group (P = 0.03); the respective values for unprotected sex were 18 versus 20% and 36 versus 28% (P = 0.06). In both treated and untreated groups, the proportion injecting drugs declined (P = 0.04), whereas the proportion reporting needle sharing decreased marginally (P = 0.11). However, trends in use of shooting galleries between the groups differed (P = 0.04) increasing slightly from 2.3 to 3% in the treated group while decreasing from 12 to 5% in the untreated group. CONCLUSION: In persons treated with HAART, self-report of high-risk behaviors remained stable or showed some increase. Persons initiating HAART should be counselled to refrain from high-risk behaviors.

Adult↗

The emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis in New York City.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade the incidence of tuberculosis has increased nationwide and more than doubled in New York City, where there have been recent nosocomial outbreaks of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. METHODS: We collected information on every patient in New York City with a positive culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis during April 1991. Drug-susceptibility testing was performed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. RESULTS: Of the 518 patients with positive cultures, 466 (90 percent) had isolates available for testing. Overall, 33 percent of these patients had isolates resistant to one or more antituberculosis drugs, 26 percent had isolates resistant to at least isoniazid, and 19 percent had isolates resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin. Of the 239 patients who had received antituberculosis therapy, 44 percent had isolates resistant to one or more drugs and 30 percent had isolates resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin. Among the patients who had never been treated, the proportion with resistance to one or more drugs increased from 10 percent in 1982 through 1984 to 23 percent in 1991 (P = 0.003). Patients who had never been treated and who were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or reported injection-drug use were more likely to have resistant isolates. Among patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, those with resistant isolates were more likely to die during follow-up through January 1992 (80 percent vs. 47 percent, P = 0.02). A history of antituberculosis therapy was the strongest predictor of the presence of resistant organisms (odds ratio, 2.7; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a marked increase in drug-resistant tuberculosis in New York City. Previously treated patients, those infected with HIV, and injection-drug users are at increased risk for drug resistance. Measures to control and prevent drug-resistant tuberculosis are urgently needed.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Income, race, and mortality.

This study was undertaken to clarify the complex relationship between poverty and race with disease-specific mortality. Data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey and the 1986 National Mortality Followback Survey were used to estimate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for various categories (all causes, all cancers, noncancerous medical causes, lung and breast cancers, ischemic heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease) associated with income below the poverty line and were compared with those with adequate or better than adequate income. All SMRs were substantially elevated. The SMRs were not appreciably affected by adjustments for confounding by alcohol consumption, occupation, or smoking. Sex-specific SMRs of blacks relative to whites with the exception of ischemic heart disease were significantly elevated for males but not for females with the exception of the SMR for all causes. However, when adjusted for per capita income within the family, black mortality never significantly exceeded that of whites. These results strongly support the conclusion that mortality differences between blacks and whites are due to differences in income and related factors. However, it is unclear why poverty should be associated with elevation in cancer relative risk.

Adult↗

The confounding of occupation and smoking and its consequences.

A strong pattern in smoking behavior can be demonstrated, in which smoking is much more prevalent among those occupational groups (and social strata) that are also more exposed to hazards in the workplace and much less prevalent among those groups less exposed to such hazards. As a consequence, comparing individuals with greater to those with lesser exposure to tobacco also compares groups that differ with respect to occupational exposure to dust, fumes and toxic substances and with respect to occupationally related lifestyle factors. Analyses of the U.S. National Health Interview Survey show that smoking and occupation are substantially confounded among individuals differing by (1) amount of smoking; (2) smoking cessation; (3) types of cigarettes smoked; (4) age of starting to smoke; and (5) exposure to more or less environmental tobacco smoke at home. This confounding between types of work and proximity to tobacco smoke may have masked relationships between type of employment and disease. But it is difficult to disentangle the effects of occupation and of smoking from each other without well planned further studies because (1) of the difficulty of estimating occupational effects and simultaneously adjusting for healthy worker effects, (2) satisfactory techniques for estimating relative effects of intertwined variables make demands on the quality and quantity of data that are not met by presently available data, and (3) there may be deeply rooted social and psychological attitudes toward effects of work versus effects of lifestyles that tend to bias investigative work.

Age Factors↗