Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Raphan

Publications and source records attributed to T Raphan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Vestibular control of sympathetic activity. An otolith-sympathetic reflex in humans.

It has been proposed that a vestibular reflex originating in the otolith organs and other body graviceptors modulates sympathetic activity during changes in posture with regard to gravity. To test this hypothesis, we selectively stimulated otolith and body graviceptors sinusoidally along different head axes in the coronal plane with off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) and recorded sympathetic efferent activity in the peroneal nerve (muscle sympathetic nerve activity, MSNA), blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. All parameters were entrained during OVAR at the frequency of rotation, with MSNA increasing in nose-up positions during forward linear acceleration and decreasing when nose-down. MSNA was correlated closely with blood pressure when subjects were within +/-90 degrees of nose-down positions with a delay of 1.4 s, the normal latency of baroreflex-driven changes in MSNA. Thus, in the nose-down position, MSNA was probably driven by baroreflex afferents. In contrast, when subjects were within +/-45 degrees of the nose-up position, i.e., when positive linear acceleration was maximal along the naso-ocipital axis, MSNA was closely related to gravitational acceleration at a latency of 0.4 s. This delay is too short for MSNA changes to be mediated by the baroreflex, but it is compatible with the delay of a response originating in the vestibular system. We postulate that a vestibulosympathetic reflex, probably originating mainly in the otolith organs, contributes to blood pressure maintenance during forward linear acceleration. Because of its short latency, this reflex may be one of the earliest mechanisms to sustain blood pressure upon standing.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2001

Interaction of the body, head, and eyes during walking and turning.

Body, head, and eye movements were measured in five subjects during straight walking and while turning corners. The purpose was to determine how well the head and eyes followed the linear trajectory of the body in space and whether head orientation followed changes in the gravito-inertial acceleration vector (GIA). Head and body movements were measured with a video-based motion analysis system and horizontal, vertical, and torsional eye movements with video-oculography. During straight walking, there was lateral body motion at the stride frequency, which was at half the frequency of stepping. The GIA oscillated about the direction of heading, according to the acceleration and deceleration associated with heel strike and toe flexion, and the body yawed in concert with stepping. Despite the linear and rotatory motions of the head and body, the head pointed along the forward motion of the body during straight walking. The head pitch/roll component appeared to compensate for vertical and horizontal acceleration of the head rather than orienting to the tilt of the GIA or anticipating it. When turning corners, subjects walked on a 50-cm radius over two steps or on a 200-cm radius in five to seven steps. Maximum centripetal accelerations in sharp turns were ca.0.4 g, which tilted the GIA ca.21 degrees with regard to the heading. This was anticipated by a roll tilt of the head of up to 8 degrees. The eyes rolled 1-1.5 degrees and moved down into the direction of linear acceleration during the tilts of the GIA. Yaw head deviations moved smoothly through the turn, anticipating the shift in lateral body trajectory by as much as 25 degrees. The trunk did not anticipate the change in trajectory. Thus, in contrast to straight walking, the tilt axes of the head and the GIA tended to align during turns. Gaze was stable in space during the slow phases and jumped forward in saccades along the trajectory, leading it by larger angles when the angular velocity of turning was greater. The anticipatory roll head movements during turning are likely to be utilized to overcome inertial forces that would destabilize balance during turning. The data show that compensatory eye, head, and body movements stabilize gaze during straight walking, while orienting mechanisms direct the eyes, head, and body to tilts of the GIA in space during turning.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2001

Ocular counterrolling induced by centrifugation during orbital space flight.

During the 1998 Neurolab mission (STS-90), four astronauts were exposed to interaural centripetal accelerations (Gy centrifugation) of 0.5 g and 1 g during rotation on a centrifuge, both on Earth and during orbital space flight. Subjects were oriented either left-ear out or right-ear out, facing or back to motion. Binocular eye movements were measured in three dimensions using a video technique. On Earth, tangential centrifugation that produces 1 g of interaural linear acceleration combines with gravity to tilt the gravitoinertial acceleration (GIA) vector 45 degrees in the roll plane relative to the head vertical, generating a summed vector of 1.4 g. Before flight, this elicited mean ocular counterrolling (OCR) of 5.7 degrees. Due to the relative absence of gravity during flight, there was no linear acceleration along the dorsoventral axis of the head. As a result, during in-flight centrifugation, gravitoinertial acceleration was strictly aligned with the centripetal acceleration along the interaural axis. There was a small but significant decrease (mean 10%) in the magnitude of OCR in space (5.1 degrees). The magnitude of OCR during postflight 1 g centrifugation was not significantly different from preflight OCR (5.9 degrees). Findings were similar for 0.5 g centrifugation, but the OCR magnitude was approximately 60% of that induced by centrifugation at 1 g. OCR during pre- and postflight static tilt was not significantly different and was always less than OCR elicited by centrifugation of Earth for an equivalent interaural linear acceleration. In contrast, there was no difference between the OCR generated by in-flight centrifugation and by static tilt on Earth at equivalent interaural linear accelerations. These data support the following conclusions: (1) OCR is generated predominantly in response to interaural linear acceleration; (2) the increased OCR during centrifugation on Earth is a response to the head dorsoventral 1 g linear acceleration component, which was absent in microgravity. The dorsoventral linear acceleration could have activated either the otoliths or body-tilt receptors that responded to the larger GIA magnitude (1.4 g), to generate the increased OCR during centrifugation on Earth. A striking finding was that magnitude of OCR was maintained throughout and after flight. This is in contrast to most previous postflight OCR studies, which have generally registered decreases in OCR. We postulate that intermittent exposure to artificial gravity, in the form of the centripetal acceleration experienced during centrifugation, acted as a countermeasure to deconditioning of this otolith-ocular orienting reflex during the 16-day mission.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2001

Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration during space flight.

During the 1998 Neurolab mission (STS-90), four astronauts were exposed to interaural and head vertical (dorsoventral) linear accelerations of 0.5 g and 1 g during constant velocity rotation on a centrifuge, both on Earth and during orbital space flight. Subjects were oriented either left-ear-out or right-ear-out (Gy centrifugation), or lay supine along the centrifuge arm with their head off-axis (Gz centrifugation). Pre-flight centrifugation, producing linear accelerations of 0.5 g and 1 g along the Gy (interaural) axis, induced illusions of roll-tilt of 20 degrees and 34 degrees for gravito-inertial acceleration (GIA) vector tilts of 27 degrees and 45 degrees , respectively. Pre-flight 0.5 g and 1 g Gz (head dorsoventral) centrifugation generated perceptions of backward pitch of 5 degrees and 15 degrees , respectively. In the absence of gravity during space flight, the same centrifugation generated a GIA that was equivalent to the centripetal acceleration and aligned with the Gy or Gz axes. Perception of tilt was underestimated relative to this new GIA orientation during early in-flight Gy centrifugation, but was close to the GIA after 16 days in orbit, when subjects reported that they felt as if they were 'lying on side'. During the course of the mission, inflight roll-tilt perception during Gy centrifugation increased from 45 degrees to 83 degrees at 1 g and from 42 degrees to 48 degrees at 0.5 g. Subjects felt 'upside-down' during in-flight Gz centrifugation from the first in-flight test session, which reflected the new GIA orientation along the head dorsoventral axis. The different levels of in-flight tilt perception during 0.5 g and 1 g Gy centrifugation suggests that other non-vestibular inputs, including an internal estimate of the body vertical and somatic sensation, were utilized in generating tilt perception. Interpretation of data by a weighted sum of body vertical and somatic vectors, with an estimate of the GIA from the otoliths, suggests that perception weights the sense of the body vertical more heavily early in-flight, that this weighting falls during adaptation to microgravity, and that the decreased reliance on the body vertical persists early post-flight, generating an exaggerated sense of tilt. Since graviceptors respond to linear acceleration and not to head tilt in orbit, it has been proposed that adaptation to weightlessness entails reinterpretation of otolith activity, causing tilt to be perceived as translation. Since linear acceleration during in-flight centrifugation was always perceived as tilt, not translation, the findings do not support this hypothesis.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2001

Orienting otolith-ocular reflexes in the rabbit during static and dynamic tilts and off-vertical axis rotation.

Orienting otolith-ocular reflexes were assessed in rabbits using static tilt, off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) and sinusoidal oscillation about earth-horizontal axes. In all paradigms, head pitch produced ocular counter-pitch and vergence, and head roll produced ocular counter-roll and conjugate yaw version. Thus, vergence and version are essential components of orienting reflexes along the naso-occipital and bitemporal axes. Vergence and version caused misalignment between the axes of eye and head movement during pitch and roll head movements. Semicircular canal input broadened the band-pass of these orienting reflexes, which would make them more appropriate when compensating for head movement during active motion.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Vestibular compensation and orientation during locomotion.

Body, head, and eye movements were studied in three dimensions while walking and turning to determine the role of the vestibular system in directing gaze and maintaining spatial orientation. The body, head, and eyes were represented as three-dimensional coordinate frames, and the movement of these frames was related to a trajectory frame that described the motion of the body on a terrestrial plane. The axis-angle of the body, head, and eye rotation were then compared to the axis-angle of the rotation of the gravitoinertial acceleration (GIA). We inferred the role of the vestibular system during locomotion and the contributions of the VCR and VOR by examining the interrelationship between these coordinate frames. Straight walking induced head and eye rotations in a compensatory manner to the linear accelerations, maintaining head pointing and gaze along the direction of forward motion. Turning generated a combination of compensation and orientation responses. The head leads and steers the turn while the eyes compensate to maintain stable horizontal gaze in space. Saccades shift horizontal gaze as the turn is executed. The head pitches, as during straight walking. It also rolls so that the head tends to align with the orientation of the GIA. Head orientation changes anticipate orientation changes of the GIA. Eye orientation follows the changes in GIA orientation so that the net orientation gaze is closer to the orientation of the GIA. The study indicates that the vestibular system utilizes compensatory and orienting mechanisms to stabilize spatial orientation and gaze during walking and turning.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed2001

The human vestibulo-ocular reflex during linear locomotion.

During locomotion, there is a translation and compensatory rotation of the head in both the vertical and horizontal planes. During moderate to fast walking (100 m/min), vertical head translation occurs at the frequency of stepping (2 Hz) and generates peak linear acceleration of 0.37 g. Lateral head translation occurs at the stride frequency (1 Hz) and generates peak linear acceleration of 0.1 g. Peak head pitch and yaw angular velocities are approximately 17 degrees/s. The frequency and magnitude of these head movements are within the operational range of both the linear and angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (IVOR and aVOR). Vertical eye movements undergo a phase reversal from near to far targets. When viewing a far (>1 m) target, vertical eye velocity is typical of an aVOR response; that is, it is compensatory for head pitch. At close viewing distances (<1 m), vertical eye velocity is in phase with head pitch and is compensatory for vertical head translation, suggesting that the IVOR predominantly generates the eye movement response. Horizontal head movements during locomotion occur at the stride frequency of 1 Hz, where the IVOR gain is low. Horizontal eye movements are compensatory for head yaw at all viewing distances and are likely generated by the aVOR.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed2001

Orientation of the eyes to gravitoinertial acceleration.

Orientation of the eyes to gravitoinertial acceleration, i.e., to the sum of gravity and the linear accelerations acting on the head and body, is a basic property of the linear vestibulo-ocular reflex to support vision. Present in a wide range of species from the lateral-eyed rabbit to frontal-eyed monkeys and humans, the eyes deviate in pitch, roll and yaw in response to pitch, roll and yaw head movements. The eyes also converge in response to naso-occipital linear acceleration. This paper provides examples of ocular orientation generated by static tilt and off-vertical axis rotation in three dimensions and demonstrates specifically how vergence would support vision in the rabbit.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Changes in the vestibulo-ocular reflex after plugging of the semicircular canals.

The gain of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) was determined in monkeys by rotation about a spatial vertical axis while upright or statically tilted forward and backward. Horizontal, vertical, and roll gains were determined at each head orientation and plotted as a function of head tilt. Before canal plugging, animals had maximal (spatial) horizontal gains when upright (spatial phase 0 degrees) and maximal roll gains when tilted forward or backward 90 degrees. Plugging caused striking changes in the characteristics of the aVOR gains at low frequencies. After plugging of the vertical canals, maximal horizontal and roll gains both occurred at head tilts of approximately 30 degrees forward. When the lateral canals were plugged, maximal horizontal and roll responses occurred when the head was tilted back approximately 50 degrees. The aVOR gains of the canal-plugged animals were also affected by stimulus frequency. In every instance, as stimulus frequency increased, the spatial phases shifted toward the normal response, that is, the response before plugging. This normalization effect was observed even in the animals with all six semicircular canals plugged, indicating that normalization was not due to spatial adaptation. A three-dimensional dynamic and kinematic model of the aVOR was able to account for all types of canal plugging by a simple change in the dominant time constant of the plugged canals from 3 s to 5 s to approximately 0.07 s. The model accurately predicted responses of the normal and canal-plugged animals at all frequencies. These data show that the central vestibular system does not spatially adapt to losses resulting from canal plugging.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Functions of the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT). II. Control of ocular pursuit.

Ocular pursuit in monkeys, elicited by sinusoidal and triangular (constant velocity) stimuli, was studied before and after lesions of the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT). Before NOT lesions, pursuit gains (eye velocity/target velocity) were close to unity for sinusoidal and constant-velocity stimuli at frequencies up to 1 Hz. In this range, retinal slip was less than 2 degrees. Electrode tracks made to identify the location of NOT caused deficits in ipsilateral pursuit, which later recovered. Small electrolytic lesions of NOT reduced ipsilateral pursuit gains to below 0.5 in all tested conditions. Pursuit was better, however, when the eyes moved from the contralateral side toward the center (centripetal pursuit) than from the center ipsilaterally (centrifugal pursuit), although the eyes remained in close proximity to the target with saccadic tracking. Effects of lesions on ipsilateral pursuit were not permanent, and pursuit gains had generally recovered to 60-80% of baseline after about 2 weeks. One animal had bilateral NOT lesions and lost pursuit for 4 days. Thereafter, it had a centrifugal pursuit deficit that lasted for more than 2 months. Vertical pursuit and visually guided saccades were not affected by the bilateral NOT lesions in this animal. We also compared effects of these and similar NOT lesions on optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN). Correlation of functional deficits with NOT lesions from this and previous studies showed that rostral lesions of NOT in and around the pretectal olivary nucleus, which interrupted cortical input through the brachium of the superior colliculus (BSC), affected both smooth pursuit and OKN. In two animals in which it was tested, NOT lesions that caused a deficit in pursuit also decreased the rapid and slow components of OKN slow-phase velocity and affected OKAN. It was previously shown that slightly more caudal NOT lesions were more effective in altering gain adaptation of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR). The present findings suggest that cortical pathways through rostral NOT play an important role in maintenance of ipsilateral ocular pursuit. Since lesions that affected ocular pursuit had similar effects on ipsilateral OKN, processing for these two functions is probably closely linked in NOT, as it is elsewhere.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Functions of the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT). I. Adaptation of the gain of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex.

We studied the role of the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) in adapting the gain of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys using lesions and temporary inactivation with muscimol. The aVOR gain was adaptively reduced by forced sinusoidal rotation (0.25 Hz, 60 degrees/s) in a self-stationary visual surround, i.e., a visual surround that moved with the subject, or by wearing x0.5 reducing lenses during natural head movements. The aVOR gains dropped by 20-30% after 2 h and by about 30% after 4 h. Muscimol injections caused a loss of adaptation of contraversive-eye velocities induced by the aVOR, and their gains promptly returned to or above preadapted levels. The gains of the adapted ipsiversive and vertical eye velocities produced by the aVOR were unaffected by muscimol injections. Lesions of NOT significantly reduced or abolished the animals' ability to adapt the gain of contraversive aVOR-induced eye velocities, and the monkeys were unable to suppress these contraversive-eye velocities in a self-stationary surround. The lesions did not affect ipsiversive aVOR-induced eye velocities, and the animals were still able to suppress them. Lesions of NOT also affected the unadapted or "default" aVOR gains. After unilateral NOT lesions, gains of ipsiversive aVOR-induced eye velocity were reduced, while gains of contraversive aVOR-induced eye velocity were either unaffected or slightly increased. Consistent with this, muscimol injections into the NOT of unadapted monkeys slightly reduced the gains of ipsiversive and increased the gains of contraversive-eye velocities by about 8-10%. We conclude that each NOT processes ipsiversive retinal-slip information about visual surround movement relative to the head induced by the aVOR. In the presence of visual surround movement, the retinal-slip signal is suppressed, leading to adaptive changes in the gain of aVOR-induced contraversive horizontal eye velocities. NOT also has a role in controlling and maintaining the current state of the aVOR gains. Thus, it plays a unique role in producing and supporting adaptation of the gain of the horizontal aVOR that is likely to be important for stabilizing gaze during head movement. Pathways through the inferior olive are presumably important for this adaptation.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2000

Role of muscle pulleys in producing eye position-dependence in the angular vestibuloocular reflex: a model-based study.

It is well established that the head and eye velocity axes do not always align during compensatory vestibular slow phases. It has been shown that the eye velocity axis systematically tilts away from the head velocity axis in a manner that is dependent on eye-in-head position. The mechanisms responsible for producing these axis tilts are unclear. In this model-based study, we aimed to determine whether muscle pulleys could be involved in bringing about these phenomena. The model presented incorporates semicircular canals, central vestibular pathways, and an ocular motor plant with pulleys. The pulleys were modeled so that they brought about a rotation of the torque axes of the extraocular muscles that was a fraction of the angle of eye deviation from primary position. The degree to which the pulleys rotated the torque axes was altered by means of a pulley coefficient. Model input was head velocity and initial eye position data from passive and active yaw head impulses with fixation at 0 degrees, 20 degrees up and 20 degrees down, obtained from a previous experiment. The optimal pulley coefficient required to fit the data was determined by calculating the mean square error between data and model predictions of torsional eye velocity. For active head impulses, the optimal pulley coefficient varied considerably between subjects. The median optimal pulley coefficient was found to be 0.5, the pulley coefficient required for producing saccades that perfectly obey Listing's law when using a two-dimensional saccadic pulse signal. The model predicted the direction of the axis tilts observed in response to passive head impulses from 50 ms after onset. During passive head impulses, the median optimal pulley coefficient was found to be 0.21, when roll gain was fixed at 0.7. The model did not accurately predict the alignment of the eye and head velocity axes that was observed early in the response to passive head impulses. We found that this alignment could be well predicted if the roll gain of the angular vestibuloocular reflex was modified during the initial period of the response, while pulley coefficient was maintained at 0.5. Hence a roll gain modification allows stabilization of the retinal image without requiring a change in the pulley effect. Our results therefore indicate that the eye position-dependent velocity axis tilts could arise due to the effects of the pulleys and that a roll gain modification in the central vestibular structures may be responsible for countering the pulley effect.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed2000

Context-specific adaptation of the vertical vestibuloocular reflex with regard to gravity.

We determined whether head position with regard to gravity is an important context for angular vestibuloocular reflex (aVOR) gain adaptation. Vertical aVOR gains were adapted with monkeys upright or on side by rotating the animals about an interaural axis in phase or out of phase with the visual surround for 4 h. When aVOR gains were adapted with monkeys upright, gain changes were symmetrical when tested in either on-side position (23 +/- 7%; mean +/- SD). After on-side adaptation, however, gain changes were always larger when animals were tested in the same on-side position in which they were adapted. Gain changes were 43 +/- 16% with ipsilateral side down and 9 +/- 8% with contralateral side down. The context-specific effects of head position on vertical aVOR gain were the same whether the gain was increased or decreased. The data indicate that vertical aVOR gain changes are stored in the context of the head orientation in which changes were induced. This association could be an important context for expressing the adapted state of the aVOR gain during vertical head movement.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2000

Promethazine affects optokinetic but not vestibular responses in monkeys.

BACKGROUND: Promethazine is used to treat motion sickness including Space Adaptation Syndrome, but there is incomplete information about how it affects vestibular and optokinetic responses. METHODS: Vestibular and optokinetic nystagmus, recorded with eye coils, were characterized in monkeys after administration of promethazine at dosages approximately equivalent to those used by humans in space. RESULTS: The initial increase of horizontal eye velocity during optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) was reduced after receiving the drug. Consequently, it took a longer time for eye velocity to rise to 60% of steady state value, the normal initial jump in eye velocity. Steady state OKN, maximum gains of optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN) and OKAN falling time constants were unaffected. The gains and time constants of the horizontal, vertical and roll angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR), the amplitude and velocity of saccades, and ocular counter-rolling (OCR), induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) were unaffected by promethazine. A two-component optokinetic model simulated the data simply by reducing the gain of the initial (rapid) component of OKN. A reduction in coupling between a non-linear element and the velocity storage integrator was required to simulate some vertical OKN data. CONCLUSIONS: Promethazine reduces the gain of the direct visual-oculomotor pathway in monkeys. It has little effect on saccades, the gain and time constant of the aVOR and the low frequency linear vestibulo-ocular reflex (IVOR), which orients the eyes during ocular counterrolling. The optokinetic deficit is consistent with reported reduction in ocular pursuit and VOR suppression after promethazine in humans.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Control of spatial orientation of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex by the nodulus and uvula of the vestibulocerebellum.

Eye velocity produced by the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) tends to align with the summed vector of gravity and other linear accelerations [gravito-inertial acceleration (GIA)]. Defined as "spatial orientation of the aVOR," we propose that it is controlled by the nodulus and uvula of the vestibulocerebellum. Here, electrical stimulation, injections of the GABAA agonist, muscimol, and single-cell recordings were utilized to investigate this spatial orientation. Stimulation, injection, and recording sites in the nodulus were determined in vivo by MRI and verified in histological sections. MRI proved to be a sensitive, reliable way to localize electrode placements. Electrical stimulation at sites in the nodulus and sublobule d of the uvula produced nystagmus whose slow-phase eye-velocity vectors were either head centric or spatially invariant. When head centric, the eye velocity vector remained within +/- 45 degrees of the vector obtained with the animal upright, regardless of head position with respect to gravity. When spatially oriented, the vector remained relatively constant in space in one on-side position, with respect to the vector determined with the animal upright. A majority of induced movements from the nodulus were spatially oriented. Spatially oriented movements were generally followed by after-nystagmus, which had the characteristics of optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN), including orientation to the GIA. After muscimol injections, horizontal-to-vertical cross-coupling was lost or reduced during OKAN in tilted positions. This supports the hypothesis that the nodulus mediates yaw-to-vertical or roll cross-coupling. The injections also shortened the yaw-axis time constant and produced contralateral horizontal spontaneous nystagmus, whose velocity varied as a function of head position with regard to gravity. Nodulus units were tested with static head tilt, sinusoidal oscillation around a spatial horizontal axis with the head in different orientations relative to the pitching plane, and off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR). The direction of the response vectors of the otolith-recipient units in the nodulus, determined from static and/or dynamic head tilts, were confirmed by OVAR. These vector directions lay close to the planes of the vertical canals in 7/10 units; many units also had convergent input from the vertical canals. It is postulated that the orientation properties of the aVOR result from a transfer of otolith input regarding head tilt along canal planes to canal-related zones of the nodulus. In turn, Purkinje cells in these zones project to vestibular nuclei neurons to control eye velocity around axes normal to these same canal planes.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Canal and otolith afferent activity underlying eye velocity responses to pitching while rotating.

Pitching the head while rotating (PWR) combines periodic activation of the semicircular canals and the otoliths to generate pitch and roll eye deviations and continuous horizontal nystagmus. Monkeys were tested after individual pairs of semicircular canals were plugged and single units were recorded in the vestibular nerve while the animals were sinusoidally pitched 20-40 deg about a spatial horizontal axis with 5- and 16-s periods and simultaneously rotated about a spatial vertical axis at 30-120 deg/s. As previously shown, the steady-state horizontal response disappeared after plugging the vertical semicircular canals, but was maintained when the lateral canals were plugged. When the left anterior and right posterior canal (LARP) pair was left intact, the steady-state response depended on the axis about which the pitching took place. When the axis was normal to the LARP plane, there was no steady-state response. When the pitching axis was perpendicular to the LARP normal, the response was maximal. Firing rates of otolith units were approximately in phase with pitch position, and the addition of rotation about a vertical axis did not change the response. Lateral canal units did not have a steady-state modulation during pitch or constant velocity rotation. During PWR, they oscillated at twice the pitch frequency. This corresponded to the frequency at which the canal was maximally activated as it aligned with the plane of rotation. The amplitude of modulation increased proportionally to rotational velocity, but the phase remained the same. These characteristics were unchanged during roll while rotating (RWR), which induces little continuous nystagmus. Anterior and posterior canal units were maximally excited near pitch-velocity maxima and minima, respectively, during pure pitching. During PWR, however, the phases of both components simultaneously shifted toward each other and toward being in phase with otolith units. The peak excitation tended toward a forward-pitch position when the rotation was to the ipsilateral side, and toward a backward pitch position when the rotation was to the contralateral side. With 120-deg/s rotation during a 16-s pitch period, the phase difference between anterior and posterior canal units was as small as 17 deg. These data support the postulate that the correlation between vertical canal and otolith units is the critical factor in generating continuous unidirectional horizontal nystagmus during PWR.

Animals↗